Family Formation & Housing

For young couples starting families, buying their first home and/or other real estate. Covers mortgages, credit cards, interest rates, children’s education savings plans, joint accounts for couples and the like.

Renting in Retirement

Posted By |

By Benjamin Felix, for Boomer & Echo

Special to the Financial Independence Hub

Canadians value few things more than a home that is owned outright. This might be especially true for retirees. The thinking seems to be that once your mortgage is paid off, your housing expenses evaporate. Unfortunately, this could not be further from the truth.

The alternative, renting, is often frowned upon. Renting is seen as throwing money away. The reality is that renting in retirement can make a lot of sense, both financially and psychologically, when it is properly understood.

The first step to accepting renting as a sensible housing choice is understanding the financial aspect of the decision. To compare the financial implications of renting and owning we need a common ground. That common ground is unrecoverable costs.

Unrecoverable Costs

Rent is an unrecoverable cost. It is paid in exchange for a place to live, and there is no equity or other residual value afterward. That is easy to grasp.

Owning also has unrecoverable costs. They are less obvious and usually get missed in the renting versus owning discussion. An owner of a mortgage-free home still has to pay property taxes and maintenance costs, both unrecoverable, to maintain their home. Each of these costs can be estimated at 1% of the value of the home per year on average.

In addition, an owner absorbs an economic cost for keeping their capital in their home as opposed to investing it in stocks and bonds. This economic cost, or opportunity cost, is a real cost that an owner needs to consider. Estimating this portion of the cost of owning is harder to do. It requires estimating expected returns for stocks, bonds, and real estate for comparison with each other.

Expected Returns

Estimating expected returns is not an easy task; it starts with understanding historical risk premiums. The market will demand more expected return for riskier assets, and this relationship is visible in historical returns.

For stocks, bonds, and real estate, the Credit Suisse Global Investment Returns Yearbook offers data going back to 1900. Globally, the real return for real estate, that’s net of inflation, from 1900 through 2017 was 1.3%, while stocks returned 5% after inflation, and bonds returned 1.9%. If we assume inflation at 1.7%, then we would be thinking about a 3% nominal return for real estate, a 6.7% nominal return for global stocks, and a 3.6% nominal return for global bonds.

To keep things simple and conservative, we will assume that real estate continues to return a nominal 3%, while stocks return an average of 6%, and bonds return 3%.

The Cost of Capital

With a set of expected returns, we can now start thinking about the cost of capital. Every dollar that a home owner has in home equity is a dollar that they could be investing in a portfolio of stocks and bonds. A retiree is unlikely to have an aggressive portfolio of 100% stocks, so we will use the 5.10% expected return for a 70% stock and 30% bond portfolio. The 2.10% difference in expected returns between the portfolio and real estate is the opportunity cost carried by the owner.

It is important to note that asset allocation, which is a big driver of these numbers, will depend on many factors including other sources of income like pensions, tolerance for risk, and portfolio withdrawal rate.

Comparing Apples to Apples

Adding up the unrecoverable costs, we now have 4.10% of the home value between property tax, maintenance costs, and the cost of capital. This is the figure that we can compare to rent.

A $500,000 home would have an estimated annual unrecoverable cost of $20,500 ($500,000 X 4.10%), or $1,708 per month. If a suitable rental could be found for that amount, then renting would be an equivalent financial decision in terms of the expected economic impact.

Other Financial Considerations

So far, we have looked at pre-tax returns. Taxes could play an important role in this decision. Increases in the value of a principal residence are not taxed. Income and capital returns on an investment portfolio are taxed. Continue Reading…

Keeping the Family Cottage in the family

Posted By |

By John Natale

Special to the Financial Independence Hub

Summers in Canada are defined by the great outdoors and one of our favourite summer pastimes is to head up to the cottage (or cabin) to lounge on chairs, enjoy some cold beverages and toast marshmallows on the campfire for a relaxing time with friends and family.

For those who own a cottage, transferring its ownership to children or grandchildren can sometimes get tricky, with many owners failing to realize the potential tax bomb that awaits. Below is one strategy that may help ensure your property remains a space that will continue to generate positive, loving memories instead of a source of worries and sleepless nights for you and your family.

 An in-depth look at the issues

For many individuals, it is important that the cottage stays in the family so the next generations can continue to enjoy it for years to come. The good news is that when you pass away, assets can be transferred to your spouse tax-free.

