RRSPs are not a Scam: A Guide for the Anti-RRSP crowd

The anti-RRSP crowd must come from one of two schools of thought:

1.) They believe their tax rate will be higher in the withdrawal phase than in the contribution phase, or;

2.) They forgot about the deduction they received when they made the contribution in the first place.

No other options prior to TFSA

RRSPs are misunderstood today for several reasons. For one thing, older investors had no other options prior to the TFSA, so they might have contributed to their RRSP in their lower-income earning years without realizing this wasn’t the optimal approach.

Related: The beginner’s guide to RRSPs

RRSPs are meant to work as a tax-deferral strategy, meaning you get a tax-deduction on your contributions today and your investments grow tax-free until it’s time to withdraw the funds in retirement, a time when hopefully you’ll be taxed at a lower rate. So contributing to your RRSP makes more sense during your high-income working years rather than when you’re just starting out in an entry-level position.

Taxing withdrawals

A second reason why RRSPs are misunderstood is because of the concept of taxing withdrawals. The TFSA is easy to understand. Contribute $6,000 today, let your investment grow tax-free, and withdraw the money tax-free whenever you so choose.

With RRSPs you have to consider what is going to benefit you most from a tax perspective. Are you in your highest income earning years today? Will you be in a lower tax bracket in retirement? The same? Higher?

The RRSP and TFSA work out to be the same if you’re in the same tax bracket when you withdraw from your RRSP as you were when you made the contributions. An important caveat is that you have to invest the tax refund for RRSPs to work out as designed.

Future federal tax rates

Another reason why investors might think RRSPs are a bum deal? They believe federal tax rates are higher today, or will be higher in the future when it’s time to withdraw from their RRSP.

Is this true? Not so far. I checked historical federal tax rates from 1998-2000 and compared them to the tax rates for 2018 and 2019.

Federal tax rates 2018-2019 federal-tax-rate-1998-2000

The charts show that tax rates have actually decreased significantly for the middle class over the last two decades.

Someone who made $40,000 in 1998 would have paid $6,639 in federal taxes, or 16.6 per cent. After adjusting the income for inflation, someone who earned $59,759 in 2019 would pay $7,820 in federal taxes, or just 13.1 per cent.

Minimum RRIF withdrawals

It became clear over the last decade that the minimum RRIF withdrawal rules needed an overhaul. No one liked being forced to withdraw a certain percentage of their nest egg every year, especially when that percentage didn’t jive with today’s lower return environment and longer lifespans.

In 2015 the federal government made changes to the minimum RRIF withdrawal table, bringing it more in-line with today’s reality:

minimum-rrif-withdrawals

6 thoughts on “RRSPs are not a Scam: A Guide for the Anti-RRSP crowd

  1. RRSP’s are not a scam but they may not have been advertised correctly 20 or 30 years ago. I remember earning so little that I wouldn’t have been required to pay taxes, yet I borrowed money to put into an RRSP because they were pushed so hard by the banks. Another thing you don’t cover is what happens when one spouse dies in their 50’s or so. If you’ve both been maxing out your contributions, suddenly the remaining spouse has the full amount to deal with. Now you have the problem of getting that money out in the most tax-efficient manner. It is easy to find yourself in a higher tax bracket since you don’t want it all to be taxed in the year of your death. Kind of defeats the purpose. I’m not anti-RRSP, but I wish I’d been more informed when younger.

  2. TFSA is by far the best way to invest for retirement But one must be discipline to never takeout the amount saved.Keep it for your retirement.
    In retirement the amount withdrawn is not added to you annual revenue which helps in not getting a OAS claw back.
    The amount withdrawn from a RIF or a RSP is added to you revenue. This a risk for a OAS claw back.
    No income tax is paid for a TFSA withdrawal.
    Withdrawal from a RIF/RSP is fully tax.
    The amount you get when you take an RSP will never make up in the taxes you will have to pay on withdrawals year after year in retirement.

  3. Can you clarify the difference in the minimum RRIF withdrawl table for pre and post 2015? The formulas appear to be the same (1/(90-age)), the examples are the same, yet the columns have different percentages.

    1. You are right. There has been no change to withdrawal minimums when you are under 70 yrs old. That’s the 1/90-age example you are looking at. It is the minimum amounts for withdrawals made after age 70 that have been reduced.

  4. If you invest wisely (and I don’t mean stocks) you can easily nudge up to the RRSP savings. To me the main benefit is it is YOUR money. Once you put it in an RRSP if you need to get that money out they hit you with a massive penalty (which I learned when I was 20 and am now 45 and never looked back). My family member recently was about to take out a massive load. I just emptied my TSFA and he paid me back with interest and I monthly built my TSFA back up. My elderly father continually complains about his RRSP and I am glad I stopped when I was 20.

Leave a Reply