Tag Archives: technology

Real Life Investment Strategies #6: Beware the Risk of the Cult Stock Roller Coaster

The Pitfalls of Fanatically Following the Stock Hype

Graphic by Steve Lowrie: Canvas Custom Creation

By Steve Lowrie, CFA

Special to Financial Independence Hub 

“There are recurring cycles, ups and downs, but the course of events is essentially the same, with small variations. It has been said that history repeats itself. This is perhaps not quite correct; it merely rhymes.”

Dr. Theodor Reik

It seems to me that the central tenet of the financial media (group-think central) is to glorify stocks or sectors that have experienced recent outsized returns. The hype of cult stocks extends and is amplified by social media channels and its various influencers.  Ask any reputable financial economist about these past monumental gains and they will indicate that “past performance is not indicative of future returns.”

Despite the restrained advice of these financial experts, it’s easy to get swept up in the hype surrounding these popular stocks and investment trends. Some choose to surrender to FOMO (fear-of-missing-out) and follow these financial fads. for the chance of scoring a big financial win with a little excitement on the side. While these stocks may seemingly promise rapid growth, there are some obvious (and not-so-obvious) risks of chasing high-flying stocks.

It’s important to consider the other option: a more thoughtful, measured investment plan. Maybe not as thrilling, but certainly a better path to reaching your long-term financial goals.

In my experience, the greatest risk to someone’s financial well-being is not so much panicking and selling in a bear market (although that can be devastating), it is getting caught in up in a fad in an up market.  Just  look back at previous fads or bubbles like dot-com stocks (late 1990s-early 2000s), housing and mortgage crisis (mid-2000s), SPACs (2020-2021), and cannabis stocks (2018-2020), to name just a few.  In all these cases, there are numerous examples of hyped stocks running up, but then going down 90% or worse. This is where we need to embrace the theory of history repeating itself to be alerted to the potential pitfalls of investing in cult stocks: they might bring the excitement but they typically underperform and create significant risk.

Let’s explore some examples of how some stocks can achieve a cult-like following and a take realistic look at how they could play out for some real-life investors.

Individual Stock with a Cult-Like Following

Looking back helps us see what is most likely to happen in the future. So, we’ll look at two individual stocks that ended up with a cult-like following.

By 2020, Nvidia was no longer just a stock: it had become a movement. There were legions of investors, bloggers, and social media influencers all singing its praises. You could barely scroll through an investment forum without seeing someone post about Nvidia being the future, with charts projecting its exponential growth.

Similarly, Peloton had developed a near-cult following. The company’s sleek bikes weren’t just fitness equipment: they were a lifestyle. And its stock wasn’t just an investment: it was a symbol of the new, post-pandemic world. As Peloton soared, so did the confidence of its investors, who believed they had found a company that was reshaping fitness forever.

But there are two major problems that plague hyped stocks:

  1. People start to believe that the company can do no wrong and that its growth is limitless. And they make investment decisions based on that ill-conceived confidence.
  2. Investors are real people with real emotions and real egos. Cult-like stocks can cloud judgment, leading to irrational decisions based on emotional narratives rather than rational analysis.

And that’s where the danger lies.

The Reality of Compounding and the Impossibility of Endless Growth

For those watching Nvidia and Peloton stocks with bated breath, it seemed like the stock would climb higher, feeding the belief that it would never stop. But here’s the thing about high growth rates: eventually, they hit a wall.

Let’s break it down: Nvidia’s market value today is about $3.4 trillion, and the entire U.S. stock market is worth around $55.2 trillion. If Nvidia kept growing at 32% annually while the market grew at a typical 10%, in less than 20 years Nvidia would make up 100% of the entire stock market.

That’s impossible.

No company can make up 100% of a market that includes every company. At some point, the math just doesn’t work. Yet in the heat of the moment, many investors don’t think about that. They were so caught up in Nvidia’s incredible growth that they assumed it could just keep going.

But in the stock market, what goes up can come crashing down.

When the pandemic waned and people started going back to gyms, Peloton’s sales fell. Its stock price, which had soared by 500%, tumbled by more than 80%.

What investors didn’t realize is that outsized returns like 32% annually for Nvidia or 500% for Peloton don’t last forever. No stock can keep compounding at such high rates indefinitely. In fact, the higher the growth, the harder it is to sustain.

