Decumulate & Downsize

Most of your investing life you and your adviser (if you have one) are focused on wealth accumulation. But, we tend to forget, eventually the whole idea of this long process of delayed gratification is to actually spend this money! That’s decumulation as opposed to wealth accumulation. This stage may also involve downsizing from larger homes to smaller ones or condos, moving to the country or otherwise simplifying your life and jettisoning possessions that may tie you down.

Retirement #2 priority but four in ten Americans don’t see it happening

Posted By |
Retirement is a close second to home ownership, according to a LendEDU survey of American saving priorities

While having enough money saved for Retirement is narrowly behind buying a home, more than a third of Americans don’t expect they’ll ever be able to retire, according to a survey released Tuesday from LendEDU.com.

Retirement saving was cited by 19% of 1,000 respondents, versus 20% prioritizing “buying my own house or apartment.” Paying off credit-card debt was cited by 14% and building an emergency fund by 10%.

While there was only a minor lack of confidence about paying off credit cards and building an emergency fund, 17% don’t believe they’ll ever become homeowners and but almost four in ten Americas (39%) don’t believe they’ll ever be able retire.

Of those doubting their ability to retire, 52% were over age 54, 30% were between 45 and 54, and 15% were 35 to 44.

As for emergency savings, 33% said a major bill resulting from an injury would destroy their savings and therefore their long-term financial goals; another 14% cited some form of debt that could quickly get out of hand. However, 28% felt “relatively secure” and did not believe their financial goals could be derailed.

Secondary priorities

After home ownership and retirement, the most cited financial priorities were some form of getting out of debt: 14% cited paying off credit-card debt, 7% paying off student-loan debt, and 4% cited paying off other forms of debt apart from credit cards or student loans. 6% answered “Building my credit score,” 5% wanted enough saved to move out of their parents’ homes and rent a home or apartment, 4% said “Buying a car,” and 3% wanted to start a business.

1% wanted to invest in real estate, another 1% wanted to buy a second home and yet another 1% wanted to buy a second or third car. 3% want to “create a retirement account” and 2% want to “invest in the market outside my retirement account.”

Money a bigger priority than Love?

Of the 37% who were not currently in a long-term relationship, 72% were more focused on their financial targets, versus a minority 23% who prioritized finding a romantic partner. (The rest preferred not to say). The survey sees this as a “glass half full” finding: “It is good that Americans are quite serious when it comes to realizing their personal finance goals. But, on the glass empty side, sometimes one’s finances can’t buy happiness, or in this case love, and it is always important to understand what is truly important in life.” Continue Reading…

The hard truth about the FIRE movement [Financial Independence, Retire Early]

Posted By |

By Maria Weyman, creditcardGenius

Special to the Financial Independence Hub

Retirement, whether near or far, is a pretty big milestone in a person’s life.

We start saving for it as early as possible and put as much towards it as we can in order to be better prepared.

Whether we want to spend it travelling, immersing ourselves in our favourite hobbies, or spending some quality time with loved ones, most of us look forward to our retirement but don’t see it happening in the near future.

The average age of retirement in Canada is 64 years old, but the popularized FIRE movement – which stands for “Financial Independence, Retire Early” – is the lifestyle concept that proposes an alternative scenario.

By living as frugally as possible and saving every bit possible while maximizing income and revenue, FIRE-devotees plan on retiring much earlier than the Canadian average.

Although we all want to retire early, and being financially independent enough to retire at a young age is possible, it might not be attainable for everyone.

We can all dream, but it’s important to look at the concept without those rose-colored, heart-shaped glasses we all get when thinking about early retirement. Realistically, the FIRE movement can be quite extreme.

Reasonable income

Living from paycheque to paycheque is still the sad reality for many Canadians, some not even being able to set aside money for normal retirement. Living as frugally as possible is just a means of survival rather than a means to a bigger end.

Stagnant wages and the ever-increasing cost of living has made it harder than ever to be financially stable, let alone financially independent, especially for lower or middle-income brackets.

