Decumulate & Downsize

Most of your investing life you and your adviser (if you have one) are focused on wealth accumulation. But, we tend to forget, eventually the whole idea of this long process of delayed gratification is to actually spend this money! That’s decumulation as opposed to wealth accumulation. This stage may also involve downsizing from larger homes to smaller ones or condos, moving to the country or otherwise simplifying your life and jettisoning possessions that may tie you down.

How Travel prepares you for the unexpected

Posted By |
Lake Atitlan, Guatemala

By Billy and Akaisha Kaderli

Special to the Financial Independence Hub

Even before we met, as individuals, Billy and I have always loved to travel.

I have written about my cross-country adventure on the back of a motorcycle when I was 19. Billy also traveled with his van to Guatemala in the 1970s and back again to his hometown of Cincinnati, Ohio.

As a couple we lived and journeyed through Europe for six months before we purchased our restaurant in Santa Cruz, California.

These trips were life-changing experiences and we just got hooked on adventure.

When we left the traditional work force in 1991, we sold everything and began to travel the world. These experiences forced us to be flexible even when we didn’t want to be.

Power outages

For instance, when we lived on the tiny island of Nevis, West Indies, every afternoon or early evening, the power in our home would go out. It could happen at 4pm or at 7:30, but it would happen. Lights would go out and the TV would click off (right as the plot thickened in the movie we were watching). The pump bringing water to the kitchen sink or toilets wouldn’t work without the electricity, so things like doing the dishes, taking a shower or using the restroom had to be prepared for in advance.

We read books by flashlight or had discussions on future travel plans.

No running water!

Speaking of taking a shower, in Nevis we shared the Governor of Nevis’s home with other housemates who were opening the Nevis Four Seasons Resort on the island.

Aside from us and Billy’s best friend who was the head chef, all the rest of the roomies were young twenty-somethings and used to First World Living. One young woman would start her hot shower, go to the kitchen, toast bread, smother it in peanut butter and jelly, eat the sandwich, then return to a steam-filled bathroom with the water still running and take her hot shower.

As natural water-savers ourselves, we thought this was over the top.

However, we had no idea how much so, until one day … we found out the cistern was empty. The only way the tank was filled was by rain that fell or by water trickling out of the city’s pipes from 10 am to 11 am daily. And by trickle, we mean drizzle by drop.

Our spectacular house in Nevis, West Indies with a view of the Atlantic Ocean

We were out of water, with all the conveniences that running water brings to living, so how were we going to take a shower?

Being in the tropics, rain came fairly regularly, like every other day or so. One morning around 9:30, it was a typical tropical downpour. Billy and I saw the flooding of water through the gutters and into our rain barrels and we both grabbed towels and soap. Moving a barrel and standing under the drainpipe of the gutter we lathered up and enjoyed this pleasure of a beautiful shower out in nature. The jungle and sugar cane fields pushed up against our house, and we had a straight shot of Nevis’ volcano. Spectacular.

Then … the rain stopped.

Oh Lord. There we were, soaped up, naked, and out in our back yard when the maid popped in for her thrice weekly cleaning. Continue Reading…

Another emotional reason to take CPP early

Posted By |

By Michael J. Wiener

Special to the Financial Independence Hub

 

For some reason, people seem wired to want to take their CPP and OAS benefits early, myself included. They grasp for reasons to justify this emotional need even though a rational evaluation of the facts often points to delaying the start of these pensions to get larger payments. I recently read about another emotional reason to justify taking CPP and OAS early.

We can choose to start taking CPP anywhere from age 60 to 70, but the longer we wait, the higher the payments. Less well known is that we can start taking OAS anywhere from age 65 to 70 with higher payments for waiting loger. It’s hard for us to fight the strong desire to take the money as soon as possible, and we tend to latch onto good-sounding reasons to take these pensions early.

But the truth is that most of us have to plan to make our money last in case we live long lives. Taking CPP and OAS early would give us a head start, but the much-higher payments we’d get starting at age 70 allow us to catch up quickly. If we live long lives, taking larger payments starting at age 70 is often the winning strategy.

