Tag Archives: gold

Inflation in Retirement

Posted By |

By Billy Kaderli, RetireEarlyLifestyle.com

Special to the Findependence Hub

First things first, what is inflation? Inflation is when too much money is competing for a finite number of goods. This causes a general increase in prices and a fall in the purchasing value of money.

The US Real-Estate market is a prime example, and we have all witnessed the rising home values. Translate this to food and energy, and this is the effect we are feeling today.

Current inflation numbers

Recent inflation numbers came in at 8.5% year-over-year. The producer price index (PPI) came in higher at 11.2% which means it is costing more for the producers to manufacture products.

These increases get passed on to you and me, the consumers, and we are going to be feeling these increases now and on into the future.

How can you protect yourselves in retirement?

Perhaps you are living on a fixed income such as Social Security. [or in Canada: CPP and Old Age Security.]  Your annual Social Security adjustment doesn’t keep up with grocery and fuel costs; thus, you are slipping backwards.

This is not a good position to be in.

One answer is to own equities. Continue Reading…

Dealers putting Clients’ Retirements in Jeopardy

Posted By |

By Nick Barisheff

Special to the Findependence Hub

Over time, most investment dealers have implemented misguided policies that will negatively affect their clients’ investment portfolios and their ability to achieve a secure retirement.

There are two main policies that have negative impacts on investors’ portfolios. One is restricting investments to a client’s original Risk Tolerance in the Know Your Client application form (KYC). When opening an account, the client will advise the dealer of their Risk Tolerance.  Most clients will indicate that they are medium risk. On March 8, 2017, the Ontario Securities Commission (OSC) implemented risk rating rules that require all mutual funds to rate their fund according to 10-year standard deviation. In 2018, I published an article entitled New Mandatory Risk Rating is Misleading Canadian investors.

Prior to the OSC’s implementation of the risk rating rules, on December 13, 2013, the OSC issued CSA Notice 81-324 and Request to Comment – Proposed CSA Mutual Fund Risk Classification Methodology for Use in Fund Facts. My comments on this policy were submitted to the OSC on March 12, 2014, along with comments from 50 other industry experts.  

I presented a paper to the OSC that argued that Standard Deviation is not an appropriate measure of risk, since the best-performing mutual fund and the worst-performing mutual fund in Canada had the same Standard Deviation.  The measure of Standard Deviation of an investment does not reduce the risk of incurring losses.

A better, more accurate methodology would have used downside standard deviation or the Sharpe or Sortino ratios which measure risk adjusted returns. Nevertheless, the OSC implemented risk rating rules requiring all mutual funds to rate the risk of their funds according to 10 year standard deviation.

As a result, if investments in a client’s portfolio exceeded the risk tolerance as indicated in the original KYC, the client was forced to redeem those investments, by the advisor’s compliance department. A number of BMG’s clients were forced to redeem their positions since our funds had a medium-high risk rating according to the OSC formula, and the clients’ KYC indicated medium-risk tolerance. A number of clients wanted to change the KYC in order to allow them to maintain ownership of our funds but were advised that, unless there was a significant change in their financial circumstances, they could not change their KYC. Continue Reading…

Big questions about Investing and Personal Finance

Posted By |

By Michael J. Wiener

Special to the Financial Independence Hub

 

We spend a lot of time worrying about interest rates, stock markets, inflation, gold, and cryptocurrencies, and how they affect our investment portfolios and personal finance.  Here I explain how I think about these issues.

Are interest rates going up?

I don’t know.  But the answer can’t end there.  We have to make choices about our mortgages and investments, and interest rates matter.  Some will express predictions confidently, but they don’t know what will happen.

I prefer to think in terms of a range.  Let’s say that we think interest rates will average somewhere between 0% and 7% over the next decade.  This range is wide and reflects the fact that we don’t know what will happen.  Because current interest rates are still low, the range is shifted toward rate increases more than decreases.  The goal now is to balance potential downside with potential upside over this range.

