By Michael J. Wiener
Special to the Financial Independence Hub
Many people advocate having a portfolio made up of mostly a core of low cost index funds along with a small “explore” part for taking concentrated risks on favourite investments. This can work well enough if you’re realistic about it, but most investors cross the line to self-delusion.
Ben Carlson does a good job justifying the existence of explore-type investments in his article The Case for Having a Fun Portfolio. After all, people are entitled to spend their money however they want. Not every expenditure has to be part of a logical long-term plan. We can buy a beer, or a motorcycle, or some favourite stock if we want. So what if the long-term expectation is that the explore part of people’s portfolios will underperform indexes.
All the logic makes sense up to this point. But just about every stock-picker I know can’t resist taking this a step further. “Besides, the stock I picked is going to do great.” In their hearts, they know their stock picks are going to outperform. Past results don’t seem to deter them. They wouldn’t bother with the explore part of their portfolios if they truly believed they would lose money over a lifetime of picking stocks.
All the evidence says that professional investors today set good relative prices so that individual investors who choose their own stocks are essentially making random picks. The odds are against the small guy, but hope springs eternal. I prefer to find hope in other pursuits.
Michael J. Wiener runs the web site Michael James on Money, where he looks for the right answers to personal finance and investing questions. He’s retired from work as a “math guy in high tech” and has been running his website since 2007. He’s a former mutual fund investor, former stock picker, now index investor. This blog originally appeared on his site on April 26, 2021 and is republished on the Hub with his permission.