However, a transfer to your children, on the other hand, may trigger a capital gains tax that must be paid before the children (or their heirs) can enjoy the property. Canadian households can only use the principal residence exemption (PRE) to protect one property from tax on capital gains. If the PRE is used for the home, then the transfer of the cottage to the children will be taxable.

Over the years, many cottages and other vacation properties have increased significantly in value and are now worth much more that their purchase price. It is important to note that 50% of this increase in value is subject to taxation. Many people are not aware that this could trigger a significant capital gains tax liability for your estate and, if it doesn’t have enough assets to pay for it, the estate may be forced to sell the cottage to pay the tax. Ultimately, your family can risk losing the property altogether.

Selling the cottage now vs. later

By selling the cottage to your children today instead of transferring it when you pass away, you can cap your tax liability and pass the responsibility for any future capital gains to your children. Because the cottage is being transferred now – and will not be included as part of your estate – the family can also avoid the time and costs associated with the settling of an estate while avoiding potential claims against your estate from creditors or other interested parties. Continue Reading…

The rising cost of owning pets

Posted By |

By Ted McCarthy

Special to the Financial Independence Hub

People are spending more on their pets than ever. No matter the pet type (hamster, dog, snake, etc.), people are willing to pay a pretty penny on their pets. The APPA reported that US$72 billion was spent on pets in 2018.

People are spending so much on their pets, LendEDU wondered if people were willing to go into debt for their pets, or spend more on their pets’ wellbeing than their own?

Pet insurance is becoming more popular with pet owners, with 2.1 million pets insured in 2017.

LendEDU surveyed 1,000 adult American pet owners to see how much they spend on their pets, with or without pet insurance.

Spending breakdown on pets

The survey showed the breakdown of pets:

  • 24% of expenses go to healthcare/vet costs
  • 55% of expenses go to food
  • 13% of expenses go to toys & accessories
  • 8% of expenses go other

These statistics are about in line with the APPA’s statistics, as over US$30 billion out of the US$72 billion spent on pets in 2018 was food alone.

The pet business is massive in America and will continually grow according to the APPA. As consumers treat their pets better and more as part of the family than before, spending per pet will increase, and people are willing to spend that money.

Pet types

Out of the six pet types surveyed, dog owners spent the most acquiring their pet at an average of US$327.13, and fish owners spent the least at an average of $53.58.

Monthly expenses stack up to about the same. Dog owners spend an average of US$157.39 per month, bird owners, an average of $127.38, and cat owners an average if $95.11. Continue Reading…

How to save money through home warranties

Posted By |

It’s a line often touted by lenders. “Mortgages are cheaper than rent,” they say. On the surface, it’s usually true. In some urban cores, many properties are grossly overpriced. However, like most sales pitches, there’s something they aren’t telling you.

Home ownership carries with it substantial financial responsibilities. In addition to your monthly mortgage payments, you’ll owe property taxes to your municipality. Do you live in a condominium? If so, you’ll also owe building fees, which pay for the upkeep of shared systems, common areas, and landscaping.

And then there is household maintenance. Every year, Americans spend an average of US$2,000 per year just to keep their homes intact. And that’s just an average: the average American household is now 37 years old. As a result, many spend more than US$2K a year on their house.

These expenses would only be mildly annoying if the economy were genuinely thriving. However, despite the stock market reaching record highs, more Americans than ever are struggling financially. 40% of us can’t cover a sudden $400 expense, and a whopping 78% live paycheck-to-paycheck.

More than ever, we’re looking for ways to rein in costs. Misguidedly, some opt to forego maintenance. This approach always backfires, though. A famous maxim says it best: pay me now or pay me (a lot more) later.

Instead, we recommend you investigate home warranties. Depending on your circumstances, they could save hundreds or even THOUSANDS per year. In this blog post, we’ll explain what home warranties are and if it is the right solution for you and your family.

What are home warranties, and how do they work?

Home warranties have been around since the 1970s. Until recently, though, most Americans had no idea what they were. Rodney Martin, CEO of America’s Preferred Home Warranty, says only 3-4% of households had them as of 2015.

There’s a simple reason why home warranties haven’t caught on. In earlier generations, the age of the average home was younger. As a result, maintenance costs were lower. Fast forward to 2018: that year, the average house in America was pushing 40 years old.

