Debt & Frugality

As Didi says in the novel (Findependence Day), “There’s no point climbing the Tower of Wealth when you’re still mired in the basement of debt.” If you owe credit-card debt still charging an usurous 20% per annum, forget about building wealth: focus on eliminating that debt. And once done, focus on paying off your mortgage. As Theo says in the novel, “The foundation of financial independence is a paid-for house.”

Retirement #2 priority but four in ten Americans don’t see it happening

Posted By |
Retirement is a close second to home ownership, according to a LendEDU survey of American saving priorities

While having enough money saved for Retirement is narrowly behind buying a home, more than a third of Americans don’t expect they’ll ever be able to retire, according to a survey released Tuesday from LendEDU.com.

Retirement saving was cited by 19% of 1,000 respondents, versus 20% prioritizing “buying my own house or apartment.” Paying off credit-card debt was cited by 14% and building an emergency fund by 10%.

While there was only a minor lack of confidence about paying off credit cards and building an emergency fund, 17% don’t believe they’ll ever become homeowners and but almost four in ten Americas (39%) don’t believe they’ll ever be able retire.

Of those doubting their ability to retire, 52% were over age 54, 30% were between 45 and 54, and 15% were 35 to 44.

As for emergency savings, 33% said a major bill resulting from an injury would destroy their savings and therefore their long-term financial goals; another 14% cited some form of debt that could quickly get out of hand. However, 28% felt “relatively secure” and did not believe their financial goals could be derailed.

Secondary priorities

After home ownership and retirement, the most cited financial priorities were some form of getting out of debt: 14% cited paying off credit-card debt, 7% paying off student-loan debt, and 4% cited paying off other forms of debt apart from credit cards or student loans. 6% answered “Building my credit score,” 5% wanted enough saved to move out of their parents’ homes and rent a home or apartment, 4% said “Buying a car,” and 3% wanted to start a business.

1% wanted to invest in real estate, another 1% wanted to buy a second home and yet another 1% wanted to buy a second or third car. 3% want to “create a retirement account” and 2% want to “invest in the market outside my retirement account.”

Money a bigger priority than Love?

Of the 37% who were not currently in a long-term relationship, 72% were more focused on their financial targets, versus a minority 23% who prioritized finding a romantic partner. (The rest preferred not to say). The survey sees this as a “glass half full” finding: “It is good that Americans are quite serious when it comes to realizing their personal finance goals. But, on the glass empty side, sometimes one’s finances can’t buy happiness, or in this case love, and it is always important to understand what is truly important in life.” Continue Reading…

The hard truth about the FIRE movement [Financial Independence, Retire Early]

Posted By |

By Maria Weyman, creditcardGenius

Special to the Financial Independence Hub

Retirement, whether near or far, is a pretty big milestone in a person’s life.

We start saving for it as early as possible and put as much towards it as we can in order to be better prepared.

Whether we want to spend it travelling, immersing ourselves in our favourite hobbies, or spending some quality time with loved ones, most of us look forward to our retirement but don’t see it happening in the near future.

The average age of retirement in Canada is 64 years old, but the popularized FIRE movement – which stands for “Financial Independence, Retire Early” – is the lifestyle concept that proposes an alternative scenario.

By living as frugally as possible and saving every bit possible while maximizing income and revenue, FIRE-devotees plan on retiring much earlier than the Canadian average.

Although we all want to retire early, and being financially independent enough to retire at a young age is possible, it might not be attainable for everyone.

We can all dream, but it’s important to look at the concept without those rose-colored, heart-shaped glasses we all get when thinking about early retirement. Realistically, the FIRE movement can be quite extreme.

Reasonable income

Living from paycheque to paycheque is still the sad reality for many Canadians, some not even being able to set aside money for normal retirement. Living as frugally as possible is just a means of survival rather than a means to a bigger end.

Stagnant wages and the ever-increasing cost of living has made it harder than ever to be financially stable, let alone financially independent, especially for lower or middle-income brackets.

Not to mention getting higher-income jobs in the first place requires many years of education and consequently entails large amounts of student loans, which in itself can take decades to pay off.

