Tag Archives: Ukraine

Investing Advice to follow in the Midst of Two Wars

Posted By |

Investing advice when Putin’s at war against Ukraine. Plus, Putin and the Israel-Hamas War

Deposit Photos

Russia launched the war in 2014, during the second Obama term, when it invaded Ukraine’s Crimean Peninsula. At the time, the U.S. and NATO were still unsure about how to react to Russia’s aggression toward its former possessions. Many observers felt Russia was just trying to retrieve some of the stature it lost with the collapse of the Soviet Union in the early 1990s.

When Russia invaded Ukraine in 2022, it expected Ukraine to collapse right away (the way France collapsed under the 1940 German invasion, say). The U.S. and other observers feared/expected the same. They still began sending security aid to Ukraine before the invasion. They also used threats of trade and financial sanctions to try to scare Russia off. These steps failed. However, Ukraine fought back surprisingly well and attracted additional aid from the West.

Putin soon saw that he had guessed wrong. But he assumed the West would quickly lose interest. Instead, the West stepped up its aid. Russia then began a series of veiled threats of military escalation, all the way up to tactical nuclear weapons.

My sense is that after its initial stumble, Russia still hoped/believed that if it kept up the military pressure and escalation/nuclear threats long enough, Ukraine and its supporters would agree to a lengthy ceasefire that would work in Russia’s favour.

It seemed to me and many other people that this was unlikely. In April of that year, I wrote that “Russia could launch a nuclear war, but it would find itself fighting against most of the advanced countries of the world. Putin is vain and may be deranged, but he isn’t stupid.”

Later I voiced the off-the-cuff view that any nuclear attack on Ukraine would spark a much more lethal response from NATO forces, which vastly outnumber Russia’s.

Just recently I came across the actual NATO-versus-Russia figures (below) from veteran Toronto journalist Diane Francis, writing in her Substack.com publication. (Note: her chart refers to a Military Asset as a “Characteristic.”)

Military Asset Comparison Between NATO and Russia

Source: dianefrancis.substack.com

The numbers show an even greater numerical advantage for NATO than I imagined. That’s just the start.

The West is also way ahead of Russia in technology, sanctions, finances, morale, global support and pretty much anything else. Russia’s main advantage in war is its ruthlessness in throwing untrained soldiers — mostly from prisons or Russian-speaking racial/cultural minorities — onto the front lines, until the other side runs out of ammunition.

Putin can only hope that Biden or a successor loses his grip and abruptly pulls out of Ukraine the way the U.S. pulled out of Afghanistan in August 2021, after two decades of hostilities.

As the sarcastic one-liner goes, that’s not likely.

Nobody can predict these things, of course. My sense is that we are seeing the last gasps of Europe’s last empire. I’d guess the outcome won’t be pretty or quick, but it may turn out to be a historical milestone. A worldwide swing back toward democracy and away from authoritarianism just might follow.

Putin and the Israel-Hamas War

My guess is that the Israel-Hamas war is just getting started and will last a long time. I also suspect that Putin had something to do with getting it started, and will do what he can to keep it going. After all, when it comes to running his country, Putin takes a grasping-at-straws approach.

Putin may think that bringing the longstanding Mideast conflict back into the headlines is going to improve his chances of conquering Ukraine and bringing the Soviet Union back from the dead.

He thinks taking a long shot is better than no shot at all. Who knows? He might get lucky.

Early on in his war on Ukraine, Putin seemed to think that Chinese dictator Xi Jinping was going to take pity on him and his country, and offer free money and/or weapons to shore up Russia’s Ukraine invasion. Instead, Xi insists on staying out of the war, while paying discount prices for Russian oil. He takes special care not to let his country get caught up in the economic sanctions that the U.S. and NATO countries and allies are directing against the Russians.

It’s not that Putin is stupid. If a war between Israel and Hamas turns out to be a big drain on the U.S. budget, the U.S. might have less money available to arm Ukraine.

Up until lately, however, Israel has had little to say about Russia’s treatment of Ukraine. Israel may soon take a more active role in helping Ukraine defend itself.

