Family Formation & Housing

For young couples starting families, buying their first home and/or other real estate. Covers mortgages, credit cards, interest rates, children’s education savings plans, joint accounts for couples and the like.

The Rising cost of Eldercare: Podcast

Posted By |

The following is an edited transcript of an interview conducted by financial advisor Darren Coleman of the Two Way Traffic podcast with eldercare expert Yvonne Dobronyi of YCD Consulting.  It appeared on September 6th under the title ‘Planning for your parents and what it’s going to cost.’

Click here for full link …

https://twowaytraffic.transistor.fm/episodes/planning-for-your-parents-and-what-it-s-going-to-cost

Coleman says the single biggest financial blind spot for families when planning for the future is the rising cost of eldercare and Yvonne Dobronyi agrees.

An eldercare consultant who counsels individuals and families through her firm, YCD Consulting, Yvonne says the monthly outlay for a retirement home starts at $3,600 for a single studio suite without care, but once in-home resources are included the tab can go up to $20,000 a month.

“Families are in denial and don’t want to ask difficult questions about moving Mom or Dad to assisted-living accommodation,” says Yvonne, who added that more than half the families she sees aren’t prepared for dealing with one, never mind two, elderly parents.

She says many seniors don’t understand they need to sell their home or cottage and sometimes both in order to afford retirement living if they have limited savings. And that seniors may have to work beyond their retirement years to maintain a cash flow to pay their bills even if they’re mortgage-free.

The two experts discussed a range of issues to do with eldercare:

  • Who holds Power of Attorney for both property and healthcare, and what happens when one sibling has it and the other doesn’t?
  • The importance of keeping these documents, along with a will, updated passport and medical records, in a designated file that’s readily accessible by a trusted contact.
  • ‘Free’ (government-funded) resources like personal care and light housekeeping services are available after assessment if you qualify but only for 2-4 hours and when staff is available.
  • Dealing with long wait lists for LTC (long-term care) homes, how to navigate the system, and making decisions during emotional stress.

Below is an edited transcript of the interview, focusing on the cost of eldercare housing services and families being prepared, or not prepared, for what can happen.

Darren Coleman

This is probably the single biggest blind spot most families have when they do their own planning. We can prepare for retirement, but this is where it tends to catch people off guard. I want to explore what life looks like when people suddenly have to figure out, how do I live independently for longer in my home, or what happens if I move into seniors’ housing.

Eldercare expert Yvonne Dobronyi, YCD Consulting Ltd

Yvonne Dobronyi

Some families are well prepared, but more than half are not. They react to a situation, so all of a sudden you have a crisis. Mom has dementia and Dad’s been the caregiver and now Dad falls in the home and breaks his hip, so he has to go to hospital. Who’s going to manage Mom? That’s when families get together to figure out what sort of care is required. So some will go to hospital, and others try to manage Mom. My experience is that a lot of times they haven’t designated a power of attorney, completed a will or made funeral arrangements.

Darren Coleman

The reason I think most find they’re not prepared is that the timing of when people will need care is unknown. And people don’t know what these things cost.

Yvonne Dobronyi

Often, family members don’t know where they have an RRSP or GIC, or whether or not their home is sellable the way it is. It’s something that’s avoided because families are in denial and don’t want to ask difficult questions. But it’s our duty as family members to be well prepared and that might involve asking difficult questions.

Darren Coleman

Someone should take the lead in these things. It might be more of a formal meeting or a conversation with some structure to it.

Yvonne Dobronyi

Absolutely. You sit down and share information that will be kept confidential. And if something happens, family members are prepared and know what to do. But  often this is not the case.

Darren Coleman

People may be dealing with these things while they’re in this emotional crisis. That’s not the best time to have that chat with your brother or sister about who’s going to look after Mom or Dad.

Yvonne Dobronyi

Very often a parent made a decision to give the power of attorney to one child and not the other two. Or two of them have the power of attorney and can’t agree on what the next steps might be. So one family member says we should move Mom and Dad into a retirement community or long-term care, and the other one says no.

Trusted contacts, Wills & Powers of Attorney

Darren Coleman

There’s a new administrative element for financial advisors in Canada now. It’s about adding a trusted contact to your file. So if people listening have not done this with their advisor, I recommend picking up the phone and saying I’d like to add that to my file. You mentioned the power of attorney and the will. We should point out there’s two kinds of power of attorney. Sometimes people will say, I have a will. Well, it doesn’t matter. The will only works once you’re gone, and the power of attorney is the document that works until you’re gone. So you need both of them.

