Tag Archives: ETFs

Benefits of a Core-Satellite Investment approach

By Erin Allen, CIM, VP Online ETF Distribution, BMO ETFs

(Sponsor Content)

Asset allocation is one of the most critical investment decisions an investor can make. Studies, such as the influential Brinson, Hood and Beebower paper, “Determinants of Portfolio Performance,1” suggest that the long-term strategic asset allocation of a portfolio accounts for over 90% of the variation of its return.

According to the study, the portfolio’s strategic – or target – asset allocation will have a greater impact on its performance than security selection or any short-term active or tactical asset allocation shifts.

The first step when constructing a portfolio is to determine the appropriate asset allocation, based on your risk profile and investment objectives, and then select investments across each asset class.

There are several approaches to constructing an investment portfolio. One such strategy is to adopt a core-satellite approach. Core-satellite investing involves using a core portfolio to anchor the portfolio’s strategic asset allocation, and adding satellite investments to enhance returns and/or mitigate risk.

Fundamentals of a core-satellite portfolio

A typical investment portfolio is comprised of traditional asset classes that represent the broad market, and generally include investment-grade fixed income securities and large-cap Canadian, U.S. and international equities, for example BMO S&P TSX Capped Composite Index ETF (ZCN), BMO S&P 500 Index ETF (ZSP), and BMO MSCI EAFE Index ETF (ZEA). These asset classes make up the portfolio’s “core” investments. Specific securities within each asset class will depend on the investor’s return objectives and risk tolerance.

In order to further diversify the portfolio, non-traditional asset classes – referred to as “satellite” strategies – are used to enhance returns and manage risk. Satellite strategies often have greater return potential than core asset classes, but may be considered higher risk (with greater volatility) when held on their own. However, they often have a lower correlation – a measure of the degree to which two investments move in relation to each other – to traditional assets classes. Satellite strategies can include asset classes or themes that can be used as either short-term, tactical investments, or held for longer periods of time. Combining investments with a low correlation can improve the risk/return characteristics of a portfolio.

Examples of satellite strategies are shown in Table 1 [below]. By using one or more of these satellite strategies in tandem with a core portfolio, investors can further diversify their portfolio across additional asset classes, regions, sectors, market capitalizations, currencies and/or investment styles. For example, real assets such as commodities, infrastructure and real estate have a tangible value that can rise during periods of inflation.

Infrastructure and real estate can also offer a steady and predictable cash flow.  Global fixed income securities provide Canadian investors with exposure to bonds in countries with different currencies and interest rate cycles, which can help reduce interest rate risk; while hedge funds, such as market neutral or multi-strategy funds, can actually lower volatility and improve a portfolio’s risk-adjusted performance.

Table 1: Courtesy BMO ETFs

Constructing a core-satellite portfolio

A core-satellite portfolio can be implemented by using:

  • Active strategies that seek to add value through security selection;
  • Passive strategies that seek to track the performance of an index representing a particular investment market;
  • A combination of active and passive strategies.

There is a fundamental investment theory that states markets are efficient and the price of any individual security already reflects all available relevant information, which makes it more difficult for active managers to outperform. Investors who share this view would generally purchase passive investments. Conversely, others believe markets are not efficient and do not always behave rationally, providing active managers with the opportunity to select undervalued securities and avoid overvalued securities – and increasing their potential to add value above the market and/or provide better risk controls and downside protection. While some studies show that the “average” active manager does not add value, well-selected managers have demonstrated the ability to add value and/or reduce risk over the long term.

One approach to constructing a core-satellite portfolio is to use passive investments for efficient markets and active investments for less efficient markets. Many traditional asset classes, such as the U.S. equity market, are considered to be very efficient, making it difficult for active managers to outperform. Non-traditional asset classes, such as Emerging Markets equities or high yield bonds, are often considered less efficient. Many of these asset classes may be more difficult to access, can be less liquid, and are not covered as broadly by research analysts, which can enable active managers greater potential to add value.

The most critical step

Determining the appropriate asset allocation (mix of stocks, bonds and other asset classes) is the most important step when building your portfolio. Whether you use a passive strategy, an active strategy, or a combination of both, the addition of one, or more, satellite strategies to a core portfolio can potentially enhance returns, reduce risk and provide a better return/risk profile for your portfolio.

Simple to use All-in-One Core Portfolio ETFs

BMO ETFs offers a range of all-in-one Asset Allocation ETFs you can select as your core investment portfolio, based on your risk tolerance and time horizon. These ETFs are a one-ticket solution where the asset allocation is determined by professional managers, and where the asset allocation is automatically rebalanced for you on a regular basis to ensure you are on track to meeting your goals. They are low cost, and there is no double dipping on the fees (all-in MER of 0.20%* includes the cost of the underlying ETFs).  Examples include our BMO Balanced ETF (ZBAL), or BMO Growth ETF (ZGRO) and BMO All-Equity ETF (ZEQT).  Click Here to learn more.

