Tag Archives: indexing

Vanguard announces the passing of founder John C. Bogle

The investment industry is saddened to learn of the passing of Vanguard founder John C. Bogle today. A true giant of the industry, Bogle was virtually the creator of index mutual funds and ETFs, and passive investing in general. Below is the press release issued today by Vanguard, which we reprint in full. I have added a few subheads and made only very minor edits.  

VALLEY FORGE, PA (January 16, 2019) — Vanguard announces the passing of John Clifton Bogle, founder of The Vanguard Group, who died today in Bryn Mawr, Pennsylvania. He was 89.

Mr. Bogle had legendary status in the American investment community, largely because of two towering achievements: He introduced the first index mutual fund for investors and, in the face of skeptics, stood behind the concept until it gained widespread acceptance; and he drove down costs across the mutual fund industry by ceaselessly campaigning in the interests of investors. Vanguard, the company he founded to embody his philosophy, is now one of the largest investment management firms in the world.

“Jack Bogle made an impact on not only the entire investment industry, but more importantly, on the lives of countless individuals saving for their futures or their children’s futures,” said Vanguard CEO Tim Buckley. “He was a tremendously intelligent, driven, and talented visionary whose ideas completely changed the way we invest. We are honored to continue his legacy of giving every investor ‘a fair shake.’”

Mr. Bogle, a resident of Bryn Mawr, PA, began his career in 1951 after graduating magna cum laude in economics from Princeton University. His senior thesis on mutual funds had caught the eye of fellow Princeton alumnus Walter L. Morgan, who had founded Wellington Fund, the nation’s oldest balanced fund, in 1929 and was one of the deans of the mutual fund industry. Mr. Morgan hired the ambitious 22-year-old for his Philadelphia-based investment management firm, Wellington Management Company.

Mr. Bogle worked in several departments before becoming assistant to the president in 1955, the first in a series of executive positions he would hold at Wellington: 1962, administrative vice president; 1965, executive vice president; and 1967, president. Mr. Bogle became the driving force behind Wellington’s growth into a mutual fund family after he persuaded Mr. Morgan, in the late 1950s, to start an equity fund that would complement Wellington Fund. Windsor Fund, a value-oriented equity fund, debuted in 1958.

In 1967, Mr. Bogle led the merger of Wellington Management Company with the Boston investment firm Thorndike, Doran, Paine & Lewis (TDPL). Seven years later, a management dispute with the principals of TDPL led Mr. Bogle to form Vanguard in September 1974 to handle the administrative functions of Wellington’s funds, while TDPL/Wellington Management would retain the investment management and distribution duties. The Vanguard Group of Investment Companies commenced operations on May 1, 1975.

The “Vanguard experiment”

To describe his new venture, Mr. Bogle coined the term “The Vanguard Experiment.” It was an experiment in which mutual funds would operate at cost and independently, with their own directors, officers, and staff—a radical change from the traditional mutual fund corporate structure, whereby an external management company ran a fund’s affairs on a for-profit basis.

“Our challenge at the time,” Mr. Bogle recalled a decade later, “was to build, out of the ashes of major corporate conflict, a new and better way of running a mutual fund complex. The Vanguard Experiment was designed to prove that mutual funds could operate independently, and do so in a manner that would directly benefit their shareholders.”

First index mutual fund in 1976

In 1976, Vanguard introduced the first index mutual fund — First Index Investment Trust — for individual investors. Ridiculed by others in the industry as “un-American” and “a sure path to mediocrity,” the fund collected a mere $11 million during its initial underwriting. Now known as Vanguard 500 Index Fund, it has grown to be one of the industry’s largest, with more than $441 billion in assets (the sister fund, Vanguard Institutional Index Fund, has $221.5 billion in assets). Today, index funds account for more than 70% of Vanguard’s $4.9 trillion in assets under management; they are offered by many other fund companies as well and they make up most exchange-traded funds (ETFs). For his pioneering of the index concept for individual investors, Mr. Bogle was often called the “father of indexing.”

1977: Direct to investors

Mr. Bogle and Vanguard again broke from industry tradition in 1977, when Vanguard ceased to market its funds through brokers and instead offered them directly to investors. The company eliminated sales charges and became a pure no-load mutual fund complex—a move that would save shareholders hundreds of millions of dollars in sales commissions. This was a theme for Mr. Bogle and his successors: Vanguard is known today for maintaining investment costs among the lowest in the industry.

A champion of the individual investor, Mr. Bogle is widely credited with helping to bring increased disclosure about mutual fund costs and performance to the public. His commitment to safeguarding investors’ interests often prompted him to speak out against practices that were common among his peers in other mutual fund organizations. “We are more than a mere industry,” he insisted in a 1987 speech before the National Investment Company Services Association. “We must hold ourselves to higher standards, standards of trust and fiduciary duty. Change we must—in our communications, our pricing structure, our product, and our promotional techniques.”

