By Dale Roberts, Cutthecrapinvesting
Special to the Financial Independence Hub
Yes that is an ironic headline. While many of the asset allocation or one ticket ETFs are quite similar, Horizons asset allocation ETFs stand out. For starters as you may know, the ETFs used within these portfolios are held within a corporate structure that do not pay out taxable distributions. They primarily use swap-based ETFs to create the portfolios. That will enable greater tax efficiency with respect to withholding taxes on foreign dividends.
With the shackles of unwanted tax hits removed Horizons TRI (Total Return Investments) one ticket ETFs can create the most efficient mix of Canadian, US and International equities and bonds. They do not have to worry about how an over weighting to US equities might create those tax inefficiencies.
I had the pleasure of chatting with Mark Noble, the Executive Vice President, ETF strategies for Horizons. The general topic was building the Balanced Portfolio for the times. Will the traditional Balanced Portfolio be able to cut it moving forward? Certainly the classic 60/40 portfolio model is built upon studies from decades past. We’ll get to that later in this post.
I had also looked at the subject and offered the New Balanced Portfolio. Not surprisingly, you’ll find mention of Horizons asset allocation ETFs in that post.
The 70/30 is the new 60/40.
It might all start with the stock to bond ratio. With bond yields so low, their contribution is likely to be much less compared to the last few decades. Good bonds might be there as risk managers but their total contribution is likely to be quite muted. How low can yields go? The question might end up being ‘how negative’ can rates go? While lower rates might deliver some higher prices, the bonds would then paint themselves into a corner with no yield to offer. It’s a Catch-22.
We might need a greater allocation to growth – more stocks.
Horizons Balanced Portfolio is 70% stocks and 30% bonds. Here’s the make up of that portfolio – ticker HBAL.

On September 10, 2020 the breakdown (rounded figures) …
- 40.8% US stocks
- 19.6% International stocks
- 10.0% Canadian stocks
- 19.7% Canadian bonds
- 9.7% US bonds (treasuries)
The target stock to bond ratio for the Balanced Portfolio (HBAL) is 70/30.

Mark had explained how the largely embraced 60/40 model is built on studies and data from the 70’s and 80’s. The portfolio design was based on looking at the long term Sharpe ratio (risk/return profile) of owning equities from many decades past.
Over the last 20 years the optimal risk return mix has moved closer to 70% stocks and 30% bonds. HBAL offers a 70/30 allocation vs. Vanguard’s VBAL of 60/40. It results in a better return trajectory. And once again, those lower yielding bonds add another reason to slightly stretch the stock allocation if we want or need to eke out some greater gains. Keep in mind that you will be taking on some greater equity risk.
I have long been a proponent of the Balanced Growth Portfolio model. I describe that as the sweet spot, delivering ‘optimal’ risk adjusted returns. Continue Reading…