Erin Allen has been a part of the BMO ETFs team driving growth since the beginning, joining BMO Global Asset Management in 2010 and working her way through a variety of roles gaining experience in both sales and product development. For the past 5+ years, Ms. Allen has been working closely with capital markets desks, index providers, and portfolio managers to bring new ETFs to market. More recently, she is committed to helping empower investors to feel confident in their investment choices through ETF education. Ms. Allen hosts the weekly ETF Market Insights broadcast, delivering ETF education to DIY investors in a clear and concise manner. She has an honors degree from Laurier University and a CIM designation.

* Management Expense Ratios (MERs) are the audited MERs as of the fund’s fiscal year end or an estimate if the fund is less than one year old since the audited MER of the ETF has not gone through a financial reporting period.

Any statement that necessarily depends on future events may be a forward-looking statement. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of performance. They involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Although such statements are based on assumptions that are believed to be reasonable, there can be no assurance that actual results will not differ materially from expectations. Investors are cautioned not to rely unduly on any forward-looking statements. In connection with any forward-looking statements, investors should carefully consider the areas of risk described in the most recent simplified prospectus.

Commissions, management fees and expenses (if applicable) may be associated with investments in mutual funds and exchange traded funds (ETFs). Trailing commissions may be associated with investments in mutual funds. Please read the fund facts, ETF Facts or prospectus of the relevant mutual fund or ETF before investing. Mutual funds and ETFs are not guaranteed, their values change frequently and past performance may not be repeated.

For a summary of the risks of an investment in BMO Mutual Funds or BMO ETFs, please see the specific risks set out in the prospectus of the relevant mutual fund or ETF .  BMO ETFs trade like stocks, fluctuate in market value and may trade at a discount to their net asset value, which may increase the risk of loss. Distributions are not guaranteed and are subject to change and/or elimination.

S&P®, S&P/TSX Capped Composite®, S&P 500® are registered trademarks of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC (“S&P”) and “TSX” is a trademark of TSX Inc. These trademarks have been licensed for use by S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC and sublicensed to BMO Asset Management Inc. in connection with the above mentioned BMO ETFs. These BMO ETFs are not sponsored, endorsed, sold or promoted by S&P Dow Jones LLC, S&P, TSX, or their respective affiliates and S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC, S&P, TSX and their affiliates make no representation regarding the advisability of trading or investing in such BMO ETF(s).The BMO ETFs or securities referred to herein are not sponsored, endorsed or promoted by MSCI Inc. (“MSCI”), and MSCI bears no liability with respect to any such BMO ETFs or securities or any index on which such BMO ETFs or securities are based. The prospectus of the BMO ETFs contains a more detailed description of the limited relationship MSCI has with BMO Asset Management Inc. and any related BMO ETFs.

BMO Mutual Funds are offered by BMO Investments Inc., a financial services firm and separate entity from Bank of Montreal. BMO ETFs are managed and administered by BMO Asset Management Inc., an investment fund manager and  portfolio manager and separate legal entity from Bank of Montreal.

BMO Global Asset Management is a brand name under which BMO Asset Management Inc. and BMO Investments Inc. operate.

®/™Registered trademarks/trademark of Bank of Montreal, used under licence.


Can you Invest solely in ETFs?

 Special to the Financial Independence Hub

As regular readers of MillionDollarJourney know, we are big fans of Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs) which are one of the fastest growing products in the market.

Were it not for the fact that financial firms and advisors have less incentives to sell ETFs than other investments such as mutual funds (that provide them with annual fees), the growth would probably be even more spectacular.

Having said that, ETFs don’t always have the best performance, and are sometimes outperformed significantly by other investment options. This also means that over years, the standard composition of most ETFs has shifted – with fixed income, commodities and FX now representing a much larger piece of the pie.

For most investors, ETFs represent the easiest and cheapest way to gain exposure in a variety of different sectors or asset classes. Investing in currencies or commodities was done by pension funds or hedge funds only a few years ago but it is now just as easy to do so for individual investors.

It might not be 100%, but a very large majority of individuals and professionals believe that portfolio diversification represents an important way to gain the same return but with lower risk. 20 years ago that meant buying bonds, private investments, etc. The major problem with that strategy is illiquid investments are often very expensive if you are not pouring a major amount of capital.

