Hub Blogs

Hub Blogs contains fresh contributions written by Financial Independence Hub staff or contributors that have not appeared elsewhere first, or have been modified or customized for the Hub by the original blogger. In contrast, Top Blogs shows links to the best external financial blogs around the world.

Navigating Fixed Income Challenges with Flexibility

Posted By |

By Brian Giuliano

Brandywine Global Investment Management, a specialist investment manager of Franklin Templeton

(Sponsor Content)

Flexibility and adaptability can work to an investor’s advantage in the challenging fixed income markets of 2021. Structural disinflationary trends are now clashing with cyclical inflationary forces in a global economy struggling to recover from the COVID-19 pandemic. Add on interest rates at record lows, demographic pressures, heavy government debt levels, and widespread technological disruption throughout the global economy.

The market environment of low interest rates makes it difficult to generate income while preserving capital. As a result, many investors have taken on additional credit or interest rate risk to try to earn a more attractive income from fixed income assets.

But there are pitfalls to this approach. Without a counterweight to the extra portfolio risk, investors could be vulnerable to an increase in interest rates or a selloff in credit markets.

One option for investors is a multisector strategy with the flexibility to adapt quickly to changing markets. A strategy that’s able to capture opportunities when available but also play defense when market conditions call for it.

Global Income Optimiser strategy

The portfolio team behind the Franklin Brandywine Global Income Optimiser strategy are strong believers in flexibility, which means we try to adapt the income and risk exposures in a portfolio to the market environment. This approach does not have any structural, home country or sectoral biases. We aim to rotate the portfolio across what we believe are the best risk-adjusted return opportunities in the global fixed income universe.

Our goal is to generate high-yield-like returns with investment-grade-like volatility for investors. We want to maximize the income that can safely be earned in a given market environment.

The Franklin Brandywine strategy seeks returns from across the investment universe, including global investment grade and high yield credit, developed market sovereigns, structured credit and emerging market debt. Furthermore, sector rotation, duration management, quality rotation and security selection are employed to meet the strategy’s investment objective. Foreign currency is hedged primarily back to an investor’s base currency, such as the Canadian dollar; however, limited exposure may be used opportunistically to add alpha for a portfolio.

This strategy became available to retail investors in Canada on June 4, when Franklin Templeton introduced the Franklin Brandywine Global Income Optimiser Fund*. Globally, the strategy has a successful track record, dating back to its inception in 2013. In the U.S, a similar fund, to the degree allowed by Canadian regulations, is 5-star rated by Morningstar.** Brandywine Global is a specialist investment manager that was part of Franklin Templeton’s acquisition of asset manager Legg Mason in 2020.

Portfolio positioning for the reopening

Brandywine Global sees growth and inflation returning to the global economy this year. We increased spread duration late in the first quarter of 2020 and began reducing high quality government bond duration; so overall portfolio duration was roughly flat last spring. From last summer through winter, we materially reduced portfolio duration.

Now, the positioning of the strategy is for a short duration, cyclically-oriented portfolio of companies that have some pricing power, given inflationary pressures from the reopening trade. There’s a mix of U.S. and European names with a concentration in the BBB and BB space. The level of credit risk is largely investment grade over the long term; less than 5% of the portfolio is in CCC securities. High quality government bonds can help manage volatility. These and other ‘safe’ assets offer lots of ‘episodic value’ for the portfolio at times, especially during volatile markets, by being sources of alpha and acting as a counterweight to riskier holdings.

Capital protection is a top priority, and the Brandywine team will not reach for yield in this strategy.

Environmental, social, governance assessments

Also, Brandywine Global integrates ESG analysis into our comprehensive assessment of information risk and price risk with this strategy. The focus is on the material ESG issues that can impact a country’s economic growth, the business activities of a corporation, or the integrity of securitized collateral. Continue Reading…

Financial knowledge of Canada’s retirement system isn’t improving, study shows

Posted By |

Financial knowledge about the Canadian retirement system fell from 2020 to 2021, says the Retirement Savings Institute.

The financial literacy of average Canadians is still low when it comes to understanding our Retirement system, says a survey being released Tuesday. The third edition of the Retirement Savings Institute (RSI) surveyed 3,002 Canadians aged 35 to 54 and found the overall RSI index measuring knowledge of the retirement income system slipped from 38% in 2020 to 37% in 2021. This, it says, is “still showing a significant lack of knowledge among Canadians.”

The RSI Index is the share (stated as a percentage) of correct answers to  29 questions posed in the survey.

The best-understood subjects continue to be CPP/QPP and RRSPs/TFSAs. Canadians still find it tougher to understand employer sponsored pension plans and Old Age Security, where the average respondents “didn’t know” the answer to half the questions.

In a backgrounder, the RSI team at HEC Montreal [a business school] says the scientific literature in several countries has established a link between general financial literacy and preparation for Retirement. However, “the level  of general financial literacy among Canadians is fairly low, although comparable to what is observed elsewhere in industrialized countries.” It also finds knowlege about narrower topics like taxes to be “rather limited.”

