All posts by Jonathan Chevreau

FP: A look at three retirement income planning software packages

Posted By |

My latest Financial Post column looks at a few retirement income planning software packages that help would-be retirees and semi-retirees plan how to start drawing down from various income sources: Click on the highlighted text to retrieve the full article: How you draw down your retirement savings could save you thousands: this program proves it.

There may be as many as 26 distinct sources of income a retired couple may encounter, estimates Ian Moyer, a 40-year veteran of the financial industry and creator of the Cascades program described in the article.

When he started to plan for his own decumulation adventure, five years ago, he felt there was very little planning software out there that was both comprehensive and easy to use. So, he hired a computer programmer and created his own package, now called Cascades.

While the main focus of the FP article is on Cascades, (available to financial advisors for $1,000 a year; do it yourself investors can negotiate a price directly), the article also references a couple of other programs we have looked at previously here on the Hub: Doug Dahmer’s Retirement Navigator and BetterMoneyChoices.com, the latter currently nearing the end of beta testing.

Dahmer has been writing guest blogs on decumulation here at the Hub almost since this site’s founding in 2014. See for example his most recent one, or the similar articles flagged at the bottom: Top 10 Rules for Successful Retirement Income Planning.

Dahmer says he’s pleased that others are waking up to the need for tax planning in the drawdown years: “Cascades provides a very good, easy-to-use introduction to these concepts.”

Planning for peaks and valleys in spending

Retirement Navigator’s Doug Dahmer

However, Dahmer would like an approach that doesn’t assume yearly spending remains relatively static: his Better Money Choices(available on line for $108 a year) allows for the “peaks and valleys” of spending as retirees pass through their Go-go to their slow-go and finally their “no-go” years.  Most retirees have to plan for sporadic large purchases like renovations or replacement of roofs or furnaces, plus of course vacations with widely varying price tags. Each spending peak represents a tax challenge, while the valleys are where the tax planning opportunities exist. Dahmer likens Better Money Choices to a gym monthly membership and Retirement Navigator to a personal trainer.

Personally, I found going through both firm’s programs a fascinating exercise, very much like putting together a jig saw puzzle. For me, Better Money Choices helps you visualize the final picture you’re trying to assemble, showing how much money you’ll need and when you’ll need it. Cascades provides vivid yearly snapshots of your year-by-year progress in putting the pieces together.

Vanguard Canada unveils low-cost actively managed mutual funds

Posted By |
Vanguard Canada’s Atul Tiwari

On the heels of its three asset allocation ETFs that shook up Canada’s investment industry in February, Vanguard Investments Canada Inc. today announced it will be providing four new low-cost actively managed mutual funds to the Canadian market.

The four new mutual funds are its first actively managed products for the domestic market: until now, it has been providing 36 exchange-traded funds (ETFs), with more than C$16 billion in assets. Vanguard says Canadians hold more than C $28 billion in Vanguard investments if you include both its Canadian products and its funds trading on US stock exchanges.

All four of the new active mutual funds are globally diversified: Vanguard says its management fees are about half that of the mutual fund industry average in Canada. (According to the Investment Funds Institute of Canada here, the average total cost of ownership of mutual funds for clients using advice-based distribution channels in Canada at the end of 2016 was 1.96% when taxes are excluded.)

IFIC has said these costs continue to fall and there’s little doubt Vanguard’s entry will accelerate the trend, and not a moment too soon, given last Thursday’s disappointing proposals from the Canadian Securities Administrators. (See the Hub’s roundup here or my Motley Fool Canada blog here).

In a press release distributed at 8 am Monday, Vanguard said the four new funds “feature global investment strategies from some of Vanguard’s longest-tenured sub-advisors” and complement its broad-based lineup of ETFs.

Vanguard Canada managing director Atul Tiwari (pictured) said “Vanguard has a deep 40-year history of active management expertise and we are excited to extend that to mutual fund investors in Canada, at a low cost … These mutual funds reflect our philosophy as an organization with a disciplined long-term approach and world-class investment managers that have worked with Vanguard for decades.”

Despite the fact The Vanguard Group Inc. pioneered index funds and low-cost passively managed investing (with more than US$5 trillion under management), it is also one of the world’s largest active managers, with US$1.2 trillion in global actively managed assets. The key contributing factors to successful active management are low costs, talent and patience, said Tim Huver, Vanguard Canada’s head of product.

Pricing varies with investment performance

Vanguard says it will use a unique pricing structure in the Canadian marketplace that aligns the interests of the sub-advisors with the funds’ investors. The maximum management fee for each mutual fund will be 0.50% and the management fee will vary up or down, up to that maximum amount, based on the investment performance of each fund.

 

Mutual Fund Maximum Management Fee First Year Management Fee
Vanguard Global Balanced Fund

 

 0.50% 0.38%
Vanguard Global Dividend Fund

 

 0.50% 0.34%
Vanguard Windsor U.S. Value Fund 0.50% 0.35%
Vanguard International Growth Fund 0.50% 0.40%

 

The first year management fee shown above is effective from June 25, 2018 to June 30, 2019. The funds will be available to financial advisors through Series F units and institutional investors through Series I units.

Canadian investors currently hold $1.5 trillion in mutual funds, according to Tiwari. “Vanguard has a long track record of lowering investment costs in the areas in which we operate, so we see providing greater choice and lower costs to a broader group of investors as very positive.”

More on the four actively managed global mutual funds Continue Reading…

Overhaul of mutual fund fees not as sweeping as some would like

Posted By |

Deferred Sales Charges (DSC) on mutual funds are going to be eliminated in Canada but recommendations released today by securities regulators did not go so far as to implement an outright ban of trailer commissions (aka trailer fees, also referred to as embedded compensation.)