For every Nvidia that defies expectations for a while, there are countless Pelotons: stocks that rise quickly but fall just as fast. The excitement and fervor around these “cult stocks” can make it easy to ignore the reality: high growth eventually stops, and the bigger the growth, the harder the fall when it comes.

The Emotional Trap of Cult Stocks

When a stock becomes a movement, like Nvidia or Peloton did, investors often fall into an emotional trap. They start to believe that their stock can only go up, and they cling to it even when the data suggests otherwise. This is where the cult-like following can become dangerous. It’s not just about numbers anymore: it’s about identity, belonging, and belief.

A hyped-up investor can come to believe in their stock so strongly that they willfully disregard data that suggests the stock’s looming downfall. And when the stock crashes, it can rock them to their emotional core.

In addition to emotional investing, ego can play a major role in financial decisions. Think about the talk around the office water cooler; it usually involves some light bragging about unimaginable investment gains on the hottest stock. But do you ever hear about the inevitable fall of those cult investments?

People are human. They want their peers to respect them and think they are brilliant. And it feels good to talk about their successes and impress their coworkers. Which makes it even less likely that they will cut their losses and have to admit an investment downfall. In fact, when there is a loss, it can often make the cult investor even more determined to regain their big wins.

Consider how behavioural finance theories impact our investment decisions; it’s such an important concept that we’ve written several blogs on the topic:

Instead of focusing on individual stocks, smart investors build diversified portfolios, which mitigate the emotional highs and lows of stock performance and allow for participation in broader market growth.

The Tale of Three Investors

Let’s take a realistic look at how this could have played out for some real-life investors…

Meet Barry, Robin, and Maurice. They were coworkers at a mid-sized corporation. They had similar lifestyles and investing background/goals:

  • Age 45 – 50
  • Married
  • 2-3 kids, aged 13 – 23
  • Senior manager or director at their company
  • Accumulators: they had made significant progress towards their financial goals but were considering their options to kick it into a higher gear Continue Reading…

An interesting RRSP idea: all-in on QQQ?

Image courtesy Tawcan/Unsplash

By Bob Lai, Tawcan

Special to Financial Independence Hub

As an engineer by education & training and an analytical person, it shouldn’t come as a surprise to readers that I ponder a lot. I like to think about something carefully before deciding or reaching a conclusion. Although this approach may not work in all situations, I enjoy being analytical on major life decisions.

The other day I woke up with this interesting idea in my head. The idea simply wouldn’t escape from my head and I ended up thinking about it for the entire day.

The interesting idea is simple: Should we go all in on QQQ with our RRSPs?

Since this is an interesting idea, I thought I’d turn it into a blog post, analyze the idea thoroughly, and hopefully come to a conclusion.

Things to consider 

A few things before we dive into the analysis.

An RRSP is a tax-deferred account. When you contribute to one, you get a tax deduction for 100% of your contributions. If you contribute $10,000 to your RRSP, it will reduce your net income by $10,000, and potentially bring you down to the lower tax bracket.

When you withdraw money from your RRSP, you will be subject to withholding tax. The amount of withholding tax is based on how much you take out.

RRSP withholding tax
The net amount after the RRSP withholding tax is then taxed at your marginal tax rate.

You also must convert an RRSP to a retirement income option such as a RRIF by the end of the year that you turn 71. Although there are no mandatory withdrawal requirements in the year you set up your RRIF, you must start withdrawing money the year after setting up your RRIF (effectively at age 72). Furthermore, there’s a minimum withdrawal rate for RRIF. The withdrawal rate increases as you age.

Note: You can convert your RRSP before age 71. If you do, there’s a minimum withdrawal rate starting at age 55.

Just like the RRSP, money withdrawn from an RRIF is taxed like working income, or at 100% of your marginal tax rate.

In other words, it doesn’t matter whether the money is from capital gains or dividend income, money withdrawn from an RRSP and an RRIF is taxed at 100% of your marginal tax rate. You don’t get any preferential dividend tax treatment like in non-registered accounts.

When we do start living off our investments (aka live off dividends), our withdrawal strategy is very similar to Mark from My Own Advisor – NRT. This means drawing down some non-registered (N) assets along with registered assets (R), leaving TFSAs (T) for as long as possible.

