Tag Archives: federal budget

What do home buyers want from the Federal Budget?

Posted By |

By Penelope Graham, Zoocasa

Special to the Financial Independence Hub

The Federal government’s budget reveal is tomorrow, and all eyes  are on what kinds of goodies will be included for beleaguered first-time home buyers.

While Finance Minister Bill Morneau has strongly hinted that some sort of measure would be unveiled to alleviate the home affordability challenges facing Canadians, it remains to be seen what that will entail. In the meantime, the government has been on the receiving end of proposals from various members of the housing industry, including local and regional real estate boards as well as Mortgage Professionals Canada, as to what would best address the issue.

Industry wants Stress Test, Amortizations, reeled back

Much of the focus has been placed on two key areas: the federal mortgage stress test, which was implemented just over a year ago in January 2018, as well as the length of maximum amortizations for first-time buyers.

Relaxing the criteria around both would improve buyers’ chances of qualifying for a mortgage, experts argue, and therefore should be the priority of the feds when implementing change. The result of the stricter threshold has effectively cooled demand in even the largest Canadian markets, and has pushed a greater percentage of buyers to high-rise living across the nation, from Vancouver condos for sale, to Hamilton and Ottawa condos, rather than single-family detached options.

Survey results yield other priorities

However, home buyers aren’t necessarily in agreeance with that approach. According to a recent survey conducted by Zoocasa, while 82% of Canadians feel that housing affordability continues to be a major issue, they’re not so sure the government is in a position to improve the situation. A total of 55% of respondents do not believe that affordability can be fixed via government measures alone, while 21% don’t feel it’s possible for new policies to exact change within the next five years.

Respondents also had different opinions about what measures would be of biggest help to their pocket books. When asked specifically about the mortgage stress test, for instance, only 57% said they were aware of what it was – and of that group, just half felt reducing the test’s rate threshold (currently the Bank of Canada’s five-year rate of 5.34% or 2% on top of the borrower’s contract rate, whichever is higher) would be of help. Only 15% of all respondents felt such a measure would be effective.

They also weren’t sold that extending maximum amortizations for high-ratio borrowers (those paying less than 20% down) or first-time buyers would be of service either; doing so would reduce monthly mortgage payments, making home financing easier on household budgets, and also ease the stress test’s affordability criteria. Continue Reading…

Budget 2018: Pixie Dust

Posted By |

By Trevor Parry

Special to the Financial Independence Hub

While Bill Morneau’ s second federal budget can be described as a punt, this third foray can best be described as a “fart in the wind;” however,  given that this is a Justin Trudeau government, the term “pixie dust” seems far more appropriate.

The Budget included two major tax measures, one relatively substantial and the other curative.  The latter was a tweaking of the rules surrounding Refundable Dividend Tax on Hand (RDTOH) , dividing the pools into eligible and ineligible pools, thus corresponding with their according dividend. The more substantive measure was to introduce a measure that reduces the ability of a corporation (or its related entities) to claim the Small Business Deduction where “substantial” income has been earned of invested after tax profits.

The new rule would see a company’s SBD eroded by 5 dollars for each 1 dollar of passive income earned in excess of $50,000 each year.  If the company earns $150,000 per year in passive income it loses the entire SBD and is subject to General Rate taxation, effectively 26%.  The government claims that this will affect about 3% of businesses.  In the cases where the full SBD is lost the company will end up paying about $55,000 in additional corporate tax.  The same company would also be paying out eligible dividends, which will be taxed at lower personal rates by the shareholder.

Finance’s pragmatic policy wonks prevailed with the Small Business Deduction

I actually think that the more pragmatic policy wonks in the Department of Finance prevailed with regard to this measure.  The SBD was introduced to provide a tax incentive for small businesses to save and invest and by this process graduate to a medium sized or growing business.  The problem of course is that tax planners have for decades sought to freeze the status of a small business in place.  This can still be achieved by paying out shareholder bonuses, but given confiscatory personal rates in most of the provinces it is likely that trusted advisors will still the ability of a corporation to defer taxation and recommend that earnings continue to be retained.   The approach the government has taken is a more comprehensive approach to total corporate earnings.  It explicitly says to business owners and incorporated professionals that you can use your corporation as a retirement vehicle, or rainy day fund but you will be taxed as a more mature business.

There are of course planning measures that can be taken to avoid this new measure.  Permanent life insurance remains the last game in town with regard to significant tax deferral possibilities.  Given that the Department of Finance engaged in meaningful consultation in fashioning the substantive update of the “exempt test” rules in 2016 that no wholesale assault on life insurance is in the offing.

Instead, I think the Department will continue to observe the golden rule — “Pigs get fat and hogs get slaughtered” — in deciding what action is necessary.  Like the 10/8 strategy before, there are strategies being implemented today that clearly drift into the aggressive category.   The diversion of loan proceeds to a shareholder in an Immediate Finance Arrangement, or the rebating of commissions without their appropriate declaration of status as taxable income come to mind.