A prime example is looking at the prices of a bond when you are buying $50,000 worth. It is understandable of course that sellers will give better prices to buyers of millions of dollars as it is an easier trade for them. Take a few percentage points here and there and you will see just how much of an impact it can have over a life of savings and investing.

Investing in ETFs – Pros and Cons

So, should you invest mostly (or only) in ETFs? Here are some of the common pros and cons to help you decide:

ETF Investing Advantages

  • Most diversified
  • More tax efficient (read our article on capital gains in Canada)
  • Easiest and quickest way to invest

ETF Investing Disadvantges

  • Costs can be high, depending on the broker you use
  • Still has some investing risks

Should Canadians invest only in ETFs?

In many ways, ETFs provide a viable alternative as they offer the opportunity to get broad (corporate bonds) or specific (1-3 year treasuries) positions that will not cost you much in terms of commission.  Furthermore, ETFs will get you much better pricing and potentially much improved returns over the long term. Continue Reading…

Building the big Dividend Retirement Portfolio with defensive Canadian ETFs

 

By Dale Roberts, Cutthecrapinvesting

Special to the Financial Independence Hub

There are a few reasons to play defense. A retiree or near retiree can benefit from less volatility and a lesser drawdown in a bear market. If your portfolio goes down less than market, and there is a greater underlying yield, that lessens the sequence of returns risk. You have the need to sell fewer shares to create income. For those in the accumulation stage it may be easier to stay the course and manage your portfolio if it is less volatile. You can build your portfolio around defensive Canadian ETFs.

For a defensive core, investors can build around utilities (including the modern utilities of telcos and pipelines), plus consumer staples and healthcare stocks. My research and posts have shown that defensive sectors and stocks are 35% or more “better” than market for retirement funding.

I outlined that approach in – building the retirement stock portfolio.

We can use certain types of stocks to help build the all-weather portfolio. That means we are better prepared for a change in economic conditions, as we are experiencing in 2022.

Building around high-dividend Canadian ETFs

While I am a total return guy at heart, I will also acknowledge the benefit of the Canadian high-dividend space. These big dividend payers outperform to a very large degree thanks to the wide moats and profitability. Those wide moats create that defensive stance or defensive wall to be more graphic. And of course, you’re offered very generous dividends for your risk tolerance level troubles.

Canadian investors love their banks, telcos, utilities and pipelines. The ETF that does a very good job of covering that high-dividend space is Vanguard’s High Dividend ETF – VDY. The ‘problem’ with that ETF is that it is heavily concentrated in financials – banks and insurance companies.

Vanguard VDY ETF as of November 2022.

Sector Fund Benchmark +/- Weight
Financials 55.4% 55.4% 0.0%
Energy 26.3% 26.2% 0.1%
Telecommunications 9.0% 9.0% 0.0%
Utilities 6.2% 6.2% 0.0%
Consumer Discretionary 1.9% 1.9% 0.0%
Basic Materials 0.6% 0.6% 0.0%
Industrials 0.4% 0.4% 0.0%
Real Estate 0.2% 0.2% 0.0%
Total 100.0% 100.0%

VDY is light on the defensive utilities and telcos. The fund also has a sizable allocation to energy that is split between oil and gas producers and pipelines. The oil and gas producers will also be more sensitive to economic conditions and recessions.

Greater volatility can go along for the ride in VDY as it is financial-heavy. And those are largely cyclical. They do well or better in positive economic conditions. But they can struggle during time of economic softness or recessions. Hence, we build up more of a defensive wall.

Building a wall around VDY

We can add more of the defensive sectors with one click of that buy button. Investors might look to Hamilton’s Enhanced Utility ETF – HUTS. The ETF offers …

█  Pipelines 26.8%

█  Telecommunication Services 23.5%

█  Utilities 49.6%

The current yield is a generous 6.5%. Keep in mind that the ETF does use a modest amount of leverage. Here are the stocks in HUTS – aka the usual suspects in the space.

BMO also offers an equal weight utilities ETF – ZUT .

And here’s the combined asset allocation if you were to use 50% Vanguard VDY and 50% Hamilton HUTS.

  • Financials 26.7%
  • Utilities 24.9%
  • Energy 26.5%
  • Telecom 16.2%

Energy includes pipelines and oil and gas producers. And while the energy producers can certainly offer more price volatility, there is no greater source of free cashflow and hence dividend growth (in 2021 and 2022). In a recent Making Sense of the Markets for MoneySense Kyle offered … Continue Reading…

Retired Money: Direct Indexing has drawbacks but a hybrid DIY strategy may have merits

Image courtesy MoneySense.ca/Unsplash: Photo by Ruben Sukatendel

My latest MoneySense Retired Money column looks at a trendy new investing approach known as “Direct Indexing.” You can find the full column by clicking on the highlighted headline: What is direct indexing? Should you build your own index?

