Building Wealth

For the first 30 or so years of working, saving and investing, you’ll be first in the mode of getting out of the hole (paying down debt), and then building your net worth (that’s wealth accumulation.). But don’t forget, wealth accumulation isn’t the ultimate goal. Decumulation is! (a separate category here at the Hub).

Unlock Healthcare Value and Monthly Income | HHL & HHLE

Image courtesy Harvest ETFs

By Ambrose O’Callaghan, Harvest ETFs

(Sponsor Blog)

The U.S. healthcare sector has faced unique challenges in late 2024 and the first half of 2025. Last year, we provided an in-depth look at global healthcare as a long-term opportunity and examined some of the catalysts and innovations that were impacting the sector. Today, the U.S. and global healthcare space continues to evolve while combatting headwinds in some key areas.

The state of U.S.  healthcare equities

Healthcare performed relatively well in the early part of 2025, despite broader trade uncertainty and macroeconomic headwinds. The medical technology and tools sub-sector experienced some short-term volatility that was driven by the uncertainty surrounding tariffs. That comes as little surprise, considering companies in the space reliance on oversees manufacturing and revenue generation.

Domestic names, like those in Managed care and select Biopharmaceuticals, remained relatively insulated during this period. This stemmed from an easing in the tariff narrative, which was triggered by a sharp drop in several macroeconomic indicators that included manufacturing activity and consumer confidence. As we progressed further into 2025, a cloud of uncertainty crept into healthcare. That contributed to some recent volatility across several sub-sectors. In this article, we have provided some recent catalysts to help investors make sense of the current situation in healthcare.

Drug pricing in 2025

On May 12, 2025, President Donald Trump signed an Executive Order (EO) titled “Delivering Most-Favored-Nation Prescription Drug Pricing to American Patients.” This EO proclaimed that the Trump administration “will take immediate steps to end global freeloading and, should drug manufacturers fail to offer American consumers, the most-favoured-nation lowest price, my Administration will take additional aggressive action.”

Ultimately, the aim is to align U.S. drug prices more closely with lower prices paid internationally. This EO echoes a summer 2020 Trump-era EO that was blocked in court and failed to be implemented. The current version faces similar hurdles. There is no bipartisan backing for the policy, the legality surrounding it is dubious, and there is opposition among both Democrat and Republican lawmakers.

All of these make the implementation of this EO unlikely. However, we could see pilot programs within the Department of Health and Humans Services (HHS), making attempts to fold the current EO’s proclamations into future IRA negotiations, or more comprehensive legislative proposals.

In addition, there are those who have predicted the policy could reduce the research and development (R&D) budgets further. That could potentially impact innovation and companies that have been propelled due to strong R&D spending. However, the risk may truly lie in the negative sentiment that continues to emerge in the news cycle.

Vaccine market uncertainty

The appointment of Robert F. Kennedy Jr. as the United States Secretary of Health has damaged sentiment for healthcare companies that manufacture vaccines. RFK Jr. is a vocal “vaccine sceptic.” Moreover, the Trump administration has pursued leadership changes at the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), which raises questions about stricter vaccine approval processes going forward.

Merck & Co, the U.S.based pharmaceutical giant, with its vaccine-related businesses, has felt the pressure. In addition to the political uncertainty, a recent CMS technical document has added to the complexity in the vaccine arena. The report suggested that reformulated drugs may no longer be classified as “new” for Medicare negotiations. This development could impact companies with operations in the “combination therapy” space like Johnson & Johnson’s Darzalex Faspro, or Bristol Myers’ subcutaneous version of Opdivo. That could affect future patent projections as well. Continue Reading…

The stock market and politics: a Case Study in Applied EMH Testing

Image courtesy Pixabay: Sergei Tokmakov

By John De Goey, CIM, CFP

Special to Financial Independence Hub

I have long been interested in the interplay between politics and the stock market. We had a fascinating real world case study that played out in real time last month.

Those who know me will likely know that I have long been a proponent of the Efficient Market Hypothesis, which was put forward by Nobel Laureate Eugene Fama as a means of explaining capital market behaviour. It comes in three forms: weak, semi-strong, and strong: each representing different levels of market efficiency.

The Weak form asserts that all past market prices and data are fully reflected in current stock prices. Therefore, technical analysis methods, which rely on historical data, are deemed useless as they cannot provide investors with a competitive edge. However, this form doesn’t deny the potential value of fundamental analysis.

The Semi-strong form extends beyond historical prices and suggests that all publicly available information is instantly priced into the market. This includes financial statements, news releases, economic indicators, and other public disclosures. Therefore, neither technical analysis nor fundamental analysis can yield superior returns consistently.

