Tag Archives: Financial Independence

FP: Bank on Yourself — Why women need to focus on Financial Independence with or without a spouse

Posted By |

My latest Financial Post column looks at an upcoming book, Bank on Yourself, which focuses on how Canadian women need to focus on Financial Independence, whether or not they are currently part of a couple. Click on the highlighted headline here for the full review: Why Women shouldn’t let a solo retirement catch them by surprise. The review also appears in the print edition of Tuesday’s Financial Post (page FP 3, April 2, 2019).

The book, which is being published this month (April) by Milner & Associates, is co-authored by a lifelong single woman, Ardelle Harrison, and a financial advisor, Leslie McCormick. McCormick is a Senior Wealth Advisor with Scotia Wealth Management but Ardelle is not a client.

The subtitle says it all: “Why every woman should plan financially to be single. Even if she’s not.”

The authors say 90% of women will end up managing their own finances at some point, whether because of divorce, widowhood or because they never married in the first place. And because women tend to live longer, expect five female centenarians for every male who reaches 100 years (according to the 2016 Canadian census).

Allegedly one of women’s biggest fears is ending up in old age as a “bag lady” destitute on the streets. In fact, 28.3% of unattached women live in poverty and single older women are 13 times more likely to be poor than seniors living in families, the authors say.

They cite Pew Research’s eye-opening finding that when today’s young adults reach their mid 40s and mid 50s, 25% of them are likely to never have been married, and that by then “the chances of marrying for the first time after that age are very small.” (Whether by choice or circumstance.)

But even those who do “couple” earlier in life may not always remain in that state. A 2013 Vanier Institute of the Family report says 41% of Canadian marriages end before their 30th wedding anniversary. 68% of divorced couples cited fighting over money as the top reason for the split. 2011 Canadian census data shows the average age at which women are widowed is 56.

Multiple Streams of Income

A key concept emphasized throughout the book is having Multiple Streams of Income, at least three in Retirement. Employment income is the springboard to other income streams,  including employer pensions.

A second is government benefits unlike CPP and OAS. Other streams are business, investment and real estate income, and annuities. Home owners have a potential backup in their home equity, although the authors rightly say “Debt is not something you want in retirement.”

I asked McCormick if these principles apply equally to single men. General financial planning principles apply across genders, she replied, but women have longer life expectancies, so when you add the gender wage cap, it’s harder for women to build wealth. Female baby boomers can expect to outlive their spouses by 10 to 15 years, “yet so few women plan for it.” While 31% of women view themselves as being financially knowledgeable, 80% of men do.  Her hope is the book will help bridge that gap. So might a planning tool at her Plan Single website (www.Plansingle.ca).

 

A beginner’s guide to Fixed Rate Mortgages

Posted By |

By Rebecca Hills

Special to the Financial Independence Hub

Fixed rate mortgages are very popular in Canada. In fact, of the 6 million mortgages that have been taken out by Canadians, 60% are fixed rate mortgages. A fixed rate mortgage agreement stipulates that the borrower will be required to pay interest on their mortgage that will not fluctuate for a set period of time. Presently, the most popular mortgage in Canada is a three-year fixed rate mortgage.

In addition, interest rates for fixed mortgages will differ, depending on the province that you are living in, as well as the number of years on the term, and also the financial institution that you borrow from. Different mortgage brokers will also offer different rates, so doing your homework beforehand, while understanding your unique financial goals and situation, will help you avoid any headaches down the line. Here, our goal is to provide you with a beginner’s guide to the fixed rate mortgage scheme.

What is meant by Fixed Rate Mortgage?

As mentioned, roughly two thirds of Canadians opt for a fixed rate mortgage over a variable rate mortgage. A fixed rate mortgage is designed for people who are averse to risk, as having a set interest rate will eliminate the risk of interest rates suddenly skyrocketing in the future. Imagine a situation where interest rates increase exponentially and you are unable to afford the sudden spike in rates. Such a possibility would not be an issue when you lock in an interest rate for the entire term of your loan.

Also, please note that you don’t have to stick with a fixed rate mortgage forever. For instance, if you receive a job promotion or inherit some money then you may be more comfortable taking a risk and switching to a variable rate mortgage. Once your mortgage has reached the end of its term you can consult with your broker in order to determine if switching to a variable rate mortgage may be the better option when it comes time to refinance your home.

Evidently, in some cases a variable rate mortgage may be the better option, if interest rates happen to be low when you sign, and remain relatively low throughout the term of your mortgage. As can be seen, both fixed rate and variable rate mortgages have their pros and cons, so if you are not sure with which to go with speaking to a financial advisor or broker may help with your dilemma.

Should I choose a fixed or variable rate mortgage?

