All posts by Financial Independence Hub

Three ways to lower Risk in your portfolio with ETFs

Posted By |

Here are some of the ways ETFs can be used strategically to help you sleep better at night.

Image courtesy BMO ETFs/Getty Images

By Erin Allen, VP, Online Distribution, BMO ETFs

(Sponsor Blog)

Volatility is often seen as the price of admission for achieving investment returns, but too much of it can feel like paying a hefty fee for a ride on an intense roller coaster, only to find yourself feeling queasy by the end and unable to enjoy the rest of the amusement park.

If the recent stock market turbulence in early August has left you contemplating panic selling, take a moment to breathe. Market corrections are a normal and healthy aspect of investing, and your portfolio doesn’t have to experience such dramatic ups and downs.

Why? Well, various defensively oriented ETFs can offer strategic ways to manage and mitigate risk, helping you stay the course and remain invested through the market’s inevitable fluctuations. Here are some ideas featuring BMO ‘s ETFs lineup:

Low-volatility ETFs

Imagine the broad market, such as the S&P 500 index, as a vast sea where the waves represent market volatility, and your investment portfolio is your boat navigating these waters.

How your boat responds to these waves is dictated by its beta, a measure that indicates both the direction and magnitude of your portfolio’s fluctuations relative to the market.

To put it simply, if the market’s “waves” have a beta of 1, and your portfolio also has a beta of 1, this means your portfolio will typically move in sync with the market, rising and falling to the same degree.

Now, consider if your boat were lighter and more susceptible to the waves, symbolized by a beta of two. In this scenario, your portfolio would be expected to swing twice as much as the market: more pronounced highs and lows.

Conversely, imagine your boat is a sturdy cargo ship with a beta of 0.5. In this case, your portfolio would react more calmly to market waves, experiencing only half the ups and downs of the market. This stability is what low-beta stocks can offer, and they can be conveniently accessed through various ETFs.

One such example is the BMO Low Volatility Canadian Equity ETF (ZLB)1, which selects Canadian stocks for their low beta. Compared to the broad Canadian market, ZLB is overweight in defensive sectors like consumer staples and utilities, which are less sensitive to economic cycles.

Holding allocations are as of August 19, 2024; sourced here1.

This ETF not only offers reduced volatility and smaller peak-to-trough losses compared to the BMO S&P/TSX Composite ETF (ZCN)2 but has also managed to outperform it — demonstrating that it is very much possible to achieve more return for less risk2.

To diversify further, you can also consider low-volatility ETFs from other geographic regions. These include three; BMO Low Volatility International Equity ETF (ZLD)3, BMO Low Volatility Emerging Markets Equity ETF (ZLE)4, and the BMO Low Volatility US Equity ETF (ZLU)5.

Ultra-short-term bond ETFs

While ETFs like the ZLB1 are engineered for reduced volatility through low-beta stock selection, it’s important to remember that they still hold equities.

In extreme market downturns, such as the one experienced in March 2020 during the onset of COVID-19, these funds can still be susceptible to market risk. This is pervasive and unavoidable if you’re invested in stocks; it affects virtually all equities regardless of individual company performances.

To fortify a portfolio against such downturns, diversification into other asset classes, particularly bonds, is crucial. However, not just any bonds will do — specific types, like those held by the BMO Ultra Short-Term Bond ETF (ZST)6, are particularly beneficial in these scenarios.

ZST, which pays monthly distributions, primarily selects investment-grade corporate bonds6. The focus on high credit quality, predominantly A and BBB rated bonds, is critical for reducing risk as these ratings indicate a lower likelihood of default and thus, offer greater safety during economic uncertainties.

Moreover, ZST targets bonds with less than a year until maturity6. This short duration is pivotal for those looking to minimize interest rate risk. Short-term bonds are less sensitive to changes in interest rates compared to long-term bonds, which can experience significant price drops when rates rise.

Charts as of July 31st, 2024 6

This strategic combination of high credit quality and short maturity durations7 is why, as demonstrated in the chart below, ZST has been able to steadily appreciate in value without experiencing the same level of volatility as broader aggregate bond ETFs like the BMO Aggregate Bond ETF (ZAG)8.

Buffer ETFs

If you recall the days of using training wheels when learning to ride a bike, you’ll appreciate the concept of buffer ETFs. Just as training wheels keep you from tipping over while also limiting how fast and freely you can ride, buffer ETFs aim to moderate the range of investment outcomes — both up and down.

Buffer ETFs may sound complex, but the principle behind them is straightforward. These ETFs utilize options to limit your downside risk while also capping your potential upside returns.