Starting in 2018, the RSI started to measure on an annual basis the financial literacy of Canadians in their “years of strong asset accumulation in preparation for retirement.” Those younger than 35 tend to have “other concerns and financial priorities than retirement,” the RSI says.

Knowledge rises with education and income, and as retirement nears

Not surprisingly, the closer to Retirement age one is, the more knowledgeable of related financial matters we tend to become. The RSI score was 33.9% for the youngest in the survey aged 35 to 39, rising to 36.6% for the 40 to 44 cohort, then to 37.8% for the 45-49 group, and a high of 39.5% for those 50 to 54.

Also as one would expect, the more schooling the higher the score: those with high school or less had an RSI score of 31.5%, while those with college or equivalent scored 36.9%, and those with a Bachelor’s degree or higher scored on average 45.3%. Similarly, the higher the household income, the better knowledge. Thus, those with household income of $30,000 or less scored just 26.1%, compared to $60,000 to $90,000 families scoring 37.3% and at the highest, families making $120,000 or more scored 45.6%.

Equally unsurprising is the fact that higher earners are more knowledgeable about RRSPs and TFSAs, especially when it comes to contribution room and withdrawal rules. They are less knowledgeable about investment returns in those vehicles, and score a low 12.6% on penalties for over contributions and other rules related to taxes.

Many confused about Employer Pensions

Employer pension plans seems to be an issue. At all ages, Canadians found it difficult to know the difference between Defined Benefit (DB) and Defined Contribution (DC) pension plans. In particular, they tend to be confused about which one reduces longevity risk (DB) and which depends on returns generated by financial markets (DC). Low-income individuals are even less knowledgeable.

Workers who are contributing employer pension plans had significantly higher scores (41%) than those who were not enrolled in such plans (32.9%).

The older and richer understand CPP/QPP better

Also as you’d expect, older people and more well-off people understand the Canada Pension Plan (CPP) or the Quebec Pension Plan (QPP) better. As the chart below illustrates, most Canadians are now well aware that taking early CPP/QPP benefits results in lower monthly benefits (shown in the “Penalty” bar), but there is still a lot of confusion about whether CPP/QPP recipients can collect benefits while still working (only 25% correctly answer this.)

Most Canadians know there is a penalty for taking CPP/QPP benefits early but there is much confusion about collecting while still working.

Older people also know OAS and GIS better. As the chart below shows, most people know you have to be at least 65 years old to receive OAS, but knowledge about technical matters like the OAS clawback, the Guaranteed Income Supplement to the OAS, and taxation of these benefits tends to be much scantier.

Basic OAS timing seems well understood but many are murky when it comes to clawbacks and eligibility and taxation of GIS benefits.

Mortgages well understood, bonds and debt not so much

When it comes to major financial products, Canadians are quite knowledgeable about compound interest, but as less so about debt doubling and quite ill-informed about Bonds, as the chart below indicates. ( Continue Reading…

Renting vs Buying Property while living abroad: Which is best for Financial Independence?

Posted By |

By Emily Roberts

For the Financial Independence Hub

Financial independence means different things to different people. It has an impact on your life planning and whether renting is preferred over buying property. If you’re planning to go abroad and live elsewhere like continental Europe, Eastern Europe, or south-east Asia, then plans may be different again.

In this article, we look at whether renting is better than buying when you’re financially independent (or working towards it).

What Does Financial Independence mean to You?

Financial independence is possible at various levels. People refer to it by different names including Barista FIRE, CoastFIRE, FI, and others.

One approach is to reach a modest level of financial independence to provide a minimal income from investments, and to let them grow from their current level for a decade or longer while working an easier, low-paid job. Another approach is to wait until you have enough and then retire, but with the occasional freelance or consulting gig too.

Financial independence doesn’t necessarily mean retirement, which generally speaking refers to stopping working as a primary source of income. Different strokes for different folks.

Advantages of Renting

When still working, renting comes out of your paycheck and reduces what you can invest for future financial independence. Some people decide to live and work abroad to reduce their living expenses, to allow them to save faster.

Renting in the US

Americans can rent places Stateside but have to be careful of the long-term leases and associated fees along with any restrictions on tenants.

Depending on the city, renting has become quite expensive, causing some to look abroad.

Renting Abroad

Renting abroad can save you considerable money compared to back home.

For instance, PropertyGuru provides rooms for rent in Kuching, Malaysia. They have rooms for under $100 a month, studios for greater privacy, and larger multi-bedroom apartments in newly constructed buildings too. Their team can locate suitable rental accommodation close to major facilities and transport links, so whether you’re working there, planning to retire, or just on vacation, they can find something suitable.

Advantages of Buying

Purchasing real estate is something that appeals to many people. When they don’t like the idea of not owning where they live, then they lean far more towards buying.

