Tag Archives: stocks

Keep calm and dividend on

Posted By |

By Mark Seed, myownadvisor

Special to the Financial Independence Hub

The markets are down, inflation remains hot, and interest rates are moving higher.

Are you worried?

I’m really not that worried.

I’ve been preparing for higher interest rates for years, well before the pandemic.

Case in point: this post is literally from five years ago. 

Where am I going???

Well, readers of this site will know I’m a big fan of companies that reward shareholders with dividends.

And why not love dividends?

Although I use a few indexed products in my investment portfolio, for extra diversification just in case, getting paid on a consistent, growing basis from Canadian and U.S. stocks: that’s a beautiful thing. I got another raise this week that I’ll link to below!

Digging deeper, I’m not that worried about the markets or inflation right now. There is a reason why dividends matter to me. Why do dividends really matter?

Beyond the Canadian dividend tax credit, beyond consistent payments and ever growing income I’ve experienced to date, dividends help me stick to my plan.

There is no financial advisor in my plan, nor fees paid to any advisor in my plan.

There is no day trading, there are no wasted fees or losses for trading.

There is no wild market speculation, I’m not trying to time anything.

I focus on my savings rate for investing and I invest more money when I have it. It’s that simple. 

Recall that dividends paid is real money paid from real company profits. Buying and holding an established company that has paid dividends for decades is a good sign (at least from a historical perspective) that this company had enough cashflow to reward shareholders and stay in business.

Companies that don’t pay dividends tend to use their money for other means, grow their business; make acquisitions or buy back shares, pay down risky debt, therefore driving the stock price higher over time.

These are not poor management decisions by any means: far from it. There are lots of ways shareholder value is created and to be honest, acquisitions, share buybacks and other company reinvestments could be better company decisions in the long-run!!

When it comes to the capital gains versus dividend income debate, there really isn’t a debate to be had, since every dollar you earn in capital gains from a stock is worth just as much as your dividend dollar paid. I love the graphic shown at the top of this blog.

Continue Reading…

Bid, Ask, Spread: 3 Stock Market terms Investors should know

Posted By |

By Charles Qi, CFA 

Special to the Financial Independence Hub

Stock market traders use a lot of jargon. Terms like “haircut,” “candlestick,” and “circuit breaker” are commonplace in the trading community, but for the average investor, not so much.

For the most part, knowing the meanings of these terms is not critical. However, there are some terms used by traders that investors should know and understand well because they’re used on a regular basis. So, in this article, I’ll share what I consider to be some of the most important terms to know when it comes to investing: bid, ask, and spread.

Bid: The highest price a buyer will pay for a stock

A trader seeking to purchase a stock or other asset will make their intent known by placing a “bid.” The bid represents the highest price the buyer is willing to pay for the stock. Establishing a bid is not only important for the buyer, but also the seller: the range of bids from interested buyers helps sellers determine how much market interest there is in a particular stock.

Ask: The lowest price a seller will accept for a stock

On the opposite side, an “ask” refers to the lowest price a seller is willing to sell a stock for. The ask represents the supply side for a market for any given stock, while the bids represent demand.

Bid-ask spread: The difference between the ask and bid

Typically, the ask — also known as the “offer price” — will be higher than the bid. The difference between the bid and the ask is known as the “bid-ask spread,” or simply the “spread.” The smaller the spread, the easier it is to buy or sell a stock. That’s because, with smaller spread, less movement is needed to bring buyers and sellers to an agreeable price and conduct a transaction. Generally speaking, stocks and other assets that are being traded in higher volumes tend to have smaller spreads. Continue Reading…

The “mostly stocks” Retirement Portfolio

Posted By |

By Dale Roberts, cutthecrapinvesting

Special to the Financial Independence Hub

It was a long time in the making, but I recently finished and posted the stock portfolio for retirees, on Seeking Alpha. It uses an all-weather portfolio approach but only puts stocks to work. Stocks are arranged by sector to perform in certain economic environments. Stocks and REITs will have to step up to do the work of bonds, gold, cash and commodities. We’re building the retirement stock portfolio on the Sunday Reads.

Here’s the post – Stocks for the retirement portfolio. That is a U.S. version. I will also post the Canadian stock portfolio (ideas for consideration)  on Cut The Crap Investing.

Defense wins ball games

The key is a core defensive stance: for market corrections, recessions and deflation. For those who are not able to access Seeking Alpha, here’s the portfolio.