For example, a buffer ETF might offer to limit your exposure to a maximum 10% price return of a reference asset (like the S&P 500 index) over a year while absorbing the first -15% of any losses during the same period.

If the reference asset rises, your investment increases alongside it, up to a 10% cap. However, if the reference asset declines, the ETF absorbs the first 15% of any loss. Only after this “downside buffer” is exhausted would you start to experience losses.

BMO offers four such buffer ETFs, each named according to the start month of their outcome period when the initial upside cap and buffer limits are set. These include: Continue Reading…

Retirement needs a new Definition

Posted By |

By Ryan Donovan

Special to Financial Independence Hub

Before we dive into this article, let’s play a quick game: a word association game. I’ll bet you a crisp $5 bill, or a shiny loonie for the more risk averse out there, that with three chances, I can guess the first word that pops into your head. Now, it has to be the first word, so no cheating. Ready, set… the word is ‘Retirement.’

If you said ‘Retirement Income,’ ‘Retirement Savings’ or ‘Retirement Home,’ I’ll come to collect my winnings. If you said anything like ‘Travel,’ ‘Hobbies’ or ‘Exploration,  then good on you; I’ll send along an IOU.

The reason I felt so confident taking that bet is because when I tell people that I work in retirement planning, 99 out of 100 times, they assume that I work in financial services. The other time, people ask about senior living. Retirement has become so synonymous with financial planning, and so associated with ‘old age,’ that they’re practically inseparable. Yet, in reality, retirement is a stage of life, not a date on the calendar, an amount in your bank account, and is certainly not a death sentence.

One of our primary goals when creating our startup, RetireMint, was to reframe the national conversation around “what it means to retire,” which, at its core, requires redefining how Canadians prepare for retirement.

Now, I am not discounting the importance and necessity of a sound financial plan. After all, you are reading this in Financial Independence Hub … Yes, financial planning is the keystone of retirement preparation, as you won’t even be able to flirt with the idea of retiring without it. Yet, retirement planning must adopt a much wider definition and break free from the tethered association of solely financial planning.

Retirement should really be a time to enjoy the fruits of your hard labour:  a chapter that will hopefully span decades, fuelled by leisure, exploration, discovery and meaning.

Answering the ‘what, where and how’ of everything you want to see, do and accomplish in this next chapter requires conscious preparation in areas far beyond spreadsheets and bank statements. 

The industry paradigm is that you have about 8,000 days in retirement, or around 22 years. In each of those years, you will have more than 2,000 hours of new-found free time that would have been spent working throughout the majority of your life. Filling these thousands of hours with meaningful and purposeful activity is much more easily said than done.

The common approach to retirement planning (yes, we are now using the wider definition) has been to ‘punt the ball down the field’ and ‘cross that bridge when you get to it.’ Yet, we see time and time again that those who leave their lifestyle planning to their first day of retirement are the ones who have the hardest time transitioning into this next chapter.

The people who say, “I’ll never get tired of sipping Piña Coladas on a beach,” face the same fate as the ones who say “I can’t wait to golf every day.” While these may be dream activities for retirees, they ultimately see diminishing returns if they’re your only activities, because humans are funny creatures:  we need meaning and variation.

Despite its innocent demeanour, retirement has some dark, inconvenient truths: 

  • Ages 50-64, 65-84 and 85+ have the three highest suicide rates in North America, and in the last five years, we’ve seen a 38% increase in suicides among Baby Boomers.
  • Canadians over 65 have a divorce rate three times the national average.
  • Over 25% of older Canadians are socially isolated, which causes a 50% increased risk of dementia.
  • And, 77% of older Canadians live with at least two chronic illnesses or conditions.

It’s statistics like these that starkly highlight the importance of planning for your lifestyle, wellness and purpose, as well as the need for trusted resources to help with this planning. This was the a-ha moment that sparked our urgency to develop RetireMint.

RetireMint stemmed from empirical evidence showing that once people’s finances are at least on the right track, their primary concerns and conversations with their financial advisors shift far beyond the scope of their meetings. “What am I going to do with the grandkids?,” “Where am I going to travel?” “What happens when I lose my work insurance coverage?,” are just a few of the plethora of questions that popped up time and time again.

It’s fantastic that Canadians have this level of trust and comfort with their advisors, but the truth is that financial advisors are not equipped to answer all of these broader retirement inquiries, and they’ll be the first to admit it. It’s clear that this undue burden falls on the shoulders of financial professionals, but if not for them, who is going to provide the answers? Continue Reading…

The Role of Technology in facilitating Impact Investing

Posted By |
Image by Unsplash

By Devin Partida

Special to Financial Independence Hub

Most investments share a fairly straightforward purpose: making money.