There are many advantages to fixed rate mortgages. For instance, you won’t have to worry about your payments increasing over the duration of the mortgage term. There are also many options to choose from, from 2- or 3-year terms, to 5- or 10-year terms. In some cases you may also have the option to sign a 6-month fixed rate mortgage or one as long as 25 years. There is also the matter of certainty, as you will know exactly what your mortgage will cost at all times. Knowing exactly how much you will be required to pay will also streamline your billing, and also help you create a budget that is safe and secure. Continue Reading…

Pensionize your Nest Egg with Annuities, your Super Bonds

Posted By |

By Dale Roberts, CuttheCrapInvesting

Special to the Financial Independence Hub

Most Canadians do not have a defined pension with guaranteed income. Speaking of birds and nest eggs, those guaranteed pensions are going the way of the dodo bird. Just 33% of Canadians have a defined benefit workplace pension where the income is guaranteed and usually indexed to inflation.

That’s according to Pensionize Your Nest Egg: How to Use Product Allocation to Create a Guaranteed Income For Life.

There’s only one way for me and you to create a generous and guaranteed income stream and that’s by way of the annuity. It’s a topic and product category that gets little attention. And when it gets attention it’s often negative. Annuities are offered by insurance companies. Strike One. Annuities come with ‘high fees.’ Strike Two. Let’s not go to Strike Three; we want to keep this blog post alive. In the process we might keep your retirement in good shape as well.

Hear me out. I’ll admit that I have not been a fan of the annuity in the past. I’ll also admit that I knew very little about annuities. That’s always a good way to form an opinion, right? Give that thumbs down based on the headlines and 5 minutes of research. So please join me in a more than surprising and interesting discovery of just what the heck an annuity is.

With an annuity you simply purchase your own pension

Yup, it’s that simple. As an example, you hand over $100,000 and the insurance company will pay you monthly income, guaranteed for life. Of course that’s a Life Annuity. There are a few types of annuities, but for now we’ll stick to the most common and most popular annuity.

And of course the rates available will fluctuate based on a few factors. Here’s a site that will give you an idea of the rates available in today’s market.

In March of 2019 here are the rates for a Canadian single male. The payment is in the range of 6% annually for a male at age 65.

Annuity RatesYou can purchase an income stream for life. And of course, the longer you wait to purchase that annuity the greater your payments. You might stagger your annuity purchase(s) over many years and periods of your retirement. That’s typically the advice found in Pensionize Your Nest Egg and offered from advisors who Pensionize a portion of their clients’ nest eggs.

When you hand over your money, it’s a done deal

These are irreversible contracts. When you purchase an annuity you usually exchange control of those funds for guaranteed income for life. When you die, your money goes to the insurance company. To be exact, a portion of your monies goes to the survivors:  to those who purchased annuities and who might live to 85, 90, 95 or 100. That’s how insurance companies can afford to pay you rates that are well beyond the bond and GIC rates of the day. With an annuity the unlucky (the dead) pay for the lucky (the living).

In the above quote table there is a 10-year guarantee, meaning that the payment would continue for 10 years from time of purchase even in the event of an early death.

Many Canadians are living well into their 90s

And from the many tools available at pensionizeyournestegg.com here’s a shocking survivability table for a 65-year-old male.

Survivability TableFor a 65-year-old Canadian male there’s a 25% chance that they’ll live to age 94. Yikes. What side of the annuity grass will you be on? This table demonstrates why a certain level of guaranteed income might be a good idea. You might at least cover your basic living needs for life and projected oldage home payments with guaranteed income.

The 3 product allocation buckets

The main theme of Pensionize Your Nest Egg is to think product buckets, not traditional asset allocation that would normally include your mix of cash, GICs, stocks and bonds. Instead the theme and 3 buckets is …

  1. Guaranteed Income For Life.
  2. Guaranteed Income Plus Growth Potential.
  3. Asset Growth Potential (your personal portfolio) Continue Reading…

Solving the home country bias in Canadian portfolios

Posted By |

Canadian investors tend to suffer from home bias – a preference to hold more domestic stocks over foreign equities. This is actually true of investors in most countries, but it’s particularly troubling in Canada where our stock markets are highly concentrated in the financial and energy sectors.

The federal government could be partially to blame for our home bias tendencies. As recently as 2005 the government imposed a limit on the amount of foreign content allowed in RRSPs and pension plans. This cap was introduced in 1971 to help support the development of Canada’s financial markets but was scrapped in the 2005 federal budget, freeing Canadians up to invest abroad.

Sizes of World Stock Markets

It’s well known that Canada makes up less than 4 per cent of global equity markets (2.7 per cent, to be exact), yet 60 per cent of the equities in Canadian investors’ portfolios are in domestic securities.

Even most model ETF and index fund portfolios have Canadian investors overweighting domestic equities, holding anywhere from 20 to 40 per cent Canadian content.

Canadian home country bias

The result is a portfolio that is more volatile and less efficient than one with international equity diversification. Indeed, investors with a Canadian home bias are taking risks they could have diversified away by increasing their allocation to global equities.

My two-ETF portfolio

So how does my portfolio stack up? When I switched to my two-ETF solution, made up of Vanguard’s VCN (Canadian) and VXC (All World, ex-Canada), I chose to have an allocation 20-25 per cent Canadian stocks and 75-80 per cent international stocks.