Mr. Bogle spoke frequently before industry professionals and the public. He liked to write his own speeches. He also responded personally to many of the letters written to him by Vanguard shareholders, and he wrote many reports, sometimes as long as 25 pages, to Vanguard employees — whom he called “crew members” in light of Vanguard’s nautical theme. (Mr. Bogle named the company after Admiral Horatio Nelson’s flagship at the Battle of the Nile in 1798; he thought the name “Vanguard” resonated with the themes of leadership and progress.)

In January 1996, Mr. Bogle passed the reins of Vanguard to his hand-picked successor, John J. Brennan, who joined the company in 1982 as Mr. Bogle’s assistant. The following month, Mr. Bogle underwent heart transplant surgery. A few months later, he was back in the office, writing and speaking about issues of importance to mutual fund investors. Continue Reading…

Stop giving Markets your attention

When I got an activity tracker several years ago I was horrified to learn just how sedentary my lifestyle had become. I’d drive to work, park my butt at a desk for eight hours, drive home, park my butt on the couch for a few more hours, and go to bed. It was mindless laziness.

I fit right in with the average North American, who walks an average of 3,000 to 4,000 steps per day.

Steps to improve my steps

My activity tracker suggested a goal of 10,000 steps per day. I was motivated by the step counter and helpful nudges to get myself moving. I started parking in a free lot about 1 kilometre away from work, adding an extra 3,000 steps to my day (and saving $50 per month in parking fees!).

My new walking routine got me up to an average of 7,000 steps per day, but still not close to my goal. Then, following my wife’s lead, I got into running three to four times per week. The extra activity helped me reach my goal – not every day, but on average throughout the week. Funny enough, I still find motivation from my activity tracker as it nudges me to reach and surpass my daily move goals.

The hyper-attention and daily nudges helped me get my butt in gear and become a healthier person.

Curbing my Screen Time

Similarly, Apple sends iPhone users a new weekly report called Screen Time that shows how much time you spend on your phone. You’ll see which apps you use most often, how many times per day you pick up your phone, how many notifications you receive per day and from which application.

The report can be an eye opener if you’re into mindless scrolling through social networking sites like Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram. Twitter is the biggest attention sucker for me. Hey, it’s where I get my news!

I also get a lot of notifications and can conclude from the report that I receive about 30-40 emails per day from work. Not cool. Because of those notifications I tend to pick up my phone 65-70 times per day to either check my email, respond to a text, or check Twitter.

The week the Screen Time report first came out I spent six hours per day on my phone. I’ve got that down to less than four hours per day and try to design rules around curbing my screen time. That means turning off unnecessary notifications and keeping my phone in another room when I go to bed.

Again, these nudges had a positive effect on drawing my attention to a negative behaviour and making a conscious effort to curb it.

Negative Stock Market Attention

Back when I was a stock-picker I obsessively checked my portfolio, and read every market headline. I scoured the internet for news about my individual stock holdings and searched for analyst opinions (only the ones that confirmed my own opinion, of course).

But just like in the previous two examples, all this attention and information made me want to act. My oil stocks were getting killed and I wanted to get out. Sobeys made a mess of its Safeway acquisition and I wanted to get out. The general market would fall by 5-10 per cent and I felt like I needed to do something – like contribute more money than I had planned, or hold off on adding new money until things “settled down.”

Stock market plunge

Nudges worked against me. I’d get email alerts when Fortis or Great West Life missed their earnings targets. What should I do with this information?

The Globe and Mail app would send helpful push notifications like, “markets plunge on European/China/Russia fears,” or,“Dow posts worst day ever.” A smart investor is supposed to act on this, right? Shift their portfolio to safer assets? Buy gold?!?

Don’t just do something, stand there!

I switched to indexing four years ago with a simple two-ETF portfolio of global and domestic stocks. Now that I own thousands of companies I no longer pay attention to the fortunes of one or two. I find myself paying less attention to market headlines in general.

I make my monthly contributions automatic and only check my portfolio when the cash balance is large enough to make a trade. I figured instead of tinkering with my portfolio daily and reacting to news I’d be better off taking a two-decade nap and letting compounding do its thing.

I make my monthly contributions automatic and only check my portfolio when the cash balance is large enough to make a trade. I figured instead of tinkering with my portfolio daily and reacting to news I’d be better off taking a two-decade nap and letting compounding do its thing.

RelatedHow and when to rebalance your portfolio

Your long-term investing plan has no time for daily market noise. Yes, we may be entering a bear market. Or it’s just a run-of-the-mill market correction. Nobody knows for sure.