With mortgages, the main concern is the downside: will we be okay if mortgage rates rise to 7%?  We may not be happy about this possibility, but we should be confident we could handle such a bad outcome without devastating consequences.  This is why it’s risky to stretch for a house that’s too expensive.

Bonds and other fixed income investments are a good way to moderate portfolio volatility.  However, long-term bonds have their own risks.  If you own a 25-year bond and interest rates rise two percentage points, anyone buying your bond would want to be compensated for the 25 years of sub-par interest.  This compensation is a drastically reduced bond price.  For this reason, I don’t own long-term bonds.  I stick to 5 years or less.

But can’t we do better?  Can’t we find some useful insight into future interest rates?  No, we can’t.  Not even the Bank of Canada and the U.S. Federal Reserve Board know what they’ll do beyond the short term.  They set interest rates in response to global events.  They do their best to predict the future based on what they know today, but unexpected events, such as a war or new pandemic, can change everything.

If we get overconfident and think we have a better idea of what interest rates will be than somewhere in a wide range like 0% to 7%, all we’re doing is leaving ourselves exposed to possible outcomes we haven’t considered.

Is the stock market going to crash?

I don’t know.  With stock prices so high, it’s reasonable to assume that the odds of a stock market crash are higher than usual, and that a crash might be deeper than a typical crash.  But that doesn’t mean a crash is sure to happen.  The stock market could go sideways for a while.  Or it could keep rising and crash later without ever getting back down as low as today’s value.

People who are convinced the market is about to crash may choose to sell everything.  One risk they take is that the crash they anticipate won’t come.  Another risk is that even if stock prices decline, they may keep waiting for deeper declines and stay out of the market until after stock prices have recovered.

Those who blissfully ignore the possibility of a stock market crash may invest with borrowed money.  The risk they take is that the market will crash and they’ll be forced to sell their depressed stocks to cover their debts.

I prefer to consider both positive and negative possibilities.  I choose a path where I’ll still be okay if stocks crash, and I’ll capture some upside if stocks keep rising.  If we could fast-forward 5 years, it would be easy to see whether we’d have been better off selling everything to cash or leveraging like crazy.  But trying to choose between these extremes is not the best approach.  I prefer to invest in a way that gives a reasonable amount of upside with the constraint that I’ll be okay if stocks disappoint.

Is inflation going to get worse or return to the low levels we’ve had in recent decades?

I don’t know.  Either outcome is possible.  Higher inflation is bad for long-term bonds, which is another reason why I avoid them.  With short-term bonds and cash, you can always choose to invest these assets in a different way without taking as big a hit as you’d take with long-term bonds.

I choose to protect against inflation with stocks.  When prices rise, businesses are getting higher prices for their goods and services.  However, this protection only plays out over long periods.  Over the short term, stocks can drop at the same time that inflation is high.  Some people like to look at historical data and declare that stocks offer no inflation protection.  These people are usually playing with mathematical tools they don’t understand very well.

All of these considerations play into the balance I’ve tried to strike with my allocation levels to stocks, bonds, and cash.  I’m trying to capture some upside from good outcomes while protecting myself from disaster if I get bad outcomes.

Is gold going up?

I don’t know.  You might think my balanced approach would mean that I’d have at least a small position in gold, but I don’t.  I have no interest in investing in gold.  It offers no short-term protections against inflation or anything else.  And over the long-term stocks have been far superior.

Gold produces nothing, and it costs money to store and guard.  Gold’s price has barely appreciated in real terms over the centuries.  In contrast, millions of people wake up every day to work hard at producing profits for the businesses that make up the stock market, and money invested in stocks over the centuries has grown miraculously. Continue Reading…

Ukraine invasion underlines investors’ need for super diversification

Posted By |

It’s scary times for everyone, investors included. As this site focuses on Financial Independence, I’ll try in this blog to direct readers to some useful sources of financial advice.

We’ll start with MoneySense, since in my role as Investing Editor at Large, I’m on top of much of the investing content there.

