Tag Archives: energy

Franklin Bissett overweights defensive stocks over traditional Canadian sectors like Energy & Financials

 

Despite a looming recession acknowledged by most of the financial industry, Franklin Templeton Canada is relatively upbeat about the prospects for both Canadian stocks and fixed income over the short- to medium-term. In a Toronto event on Wednesday aimed at financial advisors and the press, Garey J. Aitken, MBA, CFA — Calgary-based Chief Investment Officer for Franklin Bissett Investment Management — described how he has been positioning his Franklin Bissett Canadian Equity Fund somewhat defensively. (There was also a webinar version of the event.)

As you can see from the above breakdown of the fund, Aitken is way overweight defensive sectors like Consumer Staples relative to the index: the S&P/TSX composite. In Canada, consumer staples amounts to the major grocery stores like Loblaw and Metro: there’s little along the lines of such American staples giants as Proctor & Gamble or Colgate Palmolive. Aitken said his fund has owned Saputo Inc. since its IPO in the late 90s, and has long owned Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc.

The fund has been overweight consumer staples for more than a year: as the chart shows, he was overweight this defensive sector by a whopping 730 basis points a year ago and this year is even more overweight by 770 bps. He is also overweight the other big defensive sector, Utilities, by 210 bps, compared to overweight by 110 bps a year ago. The third major defensive sector globally is Health Care, but the Canadian stock market has only minimal exposure to that sector.

Aitken has moved from a small underweight position in industrials a year ago to a modest overweight in 2023 of 170 bps. And he is slightly overweight Information Technology by 140 bps, compared to a small underweight of 20 bps a year ago.

Underweight Energy, Financials & Materials

On the flip side, the fund has been and continues to be underweight in the three big sectors for which the Canadian stock market is famous: Energy, Financials & Materials. Financials (chiefly the big Canadian banks) were underweight 330 bps a year ago and Aitken has moved that to an even bigger 730 bps underweight this year. In Materials he has stayed largely pat, with a 530 underweighting today compared to a 550 bps underweighting a year ago.

The chart below shows the fund’s holding in Canadian financials. You can see that among the big Canadian banks, the fund is over the index weighting only for the Bank of Nova Scotia, and is slightly overweight Brookfield Corp. and Brookfield Asset Management:

 

However, Aitken has moved Energy (Canadian oil & gas stocks, pipelines etc.) from a small 20 bps overweight position last year to a 370 bps underweighting in 2023. The chart below shows the major Energy holdings relative to the index, with overweights in certain less well-known names: 

 

Aitken remains slightly underweight Consumer Discretionary stocks, moving from a 100 bps underweight last year to 150 bps underweight currently. Real estate is almost flat: from a slight 10 bps underweighting a year ago to a small 70 bps underweight today.  Continue Reading…

Geopolitics revitalizing Canada’s Natural Resource industries

Franklin Templeton/iStock

 

By Kim Catechis, Investment Strategist, Franklin Templeton Institute

and Andrew Buntain, Institutional Portfolio Manager, 

Franklin Bissett Investment Management                                

(Sponsor Content)

The world is living in volatile times.

East-West geopolitical tensions, which had been building even before the COVID-19 pandemic upended the lives of millions around the globe, have exploded into war in Europe. The Russia/Ukraine conflict is now well into its sixth month, with no end in sight. Severe sanctions disconnecting Russia from the West are structural and unlikely to be removed even after the conflict is resolved.

There are real consequences for the world from this conflict. Ukraine’s economy has been ravaged. Europe is back to having a militarized border. NATO has grown stronger and is spending on defence; more than 2% of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) is expected to be allocated to military expenses by member nations. Supply chain disruptions have been exacerbated by the upheaval, with an energy crisis in Europe, fears of famine in Africa, shortages of critical products in many industries and the highest inflation levels in over 40 years.

Growth expectations are falling on the growing realization that central banks are not well placed to deal with food price and energy inflation, despite aggressive policy rate hikes. In many countries, including Canada, fears of recession have replaced fears of overheated economies.

Higher commodity prices a boon for producer nations

Prices for the world’s basic commodities — energy, food, metals and minerals, forest products  — soared in the first half of the year. In recent months, they have fallen somewhat but remain high, and this situation is likely to continue. Trade patterns in place for 49 years have been destroyed, and new alliances and infrastructure take time to build. As with any change, there will be winners and losers. For commodity producers like Canada, the evolving dynamics open doors to new opportunities.