We do know that yesterday [late December] the Dow and S&P 500 had historic gains. If you happened to act on your fears and exit the market, thinking it was on its way to a 40-50 per cent meltdown, you missed out on that important rally. In fact, many of the largest one-day gains occur during down markets.

Final thoughts

Technology can help bring attention to a negative behaviour and turn it into a positive outcome. But those nudges and alerts can also work against you.

When it comes to investing often the best course of action is to do nothing and stick to your plan. Daily gyrations smooth out over a period of several months, and over several years the trajectory of the stock market tends to point up and to the right.

Many so-called experts question the value of robo-advisors during a downturn such as this, saying that investors would be better off with a human advisor. But from what I’ve heard during tumultuous times, the robos send helpful nudges via text and email explaining what is happening and why fluctuations in the market are part of a normal investing experience.

For investors that can be calming reassurance in the face of negative headlines screaming for your attention.

In addition to running the Boomer & Echo website, Robb Engen is a fee-only financial planner. This article originally ran on on Dec. 27, 2018 and is republished here with his permission.

Retired Money: Getting real about Retirement planning with Viviplan

My latest MoneySense Retired Money column looks at a financial planning software platform called Viviplan. You can find the full article by clicking on the highlighted text:  What I learned by putting Viviplan to the test.

Viviplan is the third retirement planning package I’ve tested this year, perhaps — as the MoneySense article reveals — the topic is getting all too real for me now that my wife, Ruth, has told her employer she plans to retire when she turns 65 next summer. I’m a year older and have been somewhere between self-employed and semi-retired for most of my 60s.

Previously we have looked at a couple of packages created by Emeritus Financial Strategy‘s Doug Dahmer — who is a frequent contributor to the Hub — as well as Ian Moyer’s Cascades, which you can read about in an earlier column by me here. Dahmer offers a choice of two packages: Retirement Navigator and BetterMoney Choices.com.

All these packages deserve consideration and work in more or less similar fashion. To do the job justice, you need to have handy — or at least summary information — such documents as your latest tax returns, brokerage statements, Service Canada CPP and/or OAS projections, as well as having a good grasp of your regular and occasional monthly expenses.

Having most recently performed this exercise with Viviplan — and as one of the users we interviewed for MoneySense relates — it can be a bit scary to see in black and white just how expensive daily living can be. The package won’t let you forget any tiny expense, from pet food to boarding your pet when you’re on vacation (or arranging to hire a neighbour’s teenager, which is what we do if we go away and must leave our cat behind.)

Viviplan calls itself a Robo Planner

Viviplan — which has been dubbed “Canada’s Robo Planner” — is the brainchild of financial planner Rona Birenbaum. Birenbaum also runs a separate fee-for-service financial planning firm called Caring for Clients. I have consulted her for various pieces in the past, particularly about annuities.

Indeed, when I was putting Viviplan through its paces, one of the big questions I had was whether there was a need for us to partly annuitize, seeing as Ruth has no employer-provided Defined Benefit pension at all (just a hefty RRSP), and I have only two modest DB pensions that are not inflation-indexed.

Viviplan’s Morgan Ulmer

Our main question was whether to make up for this lack of employer pensions by at least partially annuitizing, or what Moshe Milevsky and Alexandra McQueen call in the title of their book Pensionize Your Nest Egg. Another author, Fred Vettese in Retirement Income for Life, was in a similar situation when he reached 65 (the same month as I did) and had suggested annuitizing 30% of his nest egg at 65 and doing another 30% at age 75 (assuming CPP at 70). Our question for Viviplan was whether this would make sense for us too, or just for Ruth.

We went back and forth with Calgary-based certified financial planner and product manager Morgan Ulmer (pictured to the right). As she relates in the MoneySense piece, “it’s certainly not necessary,” since at today’s interest rates, Viviplan told her that for us a pure GIC portfolio could get us to where we want to go, with the virtue of more financial flexibility and higher final estate value. Like the other programs, Viviplan recommends delaying CPP till 70 and OAS too if possible.

Annuitize? No wrong decisions and no rush

Partial annuitization for Ruth along the lines of what Vettese suggests would result in a slightly lower estate for our daughter. “With annuities, you are making a choice between legacy and flexibility versus security and longevity protection,” Ulmer said in the plan’s written recommendations, “There are no wrong decisions here, and there is also no rush.” Continue Reading…

What women want – and how to get it

By Ed Rempel, CMA, Fee-for-Service Planner

Special to the Financial Independence Hub

There was a gasp from the audience, when this photo of a homeless woman was shown at a talk I recently attended.

A new survey shows that almost half of women fear they will become a “bag lady” someday. They fear being financially desperate and living on the street.

