We review books that deal with everything from financial independence topics to politics, and anything in between. We may sometimes stray into films and music if there is a “Findependence” angle.
As we telegraphed in the September installment of my MoneySense Retired Money column, this month’s column is a book review of David Booth’s Stay Calm, published early in September. For the full review in the October column, click on the highlighted headline: The calming genius of passive investing.
David Booth is founder of Dimensional Fund Advisors (DFA), maker of DFA Index Funds and DFA ETFs. I have long invested some of our family’s money in DFA funds, along with many of the other usual indexing suspects.
They are famously champions of taking a passive set-it-and-forget it approach to investing while minimizing the noise of what they have dubbed “financial pornography” propagated by traditional and social media, and the self-appointed experts who claim they can pick individual stocks or consistently time the markets.
As someone who takes a decidedly hybrid approach to investing in ETFs in various asset classes, — and occasionally indulging in a bit of high-conviction “index skimming” — I found Booth’s Stay Calm to be a refreshing reminder of the sound principles that underlie DFA.
Those who need a refresher on the virtues of passive investing will not be disappointed but as the book’s subhead implies, there are also quite a few lessons about embracing uncertainties in life in general, as well as investing in particular.
Stay Calm was published early in September by Authors Equity and is aptly subtitled “Learn to Embrace Uncertainty in Investing and Life.” The book is divided into three main parts. Part 1 is on the science of investing and covers the Gift of being an Outsider, how Markets work and how to harness public markets. Part 2 is titled “The Mindset to Stay Calm” and the four chapter titles all make for excellent bullet points; Flexibility is the key to navigating Life’s Uncertainties; Don’t Predict, Plan; Control what you can control and manage what you can’t; and Tune out the Noise.
I liked Charles Ellis’ book Winning the Loser’s Game so much that I had to read his latest: Rethinking Investing. It is very short at just over 100 small pages, but is packed with good advice. Some of it is specific to U.S. tax laws, but most of it is useful for Canadians.
Ellis takes on three huge areas of personal finance. The first is your portfolio allocation, or what you should invest in.
The second is your savings plan, and the third is your “spending rule,” or how to spend your assets during retirement.
A detailed treatment of these areas could easily run to thousands of pages, so this book is necessarily at a high level. Ellis wants you to get the broad ideas right, so that you won’t make big mistakes as you fill in the details.
Ellis calls compounding investment returns “your power curve.” He explains that most of your investment growth comes at the end, which provides motivation to begin early. Saving is “your first priority.”
Saving
He offers thirteen specific suggestions for saving money, such as use employer matching, automate deductions from pay, invest bonuses, buy preowned cars, consider a smaller house, “self-insure for auto damages under $10,000 — or whatever you can comfortably afford to pay in the unlikely event of a major accident” — and use term life insurance.
Unlike recent popular advice to focus only on big expenses, Ellis says that “Lots of small-expense items can add up and cut your potential savings.”
Investing
Ellis repeats the main themes of Winning the Loser’s Game to explain why low-cost index investing is the way to go. “The growing market dominance of expert professional investment managers … has made the market harder and harder to beat.”
There are three factors slowing down the “widespread adoption of indexing.” Referring to index investing as “passive” has negative connotations for most people. “Nobody wants to be known as passive.” The second factor is that “most investors find it hard to believe that talented active managers with superb information won’t beat the market.”
These active managers “fought against indexing as though they and their careers were seriously threatened: as they surely were and certainly are!” The third factor comes from the media, who know “that indexing’s persistent successes would not make for compelling or even interesting copy.”
When investors make active choices on market timing, they tend to perform poorly. Unfortunately, Ellis points to reports from DALBAR for evidence of this pattern. While it’s true that retail investors make poor market timing choices on average, DALBAR’s methodology for computing their losses is nonsense.
Bond allocation
Ellis makes an interesting pitch for investors to own more stocks and fewer bonds. He asks investors to include the following as part of their bond allocation: “home equity, the present value of your Social Security benefits [CPP and OAS in Canada], and your future estimated savings plus any likely inheritance.”
While I think many people would be better off with a lower bond allocation during their working years, I have to push back on the future estimated savings and inheritances. Maybe government workers can treat future savings as bond-like, those in the private sector have a lot of uncertainty in their future savings.
As for an inheritance, I see huge uncertainty in most cases. A parent may end up needing the money for elder care, or may give it to someone else, or may have less money than you think. The money I will leave to my sons is mostly invested in stocks, and they will get what’s left after all my spending. The amount they will get does not have bond-like attributes.
All that said, if thinking about home equity, government payments, future savings, and an inheritance helps people tolerate the short-term swings in stock prices, then maybe Ellis is right to give this advice, even if it isn’t all technically correct.