Finally, the Strong form asserts that all information, both public and private, is fully reflected in stock prices. Even insiders with privileged information cannot consistently achieve higher-than-average market returns. This form is criticized because it conflicts with securities regulations that prohibit insider trading.

Examples supporting EMH

While the EMH has faced criticisms and challenges, it remains a prominent theory in finance that has significant implications for investors and market participants. It has been both supported and challenged by various market phenomena. Here are some notable examples supporting EMH:

Random Walk Theory: Stock prices appear to follow a ‘random walk,’ meaning past prices do not predict future movements, something that is disclosed and disclaimed on every prospectus.

Index Fund Performance: Passive index funds often outperform actively managed funds, suggesting that markets efficiently price securities, especially once fees are taken into account.

Earnings Announcements: Stock prices quickly adjust to new earnings reports, reflecting the semi-strong form of EMH.

Examples challenging EMH

The obvious example that challenges EMH is the existence of stock market bubbles. Events like the Dot-Com Bubble and the 2007-2009 Global Financial Crisis show that prices can deviate significantly from intrinsic values and for prolonged periods of time. Such anomalies suggest that while markets are generally efficient, behavioral biases and structural factors can lead to inefficiencies, include macro-level mispricings. A well-known industry chestnut is that “markets can remain irrational longer than you can stay solvent.” Here’s where the story gets interesting …< Continue Reading…

Emergency Saving Hacks for the Gig Economy Worker

Image from Unsplash/Robert Anasch

By Devin Partida

Special to Financial Independence Hub

Freelancers are growing in abundance. The gig economy benefits from the rise of digital platforms connecting workers to customers for short-term employment. While the whole setup affords freedom and flexibility for many, it also comes with financial uncertainty.

Unlike traditional employees, gig workers don’t have a steady paycheck that comes through from month to month. There are also no work benefits nor guaranteed work hours. The unpredictability of gigs can make it difficult for people in the industry to save and build an emergency fund.

Why Gig Workers need an Emergency Fund more than ever

An emergency fund is any gig worker’s safety net. Your unique circumstance as a freelance worker makes income inconsistent and paid sick leave non-existent. This lack of employer-sponsored benefits necessitates creating your own cushions. However, financial planning is even more challenging as a gig worker :  medical emergencies, vehicle breakdowns or slow business months can become financial disasters without proper savings.

Building an emergency fund ensures you’ll be prepared when income dips or unexpected expenses arise.

Smart Saving Strategies for Gig Workers

It’s challenging, sure, but that doesn’t mean it’s impossible. Here are ways to help you start your savings journey:

Automate Your Savings From Gig Payments

Every time you receive your paycheck, set up an automatic transfer to a high-yield savings account. Some banks allow their users to automate transfers so they can set aside a portion of every deposit. If your bank doesn’t, you can do the same with apps like Digit, Qapital or Chime.

Automating your savings allows you to set it up once and forget you’re actively saving in an emergency fund. Even 5% to 10% of each payment can add up to a significant amount over time.

Use High-Yield Savings Accounts

Keep your emergency funds in a savings account with high returns rather than a checking account that pays very little interest. A high-yield savings account is an accessible and secure place to save your emergency stash. You’ll earn competitive interest while the money is idle and can withdraw cash whenever needed. Many online banks offer this benefit so you can grow your savings.

One word of caution, though: You should not put all your money in one high-yield savings account. Diversifying them creates better financial resilience.

Implement the “Pay Yourself First” Strategy

Robert Kiyosaki popularized the “pay yourself first” scheme. This method means prioritizing your saving goals before your expenses. If you treat your savings like a monthly nonnegotiable expense, you ensure you funnel some money toward financial security over discretionary spending.

Budget Based on your Lowest Income Month

Because gig work is unpredictable, you should budget every month as if it’s slow. Calculate your lowest earning month and structure your essential expenses accordingly. Put any excess in your savings fund.

Cut Unnecessary Expenses and Redirect to Savings

Do you eat out more often than you should, or buy new clothes you don’t always wear? Are you being tempted to swipe your credit card for every purchase? Assess areas in your life where you most indulge in spending money.

Knowing where your money goes can reduce shelling out where you don’t need it. Cancel unused subscriptions and opt for public transportation rather than Uber to your location. Cook at home instead of dining out and take advantage of discounts and cashback rewards. Every dollar saved can go toward building your financial cushion.

Leverage Microinvesting Apps for Small Gains

Microinvesting allows you to start saving with minimal capital, often investing spare change from day-to-day purchases. Apps like Acorns and Stash round up your purchases and invest the spare change. While not suitable as a primary emergency fund, these microinvestments are perfect for beginners and those with limited funds to supplement their savings over time.