Any war is a terrible thing, and this one is no different. Meanwhile, the stock market seems to be creeping upward. Maybe it knows something that Putin hasn’t figured out. If you’re looking for investing advice related to the wars around us, spend more time learning about the wars themselves.

Meantime, if your stock portfolio made sense to you a week or two ago, we advise against selling due to Mideast fears

No matter what the state of the world, here are three rules you can follow for maximum portfolio success:

Rule #1: Invest mainly in well-established, profitable, dividend-paying stocks.

Our first rule will help you stay out of high-risk, low-quality investments. These investments are always available, in good and bad markets. They come with hidden risks due to conflicts of interest and other negatives. Every year, they lead many inexperienced investors to substantial losses. Continue Reading…

Avoid new issues but high-quality stocks likely to gain in value over next year

Posted By |

The IPO or “Initial Public Offerings” market — more commonly known as the new issues market — has gone through an extraordinarily bad time this year. It’s been bad for all three of the groups that take part in this market. They are as follows:

Investors who put their money in new issues have lost substantial sums in the past year. On average, new stock issues tend to do worse than the rest of the market in their first few years of public trading. This past year, they performed much worse than ever.

Financial institutions that bring new issues to market for sale to investors have suffered, too, because demand for new issues has dried up. At this time of year in 2021, the new issues market had raised around $100 billion. So far this year, it has raised just $5 billion. In the past quarter century, the new issues market raised an average of $33 billion at this point in the year.

Companies that raise capital for themselves through the new issues market are suffering as well. When the new issues market began drying up as a source of corporate funding, many would-be issuers of new stocks found it was harder and more expensive than ever to find alternate sources of financing.

This will be worst year for IPOs since 2009

This will be the worst year for raising money in the new issues market since 2009, when the economy was struggling to pull out of the 2008/2009 recession.

As long-time readers know, we generally advise staying out of new stock issues. After all, there’s a random element in the success or failure of every business, especially when it’s just starting out. But new issues expose you to a special risk that you avoid with stocks that have been trading publicly for some time. That is, you can only invest in new issues when they come to market.

This is just one more example of a conflict of interest, which we’ve often referred to as the worst source of risk you face as an investor.

Companies only come to the new issue market to sell their stock when it’s a good time for the company and/or its insiders to sell. The insiders can’t predict the future, of course. However, they do know much more than outsiders do about their company. Continue Reading…

Geopolitics revitalizing Canada’s Natural Resource industries

Posted By |
Franklin Templeton/iStock

 

By Kim Catechis, Investment Strategist, Franklin Templeton Institute

and Andrew Buntain, Institutional Portfolio Manager, 

Franklin Bissett Investment Management                                

(Sponsor Content)

The world is living in volatile times.

East-West geopolitical tensions, which had been building even before the COVID-19 pandemic upended the lives of millions around the globe, have exploded into war in Europe. The Russia/Ukraine conflict is now well into its sixth month, with no end in sight. Severe sanctions disconnecting Russia from the West are structural and unlikely to be removed even after the conflict is resolved.

There are real consequences for the world from this conflict. Ukraine’s economy has been ravaged. Europe is back to having a militarized border. NATO has grown stronger and is spending on defence; more than 2% of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) is expected to be allocated to military expenses by member nations. Supply chain disruptions have been exacerbated by the upheaval, with an energy crisis in Europe, fears of famine in Africa, shortages of critical products in many industries and the highest inflation levels in over 40 years.

Growth expectations are falling on the growing realization that central banks are not well placed to deal with food price and energy inflation, despite aggressive policy rate hikes. In many countries, including Canada, fears of recession have replaced fears of overheated economies.

Higher commodity prices a boon for producer nations

Prices for the world’s basic commodities — energy, food, metals and minerals, forest products  — soared in the first half of the year. In recent months, they have fallen somewhat but remain high, and this situation is likely to continue. Trade patterns in place for 49 years have been destroyed, and new alliances and infrastructure take time to build. As with any change, there will be winners and losers. For commodity producers like Canada, the evolving dynamics open doors to new opportunities.