Not to mention getting higher-income jobs in the first place requires many years of education and consequently entails large amounts of student loans, which in itself can take decades to pay off.

Investment risks

Even if you have an income that allows some wiggle room, saving alone probably isn’t enough. To be successful in the FIRE movement requires some savvy investing.

And since we’re taking away the option of long-term, stable, compounded interest savings, the timeframe is much shorter.

But with higher rewards usually come higher risks.

It’s up to you to decide if the risk is worth the potential payout.

Retirement timeframe

Another glitch in the FIRE movement lifestyle is retirement timeframe: how long you’ll actually be retired for.

Savings breakdown

Let’s crunch some numbers just to get a general idea. The most complicated part of this calculation is compounding interest. Thankfully, we can summarize the effects of compound interest using a multiplier.

Let’s say you’re 23 years old and you plan on retiring early at 40 years old. The average life expectancy in Canada is 82 years old, meaning your retirement fund will have to be sufficient enough to carry on for over 42 years.

Compound interest allows our savings to “go further” than they otherwise would. If we are looking at a compound interest of 3.5% (moderate yield rate) we can calculate how much further savings would go for a period of 42 years:

Savings Multiplier = (1 + Annual Interest Rate)^42 = 1.035^42
Savings Multiplier = 4.241

Where the “^” indicates an exponential power (that is 2^3 =  2x2x2). This means that over a period of 42 years, your savings will essentially be multiplied by a factor of 4.2, which shows you how powerful a force compounding interest really is.

While it’s nice that our savings can grow exponentially with compound interest, taking money out of our savings results in losses that grow with compound interest. As such, if we take money out of our savings at the beginning of that 42 year period, that money is also multiplied by a factor of 4.241. Taking the money out one month after would have a slightly lower multiplier and so on. By summing the total effect of each monthly withdrawal we can also obtain a monthly expense multiplier. The first step is to find the monthly interest rate. This can be obtained as follows:

Monthly Interest Rate = (1+Annual Interest Rate)^(1/12) – 1 = (1+0.035)^(1/12) – 1
Monthly Interest Rate = 0.28708987%

Note that calculating a power x^(1/12) is a 12th root and will require a scientific calculator. After obtaining the monthly interest rate, you need to do a recursive sum representing the multipliers for all monthly withdrawals: Continue Reading…

Ten questions on Annuities – answered here!

Posted By |

I tell ya…I get no respect.

That could be an old, popular Rodney Dangerfield tagline or it could be how annuities feel from time to time:  disrespected, unloved, and generally misunderstood.

Thankfully, I have someone here to help demystify annuities: to see if these products could be right for you or someone you know at some point.

Alexandra Macqueen is a fee-for-service financial planner, author and faculty member at the Schulich School of Business.  She has also been kind enough to share her expertise on my site, why you should consider pensionizing your nest egg at some point, along with countless other personal finance and investing sites.

Here are ten questions and ten answers about annuities – in plain language – in the hopes of helping you learn more and become better educated about what these financial products actually do.

1.) Alexandra, thanks for this!  Let’s get down to basics: what is an annuity?  

At the most basic level, an annuity is a contract under which you (the annuitant) provide a sum of money to an annuity issuer — a life insurance company — who, in exchange, provides you with monthly income for as long as you are alive, no matter how long that is.

Annuities come in many different “flavours” (indexed? deferred? joint? variable? prescribed?), but all of them incorporate this basic exchange: a sum provided to an insurance company for cash flow in your bank account over time.

2.) Why should older Canadians consider annuities? Who are they designed for?

