All posts by Jonathan Chevreau

Too many opting out of employer pension offers of “free money”

Depositphotos_49320675_xsTwo of my seven eternal chestnuts of personal finance (from a MoneySense blog in August) is never to turn down “free money” from either Government or your employer.

In a piece in the Financial Post Wednesday  Barbara Shecter reports on a Sun Life Financial finding that employees are not taking advantage of up to $3 billion in corporate pension plans and programs whereby employers “match” contributions.

Defined Contribution (DC) pensions can match top-ups that amount to between 3% and 6% of total earnings. Roughly a million are in DC pensions.

Remember, if your employer offers a company pension plan — especially if they will “match” your contributions — take them up on the offer!

 

 

 

My unplanned retirement at 52: “It’s better to have a plan!”

By Del Chatterson

Special to the Financial Independence Hub

Del Chatterson

My unplanned retirement at 52 seems to have been successful, if I look back over the last 15 years, but I could have done it better and suggest that you can too, if you have a plan.

Here is my story and the lessons I have learned. I am sharing them on the assumption it’s never too late for you or me to do it better. At age 52, I quit my day job and headed into the unknown. At that time I certainly did not call it “retirement.” It was more “seeking new opportunities,” time for a change of career plans” and other appropriate clichés.

How did I get to that point? Well, I was just another engineer/MBA with a career in corporate positions and management consulting, followed by twelve years in my own business. My computer products distribution enterprise grew quickly and did very well during the booming PC revolution of the ‘80s. Then in the ‘90s the PC market rapidly changed and smaller players were squeezed out by the few surviving big manufacturers, distributors, and retailers. So the business become less fun and less rewarding as I went through the challenges of a merger, wind-up, re-start and finally an exit. My decision to leave was based simply on the lack of personal satisfaction. The stimulating challenges and my motivation had evaporated. It was time to move on.

Inspired by The Wealthy Barber

During most of the 25 years after my MBA, I had earned good compensation and was apparently smart enough to manage a sound savings and investment plan (encouraged by the wise and practical advice of Jonathan Chevreau, the Wealthy Barber and many others.) The biggest bump in compensation and savings happened, of course, during the good years in my own business when sales and profits were booming. But when I quit working and starting searching for new opportunities there were two things missing: I did not know what I really wanted and I didn’t have a plan.

Financially, I was able to carry on without income and live off my investments. My savings and investment plans, starting in my early 30s, were based on reasonable risk and return assumptions in a well diversified portfolio. I started with a brokerage account and a commission-based broker. But after some poor advice and a couple of big losses, I switched to another broker for a few years, then finally decided to go 100% self-directed. I learned my choices were as good as those of the big brokerage research advisors and I now had the luxury of boasting about the winners and keeping quiet about my mistakes.

I remained cautious on 85% of the portfolio, although it was 95% in equities, as I could never justify the low returns of fixed income and was willing to be patient through the downturns. I often explain (usually to aggressive wealth management sales people) that my decision to continue to manage my own investments is not for the better returns, but for the education and entertainment value. Admittedly, sometimes an expensive education and sometimes more horror story than action-adventure.

Over the years, however, I had achieved acceptable average returns and at age 52 I could quit working and earning income. I could “retire.”

The Rule of 15

How did I know that? Being an engineer and MBA, I did have spreadsheets to run through various scenarios that showed I could live well and still leave an inheritance behind whenever I checked out. I even developed a simple “Rule of 15” that saves you all the trouble of preparing those spreadsheets. If you have fifteen times your annual spending invested, then you are good to retire. That’s it: if you need $50,000 a year to live on, you can retire on $750,000. That amount will take thirty years to decline to zero if you can earn at least 5% a year return on it.

The experts of course, will tell you it’s more complicated than that and you need to consider inflation and volatility of returns, housing, health and family issues. However, they are not predictable anyway and you have some room for error and the ability to manage within the 5% return and the 30-year time frame assumptions. Don’t make it complicated and suffer paralysis by analysis. The Rule of 15 is a simple reality check on your retirement plans.

But financial independence — findependence as Jonathan Chevreau calls it — is not enough. You may know how you are going to spend your money during your retirement, but how are you going to spend your time? That turns out to be even more important to your long-term health and well being.