However, the past few years have seen an uptick in impact investing. While financial returns still play a role in this practice, the additional goal is to make a positive difference in the world.

According to Wikipedia, impact investing refers to investments “made into companies, organizations, and funds with the intention to generate a measurable, beneficial social or environmental impact alongside a financial return.” It’s about alining an investor’s beliefs and values with the allocation of capital to address social and/or environmental issues.

Impact investors want their funds to go toward causes they believe in. Historically, that’s been more easily said than done, but new technology makes it more accessible and reliable than ever. Here’s a closer look at how.

Facilitating Easier Investments

Like in all investments, Technology streamlines the trading process when impact investing. Digital platforms provide a single point where users can look through sustainable or socially conscious options to find an opportunity in less time. The same apps let people invest with a few taps of the screen, bypassing the time and intermediaries of conventional transactions.

Financial technology (fintech) also enables faster, smoother payments once users decide on an investment. Blockchain is one of the most promising innovations here, as even international transactions take just four to six seconds on these networks. Tech like this also reduces processing costs.

Such speed and cost-effectiveness mean impact investing is a more accessible practice. People who are interested but worried about the cost of third-party fees or don’t know where to begin can work around these concerns.

Providing new Impact Investing opportunities

Similarly, fintech provides new ways to get into impact investing. On a surface level, trading apps offer live news and cover deposits to make finding and jumping on unique opportunities easier. Beyond that, tech has democratized the finance industry to let people invest in causes they care about outside the conventional market system.

Peer-to-peer networks are a great example. Crowdfunding platforms like GoFundMe let anyone create a place for others to donate to or contribute directly to social impact. These opportunities are often more targeted than traditional investing. You couldn’t fund someone’s surgery on the stock market, but you can do so easily online.

Maximizing Transparency

New technologies also make it easier to ensure impact investments actually go to the causes they intend to. That’s important because 71% of young investors would turn down a significant sum of money if it meant supporting a company with a negative social or environmental impact.

Blockchain is a big difference-maker because the records are virtually impossible to change. Consequently, companies using the technology in their operations can provide proof of their sustainability or social impact. For example, diamond producer De Beers uses blockchain tracking for tamperproof assurance that its gems are ethically sourced.

The rise of digital data also means finding details on a business’s operations is more straightforward than ever. Similarly, it lets organizations provide specifics on their environmental and social efforts. This transparency helps investors determine if an opportunity aligns with their goals to boost trust in their investments.

Streamlining Impact Reports

Along similar lines, fintech can help impact investors see how their funding affects the causes they support. Many of these platforms were born online and can provide easily accessible updates on how the companies they highlight make a difference. For example, The Impact Crowd requires crowdfunding projects to submit reports at least once a year so users see what their funds do. Continue Reading…

Introducing Harvest High Income Shares: Top U.S. Stocks and High Monthly Income

Posted By |

By Ambrose O’Callaghan, Harvest ETFs

(Sponsor Blog) 

On Wednesday, August 21, 2024, Harvest ETFs introduced another innovative product in its growing lineup: Harvest High Income Shares ETFs.

These single-stock ETFs invest in top, well-favoured U.S. stocks, with a focus to provide high income every month from covered call writing.

The Top U.S. Stocks in Scope

Eli Lilly. A dominant global pharmaceutical manufacturer and distributor.

Amazon. A global e-commerce giant that has established a massive logistics network and an innovator in enterprise cloud computing.

Microsoft. A global leader in software services and solutions, as well as hardware technology.

NVIDIA. Established as a huge force in the semiconductor industry, with its graphics processing units (GPUs) at the forefront of the AI revolution.

These U.S. stocks are well known and sought after. They are four of the largest and most widely held stocks in today’s market. They offer a significant building block for covered call writing strategy, in that the shares of these massive companies have very deep and liquid option markets. Further, the level of volatility that accompanies the share prices is high. That makes these great stocks for Harvest’s active and flexible covered call writing strategy.

The Harvest Process:  Strong focus on High and Reliable Income every month

Record matters, and Harvest has it. For 15 years and counting, Harvest has pursued an active covered call writing strategy focused on generating high income, every month for investors in its Income ETFs lineup. Supported by its proven covered call strategy, Harvest has delivered nearly $1 billion in total monthly cash distributions over its 15-year history to investors.