Owning property domestically is possible when the prices are affordable. Unfortunately, cities with the most jobs typically also enjoy robust real estate markets with high prices to match. Sinking most of the next egg into a home makes retirement difficult. The ongoing ownership costs aren’t cheap either. Continue Reading…

Kornel Szrejber’s Podcast interview with me and PWL’s Ben Felix about the 2021 MoneySense ETF All-Stars

Posted By |

An interesting analysis of the annual MoneySense ETF All-stars feature is now available on a one-hour podcast interview hosted by BuildWealthCanada.ca’s Kornel Szrejber, with myself and PWL Capital’s Ben Felix. Click on this highlighted text for the full session: The Best ETFs in Canada for 2021.

Initially, the interview is audio-only, available through iTunes and the usual podcast services. Later there will be a version that also shows video.

The full 2021 edition of the ETF all-stars can be found here at the MoneySense site, and the Hub’s summary here. The feature appeared early in April.

There are various links to the ETFs, including the ticker symbols (most of them trading on the TSX).

Kornel Szrejber

After kind introductions of both me and Ben Felix, both of us then added a few more details about our careers before Kornel started the formal interview. He did so by asking about the general philosophy behind the All-Stars and the mechanics of how we got eight ETF experts to agree on designating roughly 50 ETFs (from a universe of near a thousand) as ETF All-Stars.

The philosophy underlying the All-stars

As I explain in the MoneySense overview, the feature – now in its 8th year – aims to help individual investors (with or without the assistance of advisors) whittle down the overwhelming choice of ETFs now on the market. The goal has never been to whipsaw investors with change for the sake of change, but rather we strive to pick “buy and hold” broadly diversified low-cost ETFs that can be held over the years and ideally the decades.

Except for the individual “Desert Island Picks” (see below), generally the idea has been to avoid flavor-of-the-month theme funds or regional equity ETFs too narrowly focused on single countries (apart from Canada and the US). As a result, we try to keep the list to a manageable number that don’t necessarily change with every passing year. Of course, once in a while there is a “game-changer” that requires a revamp: the Asset Allocation ETFs from Vanguard Canada and subsequently its major competitors being the best example.

We also assume our readers are probably not day traders but looking for low-cost manageable portfolios that might be tweaked annually but likely won’t welcome a total revamp of their investments every year. We assume some are DIY investors buying them from discount brokerages, some have full-service advisors (including shops like PWL Capital), and some are hybrid investors who largely invest on their own but like to validate their approach through perhaps a fee-only advisor.

How the panel “votes” 

As for the mechanics of choosing the ETFs, as I tell Kornel, the eight expert panelists simply debate by email or Slack and “vote” on a spreadsheet. We have four teams of two each and once each team agrees, we try and find a consensus among the four teams. So 5 out of 8 votes would carry the day: I myself don’t vote unless there is a 4-4 tie and the tie needs to be broken.

After the introductory chat, there is a brief interlude where Kornel describes his own personal transition to financial independence and semi-retirement, and addresses his own personal ETF picks, and why he holds his emergency cash with EQ Bank (as does our family). Continue Reading…

63% neglected Retirement saving during Covid; study sees urgent need for Workplace pensions

Posted By |

Over the course of the Covid pandemic the past year, almost two thirds of Canadians (63%) did not put aside anything for retirement, up from 58% last year, according to a study being released today.

That’s according to the third annual Canadian Retirement Survey from Healthcare of Ontario Pension Plan (HOOPP) and Abacus Data.

Not surprisingly, the survey also found a widespread belief that better access to workplace pensions is needed to avoid a retirement crisis.

The findings, based on an April 2021 survey of 2,500 Canadians, affirm there is a high level of anxiety about ability to save for retirement. Half (48%) said they are “very concerned” about not having enough money in retirement. That was more than the concern for one’s own physical health (44%), mental health (40%), debt load (31%) and job security (26%).  Only the daily cost of living was a greater concern than Retirement.

Steven McCormick, hoopp.com

“After more than a year of COVID-19, Canadians remain steadfast in their personal and societal concerns around retirement security,” said Steven McCormick, SVP, Plan Operations, HOOPP in a press release [pictured on right]. “As day-to-day financial pressures mount for some and ease for others, Canadians across the board are acutely aware of the importance, and challenge, of saving for retirement.”

While 46% of Canadians said they saved more money during COVID than they otherwise would have, more than half (52%) set aside nothing for retirement during the past year. Of those who said they saved less than usual, 72% saved nothing for retirement.

McCormick added: “HOOPP is proud to do its part by providing retirement security to healthcare workers, many of whom fall into groups that often don’t have access to pensions, such as women, part-time workers and younger Canadians. For our membership, the impacts of this pandemic will continue to be felt even after we emerge from the immediate crisis; but they can take some comfort in knowing their pension is secure.”

Covid disproportionately hurt finances of younger low-income groups

The COVID-19 pandemic harmed the finances of half of Canadians (52%) and did so disproportionately amongst younger and lower-income groups. Those aged 44 and younger are twice as likely to have had their finances greatly harmed (24%) than those 60+ (11%). Likewise, those earning less than $50,000 are twice as likely to have had their finances greatly harmed (25%) than those earning $100,000+ (12%). Continue Reading…