Yvonne Dobronyi

The power of attorney is responsible for making decisions on behalf of that party in a healthcare capacity. Say the resident or patient has an extreme crisis situation and is now on life support. There needs to be that meeting to determine what is the best route. And that’s a difficult decision to make. I recommend you have more than one person be the power of attorney for care, so you can look at it closely and determine together what would be the best route. Continue Reading…

Real Estate Investments for Findependence

Posted By |
Commercial Real Estate: Image via Pexels: Brett Sayles

By Devin Partida

Special to Financial Independence Hub

Real estate is a powerful investment tool for anyone looking to build wealth and achieve Findependence [Financial Independence], especially in the U.S. and Canada. It offers the potential for passive income, long-term growth and significant tax advantages, making it an attractive option for many investors.

It is crucial to understand the different types of real estate investments — such as residential, commercial and short-term rentals — and how they align with market trends in North America to make the most of this opportunity. Each type comes with risks and rewards, but real estate can be fundamental to a diversified and profitable investment portfolio when approached strategically.

The Role of Real Estate in Diversified Portfolios

Real estate provides a sense of stability that many investors find appealing, especially when compared to the volatility of the stock market and the impact of inflation in the U.S. and Canadian markets. One-third of Americans view real estate as the best long-term investment, even above stocks, gold, savings accounts or bonds.

Balancing properties with traditional investments like stocks and bonds can enhance financial stability and create a more resilient portfolio. However, understanding regional market trends is essential — particularly in high-demand areas like New York, Los Angeles or Toronto — where property values increase steadily. Being informed about these markets allows investors to make practical decisions that support their long-term goals.

Types of Real Estate Investments

Several investment options are available when building wealth through real estate. Here are different types to help investors choose the right path:

Residential Properties

Residential spaces — including single-family homes, duplexes and condos — are popular investment options for those aiming to generate rental income. Investors can also take advantage of property appreciation through this method, especially in fast-growing areas like the suburbs of Toronto, Vancouver or Austin. While the potential for returns is strong, they must consider risks like fluctuating home prices, tenant turnover and maintenance expenses.

One factor to consider is reviewing any restrictive contracts — particularly in spaces with homeowners’ or condominium associations — because these can limit how the space is used. For example, some groups have strict rules about short-term rentals, which can affect an investor’s ability to maximize returns.

Commercial Properties

Commercial properties generally provide investors with the opportunity for longer-term leases and higher rental income than their residential counterparts. Additionally, they can take advantage of tax breaks and deductions — such as depreciating the property over 39 years — which can reduce taxable income. These factors make buying and improving commercial spaces attractive for investors looking to maximize their returns.

However, these investments come with risks, including economic downturns that may affect tenants and the added complexities of managing larger spaces. For those willing to navigate these challenges, commercial real estate can be rewarding to a diversified investment strategy.

Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs)

REITs provide an accessible way to invest in large-scale commercial properties without needing direct ownership. They’re great options for those seeking regular dividends and diversified exposure.

While REITs offer attractive returns, investors have very little control over individual properties. A recent example of market impact is the decline in the market cap of Canadian REITs, which fell from nearly $59 billion in 2021 to just $38.2 billion in 2023. Despite these risks, they remain popular for those looking to enter commercial real estate quickly.

Expert Tips for Maximizing Returns

Managing a property investment requires careful planning and strategy to maximize returns. Here are tips to help investors stay ahead and ensure long-term success: Continue Reading…

Navigating the RESP

Posted By |
Image via Pexels: Ketut Subiyanto

By Megan Sutherland, BMO Private Wealth

Special to Financial Independence Hub

The days are getting shorter, nights a bit cooler and with September now upon us, back to school is on the minds of parents nation-wide.  Since 2007, the average cost of undergraduate tuition fees in Canada has increased 55% and, according to a 2023 poll, 81% of parents believe it’s their responsibility to help pay for post-secondary costs.  Conversations I’m having with clients, friends and family certainly corroborate these numbers, making it timely to talk about the Registered Education Savings Plan (“RESP”).

For decades Canadians have been able to utilize the RESP, a program developed to incentivize savings with grant money (Canada Education Savings Grant, “CESG”), and preferential tax treatment.  Who doesn’t love free money!

Okay, so what’s the deal?