More details:
  • N – Non-registered accounts – we most likely will work part-time to keep ourselves engaged and live off dividends to some degree from our non-registered accounts. The preferential dividend tax credits will come in handy.
  • R – Registered accounts (RRSPs) – we plan to make some early withdrawals from our RRSPs slowly. We may collapse our RRSPs entirely before age 71. We may also convert our RRSPs to RRIFs. This is not entirely decided (if we do convert to RRIFs, we want to make sure the dollar amount is relatively small). Early withdrawals will help us from having a large amount of money in our RRSPs and having a big tax hit when we start withdrawing. In other words, this will help smooth out our taxes.
  • T – TFSAs – since any withdrawals from TFSAs are tax-free, we intend not to touch our TFSAs for as long as possible so they can compound over time.

Mark, along with Joe (former owner of Million Dollar Journey), ran an analysis for us many years ago via their Casflows and Portfolios Retirement Projections to reinforce this withdrawal plan.

Note: if you’re interested in this retirement projections service, mention TAWCAN10 to Mark and Joe to get a 10% discount.

We may also do an RNT (Registered, Non-Registered, then TFSA) withdrawal strategy but will need to crunch some numbers. Whether it’s NRT or RNT, the important part is that we plan to slowly withdraw money from our RRSPs.

Current RRSP Holdings

Although RRSPs are best for holding U.S. dividend stocks to avoid the 15% withholding tax, we hold U.S. and Canadian dividend stocks and ETFs inside our RRSPs.

At the time of writing, we hold the following stocks and ETFs inside our RRSPs:

  • Apple (AAPL)
  • AbbVie (ABBV)
  • Amazon (AMZN)
  • Brookfield Renewable Corp (BEPC.TO)
  • BlackRock (BLK)
  • Bank of Nova Scotia (BNS.TO)
  • CIBC (CM.TO)
  • Costco (COST)
  • Emera (EMA.TO)
  • Enbridge (ENB.TO)
  • Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL)
  • Hydro One (H.TO)
  • Johnson & Johnson (JNJ)
  • Coca-Cola (KO)
  • McDonald’s (MCD)
  • Pepsi Co (PEP)
  • Procter & Gamble (PG)
  • Qualcomm (QCOM)
  • Invesco QQQ (QQQ)
  • Royal Bank (RY.TO)
  • Starbucks (SBUX)
  • Telus (T.TO)
  • Tesla (TSLA)
  • TD (TD.TO)
  • Target (TGT)
  • TC Energy Corp (TRP.TO)
  • Visa (V)
  • Waste Management (WM)
  • Walmart (WMT)
  • iShares ex-Canada international ETF (XAW.TO)
Our RRSPs consist of 18 U.S. dividend stocks, 10 Canadian dividend stocks, and 2 index ETFs.

In terms of dollar value, my RRSP makes up about 70% while Mrs. T’s RRSP (spousal RRSP) makes up about 30%. Ideally, it would be great if our RRSP breakdown were 50-50 (I’m ignoring my work’s RRSP so in reality the composition is more like a 25-75 split).

Because we started Mrs. T’s RRSP a few years later than mine it hasn’t had as much time to compound. Furthermore, I converted over $120,000 worth of CAD to USD in my RRSP when CAD was above parity. Over time, this gave my self-directed RRSP an automatic 30% performance boost.

In addition, because the exchange rate hasn’t been as attractive, the only U.S. holdings Mrs. T has are Apple and QQQ. The rest of her RRSPs are all in Canadian dividend stocks.

We purchased QQQ earlier this year inside Mrs. T’s RRSP. Dollar-wise, it makes up a very small percentage of our combined RRSPs.

Some info on QQQ

For those readers who aren’t familiar with QQQ, it’s an ETF from Invesco. Since launching in 1999, the ETF has demonstrated a history of outperformance compared to the S&P 500.

QQQ vs S&P 500

The top 11 – 20 holdings for QQQ are AMD, Netflix, PepsiCo, Adobe, Linde, Cisco, Qualcomm, T-Mobile US, Intuit, and Applied Materials. These holdings make up 15.71% of QQQ.

Due to the nature of the Nasdaq 100 Index, QQQ is heavily exposed to technology and consumer discretionary sectors.

QQQ sector allocation
As you can see from below, it also outperformed XAW and VFV significantly. This is the key attraction of QQQ, as the fund has historically outperformed many major indices.
QQQ vs XAW vs VFV performance
Source: Portfolio Visualizer

As you can see from above, $10,000 invested in QQQ in 2016 would result in over $42,000 in 2024 whereas the same amount invested in XAW and VFV would result in less than $30,000.

