Tag Archives: stocks

How to invest and shop during Trump idiocracy

Posted By |
Theatrical release poster for the film, Idiocracy. via Wikipedia.

By Mark Seed, myownadvisor

Special to Financial Independence Hub

A few months ago I wrote:

“Yes, interesting times may call for interesting portfolio changes! Or not. :)”

Well, here we are.

Regardless about how you feel about the current U.S. Administration, I would think most people would agree that this U.S. President feels very emboldened right now. With no future term to go: this is his last shot at taking shots at pretty much anything and everyone he wants without too many consequences near-term. At least it seems that way …

Since writing this post below from December I thought I would update such a post about any recent portfolio changes and beyond that, how our shopping habits have shifted (if at all) in recent months.

How to invest and shop during Trump idiocracy

I put the term “idiocracy” in the post title since it’s very much how I feel right now.

It’s like watching the Ferris Bueller movie scene: on tariffs.

History repeats.

Now that tariffs are in place and we’re now in a (trade) war between Canadian and U.S. businesses, consumers and workers (sadly), I’m expecting these tariffs will roil stock markets for months or years to come.

I have.

This is how I intend to invest and shop during some prolonged Trump idiocracy.

Approach #1 – What investments can withstand stagflation?

New tariffs are likely, in my opinion, to trigger a sustained period of low economic growth and even higher inflation: which will impact everyone.

At the most basic level, inflation means a rise in the general level of prices of goods and/or services over a period of time. When inflation occurs, each unit of currency buys fewer goods and services. Inflation results in a loss in the value of money and purchasing power. We will all be impacted by this.

Stagflation is essentially a combination of stagnant economic growth, high unemployment, and high inflation. When you think about it …. this combination probably shouldn’t exist: prices shouldn’t go up when people have less or no money to spend. This could be a place where things are trending…

Farmland might perform well during stagflation but we don’t own any.

Instead, I own some “defensive stocks” including some in key economic sectors like consumer staples, healthcare and utilities in my low-cost ETFs that should be able to weather a prolonged disruption. I also consider a few selected stocks we own as defensive plays: waste management companies. At the time of this post, both Waste Management (WM) and Waste Connections (WCN) we own have held up very well and provided stellar returns over the last 5+ years that I’ve owned them.

  • WM is up almost 100% in the last 5-years.
  • WCN is up over 100% in the last 5-years.

We’ll see what the future brings and my low-cost ETFs are a great diversifier: regardless.

Approach #2 – Staying global while keeping cash

Beyend certain sectors, investors should always consider holding a well-diversified stock portfolio across different sectors and different economic regions to reduce the long-term reliance on industries directly affected by tariffs.

While I have enjoyed a nice tech-kicker return from owning low-cost ETF QQQ for approaching 10 years now, and I will continue to hold some QQQ in my portfolio, I could see technology stocks tanking near-term. To help offset that, I own some XAW ETF for geographical diversification beyond the U.S. stock market. Thankfully. 

Times of market stress are however times to buy stocks and equity ETFs.

Near-term and long-term investing creates buying opportunities for disciplined investors. A well-structured, diversified global mix of stocks including those beyond the U.S. could provide some decent defence against a very toxic, unpredictable economic and political agenda.

For new and established readers on this site, you might be aware I’ve mentioned that our investing approach could be considered a “hybrid approach” – a structure that was established about 15 years ago as follows:

  1. We invest in a mix of Canadian stocks in our taxable account: to deliver income and some growth, and
  2. Beyond the taxable account, we own a bunch of low-cost ETFs like QQQ and XAW inside our registered accounts: inside our RRSPs, TFSAs and my LIRA for extra diversification.

I like the hybrid approach, the process and the results to date.

At the time of this post, I just don’t see how I should be making any significant changes to our equity portfolio.

Beyond our portfolio of stocks and equity ETFs we keep cash/cash equivalents.

Cash savings remains a good hedge for a very uncertain near-term future. We have a mix of Interest Savings Accounts (ISAs) / High Interest Savings Accounts (HISAs), along with Money Market Funds (MMFs) in particular in our registered accounts. Generally, plain-vanilla savings accounts offer very low interest rates. So, if you want to earn more on your savings deposits (rather than simply using your savings account) then consider an ISA or HISA.

The greatest appeal of ISAs and HISAs for taxable savings IMO is liquidity, while earning interest, and member financial institutions of Canada Deposit Insurance Corporation (CDIC) insure savings of up to $100,000. It’s good business for banks and institutions as well since money deposited generates interest by allowing the bank to access those funds for loans to others. There are usually no fees for these accounts and while interest rates have come down in recent months, ISA and HISA interest rates are consistently north of 2% at the time of this post.