Energy hits critical mass

Europe has gone on a buyers’ strike against Russia. In response, Russia is turning off the fossil fuel taps. While not a huge obstacle to oil procurement (there is plenty of oil in the world), natural gas is another matter. Russia controls 30% of the world’s natural gas reserves, and all but one of its gas pipelines go to western Europe.

Filling the huge supply gap left by Russia presents a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity for other producers to capture market share in one of the world’s most profitable regions; however, the lack of pipelines to other natural gas-producing regions means that liquid natural gas (LNG) must be transported by ship.

Largely because of transport costs, nearby producers with spare capacity like Qatar, Algeria, and Nigeria, will likely be the winners rather than Canada. In any case, Canada still benefits from the cascading effect of higher fuel prices. In the meantime, close to 20 projects have been proposed in Canada to export LNG through both coasts. Without doubt, there will be other opportunities.

“E” is for environmental backlash

As winter approaches and energy concerns grow, concerns have arisen that attractive prices and the renewed drive to obtain reliable fossil fuel supplies will set back efforts to combat climate change. For Europeans, there is no alternative to ESG; the “green deal” already in place prior to the war has been accelerated. Concurrently, however, a strong view is building that the definition of ESG needs to evolve, with many preferring “sustainability” and a focus on inclusion, rather than the exclusion often associated with ESG.

Overall, Canada’s oil and gas extraction and refining methods are considered very environmentally friendly. One example is a long-time holding in the Franklin Bissett portfolios, ARC Resources Ltd. Rather than pay others to dispose of wastewater from the drilling process, the company’s Montney operation recycles and reuses the water.

The other two letters in ESG — “S” for social and “G” for governance — should not be ignored. In an era where enormous value is being placed on reliability, a stable workforce and good corporate governance have become at least as important as efficiency. Under these criteria as well, Canada performs better than most; the Canadian oil and gas industry is recognized globally for strong social progress and governance metrics.

Agriculture: food for thought

The global response to threats of food shortages has been to advocate opening up more land for crops, but the planet has a limited amount of cropland. Significantly, almost half of the grains produced worldwide are used for animal feed, which people then consume indirectly by eating meat. In Europe, we are seeing an increase in vegetarianism; if meat consumption were to decline further because of the current situation, it could potentially lead to new patterns of behaviour that imply lower demand for animal feed. Elsewhere, food insecurity is growing, especially across Africa.

Ukraine is a major producer of sunflower oils, barley and maize (corn). Grain prices peaked in June as the United Nations struck a deal to allow some Ukraine grain shipments from Mariupol, but there is no guarantee it will continue. In countries most at risk of shortages from the disruptions, such as Nigeria and Bangladesh, people already tend to pay the largest proportion of their budgets for food. Turkey and Egypt are also very exposed to Russian wheat and have little reserve stock. Continue Reading…

Life imitates art big time with Zelenksyy’s Servant of the People re-airing on Netflix

Posted By |
The accidental politician: ex-comedian and now Ukraine president Vlodomyr Zelenskyy.

Netflix is again showing the popular Ukraine TV show,  Servant of the People, which of course stars Ukraine president Volodmyr Zelenskyy.

Here’s Wikipedia’s summary of the show, which it categorizes as political satire. [I’m using its spelling of his surname, which seems to vary by media outlet]

Airing first in the Ukraine in 2015, Netflix originally ran the show’s four seasons between 2017 and 2021 [with English subtitles]. Evidently interest has been rekindled by Zelenskyy’s Churchillian fight against Russia’s mad dictator, Vladimir Putin.

Last week, Netflix announced Season 1 of the series  was back. There are 23 episodes in the opening season, most of them about 25 minutes, although the pilot episode is twice that length.

I had missed it when it first came out but was keen to watch in light of the profile the war has generated for Zelenskyy. I’d be surprised if millions of Netflix viewers don’t think similarly and propel the show to the top of its rankings.