Maintenance costs are steadily rising. People are looking for answers. Accordingly, interest in home warranties is increasing.

So, what exactly are home warranties? In a nutshell, they are contracts that cover the repair/replacement cost of appliances and systems. All machines eventually break. Because it’s an expected outcome, though, homeowner’s insurance doesn’t cover them. Home warranties fill in this gaping hole, providing their holders with badly-needed peace of mind.

Let’s say your dishwasher grinds to a halt. Stepping over a river of leaking water, you grab your phone and call your home warranty provider. After confirming they cover your issue, they dispatch a repair technician. Apart from a nominal service fee, you pay nothing more out-of-pocket.

How can a home warranty save me money?

You might still be skeptical. After all, getting a home warranty means investing significant capital in something you’re unfamiliar with. Think of it like this: right now, the average American spends US$2,000 per year maintaining their home. Some years it’s less, but in others, it’s more. Continue Reading…

No surprise: living beyond our means is why 38% are in Debt

Posted By |

Talk about cause and effect: 38% of Canadians admit that living beyond their means resulted in their being in debt. That’s according to a survey being released this week by Manulife Bank of Canada. It also found a third of Canadians aged 20 to 69 with a household income of at least $40,000 say their spending growth outpaces their income, and 19% of those who went into debt cited not being able to break the debt habit. Almost half (49%) on indebted Canadians between the age of 20 and 34 and a majority of those aged 35 to 54 report carrying credit cards with a balance.

No surprise then that one in ten (9%) admit to being “clueless” about how much they are spending each month on average.

Blame YOLO and FOMO

Apparently cultural attitudes like “You only live once” (YOLO) and “Fear of Missing Out” (FOMO) are starting to take their toll on indebtedness. Apart from the 38% who admit their debt arose because of living beyond their means, 12% directly correlated their indebtedness to the outcome of too many costly outings with friends or family.

While 19% of debtors say they can’t break the habit, the survey also reveals that seeing debt paid off can result in joy, which is what 36% of Canadians say.

Manulife CEO Rick Lunny

And once again (see yesterday’s post on the HSBC study), Canada’s high housing prices are seen impacting this country’s Millennials. Millennials are now at the age many want to get on the property ladder and start families, two areas where Manulife is seeing expenses grow. “Housing affordability remains at near-historic highs across the country and child-care costs have risen faster than inflation for Canadians,” said Manulife Bank president and CEO Rick Lunny in a press release, “We have a financial wellness crisis in Canada.”

Obviously debt can limit one’s social life but the survey quantifies this. it found that debt limits activities with family and friends (22%), makes it impossible to spend money on entertainment (18%) and negatively impacts mental health (in 17% of cases.)

Manulife says Boomers feel less affected by debt: one would hope so since any Boomer contemplating retirement should by now have a healthy positive net worth rather than a negative one! In which case, they will be less constrained in spending on entertainment or meeting with family and friends.

Manulife finds that those under 55, women, and those with high levels of debt are most likely to feel stressed by these circumstances. It also found a “gradual yet significant” decline in the proportion of Canadians with mortgagers who express comfort with the payments. “There has been a sharp year-over-year decline in the proportion who claim to feel very comfortable about both the payments (28%, down 8 from Spring 2018) and the amount owing (21%, down 9) on their mortgage.”

The Joy of getting out of Debt

Asked to rate the perceived joy they would get from various financial accomplishments, two thirds of Canadians put getting out of debt (“escaping”) first or second overall, with having a hefty retirement nest egg a distant third.

Of course, reducing debt is easier said than done. Manulife suggests a clear “area of opportunity” is making adjustments to non-essential spending but there are demographic differences. Millennials are much more willing to sacrifice dining out compared to those who are over 35. Women are twice as likely as men to stop shopping for non-essential goods and services. Men and those who are 35 or older are most willing to give up travelling (which I’d say is certainly a non-essential spending activity!)

There are some positives in the survey. it found that three in ten say their debt is under control and they don’t need any help to control it. Others believe there are more effective ways to track debt and curb spending. Manulife cites its own Manulife All-in Banking Package, which includes Saving Sweeps that automatically moves excess funds into savings accounts each night. For more on the Debt Survey, click here.