Voluntourism

In my case, I meandered aimlessly into my unplanned retirement and tried to keep it interesting by dabbling in everything from Internet start-ups to building a consulting business; from running marathons to running for MP, playing golf to playing guitar. I dealt with some family issues, separated and divorced and did some voluntourism by helping entrepreneurs in developing economies and aboriginal communities.

After fifteen years of wandering between consulting, semi-retirement and self-unemployment, I recognized this approach was not giving me much satisfaction. I needed more passion and purpose in my life.

Since my own process clearly was not working, I started soliciting input and advice from professional resources to help figure out what I really needed for personal fulfillment. It began with a personal assessment of who I was and what I wanted. Better knowledge of myself helped me focus on what I should be spending my time on to achieve the goals of personal fulfillment. Clarity helps.

Here are the most important lessons that I learned in my unplanned retirement:

 

  1. Do not make decisions by neglecting them until events decide for you.

 

  1. Have a plan that recognizes your personal needs, goals, resources, limitations and timetable.

 

Assess who you are and where you are now; decide where you want to be and when; then start acting according to your plan. Hope for a little luck along the way, but don’t count on it.

About the Author:

DEL CHATTERSON is your Uncle Ralph.

He is dedicated to helping entrepreneurs to be better and do better.

 Del is an experienced and successful entrepreneur, executive and consultant. As an entrepreneur, he grew his computer products distribution business from zero to $20 million per year in just eight years. His consulting company, DirectTech Solutions, provides strategic advice to business owners at all stages: from start-up through the challenges of managing growth and profitability to the exit strategies for management transition and business succession.

9781496932259_COVER.inddDel is an Engineer and MBA and has lectured on entrepreneurship and business management at both Concordia and McGill Universities in Montreal. He continues to share his experience and offers ideas, information and inspiration for entrepreneurs worldwide under the persona of “Uncle Ralph.’

He has recently published two books for entrepreneurs:“Don’t Do It the Hard Way” and “The Complete Do-It-Yourself Guide to Business Plans.”

Learn more here.

 

Big TFSAs coming under taxman’s scrutiny

Woman frightened by taxesGarry Marr reports in Tuesday’s Financial Post that the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) is targeting investors with big gains in their Tax Free Savings Accounts (TFSAs, the Canadian equivalent of America’s Roth plans).

Marr says the CRA is arguing that if investors use TFSAs for frequent trading and make large gains as a result, they are in effect running a trading business and should be taxed on any income so generated. A so-called TFSA audit program has been rolled out in recent years, according to the Post’s sources.

The CRA considers eight factors to determine whether the trading pattern constitutes a business; among them are frequency of transactions, period of ownership, securities knowledge, trading experience, advertising of the service and use of speculative securities.

Calgary-based law firm Moodys Gartner Tax Law LLP is said to be preparing for a legal fight with the government.

 

 

 

Extreme Early Retirement? I call it Extreme Early Findependence!

Savings Thermometer Measuring Money Nestegg IncreaseBy Jonathan Chevreau

MoneySense.ca today is running my column on Extreme Early Retirement from the November issue. It looks at the phenomenon championed by super-frugal savers like Mr. Money Moustache and Jacob Lund Fisker of so-called Extreme Early Retirement.

The idea is to be self-sufficient, do without, live in a small home, eliminate frivolous purchases like cars or furniture and save like crazy for five or ten years: and we’re not talking the typical savings rates of 10 or 15% of a paycheque: more like 50% or more.

Frugality to a Fault?

Continue Reading…

Bond fund managers loading up on cash

American cashInteresting piece in the Wall Street Journal entitled Bond Funds Load Up on Cash. Of course, investors have been preparing — usually prematurely — for the “inevitable” risk in interest rates since soon after the financial crisis in 2008 and so far it’s yet to happen.

As the Journal reports, though, large bond funds in the United States are holding the most cash since that same financial crisis: 6.6% on average among the top ten American bond funds as of their last reporting date, according to Morningstar Inc. That cash position is more than double what it was last year (on average). The last time cash levels in bond funds were this high was 2007.

The expectation is that the Federal Reserve will finally start to act and raise rates sometime in 2015. And of course, now we’re in December of 2014, 2015 isn’t quite so far in the future as it may once have appeared. The Fed’s Quantitative Easing program ended in October (at least the latest incarnation of it).

The yield on the 10-year U.S. Treasury note was 2.169% as of Friday, the Journal reports, down from 3% when 2013 ended.