While I would in no way argue that every Canadian should consider an annuity no matter their financial situation, the reasons that a retiree might consider incorporating an annuity into part of their retirement income strategies include:

  • If you are worried about living a long time, potentially outliving the funds from your portfolio, and want to ensure you have some cash flow that cannot “expire.”
  • If you are reluctant to leave all of your assets exposed to some form of investment market risk and would prefer to have income that’s protected from market-based fluctuations.
  • Depending on factors primarily including the age at which you purchase the annuities and the source of funds used for the purchase, if you are interested in cash flow that has a higher yield than products with similar guarantees (think Guaranteed Investment Certificates or GICs), while producing lower taxable income to preserve income-tested retirement benefits (think GIS)

3.) OK, so great benefits. Why do annuities get no respect? Do you think it’s because Canadians have a huge bias: they just think advisors or planners are (as a reader actually wrote on my site) just “circling the sky” on these products?

In my view Mark, there are many potential reasons why annuities “get no love.”

Think about the asset management industry today, compared to a few decades ago: we now have relatively abundant, cheap, and transparent DIY choices that allow individual investors to take their financial management directly into their own hands.

(Mark:  I’ve written about some of these choices here:

The best all-in-one Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs) to own.

Get help to train your investing brain with a low-cost robo advisor.)

In comparison, the annuity purchase cannot be a “self-serve” choice but must involve an advisor who holds a life insurance license. The product, too, is priced to take into account interest rates at the time of purchase, actuarial factors predicting how long someone might live, and how much the company wants to attract or forego that particular kind of annuity sale at the time you’re looking to buy.

None of these elements are transparently visible to the purchaser, or even the salesperson. In other words: although the concept is simple — the exchange of cash for income — the details are not.

Other factors include the reluctance of purchasers to hand over assets to the annuity issuer, the fact that many people really underestimate just how long they might live in retirement, and the belief that a portfolio invested in markets can “beat” the implied return of the annuity while potentially leaving estate value.

4.) So you touched on transparency: a bigger issue now and rightly so. What are the typical commissions paid to advisors for annuities they sell?  Is it a one-time commission (vs. a mutual fund that typically charges for every year the asset is owned)?

Commissions on annuities are paid once (at the time of purchase), with no ongoing trailers or commissions paid to the advisor: which may explain why these products are perhaps less popular than they might be.

Typically, the commission is “tiered” based on the size of the annuity purchase, and might be, for example, 2 or 3 percent on the initial $100,000 deposit, and scaling downwards as the deposit amount goes up.

Certainly, there are other insurance products, and other asset management transactions, that pay higher commissions than an annuity purchase.

5.) Are there certain annuities that more popular than others?  Which ones?  Why?

Without a doubt the most popular annuities in Canada are group annuities sold to fulfill pension plan obligations. Many people will have some portion of their retirement income provided from an annuity even if they never go out and buy an annuity directly. The size of the individual annuity market pales in comparison to the group annuity market. Continue Reading…

Retired Money: How the financial industry may use ALDAs and VLPAs as Longevity Insurance

Posted By |
Finance professor Moshe Milevsky welcomes industry’s implementation of academic longevity insurance theories

My latest MoneySense Retired Money column looks at two longevity-related financial products that the industry may develop after the road to them was paved in the March 2019 federal budget. You can access the full column by clicking on the highlighted headline: A new kind of annuity designed to help Canadian retirees live well, for longer.

Once they are created by the industry, hopefully in the next year, these new products will introduce an element of what finance professor Moshe Milevsky has described as “tontine thinking.” In the most extreme example, a tontine — often depicted in fictional work like the film The Wrong Box — features a pool of money that ultimately goes to the person who outlives everyone else. In other words, everyone chips in some money and the person who outlives the rest gets most of the pot. As you can imagine at its most extreme, this can lead to some nefarious scenarios and skulduggery, which is why you occasionally see tontines dramatized in film, as in The Wrong Box, and also TV, as in at least one episode of the Agatha Christie TV adaption of Miss Marple.

Fortunately, the Budget doesn’t propose something quite as dramatic as classic tontines but get used to the following two acronyms if and when the insurance and pension industries start to develop them: ALDA is an acronym for Advanced Life Deferred Annuity.  As of 2020, ALDAs could become an investment option for those currently with money invested in registered plans like RRSPs or RRIFs,  Defined Contribution (DC) Registered Pension Plans and Pooled Registered Pension Plans (PRPPs).