Diversify your Income Streams

Decrease your financial vulnerability by tapping into multiple income sources. Consider taking on different types of gigs to ensure a steady flow of earnings. Whether freelancing, online tutoring or renting out a spare room, extra income streams can help you save more consistently. Continue Reading…

Canadian stocks at all-time highs

 

By Dale Roberts, cutthecrapinvesting

Special to Financial Independence Hub

On Twitter [X] I was asked what the heck is going on. “I don’t get it” offered a follower and blog reader. The Canadian economy is entering a rough patch, things are supposed to get much worse, and Canadian stocks are surging higher. In fact, the TSX Composite just reached an all-time high. More proof that no one knows what is going to happen. We can’t time the market or sitting Presidents.

Around Tuesday April 8, President Trump began to walk away from his nonsensical tariff war blabbering, just as I had predicted on March 20th.

My take on the global tariff war concept was and is …

The bad news is a global tariff war spells economic destruction.

The good news is a global tariff war spells economic destruction. Essentially, it can’t happen, I think and hope. The markets will push back  …

The markets pushed back on Trump’s plans, Trump listened, and then stocks moved on to higher prices.

And remember, the stock market is not the economy. And nearly 50% of TSX companies’ revenues originate outside of Canada.

What sectors are driving the TSX Composite?

From April 8, the TSX Composite is up 19% [as of  May 16]. We know that financials and energy and resources drive Canadian stock markets so let’s have a look there first.

Sure enough, during that period the financials XFN-T are up 28%. The banks ZEB-T are up 16%. The insurers that are within the financials indexes have helped to drive returns well above that of the banking index. Diversifed financial Brookfield is up 36%. Fairfax Financial (Canada’s Berkshire Hathaway) is up over 44% over that last year and an incredible 540% over the last 5 years, not including the modest dividend.

So ya, the financials are humming. As I wrote in investing in Canadian banks, the banks are a proxy for the Canadian economy. But they are much more as well with considerable earnings in the U.S. and in other economies and regions. Same for the insurers who are very international.

I’m more than happy to hold this ETF in my personal RRSP. My wife holds most of the indivdual stocks in her RRSP.

Not including dividends

Canadian energy stocks

Let’s move on to energy and other resources. In October of 2020 I suggested that readers consider Canadian oil and gas stocks. The timing was fortunate as the sector went on an incredible run, up over 400% at the peak. The sector did some heavy lifting along the way.

But the sector has cooled and is down some 7.3% over the last year. The returns are also negative from April 8.

That said, the Canadian pipelines have been carrying the energy sector. Enbridge ENB-T and TC Energy TRP-T are leading constituents in the Canadian TSX Composite and they have greatly outperformed over the last year. They’ve made a minor contribution.

TC Energy is up about 35% over the last year while Enbridge is up in the area of 30%. Enbridge is the forth largest holding in the TSX while TC Energy is top 15.

The materials sector XMA-T helped to lift the TSX over the last year, up 26% at its peak a week ago. Gold stocks drove the index. Gold was and is the perfect hedge for Trump’s unpredictability and potential inflation-inducing tariff strategy. Materials did some lifting along the way.

Defensive equities rise to the occasion

Consumer staples XST-T have outperformed over the last year. They have been a wonderful defensive holding. They shone during the worst of the Trump fears. That said, they (unfortunately) have a very small weighting in the TSX.

Utilities XUT-T have kept pace with the markets over the last year and have offered recent support, as the sector is near all-time highs. More on this below when we discuss retirement and managing risk with defensive equities.

Canadian tech rocks

One of the main drivers to the new highs is the tech XIT-T sector. It’s up over 41% over the last year. Shopify is up 95% over the last year. Constellation Software is up 37.5% over one year. Shopify has the second largest weighting in the TSX. It will often trade places with RBC for top spot.

From April 8, XIT is up 26%, largely driven by Shopify.

Here’s the lift from Financials and Tech from 2023 … Continue Reading…

Review of Money for Couples

Amazon.ca

By Michael J. Wiener

Special to Financial Independence Hub

Having listened to a few episodes of Ramit Sethi’s podcast where he helps couples face and conquer their money issues, I looked forward to reading his book, Money for Couples.

In it, Sethi distills his experience helping hundreds of couples into strategies that cover a wide range of problems.

It’s clear that Sethi has the skills and experience necessary to help couples with their financial problems.

However, creating a book to help people solve these difficult issues on their own is a different challenge.  I’m optimistic that this book will be helpful for some couples with big money problems.