I believe some form of savings account / ISA / HISA remains the cornerstone of everyone’s personal finance portfolio since 1. your money is saved for future expenses or ready for emergencies, 2. it is safe/low risk, 3. it is liquid, and 4. you still earn returns.

Let your equities do as they wish after that.

Approach #3 – Shop local, buy local, and avoid U.S. travel

We are fortunate to live in an area in Ottawa where we can shop local and buy from local farmers. We will continue to do that.

For those that want to shop more in Canada and buy more Canadian goods visit here:

We’ve been fortunate to save up some money in our “sunshine fund” as I call it for some future travel. I/we have no near-term plans to spend our money in the U.S.

I’ve been fortunate to visit many, many U.S. States over the years but given this recent trade war initiated by this current U.S. Administration I hardly have any desire to spend my money in a country whereby that government talks about annexing us.

It’s that simple for us.

I encourage other Canadians who can and do travel, to consider the same – avoiding the U.S. – not because of its citizens but the U.S. Administration decisions. Continue Reading…

Offence vs Defence

Posted By |
  • Ch-ch-ch-ch-changes
  • Turn and face the strange
  • Ch-ch-changes
  • Don’t want to be a richer man
  • Ch-ch-ch-ch-changes
  • Turn and face the strange
  • Ch-ch-changes
  • There’s gonna have to be a different man
  • Time may change me
  • But I can’t trace time — Changes, by David Bowie
Image courtesy Outcome/Shutterstock

By Noah Solomon

Special to Financial Independence Hub

There is a basic principle that most people follow when it comes to their spending decisions. In essence, people generally try to either

(1) Get the most they can for the least amount of money, or

(2) Spend the least amount of money on the things they want (i.e. get the best deal)

In other words, rational utility maximizers try to be as efficient as possible when parting with their hard-earned dollars.

Strangely, many investors abandon this principle when it comes to their portfolios. With investing, what you get is return (hopefully more than less), and what you pay (other than fees) is risk. People often focus on return without any regard for the amount of risk they are taking. Alternately, many make the mistake of reducing risk at any cost, regardless of the magnitude of potential returns they leave on the table.

The foundation of successful investing necessitates achieving an optimal balance between return and risk. Different types of assets (volatile speculative stocks, stable dividend paying stocks, bonds, etc.) have very different risk and return characteristics. Relatedly, a portfolio’s level of exposure to different asset classes is the primary determinant of its risk and return profile, including how efficient the balance is between the two.

Offense, Defense, & Bobby Knight

Robert Montgomery “Bobby” Knight was an American men’s college basketball coach. Nicknamed “the General,”h e won 902 NCAA Division I men’s basketball games, a record at the time of his retirement. He is quoted as saying:

“As coaches we talk about two things: offense and defense. There is a third phase we neglect, which is more important. It’s conversion from offense to defense and defense to offense.”

Nobody can escape the fact that you can’t have your cake and eat it too. You can’t increase potential returns without taking greater risk. Similarly, you can’t reduce the possibility of losses without reducing the potential for returns.

Picking up Pennies in Front of a Steamroller vs. Shooting Fish in a Barrel

Notwithstanding this unfortunate tradeoff, there are times when investors should focus heavily on return on capital (i.e. being more aggressive), times when they should be more concerned with return of capital (i.e. being more defensive), and all points in between.

Sometimes, there is significantly more downside than upside from taking risk. Although it is still possible to reap decent returns in such environments, the odds aren’t in your favour. Reaching further out on the risk curve in such regimes is akin to picking up pennies in front of a steamroller:  the potential rewards are small relative to the possible consequences. At the other end of the spectrum, there are environments in which the probability of gains dwarfs the probability of losses. Although there is a relatively small chance that you could lose money in such circumstances, the wind is clearly at your back. At these junctures, dialing up your risk exposure is akin to shooting fish in a barrel – the likelihood of success is high while the risk of an adverse event is small.

John F. Kennedy & the Chameleonic Nature of Markets

Former President John F. Kennedy asserted that “The one unchangeable certainty is that nothing is certain or unchangeable.” With regard to markets, the risk and return profiles of different asset classes are not stagnant. Rather, they change over time depending on a variety of factors, including interest rates, economic growth, inflation, valuations, etc.