No job. No income. No partner. That is the fear.

 

I have asked thousands of people: “What’s important about money to you?” The #1 answer for women is security.1

What does “security” mean? It’s surprising how often the “bag lady fear” comes up. The #1 explanation is similar, but less severe:

Security:Having enough so I never have to worry about money.

Women want to know there will always be enough income for their family, for emergencies, and for the things that are important to their lifestyle. They want to focus on their life, their family and their friends and not have to constantly worry about whether they can afford it.

What does that look like and how do you get there? The answer might surprise you.

First, three questions:

1.) Jennifer has $2 million in stock market investments. This is:

A. Very risky.

B. Financial security.

 

2.) Financial security is:

A. No debt and safe investments.

B. Large diversified portfolio.

 

3.) Who is more secure?

A. Mary has no debt.

B. Andrea has a $200,000 mortgage and $1 million in investments.

 

Whether you ever become financially secure depends a lot on your picture of financial security.

Most people who want security do exactly the opposite of what they need to do to get it. The biggest mistake most people make is to think they can be financially secure by paying off all debt and having safe investments, instead of investing wisely for long-term growth.

I call this the “Zero Plan.” You retire with zero debt, zero investments (nearly), and zero income (except a bit from the government). People who do this are actually making it hard for themselves to have the nest egg they will need to be secure.

The truth is, investing very little money and buying low-return investments means you will never build up much of a nest egg.

What does financial security look like? What I have learned from experience helping thousands of people become financially secure is this:

Real security comes from having a huge nest egg.

A large portfolio of equities (stock market investments) is financial security. That’s what security looks like. Continue Reading…

Vanguard: The hidden $1.3 trillion player in active management

Vanguard’s Daniel Wallick addresses financial advisors at 2018 Vanguard Investment Symposium

While the Vanguard Group is best known for being a pioneer of index mutual funds and exchange-traded funds, it also happens to be one of the world’s largest practitioners of active management. In a presentation Tuesday in Toronto that is taking place across the country, Vanguard executives said the US$5 trillion of money it manages worldwide includes $1.3 trillion in active management.

Vanguard Investment Strategy Group’s Head of Multi-Asset Portfolios, Daniel W. Wallick, presented financial advisors with a framework for constructing portfolios that combine active and passive approaches to investing. The heart of Vanguard’s approach remains broad cap-weighted indexes (or so-called Beta), which is what Vanguard says it means when it uses the term “indexing.”

For many investors, the broad diversification, low costs and tax efficiency of its mainstream index funds and ETFs may suffice.

But, depending on the desired complexity, Vanguard can incorporate “factors” like momentum, value, or liquidity, all factors that have shown a persistency for generating alpha (outperformance) over long periods of time. Beta and Tilts (to for example, overweighting the home country or large market caps) can be combined for the single most important task of Strategic Asset Allocation but overlaying this can be the addition of potential “Alpha” sources like Security Selection and Timing.

“Strategic asset allocation through market-cap-weighted indexes makes for a powerful tool,” Wallick said. And over 10-year periods, asset allocation policy continues to be the biggest source of variations in returns. Asset allocation explains 86% of return variation in 303 Canadian balanced funds tracked by Vanguard, 91.1% of 709 balanced funds in the U.S., 80.5% of 743 balanced funds in the UK and 89.1% of 580 balanced funds in Australia.

Cost trumps talent, patience is crucial

The 3 keys to successful active management = long-term performance

Vanguard sees three keys to successful active management: Cost, Talent and Patience. Wallick described the in-depth process Vanguard uses to select subadvisors for its actively managed funds but hiring talent has to be within strict cost-control parameters.

“Cost is a powerful indicator of future alpha.” But once the talent has been identified and hired, patience is required: Vanguard research over 15 years found that of 2,200 initial funds, 22% survived and outperformed, 24% survived but underperformed, and 54% did not survive. But even among the 22% that survived and performed, 98% of them underperformed in at least four years.

By focusing on both low costs and rigorously overseeing actively managed subadvisors, Vanguard multi manager funds have outperformed their Lipper peer-group averages by various percentages: 78% of them over 1 year, 83% of them over 3 years, 76% of them over 5 years and a whopping 100% over 10 years.

Factor-based funds vs traditional active funds

There is a half-way position between traditional beta-based Style index funds and ETFs and traditional active funds. The former (Beta) provide low cost, low turnover and lower tracking error while traditional active funds provide the opportunity to add alpha, albeit at a higher cost, potentially greater volatility, and less transparency and control. Between these are factor-based funds and ETFs, which provide consistent targeted exposure as well as low cost, but may have higher tracking error and potentially higher turnover. Continue Reading…