Here I examine reasons to take these pensions early, ending with a longer discussion of the reason newest to me. Many of these reasons are inspired by other writing, such as a Boomer and Echo article on this subject. However, you’ll find my discussion different from what you’ll see elsewhere.

Let’s start with the best reason.

1.) You’re retired and out of savings

This is a good reason to take pensions early if you’re really running out of savings other than a modest emergency fund. However, just wanting to preserve existing savings isn’t good enough on its own. It makes sense to do a more thorough analysis to see what you’re giving up in exchange for trying to preserve your savings.

2.) You have reduced life expectancy

If you’re sufficiently certain that your health is poor enough that you’d be willing to spend down every penny of your savings before age 80, then this is a good reason to take pensions early. This is very different from “I’m worried I might die young.” If as you approach age 80 you would try to stretch out your savings in case you live longer, this has repercussions all the way back to how much you can safely spend today. Almost all of us have to watch how we spend now in case we live a long life. In this case you need to do a thorough analysis to see what you’re giving up in exchange for taking pensions early.

3.) You have long periods before age 60 with no CPP contributions

If you don’t work after age 60, but delay taking CPP until 65, the 5 years without making CPP contributions can count against you. Everybody gets to drop out the lowest 17% of their contribution months in the CPP calculation. So, if you never missed a year of CPP contributions from age 18 to 60, you can just drop out the years from 60 to 65, and you won’t get penalized. But if you had many months of low contributions over the years, then having additional low months from 60 to 65 will reduce your CPP benefits.

I am in this situation. However, from 60 to 65 you go from receiving 64% to 100% of your CPP plus any real increase in the average industrial wage. Taking into account all factors, I expect my CPP to rise by about 47% by delaying it from 60 to 65. This is less than it could have been without the penalty of not working from 60 to 65, but it is still a significant increase.

Delaying CPP further from 65 to 70 is a simpler case. There is a special drop-out provision that allows you to not count the contribution months between 65 and 70. CPP benefits increase from 100% of your pension at 65 to 142% at 70.

CPP benefits rise significantly when you delay taking them. Even if you can’t use your 17% drop-out for all the contribution months from age 60 to 65, you may still benefit from delaying CPP.

4.) You want to take the CPP and OAS and invest

People don’t generally get this idea on their own. It often comes from a financial advisor. You’re unlikely to invest to make more money than you’d get by delaying CPP and OAS, particularly if you pay fees to a financial advisor.

5.) The government might run out of money to pay CPP and OAS

The government might introduce wealth taxes on RRSPs too. Despite what you might have heard from financial salespeople, CPP is on a strong financial footing. Many things may change in the future. It doesn’t make sense to overweight the possibility of cuts to CPP or OAS.

6.) You want the money now to spend while you’re young enough to enjoy it

My wife and I are retired in our 50s. When I analyze how much we can safely spend each month, the number is higher when we plan to take both CPP and OAS at 70. That’s right; we can spend more now because we plan to delay these pensions. It works out this way because CPP and OAS help protect against the possibility of a long life. Continue Reading…

Retired Money: RRSP must start winding down after you turn 71 but TFSA is a tax shelter that lasts as long as you do

Posted By |

My latest MoneySense Retired Money column has just been published and looks at the twin topic of RRSPs that must start to be converted to a RRIF after you turn 71, and the related fact that the TFSA is a tax shelter you can keep adding to as long as you live. You can find the full column by clicking on the highlighted headline: How to make the most of your TFSAs in Retirement.

Unlike RRSPs, which must start winding down the end of the year you turn 71, you can keep contributing to TFSAs for as long as you live: even if you make it past age 100, you can keep adding $6,000 (plus any future inflation adjustments) every year. Also unlike RRSPs, contributions to Tax-free Savings Accounts are not calculated based on previous (or current) year’s earned income.  Any Canadian aged 18 or older with a Social Insurance Number can contribute to TFSAs.

Once you turn 71, there are three options for collapsing an RRSP, although most people think only of the one offering the most continuity with an RRSP; the Registered Retirement Income Fund or RRIF.  More on this below but you can also choose to transfer the RRSP into a registered annuity or take the rarely chosen option of withdrawing the whole RRSP at one fell swoop and paying tax at your top marginal rate.