As always, this is not advice. This is an idea and strategy for consideration.

Defensives @ 60%

Utilities – 10%

NextEra Energy, Duke Energy Corp, The Southern Co, Dominion Energy, Alliant Energy, Oneok, WEC Energy.

Pipelines – 10%

Enbridge, TC Energy, Enterprise Partners, Energy Transfer, Oneok.

Telecom – 10%

AT&T, Verizon, Comcast, T-Mobile, Bell Canada, Telus.

Telco REITs – American Tower, Crown Castle.

Consumer Staples – 10%

Colgate-Palmolive, Procter & Gamble, Walmart, Pepsi, Kraft Heinz, Tyson Foods, Kellogg, Kroger, Hormel Foods, Albertsons Companies.

Healthcare – 10%

Johnson & Johnson, Abbott Labs, Medtronic, Stryker, CVS Health, McKesson Corporation, United Health, Merck, Becton Dickinson, Cigna Corp.

Canadian banks – 10%

RBC, TD Bank, Scotiabank, Bank of Montreal.

Growth assets – 20%

Consumer discretionary, retailers, technology, healthcare, financials, industrials and energy stocks.

Apple, Microsoft, Qualcomm, Texas Instruments, Nike, BlackRock, Alphabet, Lowe’s, Amazon, TJX Companies, McDonald’s, Tesla, Visa, Mastercard, Raytheon, Waste Management, Berkshire Hathaway, Broadcom.

Inflation protection – 20%

REITs 10%

Agree Realty Corporation, Realty Income, Essential Properties, Regency Centres Corporation, Stag Industrial, Medical Properties Trust, Store Capital Corporation, Global Self Storage and EPR Properties.

Oil and gas / commodities stocks 10%

Canadian Natural Resources, Imperial Oil, ConocoPhillips, Exxon Mobil, Chevron, EOG Resources, Occidental Petroleum, Devon Energy.

Agricultural

Nutrien, The Mosaic Company.

Precious and other metals

Tech Resources, BHP Group, Rio Tinto

All said, I am still a fan of some cash and commodities and bonds. This was offered in the post …

The hybrid approach might then include:

  • 5% cash
  • 5% bonds
  • 5% commodities
  • 85% retirement stocks

More Sunday Reads Continue Reading…

Fed Pivot turned into a Divot

Posted By |

 

By Dale Roberts, cutthecrapinvesting

Special to the Financial Independence Hub

It was a more than interesting week. Not much mattered until Jerome Powell (the U.S. Federal Reserve Chair) delivered comments on Friday. He came clean. Or at least he helped to reverse the delusion created by stock market enthusiasts that the Fed would ‘pivot’ and reverse course on the market-unfriendly series of rate hikes. Rates are going higher and they will stay higher. There will be some pain for consumers and business. Inflation must be crushed. They will do what it takes. The Fed pivot turned into a divot. The markets were not happy with the reality check.

In a Seeking Alpha article published just days before the Powell presser, Michael J Kramer of Cott Capital Management offered …

The futures, bond, and currency markets are already telling the world that there is no dovish pivot, and quite frankly, there probably never was a dovish pivot. The only market out there that hasn’t gotten the message appears to be the equity market.

If Powell can deliver a message that even a golden retriever (I own two goldens) can understand, then the equity markets’ day of reckoning will arrive in short order.

Also from Michael …

The futures knew it, bonds knew it, and the dollar knew it. Once again, the only market living on an alternate planet was equities …

Powell finally delivered a direct message

In his Jackson Hole speech, in the opening paragraph, he made it clear that his remarks would be shorter and the message would be more direct. That it was.

Very simply, rates still have further to rise, and once there, they will stay there for some time. In the following paragraphs, I have borrowed from Michael and others, I will avoid quotes for readability. My own commentary is in the mix.

Powell offered that reaching an estimate of the longer-run neutral rate is not a place to pause or stop. He said the June FOMC projections suggest rates would rise to just below 4% through the end of 2023 and that history warned against loosening policy too soon.

It’s evident that the Fed is aware of the mistakes made in the 1970s and 1980s with the stop-and-go monetary policy approach that led to even higher rates, and the Fed appears determined not to repeat those mistakes. There can be no 70’s show rerun.

Fed Chair Jay Powell said:

Restoring price stability will likely require maintaining a restrictive policy stance for some time. The historical record cautions strongly against prematurely loosening policy.