  • What is the maximum amount I can contribute per beneficiary?
    • A lifetime contribution limit of $50,000 per beneficiary.
  • How can I receive the maximum CESG?
    • Contribute up to $2,500 per year to receive 20% in CESG.
  • What if I’ve missed years of contributing?
    • You can catch up one additional year of CESG per year.
  • How much is the CESG grant?
    • Maximum of $7,200.
  • Is there an age limit on receiving CESG?
    • The CESG is available until the calendar year in which the beneficiary turns 17. However, there are specific contribution requirements for beneficiaries aged 16 or 17.
  • What is the tax treatment?
    • Contributions are not deductible but can be withdrawn tax-free.
    • Investment growth and CESG are taxed to the beneficiary when withdrawn for qualifying educational purposes.
  • Do you have to be the beneficiary’s parent to open one?
    • Any adult can open an RESP on behalf of a beneficiary – parents, guardians, grandparents, other relatives or friends – however, contribution across all plans must not exceed the maximum per beneficiary.

If you hope to have an aspiring doctor on your hands, consider harnessing the power of compounding to amp up your savings and open a plan as soon as possible!

Compare:

  1. Contribute a total of $36,000 over 14.4 years and receive the maximum CESG
    • Annualized return: 5%
    • Value at age 18: ~$80,000
  1. Contribute a $14,000 lump-sum in year one, then $36,000 over 14.4 years, for a total of $50,000, and receive the maximum CESG
    • Annualized return: 5%
    • Value at age 18: ~$115,000

 

Net benefit from additional $14,000 contribution in year one: approximately $20,000.

Saving to Attract CESG Only vs. Saving to Maximize Growth and Attract CESG 

Just like everything in life, make sure to read the fine print.  Keep in mind the following tips and traps:

  1. Open a Family Plan. Growth can be shared by all beneficiaries and the CESG money may be used by any beneficiary to a maximum of $7,200.
  2. Be prepared if the funds aren’t depleted by school costs. Contributions can be withdrawn by the subscriber without penalty. However, remaining CESG is clawed back. Growth in the RESP can be contributed to your RRSP (up to $50,000 if you have available contribution room), otherwise it is taxed at your marginal tax rate upon withdrawal by the subscriber, and there is an additional penalty tax of 20%.
  3. Choose investments wisely. Taking too much risk could result in losses that may create hard feelings or regret. Make sure to plan for withdrawals, potentially transitioning assets to cash, laddered bonds or GICs to ensure funds are available to pay for education costs.
  4. Put it in your estate plan. If you are married, consider opening the RESP in joint name. If you aren’t married or open the RESP in your name only, name a successor subscriber in your Will.
  5. U.S. citizens beware! The U.S. does not recognize the RESP as an exempt account type. Therefore, any earned income in the account is reportable on your U.S. tax return and can result in double taxation. Continue Reading…

Retired Money: Should retirees consider a Reverse Mortgage?

Posted By |

My latest MoneySense Retired Money column looks at the question of whether seniors or those near Retirement should consider  taking out a reverse mortgage. Click on the highlighted headline for the full column: Why a reverse mortgage should be a last resort for most Canadian retirees.

At first glance, reverse mortgages sound appealing, especially for those whose wealth mostly resides in their home equity. If you have little other sources of future retirement income, and especially if you have no heirs who will be annoyed at having a reduced inheritance, then the prospect of living in your home in old age and generating tax-optimized retirement income to boot does sound appealing.

Have your Home and your Money too?

As P.J. Wade wrote in her 1999 book, Have Your Home and Money Too,  reverse mortgages can be “your best friend or your worst enemy … your choice!”

However,  there’s not a lot of Reverse Mortgages available in Canada. The two main ones of which I’m aware are Equitable Bank and HomeEquity Bank (aka CHIP). According to Rates.ca “Reverse mortgages always cost more than conventional mortgages because the lender’s funding costs are higher.”

The full column includes input from occasional MoneySense contributor Allan Small, who is a senior investment advisor with IA Private Wealth Inc. as well as a podcaster. He says reverse mortgages “have not played a part in any of the retirement plans and retirement planning that I have done so far in my career. I think the reverse mortgage idea or concept for whatever reason has not caught on.” Also, “those individual investors I see usually have money to invest, or they have already invested. Most downsize their residence and take the equity out that way versus pulling money out of the property while still living in it.”

Milevsky: It all depends on to what a financial strategy is compared

For me, the definitive word on Reverse Mortgages or any other financial instrument goes to noted Finance professor and author Moshe Milevsky. He told me in an email that when it comes to reverse mortgages – or any other financial strategy or product in the realm of decumulation – “I always ask this question before giving an opinion: Compared to what?” He worries about the associated interest rate risk, which is “difficult to control, manage or even comprehend at advanced ages with cognitive decline.”