Assuming you’re going the RRIF route, all your RRSP investments can move over to the RRIF intact, while interest, dividends and capital gains generated thereafter will continue to be tax-sheltered. The main difference from an RRSP is that each year you must withdraw a certain percentage of your RRIF and take it into your taxable income, where it will be taxed at your top marginal rate like earned income or interest income. This percentage start at 5.28%  the first year and rises steadily, reaching 6.82% at age 80 and ending at 20% at 95 and beyond.

Some may be upset they are required to withdraw the money even if it’s not needed to live on. After all, you’re gradually being forced to break into capital, assuming you abide by some version of the 4% Rule (see this article.)

in 2020 only, you can withdraw 25% less than usual in a RRIF

For 2020 only, one measure introduced to cushion seniors from the Covid crisis was a one-time option to withdraw 25% less than normal from a RRIF; so if you turned 72 in 2020 you can opt to withdraw 4.05% instead of 5.4%. Continue Reading…

CPP survivorship benefits (and OAS Allowance for low-income Survivors)

Posted By |

By Mark Seed, MyOwnAdvisor

Special to the Financial Independence Hub

Long-time readers of this blog will know I remain many years away from full-on retirement – so I have tons of time to consider when to take our Canada Pension Plan (CPP) benefit and our Old Age Security (OAS) benefit.

For those who might be closer to retirement age and/or you want to know when to take CPP or OAS, make sure you read these posts below!

These are the best options when to take CPP.

Should you defer CPP to age 65 or even age 70? Here’s when to consider that.

One factor rarely covered on many blogs or financial forums is the subject of survivorship benefits for either program. It can be a major factor when determining when to take CPP or OAS for some.

What are the pros and cons of taking CPP or OAS early or late, when you factor in survivorship benefits?

Doug Runchey; DRPensions.ca

Like other financial subjects, I have my own ideas based on our financial plan but I wanted to talk to an expert. I reached out again to Doug Runchey, a pension specialist who has more than 30 years of experience working with both CPP and OAS programs.

In our latest discussion, we tackle the survivorship subject and what general rules of thumb apply.

Doug, welcome back.  Good to chat again and I hope you’ve been well …

Thanks for having me back again Mark.

I always appreciate the outreach for a take on this important subject. I agree, this isn’t talked about enough: how survivorship factors into government benefits decision-making.

For those folks not familiar with the benefits of CPP, can you remind them about the factors they should consider – when to take CPP?

The most important thing is to know exactly what your real choices are, because the numbers on your SOC or online at the MSCA website are not always very accurate. Once you have accurate numbers, you should consider factors like life expectancy, taxation, impact on other benefits (e.g., GIS), estimated expenses and other income streams.

When to take your CPP should be integrated with your overall financial retirement plan.

As we discussed in a previous post, there are some reasons to take CPP or OAS as early as possible:

  1. you need (and want) the money to live on now (probably the biggest reason)!
  2. you have good reason to believe that you have a shorter-than-average life expectancy; take the money now and spend as you please.
  3. you already have a good reliable defined benefit pension with full indexing and the CPP and OAS are “gravy”;
  4. you want to delay taking your portfolio withdrawals since you may wish to maximize the amount of money in your estate; and/or
  5. you are a “bird in hand” investor so you take Canada Pension Plan money now while you can.

Great reminders. So, what about the survivorship benefits of CPP? How are these calculated? Should that play into the decision, when to take CPP?

They should Mark.

CPP survivor’s pensions are based on two different formulas, depending on the age of the surviving spouse.

For now, let’s just consider the formula for survivors over age 65 and that is 60% of the deceased contributor’s “calculated CPP retirement pension.”. By “calculated,” I mean prior to applying the age-adjustment factor if they started receiving their retirement pension before/after age 65. This 60% is reduced however, if the surviving spouse is also in receipt of their own CPP retirement pension, under what are known as the “combined benefit” calculation rules.

These combined benefit calculation rules should definitely be a factor in deciding when to take your CPP if the survivor’s pension is in play prior to making that decision, but probably not otherwise.