First, I’d point to Allan Small’s article that appeared over the weekend: The Meaning of market swings and why you should care. Allan recaps current trends in rising inflation and rising interest rates, noting that geopolitical uncertainties can create buying opportunities on certain stocks:

“The key is to make sure your portfolio is diversified. It’s the best — and cheapest — strategy to protect your portfolio in any environment. Balance it with different sectors of the economy.”

Second, Dale Robert’s weekly market wrap for MoneySense always has plenty of good insights into up-to-the-minute market action. His February 27th instalment of Making Sense of the Markets is particularly instructive. Hub readers will be familiar with Dale’s own site, Cutthecrapinvesting, as we regularly republish Dale’s blogs here on the Hub (with his kind permission, of course!).

Here’s Dale’s recent blog on the Ukraine situation. Here’s an excerpt:

“Even a few weeks ago it was easy to predict what would help investors make their portfolios more battle-hardened. Gold and energy certainly rose to the unfortunate occasion.”

Ever since Covid hit, Dale has been furnishing sound investment ideas, often ahead of the rest of the financial blogosphere. For example, he was one of the earliest to sound the alarm that Covid would be a serious problem for investors. He was also early in recommending energy plays like Eric Nuttall’s Nine Point Energy Fund (NNRG) and inflation-fighting recommendations like the Purpose Real Assets ETF (PRA.) That’s one reason why we included Dale as a panelist in MoneySense’s yearly ETF All-Stars feature: the 2022 edition will be out this spring, albeit under the direction of a new writer, Bryan Borzykowski.

No one ever made a dime panicking

How am I responding to the financial aspect of this crisis? Well, as Mad Money’s Jim Cramer often reminds readers in such times, “No one ever made a dime panicking.” Just yesterday, The Successful Investor publisher Patrick McKeough reminded Hub readers that short-term investment decisions all too often sabotage long term returns.

Patrick has been hugely consistent over the years with the following three-fold guidelines, which are as relevant during this Ukraine crisis as in they are in sunnier times:

1.) Invest mainly in well-established, dividend-paying companies;

2.) Spread your money out across most if not all of the five main economic sectors (Manufacturing & Industry; Resources & Commodities; Consumer; Finance; and Utilities);

3.) Downplay or avoid stocks in the broker/media limelight.

In his Inner Circle Advice bulletin issued after Tuesday’s market rout, McKeough titled one section “Putin goes for broke” while urging investors to stay the course if they adhere to the three points above:”In the past third of a century, Russia has gone from dictatorship to fledgling democracy and back to dictatorship. If his Ukraine venture goes awry, it could be the end of the Putin era and the start of a new try at western-style government for Russia.

“Meanwhile, we advise sticking with your portfolio if your investments are in tune with our Successful Investor directives. Now, though, is a good time to re-emphasize that recent IPOs tend to be a poor investment choice, on average. But that’s especially so in a market situation like this one, in which volatility is likely to be above average for some time.”

Some other newsletters to which I subscribe recapped historical market action in advance and during prior outbreaks of war and invasions; generally they found that investors who “bought the invasion” eventually did well.

On the other hand, in an article in the Globe & Mail this Monday, veteran commentator Gordon Pape suggested it wouldn’t hurt to raise cash where you have significant capital gains: while they’re still gains. You can find the article, albeit paywalled, by clicking on this highlighted headline: Investors should take these steps to protect their portfolios from  the Russia-Ukraine conflict.  Pape also warned, as have many pundits, that if Russia does get away with its Ukraine invasion, it may embolden China to make a similar move on Taiwan.  Continue Reading…

The Perfect Storm for Gold

Posted By |
Image courtesy BMG Group

By Nick Barisheff

Special to the Financial Independence Hub

In December 1997, The Financial Times ran an article entitled “The Death of Gold.” Since then, the gold price in US dollars has increased 519% from $288 to $1,780. Today, after many political events and crises we have evidence of the continuous and in many ways spectacular growth of the gold price. This confluence of many current events is creating a perfect storm for gold to increase dramatically more than we imagined.