Individual Pension Plans only temporary remedy for new rules

Some might also trumpet the use of Individual Pension Plans.  IPP’s in the right instance are wonderful planning tools.  They are particularly useful for incorporated physicians who cannot plan retirement on the basis of an eventual sale of their professional corporations and who too often suffer from a lack of savings discipline.  Continue Reading…

Federal budget 2018: Just what you’d expect from a Liberal government well into its mandate

Posted By |

The Liberals’ 2018 federal budget that descended on us on Tuesday afternoon is pretty much what you’d expect from the Justin Trudeau administration at this slightly-past-the-midway point of its mandate: lots of spending on things like gender pay equity, parental leave, native rights. Another stab at sin taxes, with a carton of 200 cigarettes going up by $1 and a proposal for excise duties on cannabis if and when marijuana becomes legal in July. A bit of business tax reform scaled down from the measures that so incensed small business last fall. As for balancing Ottawa’s books? Not so much.

The CBC’s web site provides this overview: Liberals spend billions to close gaps for working women, indigenous families. If you want to do straight to the source, click on the Finance Canada site here.

Here’s the Globe & Mail’s overview that went up soon after 4 pm:  Federal budget highlights: 12 things you need to know. In case you’ve met the paywall limit on free views, it reports that the budget is in line with previous estimates from Finance Canada, which means deficits for the “foreseeable future.”  Pay equity legislation is proposed for federal government employees and federal regulated sectors. And $447 million will be spent over 5 years to create a new indigenous Skills and Employment Training Program (replacing the Aboriginal Skills and Employment Training Strategy).  And another $1.4 billion or more over 6 years is proposed for First Nations child and family services.

A National Pharmacare program is being “consulted” on. More detail on passive income and private corporations: companies with more than $150,000 in passive income will no longer be eligible for the small business tax rate, while those with under $50,000 oil passive income will not be affected. In between is a formula. Also more than half a billion will go to Cybersecurity, and $3.8 billion over 5 years will go to “support science.”  And journalism has not been forgotten: the budget proposes $50 million over 5 years to support journalism in “underserved communities.”

At the National Post, this piece looks at 5 ways average Canadians could be impacted by the federal budget. MoneySense‘s Julie Cazzin totes up 15 ways Budget 2015 will impact your wallet. There’s something for everyone, Cazzin writes, but no real showstoppers. Julie also looks at 5 measures that directly impact Canadian families. Another MoneySense writer looks at the implications for small business owners.

Carrick sees 7 changes affecting personal finances

Here’s Rob Carrick’s piece on 7 changes that could affect your finances. Carrick writes in the Globe that Ottawa will be modernizing deposit insurance, replace the Canada Working Income Tax Benefit with the introduction of a Canada Workers Benefit, which raises benefits by up to  $170 a year in 2019 for single parents and couples, while raising the level at which the benefit is phase out from $32,339 to $36,483. The Sears bankruptcy appears to have stimulated consultation on pension security, while as of June 2018 an extra five weeks of parental benefits will be available when parents share parental leave. (Yes, Justin Trudeau’s government wishes to encourage more men to take pat leave!) There is also an expansion of the medical expense tax credit and a move to strengthen the oversight of bank sales practices by the federal Financial Consumer Agency of Canada.

Coyne: Budget has nothing to do with budgeting; Ivison: Liberals show their cunning

Back at the National Post, you can get useful video insights from columnists Andrew Coyne, John Ivison and William Watson here. Coyne’s column is titled Liberals deliver a federal budget that has nothing to do with budgeting, or the economy.  In it, he wryly observes that the Liberals are pandering “to every conceivable Liberal client group and policy cult: environmentalists, seasonal EI recipients, multiculturalism, official language groups, regional development, all the way to the media … And, of course, feminists.”

John Ivison’s column is headlined “In their third federal budget, Trudeau’s Liberals show their cunning.”

Finally, for a sober look from the tax and accounting pros at KPMG, read this overview.

My take? How about addressing pension inequity between public and private sectors?, not just gender pay inequity?

Continue Reading…

Wealthy investors dodge capital gains bullet but little else to cheer about in Budget

Posted By |

motley-fool-logoHere’s my latest blog for Motley Fool Canada: Investors dodge bullet on capital gains but little else to cheer about in Budget 2016.

Note the paragraph about the the roadblocks put in the way of two strategies involving life insurance, often used by business owners. You can find more detail about this in yesterday’s Hub guest blog by Robert Kepes: Budget closes two life insurance planning strategies.

cfzVzH_O
Jamie Golombek

Little good news for the wealthy

In today’s Financial Post, CIBC Wealth’s Jamie Golombek also provides a fine overview of the Budget’s impact on the wealthy.

Continue Reading…

Federal Budget 2016: don’t expect much relief for personal finances or retirement

Posted By |
image
Federal finance minister Bill Morneau selects Canadian-designed shoes for upcoming federal budget

Here’s my latest column in the Financial Post, which provides a look ahead to the federal budget, which will go live at 4 pm Tuesday afternoon.

You can find the column here by clicking on this headline: Why Tuesday’s budget may not hold much good news for your personal finances. It’s also in the print edition of today’s paper.

Here is info on the media lockup, which starts at 9:30 am.

Once the floodgates open on or shortly after 4 pm Tuesday, you should be able to get access to the budget by clicking on the Department of Finance website here. We will update this site as necessary and also watch my Twitter feed @JonChevreau, as we disseminate coverage once available. This feed also shows up on the right side of the Hub’s main page.