Energy hits critical mass

Europe has gone on a buyers’ strike against Russia. In response, Russia is turning off the fossil fuel taps. While not a huge obstacle to oil procurement (there is plenty of oil in the world), natural gas is another matter. Russia controls 30% of the world’s natural gas reserves, and all but one of its gas pipelines go to western Europe.

Filling the huge supply gap left by Russia presents a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity for other producers to capture market share in one of the world’s most profitable regions; however, the lack of pipelines to other natural gas-producing regions means that liquid natural gas (LNG) must be transported by ship.

Largely because of transport costs, nearby producers with spare capacity like Qatar, Algeria, and Nigeria, will likely be the winners rather than Canada. In any case, Canada still benefits from the cascading effect of higher fuel prices. In the meantime, close to 20 projects have been proposed in Canada to export LNG through both coasts. Without doubt, there will be other opportunities.

“E” is for environmental backlash

As winter approaches and energy concerns grow, concerns have arisen that attractive prices and the renewed drive to obtain reliable fossil fuel supplies will set back efforts to combat climate change. For Europeans, there is no alternative to ESG; the “green deal” already in place prior to the war has been accelerated. Concurrently, however, a strong view is building that the definition of ESG needs to evolve, with many preferring “sustainability” and a focus on inclusion, rather than the exclusion often associated with ESG.

Overall, Canada’s oil and gas extraction and refining methods are considered very environmentally friendly. One example is a long-time holding in the Franklin Bissett portfolios, ARC Resources Ltd. Rather than pay others to dispose of wastewater from the drilling process, the company’s Montney operation recycles and reuses the water.

The other two letters in ESG — “S” for social and “G” for governance — should not be ignored. In an era where enormous value is being placed on reliability, a stable workforce and good corporate governance have become at least as important as efficiency. Under these criteria as well, Canada performs better than most; the Canadian oil and gas industry is recognized globally for strong social progress and governance metrics.

Agriculture: food for thought

The global response to threats of food shortages has been to advocate opening up more land for crops, but the planet has a limited amount of cropland. Significantly, almost half of the grains produced worldwide are used for animal feed, which people then consume indirectly by eating meat. In Europe, we are seeing an increase in vegetarianism; if meat consumption were to decline further because of the current situation, it could potentially lead to new patterns of behaviour that imply lower demand for animal feed. Elsewhere, food insecurity is growing, especially across Africa.

Ukraine is a major producer of sunflower oils, barley and maize (corn). Grain prices peaked in June as the United Nations struck a deal to allow some Ukraine grain shipments from Mariupol, but there is no guarantee it will continue. In countries most at risk of shortages from the disruptions, such as Nigeria and Bangladesh, people already tend to pay the largest proportion of their budgets for food. Turkey and Egypt are also very exposed to Russian wheat and have little reserve stock. Continue Reading…

How Investors can respond to Ukraine Invasion

By Sa’ad Rana, Senior Associate – ETF Online Distribution, BMO ETFs

(Sponsor Blog)

It has been almost two months since Russia invaded Ukraine. During this time, we have been witnessing the dramatic impact the war has had on global markets and economies. There is also concern with how these events will impact our portfolios and investments. 

Economic Impact

Inflation numbers are expected to continue rising higher and this war will put more upward pressure on inflation. Russia is a large global oil exporter. Increased sanctions on Russia will undoubtedly cause a supply squeeze in the oil market, which will lead to higher oil prices. In addition, Russia and Ukraine both account for about 25% of total wheat exports, which will now be limited. This can drive up food costs on a global scale. The war will also continue to restrict supply chains. For example, planes are being diverted because Russian air space is closed to more than 35 countries. Having to go around Russia leads to longer travel, resulting in increased fuel consumption and trip costs.  Continue Reading…

Canadian Energy: An Industry in Transition

 

Franklin Templeton/iStock

By Les Stelmach, Izabel Flis, Mike Richmond, Naveed Sunderji

Franklin Bissett Investment Management

(Sponsor Content)

This is an interesting time for the energy industry. Occasional reflexive selling based on emerging demand or supply concerns has been short-lived. Late last fall (based on January distribution), consuming nations like the United States tried to mitigate higher crude oil prices by releasing volumes from their strategic petroleum reserves to little avail.