Case for going all-in on QQQ

Why would we consider going all in on QQQ?

Because QQQ has done very well historically compared to the major U.S. and Canadian indices.

Per the chart above, QQQ had an annualized return of 19.09% since 2016. In the last 20 years, QQQ has had an annualized return of 14.03% and an annualized return of 18.12% in the last 10 years.

Assuming we invest $150,000 in QQQ and enjoy an annualized return of 15% for the next 10 years, we’d end up with $606,833.66, assuming no additional contributions. On the flip side, if we have the same money and have an annualized return of 10% (long-term stock return), we’d end up with $389,061.37. This means investing in QQQ would result in more than $217.7k of difference in return on capital or 56%. This is a pretty significant difference.

Yes, historical returns don’t guarantee future returns. However, the high exposure to technology stocks should allow QQQ to continue the superior return for years to come.

Due to the fact that RRSP and RRIF withdrawals are taxed 100% at our marginal tax rate, it makes sense to attempt to maximize the total return inside of RRSPs/RRIFs instead of a mix of dividend income and capital return.

Case against going all in on QQQ

The biggest case against going all in on QQQ? Our dividend income would take a big hit.

Our RRSPs contribute about 30% of our annual dividend income. With our 2024 target of $55,000, selling everything in our RRSPs and holding QQQ only would reduce our total dividend income to about $38,500 (ignoring QQQ distributions completely).

But focusing on dividend income alone is a bit silly when we should be considering total return and the total portfolio value.

Out of the 18 U.S. stocks that we hold in our RRPS, QQQ holds 9 of them already. The stocks that QQQ doesn’t hold are:

  • Abby
  • Johnson & Johnson
  • Coca-Cola
  • McDonald’s
  • Procter & Gamble
  • Target
  • Visa
  • Waste Management
  • Walmart

These 9 stocks make up about 25% of our RRSP in terms of dollar value. Since we purchased these stocks many years ago, they have all done very well, with a few of them being multi-baggers. I would hate to sell the likes of Visa and Waste Management.

Investing in QQQ does mean that when we start to live off our investment portfolio, rather than withdrawing mostly from dividends inside our RRSPs in the first few years (to increase our margin of safety), we’d need to sell QQQ shares and touch our principal.

If there are a few years of poor returns at the beginning of our retirement, this could cause a significant reduction in our portfolio value. Essentially, selling shares may not have as much margin of safety compared to relying on withdrawing dividends only.

Another case against going all in on QQQ is that QQQ is currently highly concentrated in technology stocks so it’s not all that diversified compared to other index ETFs like XAW. The latest AI hype has significantly bumped up the share price of many technology stocks. Would we see a Dot Com type of bubble in the future and hamper the return of QQQ? That’s certainly possible.

QQQ historical return
QQQ historical return

As you can see from the chart above, QQQ didn’t recover from the Dot Com bubble for about 14 years. This is a risk we would take on if we were to go all in on QQQ.

Potential Alternatives to going all-in on QQQ

Instead of going all in on QQQ, there are some potential alternatives.

First, we can simply add more QQQ shares in the next few years to have QQQ make up a larger percentage of our dividend portfolio. This is already our plan of record but we stay focused on this goal instead of purchasing more dividend paying stocks in our RRSPs.

Second, since we hold QQQ inside of Mrs. T’s RRSP and she holds mostly Canadian dividend stocks in her RRSP, we can consider closing out these positions and using the money to buy QQQ shares.

If we were to do that, we’d only lose about 12% of our forward annual dividend income, going from $55,000 to $48,400. Assuming QQQ continues the superior performance over other indices, holding only QQQ and Apple in Mrs. T’s RRSP and continuing to contribute to her RRSP only may mean that we have a higher chance of ending up with a 50-50 RRSP split down the road.

Some additional logistics to consider

The second option mentioned above is quite intriguing. But there are some logistics to consider if we were to forward with this option.

Second, we’d need to convert CAD to USD and take a hit on the exchange rate. Utilizing Norbert’s Gambit would allow us to save on the additional current exchange fees. The alternative solution would be to journal as many of the holdings to the U.S. exchange, close the positions, and end up with USD.

Another option is to consider the Canadian equivalents, like XQQ, ZQQ, HXQ, or ZNQ to avoid currency conversion. As many of you know, I’m all for simplicity and straightforwardness, so it makes sense to hold the original ETF QQQ instead of other alternatives.