Investment risks

Even if you have an income that allows some wiggle room, saving alone probably isn’t enough. To be successful in the FIRE movement requires some savvy investing.

And since we’re taking away the option of long-term, stable, compounded interest savings, the timeframe is much shorter.

But with higher rewards usually come higher risks.

It’s up to you to decide if the risk is worth the potential payout.

Retirement timeframe

Another glitch in the FIRE movement lifestyle is retirement timeframe: how long you’ll actually be retired for.

Savings breakdown

Let’s crunch some numbers just to get a general idea. The most complicated part of this calculation is compounding interest. Thankfully, we can summarize the effects of compound interest using a multiplier.

Let’s say you’re 23 years old and you plan on retiring early at 40 years old. The average life expectancy in Canada is 82 years old, meaning your retirement fund will have to be sufficient enough to carry on for over 42 years.

Compound interest allows our savings to “go further” than they otherwise would. If we are looking at a compound interest of 3.5% (moderate yield rate) we can calculate how much further savings would go for a period of 42 years:

Savings Multiplier = (1 + Annual Interest Rate)^42 = 1.035^42
Savings Multiplier = 4.241

Where the “^” indicates an exponential power (that is 2^3 =  2x2x2). This means that over a period of 42 years, your savings will essentially be multiplied by a factor of 4.2, which shows you how powerful a force compounding interest really is.

While it’s nice that our savings can grow exponentially with compound interest, taking money out of our savings results in losses that grow with compound interest. As such, if we take money out of our savings at the beginning of that 42 year period, that money is also multiplied by a factor of 4.241. Taking the money out one month after would have a slightly lower multiplier and so on. By summing the total effect of each monthly withdrawal we can also obtain a monthly expense multiplier. The first step is to find the monthly interest rate. This can be obtained as follows:

Monthly Interest Rate = (1+Annual Interest Rate)^(1/12) – 1 = (1+0.035)^(1/12) – 1
Monthly Interest Rate = 0.28708987%

Note that calculating a power x^(1/12) is a 12th root and will require a scientific calculator. After obtaining the monthly interest rate, you need to do a recursive sum representing the multipliers for all monthly withdrawals: Continue Reading…

The best Savings Accounts: based on what you’re saving for

Posted By |
Image from unsplash

By Zack Fenech

Special to the Financial Independence Hub

Saving can be one of the most time-consuming methods of acquiring personal wealth, but if you choose the right account for the right goal, you can make the most out of this lengthy process.

The best way to make your money work over time is by choosing the best savings account based on what you’re saving for.

Picking the best savings account in Canada can maximize your interest return and (in some cases) minimize the amount of taxes you’ll end up having to pay.

How to choose a Savings Account

Generally speaking, there are three main types of savings accounts available: a Registered Retirement Savings Plan (RRSP), a Tax-Free Savings Account (TFSA), and a High-Interest Savings Account (HISA). Considering this, it’s important to establish what exactly it is that you’re saving for, and how much time you’re willing to invest with your money.

While this might seem obvious, it’s a crucial step in the financial planning process. By finding the best savings accounts based on what you’re saving for, you’ll be able to achieve your financial goals much more quickly.

The other side of the coin shows that not choosing the right account can cause roadblocks down the line and sometimes cost you money in early withdrawal fees and taxes.

For example, if your aim is saving on a down payment for your first house, but you have all of your money wrapped up in, let’s say, GICs, you won’t be able to withdraw funds early without a penalty.

But that’s not to say that savings accounts are only propped up for massive investments like homes or your retirement.

Saving up for a car, your wedding, or even a trip can have significant benefits on your interest return, but only if you pick the best savings accounts for your financial goals.

Base choice of Savings Account on what you’re saving for

If you’re unsure what it is you need to save for, consider these two questions before making any firm decisions:

  1. What is my financial situation like right now?
  2. Will I need to access the money I’m investing soon?

Here are a few suggestions why a TFSA, RRSP, and HISA are best suited for your short-term and long-term goals, whatever they may be.

