Tag Archives: self-directed investing

Who speaks for the Self-Directed investor?

By Ian Duncan MacDonald

Special to the Financial Independence Hub

Recently I read an article by a financial advisor with “25 years of experience in dealing with individual investors.”

He sees his role as a coach helping” investors ignore Wall and Bay Street hype and hysteria ….” As he sees it, only investment advisors can protect investors from themselves.  He sees these ignorant self-directed investors as, “piling into the market after superior stock returns and before inferior returns,” “ignoring tax ramifications” and foolishly “investing for entertainment.”

When you give access to your money to an advisor you are immediately creating the potential for that advisor to use your money in their self-interest: not yours.   While this advisor does address investment advisor fees, “The financial regulators require us to disclose them.” He does not touch upon the seemingly daily reporting of investment advisor thefts of client money nor all the “legal” but murky ways that investment advisors can siphon of your money.

(The “full-service fee schedule” account you signed probably allows all the following fees to be charged against your investment account: operating fees such as custody fees, interest charges on debit balances, fees for manages and fee-based programs, transaction fees, foreign transaction tax, issuer commissions, service fees, fee for managing funds, deferred sales charge, referral fee, etc). Self-directed investors are shielded from almost all of these fees.

On rare occasions investment advisors get charged with theft:

“Posted On Wednesday March 24, 2021

The Halton Regional Police Service – Fraud Unit has arrested a Burlington man in relation to a fraud investigation.

The accused was an investment industry professional who worked for a financial company that was registered with the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada (IIROC).  Between 2011 and 2016, two victims invested a total of approximately $1.6 million with the accused to purchase insurance and other investments. The accused diverted the funds he received from the victims to his own bank accounts.”

The following is just the last month’s reporting of investment advisor IIROC disciplinary hearings plus their last statistical complaints report:

Release Date Title
5/4/2021 In the Matter of Edward Ho Rha – Adjournment Related Documents
4/30/2021 In the Matter of Joan McCarthy – Set Date Appearance Related Documents
4/30/2021 In the Matter of James Robert Harris– Settlement Hearing Related Documents
4/21/2021 In the Matter of Neil DiCostanzo – Adjournment Related Documents
4/20/2021 In the Matter of Bonnie Wyatt – Settlement Accepted Related Documents
4/16/2021 In the Matter of Alberto Storelli – Discipline Hearing Related Documents
4/13/2021 In the Matter of Joseph Anthony Thomson and Douglas Gerald McRae – Discipline Hearing Related Documents
4/8/2021 Staff Policy Statement – Early Resolution Offers
4/7/2021 In the Matter of Dean Martin Jenkins – Penalty Decision Related Documents
4/1/2021 In the Matter of Thomas Stock – Appearance to set a hearing date Related

Statistics Filed by Dealer Firms (COMSET)

“IIROC rules require Dealer Members to inform IIROC, using IIROC’s Complaints and Settlement Reporting System (ComSet), when certain events occur, including when a Dealer Member receives a written client complaint, when criminal charges are laid against a Dealer Member or any of its individual registrants, or when a securities-related civil claim is brought by a client.” Continue Reading…

The ideal Stock

By Ian Duncan MacDonald

Special to the Financial Independence

The “good” dividends of financially strong companies provide a reliable income and increase the odds for an ever-rising share price.

There are 14,982 corporations in North America with common shares for purchase. For a strong, diversified portfolio you need only find 20 corporations whose shares come closest to matching the following “ideal criteria.”

(1) A stock price greater than $100
(2) A stock price that was greater than $100 four years ago
(3) A stock price that is now 99.50% greater than it was 4 years ago
(4) A stock with a book value greater than $100
(5) A current stock price greater than 49.5% of the book value
(6) Five or more analysts rating the stock a “buy”
(7) Five or more analysts rating the stock a “strong buy”
(8) A dividend yield percent between 7.50% and 10.49%.
(9) An operating margin greater than 79.50%
(10) An average daily volume of shares traded greater than 2,000,000
(11) A stock’s price-to-earnings ratio between 0.1x to 5.49x

In 20 years of reviewing thousands of stocks I have never found a stock that met all eleven criteria. Therefore, since the ideal stock does not exist it means you must sort through those 14,982 stocks to find those 20 that come closest to matching the 11 criteria.

To help identify the best dividend stocks, I score stocks using the above 11 criteria (my background was in commercial risk systems with Dun & Bradstreet, Equifax, etc). When the 11 scores are added they have the potential to reach a total of 100. After scoring thousands of stocks the highest score I have ever calculated is 78; the lowest score is 8. I avoid buying stocks scoring under 50.

Why dividends are important in Value investing

The best portfolio candidates emerge when you sort, by descending score, all 628 U.S. common stocks traded on the NYSE and the NASDAQ paying a dividend of 6 % or greater and all 199 Canadian common stocks paying a dividend of 3.5% or greater on the TSX. A scoring system objectively, mathematically applies a derived number to a stock. This number identifies those dividend stocks that will provide the most reliable, generous dividend income with the potential for substantial future share price gain. Continue Reading…