For many couples, talking about money is painful and ends in a fight.  A common theme throughout this book is that couples need to find a way to have money discussions that feel good.  To this end, Sethi provides many strategies as well as actual scripts of what to say.  These strategies go a long way to help draw in a spouse who avoids all talk about money.

Money personalities

Although many people think they’re just bad with money, “there’s no question you can get good at managing money, just like you became good at driving and speaking English.”  The way forward depends on your money personality.  Sethi sees four common money types: avoiders, optimizers, worriers, and dreamers (who think some big score will come soon to solve all their money problems).

The book gives specific advice for each money personality.  For example, “Worriers change when they have skin in the game (for example, they manage part of the family finances), when they’re educated about money, and when their finances are extremely simple so they can understand them.”  In the case of dreamers, “I have no advice, because you’re not reading this book.”  Instead, Sethi offers advice to spouses of dreamers.

I saw myself a little bit in the optimizer personality description, but not much in the other personalities.  Even the optimizer personality doesn’t fit well, though: I’ve never tried to maintain a budget and have only tracked spending a few times.  I don’t seem to fit into any of these personalities.  Perhaps, these are the money personalities of people who have money issues, and there are other money personalities for people who don’t have money issues.  I’m not sure.

Moving toward a rich life

Sethi is known for saying people should stop focusing on $3 questions and start focusing on $30,000 questions.  This is the difference between deciding whether to buy $3 coffee vs. big-ticket items like “automating investments,” “minimizing investment fees,” and “creating a debt -payoff plan.”

Some take this to mean that it’s always okay to spend small amounts.  I’m not sure this is what Sethi means.  In any case, as I see it, it’s a mistake to agonize over small amounts every day.  Analyze how you spend money in small amounts, add up a full year’s worth of small amount spending in each category, and then decide if each category of spending fits in your financial plan.  You now have a quick yes or no answer to every type of small amount for the next year.  This frees up some mental bandwidth for thinking about bigger questions.

This shift to thinking about big money questions is an important part of what Sethi calls “designing your rich life vision.”  When a couple agree on what really matters to them and how they want to live in the future, they can take steps to make their vision a reality.  Otherwise, they might just continue wasting money on things they don’t care much about and never get where they’d really like to be.

As I read this book, I decided to do some of the exercises myself, and I squirmed a little as I got to the big questions about what kind of life I really want.  These questions can be daunting, but they’re important.  Even for a retiree like me who has already found the life I want for now, thinking about what I want my future to look like isn’t easy.  Facing these questions and coming to agreement with a spouse matters.

Couples dynamics or … how to stop fighting over money

The book describes three common problematic couples dynamics: sitcom (where couples take jabs at each other to entertain others rather than really communicating), chaser/avoider, and innocent doe/enabler.  For each dynamic, Sethi describes specific ways to break dysfunctional patterns, create meaningful communication, and handle money better.  He also provides scripts of what healthy conversations about money look like.

After solving some of these emotional issues, couples are ready to move into some of the more numerical pursuits, like creating what Sethi calls a Conscious Spending Plan (CSP) and setting up an automated system of bank accounts and credit card accounts.  A CSP lays out what percentage of income should go toward fixed costs, short-term savings, long-term investments, and guilt-free spending.  Putting an end to feeling guilty every time you buy something is a dream for many people!

I’ve seen enough young couples mess up their finances to see the value in Sethi’s methods, but I wonder how many couples out there are like my wife and me.  We kept all our accounts separate, which Sethi doesn’t recommend.  We never automated our savings and just saved what was left over.  This turned out to be a lot of money most of the time, despite the warnings from the Wealthy Barber, Sethi, and others that you must pay yourself first.

Although we’ve made good strides in spending meaningfully, my wife and I tend more toward underspending.  Many joke about how they wish they (or their spouses) were underspenders, but it can be a real problem.  The book mainly focuses on the more common problems relating to overspending, but it does have a subsection specifically about underspending.

Calling out businesses

One thing Sethi does that I find useful and amusing is calling out businesses to avoid.  In one example, a couple closes their Wells Fargo account “because they are one of the worst predatory banks in the world.”

For many people, “their parents never talked about money, so when they reached adulthood, they were defenseless, left to make sense of the world against companies like Wells Fargo and Ameriprise as well as whole-life insurance scammers.”

Specific advice

Sethi advises couples to set a “worry-free spending number.”  The idea is that anything under some threshold, like $20, is automatically not subject to criticism by a spouse.  I find this lacks a time component.  My wife and I have a number like this, but the threshold is very different depending on whether it is a one-off or if it’s daily.  I can buy $1,000 worth of sports equipment a few times a year without a family discussion, but I can’t spend $200 on lunch a few times a week. Continue Reading…