Conclusion – Should we go all in on QQQ? 

So, have I reached a decision after all the considerations?

I’ll admit, the second option mentioned (holding only QQQ in Mrs. T’s RRSP) is very intriguing to me. But I am going to sleep on it for a bit and discuss the idea with Mrs. T before making any major decisions. In the meantime, we will continue to add more QQQ shares in Mrs. T’s RRSP so QQQ makes up a bigger percentage of our dividend portfolio.

Readers, what would you do? Would you go all in on QQQ?

Hi there, I’m Bob from Vancouver, Canada. My wife & I started dividend investing in 2011 with the dream of living off dividends in our 40’s. Today our portfolio generates over $2,700 in dividends per month. This post originally appeared on Tawcan on July 15, 2024 and is republished on the Hub with the permission of Bob Lai.

June Checkup: Healthcare & Technology

Image courtesy Harvest ETFs

By Ambrose O’Callaghan, Harvest ETFs

(Sponsor Blog)

The United States stock markets have delivered positive returns through much of 2024, continuing the positive momentum that was established in the previous year.

However, that performance has increasingly been powered by a smaller segment of large-cap companies. Indeed, readers have undoubtedly heard about the outsized performance of the “Magnificent 7” in the tech space over the past year. If we strip out the “big six” of Amazon, Meta, Nvidia, Microsoft, Apple, and Alphabet from the S&P 500, we have experienced three calendar quarters of negative earnings growth across the rest of the market.

Investors took profits in the month of April. Demand resumed in the month of May, but with a broader range of equities. Nvidia continued to show its dominance, but there were other sectors and stocks that were able to catch up with the leaders to close out the first half of 2024.

The summer season is historically slow in the markets. Harvest’s portfolio management team expects volatility to persist for both bonds and equities. Moreover, the team emphasizes that this summer is a key moment to stay active, attentive, and invested. A prudent strategy in this environment involves looking under the surface for opportunities while generating cash flow from call options to support total returns.

June Healthcare check up

The healthcare sector pulled back slightly in the month of May 2024. Negative moves in the healthcare sector over the course of May 2024 were driven by stock specific events. Macroeconomic data sets impacted the healthcare sector in line with others. Within healthcare, the managed care subsectors experienced volatility earlier in 2024 and changes to reimbursement structures impacted valuations in the near term. The Tools & Diagnostics sub-sector has also proven volatile due largely to a slower-than-expected recovery in China.

Regardless, there are still very promising opportunities in the GLP-1 drug category space for diabetes and obesity. The uptake of these drugs in the U.S. has been significant at a still-early stage in their lifespan. A recent study from Manulife Canada found that drug claims for anti-obesity medications in Canada rose more than 42% from 2022 to 2023.

Harvest Healthcare Leaders Income ETF (HHL:TSX) offers exposure to the innovative leaders in this vital sector. This equally weighted portfolio of 20 large-cap global Healthcare companies aims to select stocks for their potential to provide attractive monthly income as well as long-term growth. HHL is the largest active healthcare ETF in Canada and boasts a high monthly cash distribution of $0.0583.

Harvest Healthcare Leaders Enhanced Income ETF (HHLE:TSX) is built to provide higher income every month by applying modest leverage to HHL. It last paid out a monthly cash distribution of $0.0913 per unit. That represents a current yield of 10.44% as at June 14, 2024.

Where does the technology sector stand right now?

Investors poured back into technology stocks in May 2024 after taking profits in the month of April. However, they were more discriminating than in previous months and showed a preference for hardware stocks, specifically semiconductors.

Nvidia maintained its leadership position. It has soared past a $3 trillion market capitalization in the first half of June 2024. However, other AI-related tech stocks encountered turbulence which may give some investors pause around the broader bullish case for AI. Continue Reading…

Approach the A.I. bandwagon with caution

Pexels: Cottonbro Studio

It’s hard to pick up a financial publication or peruse most general-interest media outlets these days without being blitzed by stories about ChatGPT and the latest mania: A.I. or Artificial Intelligence.

Just last week the New York Times devoted an episode of its The Daily podcast to Silicon Valley’s rush to A.I., even as venture capitalists start shying away with the previous darling, Cryptocurrency.