This new, innovative product line, focuses on investing in shares of a single company targeting the largest, most widely held U.S. stocks. Harvest’s investment team — with a combined six decades of investment experience — will use Harvest’s well-established covered call writing strategy to provide high monthly income to investors while delivering on what sets Harvest apart;  that is, ensuring that investors enjoy not just high, but consistent, stable, predictable, and reliable income each month.

The premium income from covered call writing can be treated as capital gains. That means the high income that the Harvest High Income Shares ETFs seek to provide can be regarded as being among most tax-efficient income. The Harvest High Income Shares  ETFs are organized as Canadian Trust Units and are available in Canadian and U.S.-dollar-denominated Units. As open-end mutual funds listed on an exchange (“ETFs”), on the TSX, they provide trading and reporting flexibility for Canadian investors.

Innovation, High Monthly Income, and Upside

The covered calls strategy used in the Harvest High Income Shares  ETFs will operate with up to 50% write level. Harvest’s portfolio management team has stress tested these equities with an average 2-year implied volatility. It found they can produce high levels of income at much lower write levels. Therefore, a 50% write level, in their view, provides a conservative floor to ensure unitholders will be able have reliable high-income generation every month. Continue Reading…

Active or Passive Investing: Which is Best?

Posted By |
Image courtesy Justwealth

By Robin Powell, The Evidence-Based Investor*  

Special to Financial Independence Hub

* Republished from the Just Word Blog from Robin Powell, the U.K.-based editor of The Evidence-Based investor and consultant to investors, planners & advisors  

There are broadly two types of investing: active and passive investing. Active investors try to beat the market by trading the right securities at the right times. Passive investors simply try to capture the market return, cheaply and efficiently. So which approach is better?

Instinctively, most people who haven’t looked into the issue in any detail tend to assume that active investing is superior. After all, the thinking goes, it’s surely preferable to be doing something to improve your investment performance, instead of just accepting whatever return the market offers. Active investing has certainly been much more popular than passive in the past.

But if you look at the evidence, you’ll see that over the long run, most mutual fund managers have underperformed passively managed funds.

S&P Dow Jones Indices keeps a running scorecard of active fund performance in different countries, including Canada, called SPIVA. It consistently shows that, regardless of whether they invest in equities or bonds, most active managers underperform for most of the time.

The latest SPIVA data for Canada were released a few weeks ago, and they chart the performance of active funds up to the end of December 2023. What the figures show is that the great majority of funds have lagged the relative index once fees and charges are factored in, especially over longer periods of time.

Underperformance over ten years is even more pronounced. For example, 98.04% of Canadian Focused Equity funds, 97.56% of U.S. Equity funds and 97.60% of Global Equity funds underperformed the benchmark. Remarkably, on a properly risk-adjusted basis, not a single U.S. Equity fund domiciled in Canada beat the S&P 500 index over the ten-year period.

In fact, fund managers have found it so hard to outperform that, of the funds that were trading at the start of January 2014, just 61.33% of them were still doing so at the end of December 2023. That’s right, almost four out of ten funds failed to survive the full ten years.

Of course, it might still be worth investing in an active fund if you knew in advance that it’s likely to be one of the very few long-term outperformers. The problem is that predicting a “star” fund ahead of time is very hard to do, and past performance tells us very little, if anything, of value about future performance.

To illustrate this point, the SPIVA team examined the persistence of funds available to Canadian investors. Among Canadian-based equity funds that ranked in the top half of peer rankings over the five-year period to the end of December 2017, only 45% remained in the top half, while 55% fell to the bottom half or ceased to exist, at least in their own right, in the following five-year period.

To be clear, I’m not saying that active managers in Canada are any less competent than their counterparts in other countries. What the SPIVA analysis shows is that managers all over the world struggle to add any value whatsoever after costs. Distinguishing luck from skill in active management is notoriously difficult, but the proportion of funds that beat the markets in the long run is consistent with random chance.

Why do so few active managers outperform?

So why is active fund performance generally so poor? The most important reason is that beating the market is extremely difficult. Why? Because the financial markets are highly competitive and very efficient. Never before have investors had so much information at their disposal. New information is made available to all market participants at the same time, and prices adjust accordingly within minutes, or even seconds.

In the short term, then, prices move up and down in a random fashion. So, identifying a security that is either underpriced at any one time is a huge challenge.

Another reason why active fund performance tends to be so disappointing is that active managers incur significant costs. Salaries, research, marketing, the cost of trading and so on: all of these things need paying for, and it’s the investor who picks up the tab. Once all these costs are added together, they present a very high hurdle for fund managers. Simply put, any outperformance they succeed in delivering is usually wiped out by fees and charges. Continue Reading…