Here’s a definition from Investopedia : “Direct indexing is an approach to index investing that involves buying the individual stocks that make up an index, in the same weights as the index.”

When I first read about this, I thought this was some version of the common practice by Do-it-yourself investors who “skim” the major holdings of major indexes or ETFs, thereby avoiding any management fees associated with the ETFs. It is and it isn’t, and we explore this below.

Investopedia notes that in the past, buying all the stocks needed to replicate an index, especially large ones like the S&P 500, required hundreds of transactions: building an index one stock at a time is time-consuming and expensive if you’re paying full pop on trading commissions. However, zero-commission stock trading largely gets around this constraint, democratizing what was once the preserve of wealthy investors.   According to this article that ran in the summer at Charles River [a State Street company], direct indexing has taken off in the US: “ While direct index portfolios have been available for over 20 years, continued advancement of technology and structural industry changes have eliminated barriers to adoption, reduced cost, and created an environment conducive for the broader adoption of these types of strategies.”

These forces also means direct indexing can be attractive in Canada as well, it says. However, an October 2022 article in Canadian trade newspaper Investment Executive suggests “not everyone thinks it will take root in Canada.” It cast direct indexing as an alternative to owning ETFs or mutual funds, noting that players include Boston-based Fidelity Investments Inc, BlackRock Inc., Vanguard Group Inc., Charles Schwab and finance giants Goldman Sachs Inc. and Morgan Stanley.

An article at Morningstar Canada suggested direct indexing is “effectively … the updated version of separately managed accounts (SMA). As with direct indexing, SMAs were modified versions of mutual funds, except the funds were active rather than passive with SMAs.”

My MoneySense column quotes Wealth manager Matthew Ardrey, a vice president with Toronto-based TriDelta Financial, who is skeptical about the benefits of direct indexing: “While I always think it is good for an investor to be able to lower fees and increase flexibility in their portfolio management, I question just who this strategy is right for.” First, Ardrey addresses the fees issue: “Using the S&P500 as an example, an investor must track and trade 500 stocks to replicate this index. Though they could tax-loss-sell and otherwise tilt their allocation as they see fit, the cost of managing 500 stocks is very high: not necessarily in dollars, but in time.” It would be onerous to make 500 trades alone, especially if fractional shares are involved.

Ardrey concludes Direct indexing may be more useful for those trying to allocate to a particular sector of the market (like Canadian financials), where “a person would have to buy a lot less companies and make the trading worthwhile.”

A hybrid strategy used by DIY financial bloggers may be more doable

I would call this professional or advisor-mediated Direct Indexing and agree it seems to have severe drawbacks. However, that doesn’t mean savvy investors can’t implement their own custom approach to incorporate some of these ideas. Classic Direct Indexing seems similar but slightly different than a hybrid strategy many DIY Canadian financial bloggers have been using in recent years. They may target a particular stock index – like the S&P500 or TSX – and buy  most of the underlying stocks in similar proportions. Again, the rise of zero-commission investing and fractional share ownership has made this practical for ordinary retail investors. Continue Reading…

BMO ETFs: Tax Loss Harvesting

illustration of a man on a laptop with charts and graphs behind him, sitting on money to illustrate investing

(Sponsor Content)

With volatile markets, rising inflation and a potential economic slowdown, 2022 has proven to be a challenging year for investors. Exchange traded funds (ETFs) are effective tools for investors to help navigate these uncertain markets and can be used to help crystallize losses from a tax perspective. As 2022-year end approaches, this article provides trade ideas to help you harvest tax savings from under-performing securities.

What is Tax-Loss Harvesting?

By disposing of securities with accrued capital losses, investors can help offset taxes otherwise payable from securities that were sold at a capital gain. The proceeds from the sale of these securities can then be reinvested in different securities with similar exposures to the securities that were sold, in order to maintain market exposure.

  • Realized capital gains from previous transactions can be offset by selling securities, which are trading at a lower price than their adjusted cost base.
  • Investors can then use the proceeds from the security that is sold to invest in a different security, i.e. BMO Exchange Traded Funds (ETF).
  • In addition to common shares, tax-loss harvesting can also be applied in respect of other financial instruments that are on capital account, such as bonds, preferred shares, ETFs, mutual funds, etc.

Considerations:

If capital gains are not available in the current year, the realized losses may be carried back for three years to shelter gains realized in those years or carried forward to reduce capital gains in upcoming years.

Continue Reading…