It seems everyone wants a piece of what they hope will become the next Nvidia, a chip play that pundit Jim Cramer once named after his own dog. Give him credit: anyone who bought before Nvidia famously passed the US$1 trillion market cap level this year is probably sitting on a double or triple, including Yours Truly.

In a recent video interview I did with Allan Small, I mentioned in passing that while I do happen to own Nvidia going back some years, I also have my share of painful losers, and that my approach to A.I. and technology in general is that it should merely be part of a normal diversified portfolio. I told him that I’ve always had a reasonable exposure to technology, seeing as I was the Globe & Mail’s technology reporter going back to the early 1980s (perhaps one of the first to specialize in that beat.)

A.I.-themed ETFs

Speaking of the Globe, I see that its personal finance columnist Rob Carrick recently weighed in with his take on A.I. You can find it (under paywall) here. For those who can’t get past the paywall, Carrick lists some examples of A.I.-themed ETFs, adding the hedge “if you’re comfortable with the risk of a more direct approach to AI investing.”

One is an ETF I happened to take a flyer on myself a few years ago, so far under water: the Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence ETF (BOTZ-Q; the others include the iShares Robotics and Artificial Intelligence Multisector ETF (IRBO-A) and the First Trust Nasdaq Artificial intelligence ETF (ROBT-Q.) Carrick also mentions a few other Canadian-listed ETFs with the most exposure to AI produced by TD Securities: I’ll just list the suppliers and ticker symbols here: two from Horizons ETFs (RBOT-T and MTAV-T), two from Evolve (TECH-T and DATA-T), and one from BMO: ZINT-T.

Personally, I doubt I’ll buy any of these theme ETFs. Investors typically get burned by the FOMO and elevated valuations inherent on jumping on a thematic bandwagon once the train has already left the station [to mix a metaphor] and embraced widely by the media. The most prominent example will be marijuana ETFs, which have generated little but painful losses for most investors, even those early to the party. More recently are cryptocurrencies, whether obscure individual holdings or packaged up in ETFs (led by Canada!) Continue Reading…

Why technology + income can suit an uncertain market

Markets are hesitant, but large-cap tech has been resilient. Learn why large-cap technology with an income strategy can help investors now.

 

By James Learmonth, Senior Portfolio Manager, Harvest ETFs

(Sponsor Content)

After recovering from some of their 2022 shocks early this year, markets have been trepidatious through most of 2023. That recovery and volatility story, on paper, looks broad based. Between January and mid-May, the S&P 500 is up around 8-9%. The S&P 500 Information Technology index, however, is up over 25% in the same rough time period. That outperformance skews even higher when we isolate some of the largest names in the technology sector.

So while overall market performance this year has been steady, turning choppier since the US banking crisis began in March, large-cap tech leaders are doing what they tend to do: lead.

In a macro environment of market uncertainty, high inflation and tech outperformance, one strategy can give investors exposure to large-cap technology companies, while providing income and ballast against volatility.

Why Large-cap Tech has been a leader

To understand how a tech income strategy can help investors, it’s worthwhile to unpack what has made technology a leading sector so far in 2023.

Q1 earnings season for tech shed some light on the sector’s outperformance. Part of that performance is due to a more broadly positive market sentiment in 2023, compared to 2022, in addition to some recovery following the sector’s struggles last year. Notable, however, is the positive reception large-cap companies have received for their artificial intelligence (AI) strategies.

AI has been the hot new topic this year, and large-cap tech companies have been quick to capitalize on the rapid pace of innovation in this space. Whether they are innovating their own AI tech, or applying AI to new areas these companies are creating serious value for shareholders with this technology.

It’s worth emphasizing the dominance of large-caps in this moment, companies like Meta, Apple, and Microsoft. In recent history, major tech leaps have been associated with ‘disruption’ of traditional larger players. So far in the rise of AI we’ve seen the largest companies leading, demonstrating their value as innovators and appliers of innovation.              

Why Volatility is persisting in the broader market

Despite all the positivity in large-cap technology, broad markets have been choppy this year. Most of their recovery took place in the first months of 2023, and since the onset of a US banking crisis in March market performance has been choppy up and down, aggregating out flat.

Macro forces are largely to blame. The banking crisis highlighted the ongoing impacts of rapid rate hikes by central bankers starting last year. Even as that hiking period seems to be ending, the consequences of those raised rates will be felt over the next several months. More recently, fears about the US debt ceiling have troubled markets while geopolitics continues to impact sentiment. Continue Reading…