The other type of annuity proposed are Variable Payment Life Annuities (VPLAs), for DC RPPs and PRPPs, which would pool investment risk in groups of at least 10 people. Not quite tontines in the classic academic sense but with the pooling of risk VPLAs certainly have an element of “tontine thinking.”

The budget says a VLPA “will provide payments that vary based on the investment performance of the underlying annuities fund and on the mortality experience of VLPA annuitants.” That means – unlike traditional Defined Benefit pensions – payments could fluctuate year over year.

There is precedent for pooled-risk DC pensions: The University of British Columbia’s faculty pension plan has run such an option for its DC plan members since 1967.

The budget said Ottawa will consult on potential changes to federal pension benefits legislation to accommodate VPLAs for federally regulated PRPPs and DC RPPs, and may need to amend provincial legislation. But it’s ALDAs that initially captured the attention of retirement experts, in part because of its ability to push off taxable minimum RRIF payments.

Up to $150,000 of registered funds can go into an ALDA

An ALDA lets you put up to 25% of qualified registered funds into the purchase of an annuity. The lifetime maximum is $150,000, indexed to inflation after 2020. Beyond that limit you are subject to a penalty tax of 1% per month on the excess portion. Continue Reading…

Why you need a Financial Planner

Posted By |

By David Miller, CFP, RFP

Special to the Financial Independence Hub

When you start to look for help with your finances, whom do you ask first? Your best friend, parents, or a banker? By asking for a financial planner first, you are more likely to keep more of your money, save your time, and reduce your financial risks to help you reach your goals.

Here are my three favorite reasons you should look for and hire a financial planner:

  • Increased Financial Confidence
  • Accountability of Actions
  • Advancing Your Financial Literacy

Before I dive into these three reasons, I need to acknowledge that there seems to be some serious confusion for most of the Canadian public about who is advising them and what a financial planner is. Most people either don’t understand or don’t have enough information about who is advising them on their financial matters. This is an especially difficult task as everyone will have a slightly different experience with an advisor, given the advisor’s level of experience, education, skill, registration requirements, ethical requirements, personal biases, employment requirements and specialisation within the industry.

The complexity in the industry, with slight differences between advisor titles, is staggering. You may be meeting with a financial adviser, financial advisor, investment advisor, portfolio manager, investment counsellor, financial consultant and wealth coach among others. They may each do different things, target different niches, and/or specialize in different areas but may not actually provide financial planning services. Adding to the complexity is the lack of legislation for the term financial planner in all provinces except for Quebec.

“There is no legislated standard in place for financial planners or for those who offer financial planning services. In fact, in every Canadian province except Quebec, people may call themselves financial planners without having any credentials or qualifications whatsoever” – Financial Planning Standards Council.

I bring this up because I want to be clear that people looking for financial advice should look to hire and pay for the right type of financial advice. This is in the form of Certified Financial Planning professionals (CFP®) registered with the Financial Planning Standards Council (FPSC, now called FP Canada) and/or Registered Financial Planners (R.F.P.) from the Institute of Advanced Financial Planners (IAFP). These are the people I call financial planners with a nod to the IAFP for placing a higher level of ethical and planning experience requirements upon registrants.

I understand how valuable it can be when you meet the right advisor and get the right advice. Yet the value of financial planning has been described as incredibly difficult to quantify and you may see it as a secondary benefit and a waste of money or time. After all, there is great information on the internet, and your parents, best friend, banker etc. must know how best to help you, right?

Without further ado, here are my top reasons you should look to hire a financial planner instead:

  • Increased Confidence – Know your WHOLE picture

The statistics speak loudly:

Utilizing the FPSC’s most recent survey is maybe the best way to quantify how financial planning can increase levels of confidence. People feel much more on track with their financial affairs than compared to those without a financial plan.

Let’s look at an example of someone looking to plan their retirement. In preparation, a person must understand not only that they have enough money to last through their retirement but go through a laundry list of to-do items and complex decisions to make. Just to list a few: Continue Reading…