Currency Devaluation

Typically, currency devaluation is always at the heart of a rising gold price. This has been taking place in all of the major fiat currencies, resulting in an average annual price increase in gold of over 10% since 2000.

“For the naïve there is something miraculous in the issuance of fiat money. A magic word spoken by the government creates out of nothing a thing which can be exchanged against any merchandise a man would like to get. How pale is the art of sorcerers, witches, and conjurors when compared with that of the government’s Treasury Department.” — Ludwig von Mises

Since 1900, all major fiat currencies have been devalued by over 90%.

To understand currency devaluation, it is necessary to understand that all currency is created by governments issuing debt and then the central bank monetizing that debt by printing the currency. In 1960, the U.S. federal debt to GDP stood at 52.2%, whereas today it has grown to 125.9%. The Federal Reserve has increased its balance sheet by a historically unprecedented amount of over $7.5 trillion since 2008.

Because of this central bank policy, all western currencies are being devalued and this in turn leads to inflation.

“Nations are not ruined by one act of violence, but gradually and in an almost imperceptible manner by the depreciation of their circulating currency, through excessive quantity.”

— Nicholas Copernicus – 1525

 “Fed Chairman Powell has pumped trillions of newly printed dollars into the system in order to prop up the financial markets, but in the process has unleashed a tsunami of inflation that is unlike anything we have seen since the 1970s.” — Michael Snyder

“For the first time in history, ALL the major central banks are printing money. One of two things will occur. If they continue to print, their respective currencies will lose their purchasing power, and we’ll have inflation or even hyper-inflation.”

As Currencies are Devalued, Price Inflation will inevitably follow

Inflation, as this term was always used everywhere and especially in North America, means increasing the quantity of money and bank notes in circulation and the quantity of bank deposits subject to check. But people today use the term ‘inflation’ to refer to the phenomenon that is an inevitable consequence of inflation, and that is the tendency of all prices and wages to rise.

In October 2021, consumer inflation jumped to a four-decade high, the highest since the days of runaway inflation in the early 1980s. Headline year-to-year GDP inflation hit a 38-year-plus high of 4.53%.

According to John Williams of Shadowstats.com, if inflation was calculated using 1980s methodology, the CPI would be nearly 15%. Since treasury yields are about 2%, the true inflation-adjusted treasury yield would be about -13%.

Gold Rises Fastest When Real Yields Go Negative

 

Inflation is destined to go even higher in 2022. Many of the biggest corporations have already announced price increases that will take effect in 2022.

Declining GDP — Stagflation

“The…economy is facing a period of stagflation in which both growth and inflation disappoint.” — David Walton, Goldman Sachs

Stagflation is worse than a recession. It’s because stagflation combines the bad economic effects of a recession (stock declines, unemployment increases, housing market dips) with inflated prices. When this is dragged out over the long term, it becomes a problem that can have a big impact on societal habits.

To make matters worse, we are already experiencing declining GDP together with increasing inflation. This is due to an unusual combination of supply chain disruptions and labour shortages due to COVID-19 policies that have been implemented in most western countries.

Supply Chain Disruptions

The COVID-19 pandemic impact and the disruptive government responses continue to have enormous negative impact on global supply chains. Beyond COVID-19, compounding profound governance incompetence, media bias, political conflicts, disintegration of society split by “Covid politics,” natural disasters, cybersecurity breaches, international trade disputes have negatively impacted supply chains leading to product shortages, distribution delays, and manufacturing disruptions. The lockdowns imposed in many countries have led to revenue declines and many bankruptcies, with many more to come. Making matters even worse is the implementation of vaccine mandates, causing over 4 million people to leave the workforce in the U.S. This will lead to other societal problems due to lack of first responders, nurses, firefighters, and police.

Some analysts expect that it will take years for the capacity constraints and backlogs to ease. Continue Reading…