Retirement spending rule
Ellis encourages people to think about drawing from their savings in retirement like a university endowment. “First, average the year-end values of your assets over the prior several years (preferably more than five years) to dampen the impact of market fluctuations.” Then choose a prudent annual withdrawal percentage, “likely 4–5%.”
“For example, if you settle on a 5% rate of withdrawal and a six-year moving average of the year-end value of your assets, a 30% drop in the stock market would lead to only a 5% reduction in your payout that year.” This approach offers an alternative to “having a portfolio laden with low-return bonds.” Continue Reading…
Below we canvas 11 retirement experts and financial planners in Canada and the United States about how they and their clients can use new Longevity insurance products above and beyond traditional life annuities.
These experts were gathered by Featured.com, which has been supplying Findependence Hub with quality content for several years. It recently changed its procedure so editors like myself can request input on particular topics we think will interest our readership. The sources are all on LinkedIn, as you can see by clicking on their profiles below.
Here’s what we asked for this instalment:
“In addition to Annuities, what is one new Longevity product or fund that you believe in enough to recommend to clients approaching or already in Retirement? Examples in Canada are Purpose Longevity Fund and Guardian’s Longevity Funds. Are there similar new products in the U.S. (or Canada) of which you are aware?”
Here is what these 11 thought leaders had to say:
LifeX ETF delivers transparent Longevity Income
In addition to traditional annuities, one of the emerging longevity products in the U.S. that I have come to recommend to clients approaching or already in retirement is the LifeX Longevity Income ETF, particularly the LFAI fund.
While it is not a classic insurance product, it is designed to provide predictable monthly distributions over a long horizon, effectively hedging against the risk of outliving one’s assets. The fund invests primarily in U.S. Treasuries and money-market instruments, and its structure is built around the concept of a target cohort’s 100th birthday, which allows for a systematic income stream without relying on a life insurance company guarantee.
For many clients, especially those who purchased assets during low-interest periods or are seeking reliable cash flow without tying up their entire portfolio in an annuity, this product offers a compelling complement to their existing retirement income strategy. What I find particularly valuable is the transparency it provides. Unlike certain annuities, clients can clearly see the underlying investments, understand how distributions are generated, and retain the flexibility to adjust allocations as their personal circumstances or market conditions evolve.
It also fits naturally into a broader retirement strategy where a portion of assets remains growth-oriented, some is allocated to defensive income-generating investments, and a dedicated longevity-income segment addresses the specific risk of living decades beyond retirement.
Of course, it is not without considerations; while the fund aims to provide stable income, it is sensitive to interest-rate changes, inflation, and the assumptions built into its cohort-based design. Clients need to assess the fit carefully, ensuring the time horizon and income targets align with their health, lifestyle, and other holdings. For those who understand these dynamics, however, it offers a sophisticated and innovative approach to longevity planning, bridging the gap between traditional annuities and fully self-managed income portfolios, and giving retirees confidence that they can sustain their lifestyle even as they live longer than expected.
BlackRock LifePath Paycheck Fund Offers Flexibility
JP Moses, Tennessee
If you’re getting close to retirement, you might want to check out the BlackRock LifePath Paycheck fund. I’ve been following it. It works like those Canadian longevity funds, designed to give you regular monthly checks. The biggest risk is outliving your savings, and this fund has professionals handle the withdrawals so you don’t run out of money. It seems to offer more flexibility than a traditional annuity, which is worth a look.
Vanguard and Fidelity Deliver Stable Retirement Income
Evan Tunis, Florida
The Vanguard Target Retirement Income Fund is not an entirely new “longevity” product in the mold of Canada’s Purpose and Guardian funds, but it fulfills a similar role for retirees. It is intended to deliver a steady flow of income while protecting against the effects of inflation by investing in a diversified blend of stocks, bonds and cash. The Fidelity Strategic Advisers (r) Core Income Fund is also designed to provide income for retirees with a diversified approach. The two funds both provide some level of stability for those who want to keep a lid on risk and market vomit in retirement.
I’ve often been asked about newer longevity products beyond traditional annuities, especially by clients preparing for retirement who want flexibility without giving up stability. What I have observed while working with financially cautious founders and executives is that people want income structures that feel modern, transparent, and liquid, and one option in the U.S. that I genuinely find promising is the Stone Ridge LifeX Longevity Income ETFs. I first came across them while helping a client map out a long term retirement strategy, and what stood out was how these funds provide monthly distributions while still allowing investors to keep full liquidity. I remember reviewing the structure and appreciating how it focuses on Treasuries and a long horizon rather than tying someone into an insurance contract. It felt refreshing. many retirees dislike the idea of locking up money permanently, and this approach allowed them to protect their cash while still receiving consistent income. The experience reminded me of moments with founders who want efficiency without losing control, and pattern is similar
In my opinion, the biggest advantage of these longevity ETFs is the balance between predictability and freedom, since investors receive monthly payouts but can still adjust their strategy if life takes an unexpected turn. The main drawback is that there is no lifetime guarantee, so someone who ends up living much longer than expected might outlive the structure if they rely on it too heavily. I often explain that longevity planning still requires layering different tools rather than expecting one product to solve everything. Another point that came up during discussions with retirees is the sensitivity to interest rate changes, which can affect the value of the ETF itself, and it is important not to overlook that risk. Still, for clients who want something more adaptable than an annuity, this has become a strong option to consider. I also pay attention to emerging pooled longevity concepts, similar to modern tontine ideas, which share risk across participants and create higher payouts for those who live longer. Even though these structures are not mainstream in the U.S. yet, the logic is compelling for retirees who expect longer than average lifespans. Whenever I see innovation like this, I feel the same excitement I do when a founder shows us a new model at spectup because it signals that the industry is shifting toward more transparent, flexible solutions.