The Canadian Securities Administrators (CSA) also released proposals regarding rules about what advice or products are in the “best interest” of financial consumers.

 

You can find a full summary in this article that appeared today in the Globe & Mail. (The full link may only be available to G&M subscribers, depending on how many free views readers have previously accessed). Rob Carrick also has a column on the topic titled It just became clear we’ll never see an investment industry where clients must come first. Well, we’ll see. Over at the Financial Post, Barbara Schecter reports OSC drops push for adviser standard.

Big win for industry

For more of an industry perspective, there is a full report here at Advisor.ca. And the industry’s newspaper, Investment Executive, headlined its coverage as “a big win for the industry.”

John De Goey

One of the sources cited in both G&M articles is John De Goey, an investment adviser and author, who also sent this email to the Hub expressing his disappointment in the decisions:

“This is shameful on the part of the CSA.  It has been almost 15 years since Julia Dublin’s Fair Dealing Model drew attention to the concern of bias caused by embedded commissions.”  He also offered these four observations:

  • The primary concern is advisor bias as caused by embedded compensation, and there’s nothing here to address that
  • Does not allow for “product meritocracy”
  • Does not address how the trailing commission on equities is double the trailing commission on income (which creates obvious, massive, self-evident advisor bias)
  • Does nothing to address the discrepancy between ETFs and mutual funds.  Advisor’s preferred business model should never drive product recommendations

 

Vanguard says industry will organically evolve away from embedded compensation

Vanguard Canada’s Atul Tiwari

However, Vanguard Investments Canada Inc. managing director Atul Tiwari said Vanguard is “encouraged by some of the proposals from the CSA. Although there will not be a ban on embedded commissions, we believe that the Canadian market, like other regions around the world, will organically evolve away from it. The CSA has made clear that suitability determinations will need to be in the best interests of clients. This will likely accelerate the move that we are already seeing in advisors going from commission-based to fee-based models. We support that trend as providing superior fee transparency and enhancing the use of low cost products to give clients better long term returns. Vanguard will continue to champion the interests of Canadian investors with more low-cost and high-quality product options.”

And finally, my take on this at the Motley Fool

(Added on Friday afternoon): You can find my own take on this development in my monthly blog at Motley Fool Canada. Click on the highlighted headline here: New mutual fund advice guidelines underwhelm advocates for Consumer-Investors.

 

Retired Money: How to be financially, physically and emotionally fit for Retirement

Posted By |

My latest MoneySense Retired Money column, which has just been published, looks at a self-published book by the semi-retired (at age 64) Howard Pell. His book is titled Retire Fit, Fit & Fit. Click on the highlighted headline to retrieve the full MoneySense column: Retirement fitness involves mind and body, as well as money.

So what does the Fit, Fit & Fit mean? It’s in the headline of this blog as well as the adjacent photo taken from the book cover, which is the book’s subtitle. So it’s referring to being all three of financially fit, physically fit and emotionally fit for Retirement.

There are plenty of books about financial fitness so Pell pays only lip service to that aspect: what he brings to the table is insights on how to integrate finances with physical and emotional fitness. (To some extent, so does the book I co-authored with Mike Drak: Victory Lap Retirement)

Pell, who is based in Waterloo, Ont., does add a few newish terms to the semi-retirement lexicon.  He dubs the lifestyle “voluntary unemployment” but like many at this stage, finds the word “retired” inadequate. He tosses out several alternatives but the best one is his suggestion to simply adopt the Spanish word for “retired,” which is Jubilado (for males) or Jubilada (for females.”) He would use the term to signify anyone who is financially, physically and emotionally fit.

I can certainly relate to his observation of the semi-retired life that  “The big difference is that now all my deadlines and commitments are self-imposed.” Of course, as the old quip goes about driven self-employed business people: “My boss is a slavedriver.”

Pell also went personally through the “glide path” to semi-retirement described in other Retired Money columns and here at the Hub, via working a three-day week for his then employer during the last two years of his time there. This is a good way to test out your financial fitness while also clearing time for more physical fitness and — perhaps the toughest challenge — preparing for emotional fitness for retirement (I’m speaking for myself here.)

Finding the sweet spot

A Venn diagram on page 7 of Pell’s book (shown adjacent) illustrates that the sweet spot is the intersection where financial, emotional and physical fitness all converge.

If they don’t, and you became financially fit by selling out either your physical and/or your emotional health, the retirement your finances make possible may be a very limited and unsatisfying one.

It’s also possible to be only physically fit or only emotionally fit but lack the financial resources for retirement. The need to keep working to pay the bills will be frustrating, especially if all your peers have retired.

Continue Reading…

FP: How tax-efficient ETFs can help dividend and fixed-income investors

Posted By |

My latest Financial Post column (on page FP8 of Friday’s paper) looks at how certain tax-efficient ETFs can provide investors with a measure of tax relief in their non-registered portfolios. You can find the full column online by clicking on the highlighted headline here: Friends with Benefits: How ETFS can help keep the taxman at bay.

By definition, investing in taxable (non-registered) accounts is inherently tax inefficient. Outside registered plans, fixed income is the most harshly taxed asset while deferred capital gains is most favorably taxed.

In between are dividends. As anyone who receives T-5 or T-3 slips at tax time knows, dividends create a yearly tax liability, although as Markham-based fee-for-service financial planner Ed Rempel observes, those with annual taxable income under $47,000 will pay little or not tax on Canadian dividends.

Foreign dividends are highly taxed like Canadian interest, but qualifying Canadian dividends generate the dividend tax credit. This eases the pain but retirees are often irked by the dividend “gross-up” rules, which can bump them into higher tax brackets and result in clawback of government benefits like Old Age Security. Continue Reading…