That allocation would be relatively easy to monitor and rebalance if it was simply held in my RRSP. Whenever I added new money to my RRSP, I’d simply buy the ETF that was lagging behind its initial target allocation.

But I complicated things recently when I started contributing again to my TFSA. I wanted to treat my TFSA and RRSP as one total portfolio and keep the same asset mix in place. Since my RRSP was much larger than my TFSA, I decided to hold mostly foreign content (VXC) in my RRSP while putting Canadian stocks (VCN) in my TFSA.

This worked out great for several years but now I’ve run into a second problem; I’m contributing to my TFSA at a much faster pace than my RRSP. That’s because I’ve maxed out all of my unused RRSP contribution room and, due to the pension adjustment, I get a measly $3,600 per year in new contribution room.

Meanwhile I still have loads of unused TFSA contribution room and so I’ve been socking away $12,000 per year for the past two-and-a-half years. I hope to continue at that pace for many more years until I’ve completely caught up on all that available contribution room.

The result is a portfolio that is becoming increasingly more tilted to Canadian equities. At this rate, if I continue filling my TFSA with VCN, my portfolio will have more than 30 per cent Canadian content in five years, and nearly 40 per cent Canadian content in 10 years.

My Home Bias Solution

I’m considering a change to my two-fund portfolio. With the introduction of Vanguard’s new all-equity asset allocation ETF – VEQT – I could turn my two-fund solution into a true one-fund solution and make investing even more simple. Continue Reading…

Aman Raina’s 4-year Robo Advisor review

Posted By |

 

By Aman Raina, SageInvestors

Special to the Financial Independence Hub

Four years ago, Obama was President of the United States and Stephen Harper was Prime Minister of Canada. A Liberal was running America and a Conservative was running Canada. The New England Patriots were still making it to the Super Bowl, even winning a few…

…and I had opened my Robo Advisor account.

Yes it been a full 4 years since I opened up my Robo Advisor account. For those new to investing, a Robo Advisor is a new wave of wealth management companies that invest on behalf of others using an online platform and a combination of algorithms and computer coding to buy and sell specific investments and manage portfolios. Four years ago these firms were just stepping into the investing conciousness, but since then they have mushroomed and even traditional investment companies are now offering some flavor of online investment management services. It all seemed quite appealing however there was one thing that many marketing materials, blogs, and mainstream media was avoiding (and still are I might add)…do these types of services make money for investors?

Since no robo advisor company back then was interested in disclosing their performance (they still avoid it) other than citing research that their strategy is superior, I decided four years ago to try an experiment and find out for myself. I setup an account with one of the big Robo Adviser firms. My goal was to go through the process and blog about my experience and more importantly, the results. I’ve always said that we need a good five years to really get a handle on how effective these services are compared to traditional wealth management services. Well, we’re at the 80% mark of my ROBO journey, so let’s check back in and take a look at how it’s doing now and see if we can squeeze any conclusions about the service.

In previous years, I have stated that for us to get a real handle on their effectiveness, we need to see these robo-portfolios experience some stress. Up until 2018, the markets have been quite tame. We’ve seen how these portfolios operate in a period of rising stock prices. In 2018 we finally hit some periods where there were major swings in stock prices around the world. In February we saw the Dow Jones on several days drop more than 1000 points and in December we had the Christmas Eve Massacre where stock prices fell off a cliff creating a lot of hand wringing over the Christmas break. Finally meaningful, although short-term stress points for the ROBO portfolio.

Performance

Below is the current status of my ROBO portfolio as of January 30, 2019 and below that is the chart of annual returns over the past four years.

My ROBO Advisor portfolio as of January 30, 2019

My ROBO Advisor portfolio as of January 30, 2019

ROBO Portfolio Annual Return

(annual returns)

 The first year was a rough one for ROBO as it had lost 2.15 per cent. In the second year and third year, ROBO picked up its game. The portfolio generated a 13.2 per cent return in Year 2 and in Year 3 it posted another solid year with a 14.2 per cent return. In 2018, the portfolio pulled back going down a total of 2.1 per cent. The loss was tempered by dividends, where the portfolio generated $142.91 in dividend income. The ROBO was also saved a bit by a strong rebound in stock prices in January coming off the correction in December. The losses could have been much worse. Considering the largest component of the ROBO portfolio was concentrated in US and Canadian stocks and where the S&P500 and TSX/S&P Composite were down 6.3 and 11.7 per cent respectively in 2018, a 2.1 per cent drop is very reasonable. I lost money but not as much. Since January 2015, the portfolio is up 22 per cent over the last 4 years.

Asset Allocation

When I set up the account I answered a series of questions about my financial literacy and risk tolerance. ROBO took my responses and crafted a portfolio that it felt was compatible with my profile. As I am pretty experienced with investing and have a long-term investment horizon, ROBO determined that a portfolio mix of 85 per cent stocks and 15 per cent bonds would work for me. It has since then retained the same stocks/bonds ratio.   Continue Reading…