Given this dynamic, it follows that determining your optimal asset mix is not a “one and done” treatise, but rather a dynamic process that takes into account changing conditions. Yesterday’s optimal portfolio may not look like today’s, which in turn may be significantly different than the one of the future.

It’s not just the risk vs. return profile of any given asset class that should inform its weight with portfolios, but also how it compares with those for other asset classes. As such, investors should use changing risk/return profiles among asset classes to “tilt” their portfolios, increasing the weights of certain types of investments while decreasing others.

In “normal” times, the expected return from stocks exceeds the yields offered by cash and high-grade bonds by roughly 3% per annum. However, this difference can expand or contract depending on economic conditions and relative valuations among asset classes.

In the decade plus era following the global financial crisis, not only did rates remain at historically low levels, but the prospective returns on equities were abnormally high given the positive impact that low rates have on spending, earnings growth, and multiples. Against this backdrop, the prospective returns from stocks far exceeded yields on safe harbour investments. Under these conditions, it is no surprise that investors who had outsized exposure to stocks vs. bonds were handsomely rewarded.

Expected Return on Stocks vs. Yield on High Grade Bonds: Post GFC Era

As things currently stand, the picture is markedly different. Following the most significant rate-hiking cycle in decades, bonds are once again “back in the game.” Moreover, lofty equity market valuations (at least in the U.S.) suggest that the S&P 500 Index will deliver below-average returns over the next several years. Continue Reading…

Tariffs Troubles? Remember this Timeless Tip: “It’s already priced in.”

Posted By |
Image: Canva Custom Creation/Lowrie Financial

By Steve Lowrie, CFA

Special to Financial Independence Hub

A key concern many investors have at the moment is the impact of Trump’s tariffs on goods produced outside the U.S. on the markets. I’m hearing from those wondering if they should do something to protect their wealth; their primary question is: What should I do with my investments?

My answer (as it usually is when investors are concerned about the geopolitical impact on the markets): stick with the plan because, by the time the news is public and you become concerned, the markets have already accounted for it/priced it in, so any reaction you take is too late.

A useful historical reference on tariffs is President Trump’s first term. Starting in 2017, his administration targeted China, implementing tariffs on a broad range of products by 2018. The following years saw ongoing trade negotiations that led to an agreement, though many tariffs remained. Despite the uncertainty, both U.S. and Chinese markets outperformed the MSCI World ex USA Index over Trump’s four-year term. Have a look at the data from 2017 to 2020, as Dimensional compares China MSCI Index to US S&P 500 Index to MSCI World ex USA Index.

Markets are forward-looking, meaning that the potential economic effects of tariffs are likely already factored into current prices. As a result, when these anticipated changes materialize, their impact on markets may be limited.

Understanding how Market Pricing Works

Let’s talk about the price of stocks.

It stands to reason: To make money in the market, you need to sell your holdings for more than you paid. Of course, we’re all familiar with good old “buy low, sell high.” But despite its simplicity, many investors fall short. Instead, they end up doing just the opposite, or at least leaving returns on the table that could have been theirs to keep.

You can defend against these human foibles by understanding how stock pricing works and using that knowledge to your advantage.

Good News, Bad News, and Market Views

How do you know when a stock or stock fund is priced for buying or selling?

The short answer is, we don’t.

And yet, many investors still let current events dominate their decisions. They sell when they fear bad news means prices are going to fall. Or they buy when good news breaks. They invest in funds that do the same.

While this may seem logical, there’s a problem with it: You’re betting you or your fund manager can place winning trades before markets have already priced in the news.

To be blunt, that’s a losing bet.

You’re betting that you know more about what the price should be at any given point than what the formidable force of the market has already decided. Every so often, you might be right. But the preponderance of the evidence suggests any “wins” are more a matter of luck than skill.

Me and You against the World

Whenever you try to buy low or sell high, who is the force on the other side of the trading table?

It’s the market.

The market includes millions of individuals, institutions, banks, and brokerages trading hundreds of billions of dollars every moment of every day. It includes highly paid analysts continuously watching every move the markets make. It includes AI-driven engines seeking to get their trades in nanoseconds ahead of everyone else.

And you think you can beat that?

We believe it’s far more reasonable to assume, by the time you’ve heard the news, the collective market has too, and has already priced it in.

  • News of a recession, under way or avoided? It’s already priced in.
  • Inflation on the rise, or abating? It’s already priced in.
  • A company suffers a calamity or makes a major breakthrough? It’s already priced in.
  • The government passes critical legislation that helps or hinders global trading? It’s…

And so on. Here’s your best assumption:

If it’s public knowledge, it’s already priced in. (And if it’s insider information, it’s illegal to trade on it.)

