Family Formation & Housing

For young couples starting families, buying their first home and/or other real estate. Covers mortgages, credit cards, interest rates, children’s education savings plans, joint accounts for couples and the like.

Adding Canadian and international REIT ETFs to your portfolio

Posted By |

By Dale Roberts, Cutthecrapinvesting

Special to the Financial Independence Hub

You’ll notice that in the ETF Model Portfolio page on Cut The Crap Investing I first offer up the core portfolios with the traditional building blocks of Canadian, US and International stocks supported by a broad basket of Canadian bonds.

That’s a core approach embraced by many self-directed investors. You’ll even see that simple asset allocation embraced by Dan Bortolotti of Canadian Couch Potato. In fact, Dan will argue that any additions or ‘complications’ are not necessary.

Many will suggest that we do not need to spice things up much beyond that core ‘meat and potatoes’ asset allocation. A Canadian investor can certainly put together a sensible portfolio with those assets and that investor would have been rewarded with some very solid returns.

There are assets that can deliver the potential of greater returns and greater diversification. REITs and foreign bonds and emerging market equity funds would fall into that camp. You’ll see those holdings in the portfolios of many of the Canadian Robo Advisors. In the game-changing asset allocation portfolios from Vanguard you’ll find US bonds and emerging market stocks.

One Canadian Robo Advisor that employs REITs and foreign bonds is ModernAdvisor. I am a big fan of that firm and I am a fan of their asset allocation moves. Please have a read of ModernAdvisor. A Better Way For Canadians To Invest. The Canadian Robos can also be a great source of education by way of their blogs. Here’s a wonderful REIT primer from ModernAdvisor: Diversify With A REIT ETF.

In that post we’ll find the chart that strongly suggest why we should include REITs for greater portfolio diversification.

From that blog post …

In addition to the income aspect of REITs, real estate also provides strong diversification benefits for a portfolio already holds stocks and bonds. Since 2002, the 5-year correlation between the S&P/TSX Capped REIT Index with the S&P/TSX Composite Index has ranged between 0.23 and 0.76, averaging 0.55. The correlation with Canadian bonds is even more attractive, ranging between -0.02 and 0.34, and averaging 0.12.

Correlation of 1.0 indicates perfect positive correlation; that is, the two investments move in the same direction. Correlation of -1.0 indicates perfect negative correlation, that is, the two investments move in the opposite direction. Correlation of 0.0 indicates that there is no relationship between the two investments.

From the chart we can see that we do gain additional diversification.

Canadian REIT exposure is quite easy. The core Canadian REIT approach is covered by Vanguard with VRE, iShares with XRE and BMO offers ZRE.

  • For more on 2019 ETF performance including those REITs you can have a read of this recent post on Cut The Crap Investing.

US and International REIT exposure

Things get a little more tricky when we leave Canada due to withholding taxes and the potential of currency conversion charges. The go-to Canadian dollar International REIT is iShares CGR. That is a US and Global REIT.

Given that CGR is a Canadian dollar REIT ETF with US and International assets you will face those withholding taxes on income. On that, the folks at ModernAdvisor suggest that you hold that ETF in a taxable account whenever possible as you can claim the tax credit. That said, if you are only investing in registered accounts such as an RRSP and TFSA you might not let the tax considerations drive the bus. The additional diversification and potential of greater returns might rule the day for your portfolio.

Hold US REITs in a US Dollar Account

This is a good practice or portfolio approach for your entire equity assets. Continue Reading…

Flipping Homes: One way young adults can achieve Financial Freedom

Posted By |

By Donna Johnson

Special to the Financial Independence Hub

One of the top ways to make money historically has involved investing in real estate. Buying distressed houses at a good price and then selling them for a profit, known as flipping, is a great option for making money in housing. For those who are young adults, there is time to take risks and recover if they don’t pan out. Flipping houses is one of those calculated risks that could help younger American or Canadian adults achieve financial freedom in relatively short order. Here is how the flipping process works.

Find a house

In order to flip a house, it’s necessary to first own the house. A house that’s ripe for flipping might be a very distressed house in a great neighborhood. With tens of thousands of dollars of work, flippers could theoretically earn a profit that equals or exceeds their initial investment. Even a home that’s merely a bit dated in its decor could provide a good opportunity in the right location.

It’s important to know the market before purchasing a house to flip. It will be difficult to sell a house for a profit in a bad neighborhood no matter how impressive the renovations are. Additionally, comps in the local market will need to be high enough to provide a gap between what the flip initially costs and what you can sell it for. Otherwise, it will be difficult to make a profit.

Have money available

It’s important to have quite a bit of cash on hand before beginning a house flip. Those 3.5% down payments associated with FHA loans [in the U.S.] are only available for homes that will be occupied by the owner. Banks consider flips investment properties. Therefore, a flipper can expect a bank to require a 20% down payment as security for a loan. Continue Reading…

Renting in Retirement

Posted By |

By Benjamin Felix, for Boomer & Echo

Special to the Financial Independence Hub

Canadians value few things more than a home that is owned outright. This might be especially true for retirees. The thinking seems to be that once your mortgage is paid off, your housing expenses evaporate. Unfortunately, this could not be further from the truth.

The alternative, renting, is often frowned upon. Renting is seen as throwing money away. The reality is that renting in retirement can make a lot of sense, both financially and psychologically, when it is properly understood.

The first step to accepting renting as a sensible housing choice is understanding the financial aspect of the decision. To compare the financial implications of renting and owning we need a common ground. That common ground is unrecoverable costs.

Unrecoverable Costs

Rent is an unrecoverable cost. It is paid in exchange for a place to live, and there is no equity or other residual value afterward. That is easy to grasp.