Powell noted that fighting inflation will take a sustained period of below-trend growth and a softening labor market, which could bring pain to households, and are the costs of reducing inflation. In the third paragraph of his speech, it’s right there. The Fed is willing to sacrifice growth and face rising unemployment to bring inflation down. He is telling the market there will be no “pivot” anytime soon.

Inflation is driving the bus

The Fed chair said central banks need to move quickly, warning historical episodes of inflation have shown that delayed reactions from central banks tend to come with steeper job losses.

“Our aim is to avoid that outcome by acting with resolve now,” Powell said.

The following image is not a live video, but an example of the headlines that ‘spooked’ the markets.

Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell on Friday said the central bank’s job on lowering inflation is not done, suggesting that the Fed will continue to aggressively raise interest rates to cool the economy.

Get the inflation-killing job done

“We will keep at it until we are confident the job is done,” Powell said in remarks delivered at the Fed’s annual conference in Jackson Hole, Wyoming.

“While the lower inflation readings for July are welcome, a single month’s improvement falls far short of what the Committee will need to see before we are confident that inflation is moving down,” Powell said Friday.

The central bank has delivered four consecutive interest rate hikes over the last six months, moving in June and July to raise rates by 0.75%, the Fed’s largest moves since 1994. By raising borrowing costs, the Fed hopes to dampen demand by making home buying, business loans, and other types of credit more expensive. Continue Reading…

Stocks: The Undisputed Champion (by A Country Mile)

Posted By |

By Noah Solomon

Special to the Financial Independence Hub

In Stocks for the Long Run, Wharton Professor Jeremy Siegel states “over long periods of time, the returns on equities not only surpassed those of all other financial assets but were far safer and more predictable than bond returns when inflation was taken into account.”

As the following table demonstrates, not only have stocks outperformed bonds, but have also trounced other major asset classes. The effect of this outperformance cannot be understated in terms of its contribution to cumulative returns over the long-term. Over extended holding periods, any diversification away from stocks has resulted in vastly inferior performance.

Real Returns: Stocks, Bonds, Bills, Gold, and the U.S. Dollar: 1802-2012

The All-Stock Portfolio: Better in Theory than in Practice

Notwithstanding that past performance is not a guarantee of future returns, the preceding table begs the question why investors don’t simply just close their eyes and hold all-stock portfolios. In reality, however, there are valid reasons, both psychological and financial, that render such a strategy less than ideal for many people.

The buy and hold, 100% stock portfolio is a double-edged sword. If you can (1) stick with it through stomach-churning bear market losses, (2) have a (very) long-term horizon, and (3) don’t need to sell assets for any reason, then strapping yourself into the roller-coaster of a 100% stock portfolio may indeed be the optimal solution. Conversely, it would be difficult to identify a worse alternative for those who do not meet these criteria.

With respect to the emotional fortitude required to stand pat through bear markets, there is considerable evidence that many investors are simply incapable of doing this. Perhaps one of the best illustrations of this fact is Fidelity Investments’ flagship Magellan Fund under the stewardship of legendary investor Peter Lynch. From May 1977 to May 1990, Lynch managed to achieve an annualized return of 29.06% as compared to 15.52% for the S&P 500 Index. However, the average investor in the fund actually lost money during this period.

Many Magellan investors hopped on board when the fund was soaring and then jumped ship during difficult periods. This all-too-common misfortune is well-depicted by the following graph, which demonstrates how emotionally charged decisions can have a devastating effect on long-term performance.

Even if you have the emotional fortitude to stay the course through bear markets, there may be other reasons that compel investors to liquidate stocks, whether it be to fund living expenses, help their children buy homes, or invest in other opportunities. Unfortunately, the markets pay no heed to the convenience of mortals. If you are lucky, the need for cash will materialize at market peaks. Conversely, if you need liquidity near market troughs, then the effect is similar to that detailed in the graph above.

Bonds: the Good News & the Bad News

Historically, investors have used bonds to diversify their stock portfolios and reduce volatility. Investors typically set aside enough in bonds to weather periodic stock market downturns. Over the past several decades, the diversification value from holding bonds has been neutral to overall portfolio returns. During the bull market in bonds of the past 30 years, bond returns have just about kept pace with those of stocks. However, as indicated by the table at the beginning of this missive, this has not typically been the case. Continue Reading…