LifeX ETFs offer flexible, predictable Retirement Income
Sovic Chakrabarti, Vancouver, BC
When I think about longevity-focused options beyond traditional annuities, one U.S. product I genuinely find compelling is the Stone Ridge LifeX Longevity Income ETFs. What draws me to LifeX is that it tries to solve the same problem that Canadian funds like Purpose Longevity and Guardian Longevity address — steady income over an unknown lifespan — but without locking someone into an irreversible insurance contract.
Instead of handing over capital permanently, retirees stay invested and receive structured monthly distributions, which feels more flexible and respectful of changing needs. I’ve always liked the idea of having income that mimics an annuity while still keeping the door open if health, family, or market circumstances shift.
I’ve come to see LifeX as especially appealing for clients who want predictable cash flow but aren’t comfortable giving up control of their assets. Because the funds are built largely on U.S. Treasuries, the income stream feels relatively stable, and the target-date structure helps align payouts with the later stages of retirement, when longevity risk becomes more real. The liquidity alone makes it feel like a meaningful evolution in retirement planning: it’s easier to sleep at night knowing the money isn’t trapped.
Of course, I’m also realistic about its limitations. There’s no lifetime guarantee the way a true annuity offers, and the income still depends on market and interest-rate dynamics. It’s not a perfect replacement for insurance-based products. But as a complement — or even a middle ground between full guarantees and full market exposure — it’s one of the few newer U.S. longevity products I’d feel confident putting on the table for someone approaching or entering retirement.
It goes into more detail on William Bengen’s updated book about the 4% Rule, which was one of three recently published financial books we reviewed in the last Retired Money column.
For that column I had originally planned to focus exclusively on that book, A Richer Retirement, Supercharging the 4% Rule to Spend More and Enjoy More. However, I decided to review two other books at the same time; meanwhile I ended up on a related project on my own site, which involved asking more than a dozen financial advisors on both sides of the border what they think of the 4% Rule and the tweaks Bengen covers in his follow-up book. You can see all responses in this blog that appeared earlier this month on Findependence Hub, but at over 5,000 words it was a tad long for the space normally assigned to the Retired Money column.
For the MoneySense version, I focused on the most insightful comments and added a few thoughts of my own. The survey was conducted via Linked In and Featured.com, which has long supplied good content for my site.
Broader diversification spawns a 4.7% Rule
Trusts and estates expert Andrew Izrailo, Senior Corporate and Fiduciary Manager for Astra Trust, says Bengen’s original idea was to provide a sustainable income stream for at least 30 years without depleting your savings. In his new book, Bengen “revisits this concept using updated data and broader asset allocations,” summarizes Izrailo, “He now argues the safe withdrawal rate could rise to around 4.7%, supported by stronger market performance and portfolio diversification beyond the original stock-bond mix.”
For American investors, Izrailo still begins with 4% as a baseline because “it remains simple and conservative. Then I evaluate three major factors before adjusting: market volatility, portfolio performance, and expected longevity.” For Canadian retirees, “I tend to start lower, around 3.5%, due to differences in taxation, mandatory RRIF withdrawal rules, and the impact of currency and inflation differences compared to U.S. portfolios.”
Toronto-based wealth advisor Matthew Ardrey, of TriDelta Financial was not part of the original Featured roundup but agreed with the general view that while a helpful starting point, the 4 Rule is only a guideline. “When I meet with a client, I don’t rely on the 4% rule at all,” said Ardrey, who has worked with clients for more than 25 years “I’ve learned that rules of thumb — like the 4% rule — pale in comparison to the clarity and confidence that come from a well-crafted” and personalized financial plan. Such a plan should reflect each person’s unique circumstances, priorities, and goals, allowing them to build the right decumulation strategy for their situation.
No one size fits all
Almost all the experts caution against taking a one-size-fits-all approach to the 4% Rule or its variants. Over 20 years with her own clients financial advisor and educator Winnie Sun, Executive Producer ofModernMom, starts with 4% as the baseline, then adjusts it based on actual client spending patterns and market conditions … The biggest mistake I see isn’t about the percentage itself: it’s that people forget about tax efficiency in withdrawal sequencing.”