Owning also has unrecoverable costs. They are less obvious and usually get missed in the renting versus owning discussion. An owner of a mortgage-free home still has to pay property taxes and maintenance costs, both unrecoverable, to maintain their home. Each of these costs can be estimated at 1% of the value of the home per year on average.

In addition, an owner absorbs an economic cost for keeping their capital in their home as opposed to investing it in stocks and bonds. This economic cost, or opportunity cost, is a real cost that an owner needs to consider. Estimating this portion of the cost of owning is harder to do. It requires estimating expected returns for stocks, bonds, and real estate for comparison with each other.

Expected Returns

Estimating expected returns is not an easy task; it starts with understanding historical risk premiums. The market will demand more expected return for riskier assets, and this relationship is visible in historical returns.

For stocks, bonds, and real estate, the Credit Suisse Global Investment Returns Yearbook offers data going back to 1900. Globally, the real return for real estate, that’s net of inflation, from 1900 through 2017 was 1.3%, while stocks returned 5% after inflation, and bonds returned 1.9%. If we assume inflation at 1.7%, then we would be thinking about a 3% nominal return for real estate, a 6.7% nominal return for global stocks, and a 3.6% nominal return for global bonds.

To keep things simple and conservative, we will assume that real estate continues to return a nominal 3%, while stocks return an average of 6%, and bonds return 3%.

The Cost of Capital

With a set of expected returns, we can now start thinking about the cost of capital. Every dollar that a home owner has in home equity is a dollar that they could be investing in a portfolio of stocks and bonds. A retiree is unlikely to have an aggressive portfolio of 100% stocks, so we will use the 5.10% expected return for a 70% stock and 30% bond portfolio. The 2.10% difference in expected returns between the portfolio and real estate is the opportunity cost carried by the owner.

It is important to note that asset allocation, which is a big driver of these numbers, will depend on many factors including other sources of income like pensions, tolerance for risk, and portfolio withdrawal rate.

Comparing Apples to Apples

Adding up the unrecoverable costs, we now have 4.10% of the home value between property tax, maintenance costs, and the cost of capital. This is the figure that we can compare to rent.

A $500,000 home would have an estimated annual unrecoverable cost of $20,500 ($500,000 X 4.10%), or $1,708 per month. If a suitable rental could be found for that amount, then renting would be an equivalent financial decision in terms of the expected economic impact.

Other Financial Considerations

So far, we have looked at pre-tax returns. Taxes could play an important role in this decision. Increases in the value of a principal residence are not taxed. Income and capital returns on an investment portfolio are taxed. Continue Reading…

Keeping the Family Cottage in the family

Posted By |

By John Natale

Special to the Financial Independence Hub

Summers in Canada are defined by the great outdoors and one of our favourite summer pastimes is to head up to the cottage (or cabin) to lounge on chairs, enjoy some cold beverages and toast marshmallows on the campfire for a relaxing time with friends and family.

For those who own a cottage, transferring its ownership to children or grandchildren can sometimes get tricky, with many owners failing to realize the potential tax bomb that awaits. Below is one strategy that may help ensure your property remains a space that will continue to generate positive, loving memories instead of a source of worries and sleepless nights for you and your family.

 An in-depth look at the issues

For many individuals, it is important that the cottage stays in the family so the next generations can continue to enjoy it for years to come. The good news is that when you pass away, assets can be transferred to your spouse tax-free.

However, a transfer to your children, on the other hand, may trigger a capital gains tax that must be paid before the children (or their heirs) can enjoy the property. Canadian households can only use the principal residence exemption (PRE) to protect one property from tax on capital gains. If the PRE is used for the home, then the transfer of the cottage to the children will be taxable.

Over the years, many cottages and other vacation properties have increased significantly in value and are now worth much more that their purchase price. It is important to note that 50% of this increase in value is subject to taxation. Many people are not aware that this could trigger a significant capital gains tax liability for your estate and, if it doesn’t have enough assets to pay for it, the estate may be forced to sell the cottage to pay the tax. Ultimately, your family can risk losing the property altogether.

Selling the cottage now vs. later

By selling the cottage to your children today instead of transferring it when you pass away, you can cap your tax liability and pass the responsibility for any future capital gains to your children. Because the cottage is being transferred now – and will not be included as part of your estate – the family can also avoid the time and costs associated with the settling of an estate while avoiding potential claims against your estate from creditors or other interested parties. Continue Reading…

The rising cost of owning pets

Posted By |

By Ted McCarthy

Special to the Financial Independence Hub

People are spending more on their pets than ever. No matter the pet type (hamster, dog, snake, etc.), people are willing to pay a pretty penny on their pets. The APPA reported that US$72 billion was spent on pets in 2018.

People are spending so much on their pets, LendEDU wondered if people were willing to go into debt for their pets, or spend more on their pets’ wellbeing than their own?

Pet insurance is becoming more popular with pet owners, with 2.1 million pets insured in 2017.

LendEDU surveyed 1,000 adult American pet owners to see how much they spend on their pets, with or without pet insurance.

Spending breakdown on pets

The survey showed the breakdown of pets:

  • 24% of expenses go to healthcare/vet costs
  • 55% of expenses go to food
  • 13% of expenses go to toys & accessories
  • 8% of expenses go other

These statistics are about in line with the APPA’s statistics, as over US$30 billion out of the US$72 billion spent on pets in 2018 was food alone.

The pet business is massive in America and will continually grow according to the APPA. As consumers treat their pets better and more as part of the family than before, spending per pet will increase, and people are willing to spend that money.

Pet types

Out of the six pet types surveyed, dog owners spent the most acquiring their pet at an average of US$327.13, and fish owners spent the least at an average of $53.58.

Monthly expenses stack up to about the same. Dog owners spend an average of US$157.39 per month, bird owners, an average of $127.38, and cat owners an average if $95.11. Continue Reading…