Tax-Free Savings Account (TFSA)

A Tax-Free Savings Account (TFSA) isn’t exactly a savings account. Think of TFSAs as tax shelters. You can put cash, mutual funds, stocks, bonds, or GICs in a TFSA and shelter them from taxes, as long as you remain under your yearly TFSA contribution limit [currently $6,000.]

The contribution limit on your TFSAs depends on how much you contribute each year and the yearly contribution limit allotted by the Canadian Revenue Agency (CRA).

If you exceed your yearly TFSA contribution limit by $2,000, you will not be able to deduct the exceeded amount. Contributions that exceed the $2,000 threshold are subject to a 1% fee for every month the amount remains in your RRSPs.

[Editor’s Note: see reader comment below and refer to this explanation at the Canada.ca website.]

Registered Retirement Savings Plan (RRSP)

A Registered Retirement Savings Plan (RRSP) might seem like a savings account exclusively for retirement planning. However, it’s also one of the best savings accounts for saving for your first home.

An RRSP is somewhat similar to a TFSA. Both shelter your contributions from tax: so long as you remain below your yearly contribution limit. Unlike a TFSA, however, an RRSP does not allow you to withdraw money tax-free. Continue Reading…

Just how steep is housing affordability in Toronto and Vancouver?

Posted By |

By Penelope Graham, Zoocasa

Special to the Financial Independence Hub

It’s no secret that in order to purchase a house in Toronto or Vancouver, you’ll need to have considerable financial assets; however, a new study from Zoocasa reveals just how elite income earners need to be in order to afford the benchmark single-family home in these cities.

According to the data, which is based on benchmark home prices sourced from the Canadian Real Estate Association as well as income tax filings from Statistics Canada, a Torontonian buyer must be within the top 10% of earners to afford a house priced at $873,100, while only Vancouverites within the top 2.5% could do so for a home priced at $1,441,000.

The numbers also show that prices for entry-level housing, such as condos, remain out of reach for many; buyers must be within the top 25% of income earners to afford the benchmark unit, which costs $656,900 in Vancouver and $522,300 in Toronto, respectively.

Affordability is greater in Southern Ontario, Prairies

However, the study also highlights the comparative affordability in other cities; several of the secondary markets in Ontario, as well as in the Prairie provinces, are much more accessible in terms of housing prices.

For example, those interested in markets within proximity of the GTA, such as Waterloo real estate, need only be within the top 50% to purchase a condo priced at $320,857, though houses are still only in reach for those within the top 25%, at a benchmark of $523,720.

London is also a reasonable alternative for first-time buyers; those looking to purchase a house priced at $426,236 must be within the top 25%, though condos for sale in London are accessible to the top 50%, at $307,359.

Regina takes top spot for affordable Real Estate

Continue Reading…

ETFs or mutual funds: Making the best choice for your financial future

Posted By |

By Clayton Brown

(Sponsor Content)

You’re probably familiar with mutual funds. Most people have encountered them at some point: either through their banks and financial advisors, or their friends complaining about the fees.

ETFs are a newer investment, which people tend to associate with lower fees and broad diversification.

“So, what is the difference between a mutual fund and an ETF?”

Mutual funds are bundles of stocks and bonds that are managed for you by a bank or investment firm. Traditionally, they’re taking a hands-on approach to try to beat the market.

With actively managed mutual funds, you have managers who are trading a lot to take advantage of opportunities. However, this active trading comes at a cost, which usually translates into higher fees.

Most ETFs, or Exchange-Traded Funds, tend to take a different approach. They were primarily set up to track an index of investments (eg. The S&P 500 is an index of 500 publicly-listed US stocks and an ETF could track it. But you could have track indexes of tech stocks, energy investments, real estate investments, etc).

With most ETFs, portfolio managers are trying to reproduce the holdings and performance of an index. They give investors diversified exposure to an index at a low cost.

With those kinds of funds, managers don’t need to rebalance as often. That could mean lower costs for them. In turn, they can charge lower fees for the client.

“Which one is a better financial fit for me?”

Based on the above description, you might be wondering, “Why should I take a hands-off approach and match indexes, when I can take a hands-on approach and try to beat them?” Continue Reading…