More recently, higher rates of COVID infection in some European countries and the emergence of the Omicron variant sparked some selloff in oil prices, but this is likely to be short-lived as the trajectory for global demand approaches pre-COVID levels.

In addition, the ongoing focus on climate change concerns — most recently articulated at the COP26 conference in Glasgow, — has increased pressure on producing nations and companies to limit production. The current lack of a coordinated suite of energy alternatives that can deliver reliably at the necessary scale does little to deter demand. Arguably, this phase of the transition is contributing to higher prices for crude oil and natural gas. Prices for both commodities have supported greater returns and profitability for oil and gas companies, rewarding investors willing to ignore the volatility.

The path to net zero: journey of 1000 steps

While the last 20 years have seen significant improvements in cost-effectivenes and efficiency for renewable technologies, the sobering reality is that they are not yet able to carry the full load of global economic activity. Renewables still generate comparatively less energy than hydrocarbons, are less stable and vulnerable to demand shocks. An aggressive transition to renewables can backfire, as Californians discovered during last summer’s severe heatwave when their heavily renewable-reliant energy supply was unable keep up with the increased demand. The result was rolling blackouts.

The infrastructure created to support the extraction, production and transportation of hydrocarbons will not be transformed overnight, but in some cases it will become part of the transition to cleaner energy. Pipelines, for example, are essential conduits for hydrocarbons. Political controversy aside, from an environmental perspective they are currently the safest, most efficient, most cost-effective and cleanest mode of transport.

Some natural gas exports are already serving decarbonization efforts in developing nations. In the future, some pipelines may be converted to carry low-carbon recycled natural gas (RNG), hydrogen or carbon dioxide to be sequestered as these alternatives become more widely adopted. Longevity and cash flows for these assets are considered stable over the near future.

Energy and ESG: surprisingly compatible

For oil and gas companies, the emphasis on “E” in ESG (environmental) is really a “C” (climate change). The scrutiny around gas emissions does not isolate one measure to the exclusion of others. Water and waste management, turnover rate, injury rates: these and many other factors are part of a comprehensive ESG analysis. Continue Reading…

MoneySense Retired Money: Is it too late to jump aboard the Energy bandwagon?

My latest MoneySense column is something I might better have written early in 2021, rather than late in the year. It’s about the the resurgence of the energy sector: not alternative energies like solar or wind but good old-fashioned oil (black gold), natural gas and even coal.

You can find the full column by clicking on the highlighted text: Are Energy stocks a good buy now? 

As I admit there, readers would have been better served by heeding the advice of  MoneySense colleague Dale Roberts, who was early identifying this trend a year ago when he mentioned this Canadian energy ETF back in October 2020. (iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF: XEG/TSX.)

In fact, I did buy a little of it, only to see it fall back later in 2020, and I foolishly sold for tax-loss selling purposes.  But as the column relates, I did repurchase it, as well as BMO’s Equal WeightedOil & Gas ETF (ZEO/TSX) and a few more besides.

Until this year, I was happy to pick up whatever energy plays exist in the “Core” ETF investments. Besides, most Canadians should have healthy exposure to energy just by virtue of owning standard Canadian equity ETFs or even balanced funds. After all, Vanguard’s FTSE Canada All Cap Index ETF (VCN/TSX] is 12.3% in energy, just a tad below the index’s 12.6%.

By contrast, the S&P 500 index has only a tiny 2.33% in Energy. In fact, south of the border, Energy is the smallest of the 11 sectors, which are topped by Information Technology a 27.6%.  However, Energy stocks have well outpaced the S&P500, generating a total return of 42% in 2021, as of October 1st, compared with just 18.4% for the broad index.

Performance chasing or start of multi-year bull market?

So loading up on Energy seemingly this late in the game would be a futile exercise in performance chasing, some would argue. Who knows, but personally I was persuaded by the repeated public utterances of Ninepoint’s Eric Nuttall [notably and repeatedly in the Financial Post] that this may be merely the confirmed start of a multi-year bull run in Energy. Accordingly, earlier in the year I took a modest flyer on Nutall’s NinePoint Energy ETF [NNRG/Neo exchange]. His focus is Canadian mid-cap energy stocks, although there is a small 7.8% weighting to US energy stocks. Continue Reading…