What we don’t yet Know

As soon as an event is priced in, several things make it difficult to profitably trade on the news:

You’re Buying High, Selling Low: If you trade on news after it’s been priced in, odds are you’ll buy at a higher price (after good news) or sell at a lower price (based on bad news). Continue Reading…

Stock Market Anxiety leads to Bad Investing Decisions. Here’s what to do instead

Posted By |

Ignore stock market anxiety and negative stock predictions and instead focus your investing strategy on diversification and portfolio balance

Image by Pexels/Markus Spiske

The current state of the world is generating stock market anxiety, as it often does. My guess is that the Israel-Hamas war is just getting started and will last a long time. I also suspect that Russian dictator Vladimir Putin had something to do with getting it started, and will do what he can to keep it going. After all, when it comes to running his country, Putin takes a grasping-at-straws approach.

Putin may think that bringing the longstanding Mideast conflict back into the headlines is going to improve his chances of conquering Ukraine and bringing the Soviet Union back from the dead.

He thinks taking a long shot is better than no shot at all. Who knows? He might get lucky.

Early on in his war on Ukraine, Putin seemed to think that Chinese dictator Xi Jinping was going to take pity on him and his country, and offer free money and/or weapons to shore up Russia’s Ukraine invasion. Instead, Xi insists on staying out of the war, while paying discount prices for Russian oil. He takes special care not to let his country get caught up in the economic sanctions that the U.S. and NATO countries and allies are directing against the Russians.

It’s not that Putin is stupid. If a war between Israel and Hamas turns out to be a big drain on the U.S. budget, the U.S. might have less money available to arm Ukraine.

Up till lately, however, Israel has had little to say about Russia’s treatment of Ukraine. Israel may soon take a more active role in helping Ukraine defend itself.

Any war is a terrible thing, and this one is no different. The stock market seems to be creeping upward. Maybe it knows something that Putin hasn’t figured out.

Meanwhile, if your stock portfolio makes sense to you, we advise against selling due to Mideast fears.

Stock market anxiety recedes with investment quality, diversification and portfolio balance

You’ll find that many of your worries concern things that are unlikely to happen; that are already largely discounted in current stock prices; and that probably won’t matter as much as you feared they would.

You get a much better return on time spent if you devote less of it to worrying about high-risk investments, and more of it to an investing strategy. Create a strategy that is built upon analyzing the quality and diversification of your investments, and the structure and balance of your portfolio.

There’s another advantage as well. A calm investor is much less likely to react in haste and make sudden decisions that could prove to be damaging in the long run. Continue Reading…

2024 in Review and 2025 Kick Off

Posted By |
Stock image courtesy Harvest ETFs

By Ambrose O’Callaghan, Harvest ETFs

(Sponsor Blog)

The year 2024 started in a similar fashion as 2023. The mega-cap-concentrated technology sector fuelled positive upward momentum.

Economic data slowed in the first quarter of 2024. Meanwhile, relatively defensive areas benefited through the spring months and again through the end of the summer season as recession concerns resurfaced ahead of the first interest rate cut in August.

How a “soft landing” has impacted the market

Equities and bonds continued to be very sensitive to the day-over-day economic data points. In another period these data points might have less impact on the behaviour of individual stocks and bonds. The chart below illustrates the dramatic shift in earnings growth expectations from 2022 through to the first quarter of 2026. Market and investor sentiment has improved as the US Federal Reserve has seemingly been able to orchestrate a “soft landing.”

Source: Bloomberg, January 10, 2025.

The ability of the Fed to produce a “soft landing” in 2024 was reflected in the meaningful uptick in earnings expectations for the entire market. Previously, the Magnificent 7 (Apple, Microsoft, Alphabet, Amazon, NVIDIA, Meta, and Tesla) has been the driving force, outshining the broader market.

Through November 2024, the stock market rejoiced the certainty of the coming Republican administration. It continued to rally hard through to the end of November with nearly every sub-sector up over 10%.

Source: Harvest Portfolios Group, Inc. January 2025.

Transitioning from 2024 to 2025

The month of December 2024 closed as only the third negative month of that calendar year. Factors like tax loss selling, volume voids, and policy rhetoric compounded to contribute to the decline in the final month of the previous year. Regardless, the broader markets finished in the black for the second year in a row with a 20% upward movement. That rate of increase is a rarity over the past 40 years. That said, the strong move upward does not mean a correction is more likely to occur in 2025. Continue Reading…