Oakville, Ont.-based insurance broker James Inwood says the 4% rule is “a decent guideline, but it’s not some magic number you can set and forget. I’ve watched people get into trouble because they didn’t account for medical bills, which are a real wild card here in Canada. I always tell people to build in a cash buffer and check in on that withdrawal rate every couple of years instead of just locking it in permanently.” Continue Reading…
Many aspects of personal finance have changed in the 36 years since The Wealthy Barber classic book first appeared.
To update it, author David Chilton had to not only do an extensive rewrite, but he had to come up with new advice. He did a great job of making The Wealthy Barber 2025 update fully relevant to Canadians today.
Chilton takes important topics that are usually dry and hard to understand and brings them alive in an entertaining story format. But this book is much more than just a fun take on personal finances; the advice is excellent. Chilton gives insights you won’t find elsewhere. The book is like a course on personal finance requiring no previous knowledge, and even discussions of insurance and wills are funny and compelling enough to be page-turners.
The bulk of the book is a set of financial lessons mainly aimed at Canadians between 20 and 45. The early chapters introduce the characters, make it clear that the lessons require no prior expertise, and that the lessons really will help with seemingly impossible problems like the high cost of housing. These early chapters do a good job of convincing readers that they really can improve their financial lives.
Between the jokes and identifying with the characters, readers will find themselves enjoying lessons that would normally be boring. Chilton uses dialogue to emphasize important points, to voice objections to his advice, and to clarify common misunderstandings.
I often find things I disagree with in books, but that really isn’t the case here. Chilton had to make some tough decisions about which details to include and which to leave out, and most readers could come up with a topic or nuance they wish was covered. One topic I think could have made the cut is that some investors think they don’t pay investment fees. I’ve heard people recommend their advisor because he doesn’t charge any fees. All advisors get paid out of their clients’ money in one way or another, no matter what anyone says to the contrary.
I won’t try to summarize the lessons because the result wouldn’t be useful. Without Chilton’s explanations of the whys behind his advice, too much would be lost. Instead, I’ll comment on several areas.
Artificial Intelligence (AI)
Chilton didn’t really discuss AI except to make a good joke that I won’t spoil. He was asked the question “What happens if AI takes away most of our jobs and the economic system collapses?” There are some bad things AI could do such as cyber war, monitoring all of our actions, preventing us from doing “unapproved” things, and limiting our movements. However, I don’t see negatives in AI doing jobs for us. If AI together with machines will eventually grow our food, make clothes and other goods, and build houses, why will we need money? Until we get to that point, we’ll still need money and people to do jobs.
Pay yourself first
One of the book’s characters says “Save first, spend the rest, good. Spend first, save the rest, bad.” This core piece of advice survived from the original book, but there are some caveats now. For example, some diligent savers “offset the growing value of their assets on their net-worth statements with matching, or near matching, debts on the liability side. From excessive car loans to large credit-card balances to massive lines of credit, many [live] beyond their means to a scary level.”
Watching other people, I’m convinced that it’s important to set aside savings from your pay first and then spend later, but my wife and I are weirdos who never needed to do this. Our natural tendency to spend little usually left plenty of savings at the end of each pay period. We’re the type who had to learn to spend more as our income and savings grew.
Index investing
I thought the passage explaining why we should just buy all stocks instead of trying to pick the best ones was well done. It included “No, we can’t just buy the winners. No, there is no way for us to consistently pick them ahead of time. No, the people we hire to do it for us aren’t any good at it either.”
Like most experts who are trying to help their audiences, Chilton is a fan of all-in-one asset allocation ETFs. “Not only does the fund buy the individual stocks for you, it does so across the world,” and “These funds also do all the rebalancing for you.” These funds handle everything so there is no need to monitor your progress. In fact, to avoid making emotional decisions, you’re best to “pay almost no attention” to the daily or weekly changes in the value of your savings.
“One of the most important factors, if not the most important, as you choose what type of investments to make, is the associated time frame. How long are you able to set the money aside? How long until you need it?” Stocks in the form of all-in-one ETFs are for the long term. For something like a house down payment, “unless I thought my purchase was at least five to seven years away,” I wouldn’t invest it aggressively.
Starting early
I’m a fan of advising people to start the saving habit early. Chilton gives an example to motivate this advice where saving $1000 per month for 8 years is more valuable than saving $1000 per month for the subsequent 24 years. Continue Reading…
Posted By 
As we telegraphed in the September installment of my MoneySense Retired Money column, this month’s column is a book review of David Booth’s Stay Calm, published early in September. For the full review in the October column, click on the highlighted headline: The calming genius of passive investing.
Posted By 