What are the alternatives to a reverse mortgage? Is it selling the house and moving? Or, Milevsky asks, “Is the alternative reducing your standard of living? Is the alternative taking a loan from a local bookie? It’s the alternative that determines whether the reverse mortgage is a good idea or not … Generally I will not rule them out and I think they will continue to grow in popularity among retiring boomers, but I wouldn’t place them at the very top of the to-do list when you get to your golden years.”

Darren Coleman interviews Tax expert Kim Moody about Liberals floating tax on Home Equity

Posted By |
Darren Coleman (left) and Kim Moody (right, with glasses).

The following is an edited transcript of an interview conducted by financial advisor Darren Coleman’s of the Two Way Traffic podcast with tax expert Kim Moody, of Moody Private Client. It appeared on August 8th: click here for full link.

Moody recently wrote an article in the Financial Post about the government flirting with the idea of a home equity tax, even on principal residences. Such a tax could result in an annual levy of about $10,000 for a home worth $1 million. He described that, along with the increase in the capital gains inclusion rate that has already passed into law, “really bad tax planning” based on ideology, not economics.

In the podcast Moody and Coleman also discussed …

  • The disparity between U.S. and Canadian tax rates, beginning with how the state of Florida compares with Ontario, a difference of 17%.
  • The tax model established in Estonia lets you reinvest in your company without paying corporate tax while personal income is taxed at a flat rate of 20%. They say such a system would work in Canada, and celebrate success and entrepreneurship.
  • What organizations like the Fraser Institute and mainstream economists think about Canada’s economic performance.

Below we publish an edited transcript of the start of the interview, focusing on the capital gains inclusion rate and trial balloon about taxing home equity.

Darren Coleman, Raymond James

Darren Coleman:  I’m Darren Coleman, Senior Portfolio Manager with Raymond James in Toronto.  I’m delighted to be joined by Kim Moody of Moody’s tax and Moody’s private client. You’re also a law firm based in Calgary, Alberta, and probably one of Canada’s best known tax and estate planning advisors. You may have heard our last conversation with Trevor Perry  about some of the issues we might be seeing in terms of taxation of the principal residence in Canada.

I think because governments have spent so much money that we’re going to see tremendous innovation in taxation.  Do you want to set the table for the article you wrote in the Financial Post, where you talked about where this is coming from, and why Canadians might be on alert for what might be coming to tax the equity in their homes.

Kim Moody: The point of the piece was mainly just to put Canadians on notice that you had the Prime Minister and the finance minister sitting down with what I call a pretty radical
think tank.  I consider them an ideological bastion of radical thought but that issue aside,
they call them call themselves a think tank, and this particular one, led by Paul Kershaw of
Generation Squeeze, has stuff on their website that pretty much attacks older Canadians:
basically saying they’ve gotten rich by going to sleep and watching TV. Unbelievable. Whoever approved that, it’s just so offensive. But that issue aside,  the whole connotation of the messaging is that, hey, these people are rich. We’ve got these poor young Canadians who are not rich and they can’t afford houses because you’re rich and …

Darren Coleman Someone should do something about it, right? That’s the trick.

Kim Moody

Kim Moody: Someone should do something about it. And their solution is to introduce a so-called Home Equity tax on any equity of a million dollars or more. And they call it a modest surtax of 1% per year. So it’s like another, effectively property tax … It’s just so nonsensical and so offensive on a whole bunch of different levels. Like you think about grandma and grandpa, yeah, they’ve got equity in their homes, but they don’t have a lot of cash. They’ve been working hard their entire lives to pay off their houses. And yes, they want to transfer down to their kids at some point, but right now, they’re living again, and they’re making ends meet by living off their pensions that they worked hard, and you’re expecting them to shell out more money for that, and I find that offensive.

…. Back to the original premise of why I wrote the article:  to let Canadians know that our leaders are entertaining stuff like this. It doesn’t mean they’re going to implement it, but they’re actually entertaining radical organizations like this and secondly, just to put Canadians on
notice that this is just the beginning. If this regime continues with out-of-control spending and no
adherence to basic economics, then we could expect a whole bevy of new taxes.

Darren Coleman  

Indeed, they’ve already done some of this, right? So you know that this idea about we’re going to tax home equity, either through some kind of annual surtax on equity over a certain amount, or we’re going to put a capital gain on principal residences. And I would argue that for years now, Canadians have had to report the sale of the principal residence on their tax returns, which is a non-taxable event, yet you now have to tell them, and if you don’t, there’s a penalty. Continue Reading…