Shall we look at an example, from a couple that prefers the “bird in hand” income?

To demonstrate these combined benefit calculation rules, let’s use an example where the husband’s calculated CPP was $1,000 and the wife’s calculated CPP was $700.

If they both took their CPP early at age 60, they would each receive 64% of their calculated CPP, which would be $640 for the husband and $448 for the wife.

If the husband passed away at age 70, the wife would normally be eligible for 60% of his calculated CPP, which is $600. Under the combined benefit rules though, that amount is reduced by 40% to $360.

As a result, the survivor’s retirement pension is increased by a “special adjustment” in the amount of $86.40 (36% of the $240 reduction to the survivor’s pension). The net combined benefit that the wife would receive is then $894.40 (her original retirement pension of $448, the reduced survivor’s pension of $360 and the “special adjustment” increase to her retirement pension of $86.40). Continue Reading…

What does RioCan’s 33% dividend cut mean for Canadian REIT sector?

Posted By |
Image by Clker-Free-Vector-Images from Pixabay

 

By Dale Roberts, Cutthecrapinvesting

Special to the Financial Independence Hub

What a difference a pandemic makes. And what a difference a few months can make in the REIT sector. Just a few short months ago RioCan CEO Ed Sonshine promised that the distribution was rock solid. But on Friday of this week RioCan cut its dividend by some 33%.

In May of 2020 Mr. Sonshine had offered …

“Either the market has way overreacted on the downside, or there’s this feeling that the world is so awful that they’re all going to be cut … I can assure you that’s not the case for RioCan.”

So much for assurances, and so much for those dividend payments. And ya, the world is kinda awful in 2020 Mr. Sonshine. These are tough days for many REITs with exposure to retail and office space. We are in the midst of the work from home and shop from home and eat at home new normal. Obviously, it was irresponsible and misguided to make any kind of promise in the middle of the first modern day pandemic.

At the time (in May) on BNN Bloomberg the RioCan CEO also offered:

The current yield is “probably the highest we’ve ever traded at in history, and our portfolio is the best it’s ever been in history.”

The REIT announced late Thursday that the monthly distribution will fall to eight cents per unit as of January from the rate of 12 cents, which has been consistent since February 2018.

And the vaccine rollout timetable for Canada also affected the decision to cut the dividend. We might not be getting to the other side of the pandemic as quickly as we might have thought a few weeks ago. Many REITs do need the world order to get back to normal, or let’s say ‘more normal’. Much of 2021 might look a lot like 2020.

However, after Prime Minister Justin Trudeau recently said he expects most Canadians won’t be vaccinated against COVID-19 until September 2021, Sonshine said it made the company realize the year ahead remains uncertain.

BNN Bloomberg

Canada’s best performing REIT ETF has limited exposure.

When I heard the news that RioCan cut its dividend, I immediately thought of the RioCan exposure in the CI First Asset REIT. I wrote that dedicated post in late October. Looking under the hood, that CI First Asset REIT only has some 2.8% exposure to RioCan. Compare that to the index REIT ETFs offered by Vanguard, iShares where you’ll find exposure in the range of 10%. The BMO equal weight REIT has the exposure under 5%, of their 22 holdings. Horizons REIT ETF (HCRE) also mimics the same index as the BMO offering: the Solactive Equal Weight Canadian REIT Index. Those are both wonderful options.

Back to that CI REIT, it has very modest exposure to the retail sector, and what it does own is by way of some solid grocery store anchors. The fund also has very limited exposure to office REITs at 6%. The fund, thanks to its active management and more broad-based portfolio appears to be well positioned for the pandemic and ‘new normal’.

Remember why you own those REITs

Real estate is known as rock solid: these are hard assets. You collect rent. It is not a good time to run away from the sector. Remember why you own those REITs in the first place. You own it for diversification and for the generous dividend payments.

REITs are a wonderful diversifier for those stocks and bonds. It’s another layer for the portfolio.

And here’s a very informative post from Horizons – Finding the right income opportunity in 2020. That post covers why preferred shares an

d REITs can provide some of that desired yin and yang on the diversification front.

And here’s why REITs can benefit when bond yields and rates are low. Continue Reading…