Based on the first nine episodes I’ve seen, it’s fascinating to see a modern democracy and actual shots of Kiev and other parts of a beautiful Ukraine as it was a few years before the February 2022 invasion: the highways and late-model cars, young people embracing social media, smart phones, Skype and Zoom calls and even crowdfunding for the teacher’s political campaign: talk about life imitating art! At one point, after a kiss, one character declares “I have to tweet this!” There are plenty of shots of TV news standup reports so familiar to North American viewers of CNN or Fox 24/7 cable news.

All of which makes a stark contrast with Russia’s current post-invasion Iron Curtain on independent media and social media, where the only sources of information are state-sanctioned television believed only by older Russians who aren’t technology literate. See a recent New York Times piece on the thousands of tech-savvy young Russians fleeing the country for Armenia and other parts of western Europe, where they gather in cafes with their Apple laptops and Smartphones.

“Shockingly prescient”

With the benefit of hindsight, it’s heart-wrenching to see so much foreshadowing of the calamity to come in the show’s occasional references to Russia and even to Putin himself in the opening episodes. At one point, the TV president says “Putin has been deposed,” quickly adding “I was kidding.”

Then, in episode 7, one character portrays the Zelenskyy character’s options as “to flee or to stay.”

Little wonder that in its review of the series last week, the Daily Beast describes it as “shockingly prescient.”

For those who are new to the series, here’s one website’s brief plot description:

“After a Ukrainian high school teacher’s tirade against government corruption goes viral, he soon finds himself sitting the president’s seat.”

Zelenskyy played a history teacher named Vasily Petrovych Goloborodko.  But life began to imitate art in earnest early in 2018, when a political party named after the television series was registered with the Ministry of Justice. In real life, Zelenskyy was elected President of Ukraine in April 2019, with more than 70 per cent of the second-round vote. Continue Reading…

What investors need to understand about the Russian invasion of Ukraine

Posted By |

By Allan Small,  iA Private Wealth

Special to the Financial Independence Hub

Markets are down. The Nasdaq is in bear territory and the S&P500 is in correction territory (at the time of writing).

This is the direct result of the Russian invasion of Ukraine. Not surprisingly, investors are nervous about what will happen to their wealth. I’ve certainly been getting calls from clients unsure about what to do.

Here’s what I’ve been telling them: Don’t panic. This too shall pass. The world has weathered terrible events in the past and come out the other side. We will again.

In my 25-year career as an investment advisor, investors faced Y2K, a worldwide financial collapse, and a global pandemic. In each case, downturns were followed by rebounds and even better returns.

This is temporary and stability will return

Russia’s war against the Ukraine is wrong and creating a tragic humanitarian crisis, but in terms of the markets, investors should view it as a temporary event: because it is. Yes, markets are down – for now – but they are not going to collapse. You are not going to lose all your money. Your wealth may drop for a period of time, but once the war is over, regardless of the outcome, stability will be restored and returns will tick up, in my opinion. For those fearing a global nuclear war, then market performance won’t matter.

Uncertainty causes markets to fall. Even before Russia invaded Ukraine, the markets were experiencing volatility because the central banks in Canada and the U.S. announced they would be increasing interest rates and reducing stimulus support. Higher interest rates are the primary tool to curb inflation, which is at record highs in both countries. While this made some investors nervous, it’s important to understand that the fact the Bank of Canada and the Federal Reserve are raising interest rates means the economies in both countries are strong.

Statistics Canada’s labour report for February showed just how strong. Unemployment had fallen below pre-Covid 19 levels for the first time since the start of the pandemic, down to 5.5%.[1] The Office of the Parliamentary Budget Officer projects an economic rebound and robust performance in the second half of 2022.[2] All of this is good for the markets and those benefits will be realized once the war and geopolitical tensions end.

Energy self-sufficiency will be a positive

Energy prices are high now because demand is greater than supply. Worldwide sanctions against Russia, a major global producer of oil and natural gas, mean Canada, the U.S. and Europe are looking for other suppliers and working to become more energy self-sufficient:  a positive going forward. When the Russia-Ukraine situation becomes more stable, those prices, which are also driving up inflation, will drop, in my opinion. Continue Reading…