Tag Archives: retirement income

Strategies for Building a Substantial 401(k) Balance

Posted By |

Retirement planning may not be at the forefront of every twenty or thirty-something’s mind. However, starting early could mean the difference between a retirement spent in comfort or want. With social security’s uncertain future and the rising cost of living, the sooner you embark on saving for retirement, the better. Managing your retirement savings wisely will ensure a peaceful and fructiferous future. Learn the strategies now for building a substantial 401(k) balance [United States.]

Image by Adobe Stock/ juliasudnitskaya

By Dan Coconate

Special to Financial Independence Hub

Today, a robust 401(k) plan is more crucial than ever for securing your retirement. Understanding how to manage your contributions and investments effectively can set you on the path to Financial Independence. As the traditional employer-sponsored pension system becomes less common, individuals are increasingly responsible for their retirement savings.

By taking advantage of employer contributions, understanding investment options, and reviewing your plan, you can cultivate a retirement savings strategy that prepares you for the future and helps you build financial confidence. These strategies for building a substantial 401(k) balance will ensure it becomes a strong pillar of your retirement portfolio.

Choose the Right Investment Options

Most 401(k) plans offer various investment options, and selecting the right mix can directly impact your retirement savings. Investments fall primarily into stocks, bonds, and mutual funds or ETFs, all carrying different risk levels and potential returns. A balanced portfolio that reflects your risk tolerance, investment timeline, and financial goals can better weather market fluctuations. Review your options regularly and consider rebalancing your portfolio to adapt to any changes in the market or your personal situation.

Gradually increase Contributions

If you’re hesitant about contributing a significant portion of your salary to your 401(k) from the outset, consider implementing a gradual increase plan. Many employers allow you to set up automatic annual increases in your contribution percentage. Taking advantage of raises or bonuses to boost your contributions ensures that you consistently increase your savings without feeling the financial strain of a sudden change.

Regularly Review your Plan

Conducting annual reviews of your 401(k) to ensure it remains aligned with your financial objectives is vital. Life changes, such as starting a family or changing careers, can shift your needs and goals, requiring adjustments to your retirement strategy. Continue Reading…

Retired Money: Sun Life enters the Decumulation market

Posted By |

My latest MoneySense Retired Money column looks in-depth at a new “Decumulation” offering from Sun Life, unveiled late in September. You can find the full column by clicking on the highlighted headline: What is Sun Life’s new decumulation product?

As you can see from image below taken from MyRetirement Income’s website, the emphasis is on providing regular income to last to whatever age a retiree specifies. That income is not, however, guranteed as a life annuity would be.

The Globe & Mail’s Rob Carrick first wrote about this shortly after the Sun announcement. My column adds the opinions of such varied Canadian retirement experts as author and finance professor Moshe Milevsky, retired actuary Malcolm Hamilton, Caring for Clients’ Rona Birenbaum and Trident Financial’s Matthew Audrey, as well as Sun Life Senior Vice President, Group Retirement Services, Eric Monteiro.

Some of the more cynical takes are that this is a way for Sun Life to continue to profit from client financial assets gathered during the long accumulation phase, rather than seeing them migrate to other solutions, such as annuities provided by either one of its own life insurance arms or that of rivals.

Aiming for Simplicity and Flexibility

As Sun’s Eric Monteiro told me in a telephone interview, the company’s preliminary research found that rival products that were first on the market (see full MoneySense column) were often perceived as complicated, and as a result uptake of some of these pioneering Decumulation products have been underwhelming. It sought to create a solution that was relatively simple and flexible.

In essence, it is not dissimilar to some Asset Allocation ETFs, such as Vanguard’s VRIF, which is 50% equities and 50% fixed income. But Sun’s product may and probably will have different proportions of the major asset classes. In fact, it lists 16 external global money managers who deploy up to 15 different asset classes, which include Emerging Market Debt, Liquid Real Assets, Direct Infrastructure, Liquid Alternatives and Direct Real Estate. Managers include BlackRock Asset Management, Lazard Asset Management, Phillips, Hager & North, RBC Global Asset Management and its own Sun Life Capital Management. Continue Reading…

Transitioning from Accumulation to Distribution

Posted By |

By Alain Guillot

Special to Financial Independence Hub

I have been saving since I arrived in Canada 25 years ago. During my first year I saved as little as $10 month, but in general I saved about $25 during the first 10 years, then I increased the amount I was saving to about $500 per month and during the past 5 years I was saving as much as $1,000 per month.

Finally this year, I stopped contributing to my retirement accounts. Instead, I started taking out whatever I get as a dividend distribution from my non-registered account.

I have to tell you. It feels good!

I have accumulated over $500,000. According to the 4% rule, I can withdraw the equivalent of $20,000 per year, which is more or less my cost of living.

At this moment I am only withdrawing from 1% to 2% of my capital per year. I am withdrawing the dividend distributions from my non-registered accounts.

I see some cash siting on my broker’s account and I just transfer it to my checking account and I invite myself for dinner.

At the beginning of the year, I transfer the maximum allowed from my non-registered account to my TFSA. I have a feeling that the maximum allowed for 2024 will be $7,000. I will be ready.

Transferring capital from non-registered account to TFSA will allow to earn more and pay less taxes.

I am in the fortunate position where I don’t even need my retirement money right now. My part time job, which I love, provides me enough to live.

I think that I will use my retirement money to pay for some luxuries that I haven’t paid for myself before, like… instead of taking one vacation per year, I will take two vacations per year, one to my home country, and another to any other random country. Continue Reading…

Boosting the Spend Rate in Retirement

Posted By |

 

By Dale Roberts

Special to Financial Independence Hub

Cut The Crap Investing recently looked at the go-to chart on creating retirement income. The post looked at sustainable spend rates. The 4% “rule” suggests that you can start at a 4.2% spend rate, and then increase spending each year to adjust for inflation. That protects your spending power and lifestyle in retirement.

That said, the 4% rule is based on a very conservative 50/50 stock to bond allocation using U.S. assets. We might be able to boost the spend rate in retirement by adding more growth and more non-correlated assets.

Here’s the post – creating retirement income from your portfolio. The very telling chart in that post looks at 4%, 5% and 6% spend rates for every month start date from 1994.

Check out the updated GIC rates at EQ Bank

See the blog post for how to read this chart.

In the above post and charts we see the challenges of a 5% or 6% spend rate with a traditional balanced portfolio.

Here’s a very good post that shows how we can potentially boost our spend rate. And the go-to table on boosting your retirement start date with gold, REITs, small cap value, and international stocks in the mix. The equity allocation is moved up to 70% as well.

From that post …

So instead of limiting your retirement portfolio to the S&P 500 and government bonds, think about diversifying with small-cap value and gold! If you don’t mind a little more complexity, go a step further with REITs, utilities, and international stocks. This level of diversification has done very well in the past. It includes at least one asset that does well in each type of economic situation.

That post offers a nod to the all-weather portfolio and utilities as a defensive asset. Readers will know I am a favour of both additions, especially the defensive sectors for retirement that includes consumer staples, healthcare and utilities (including pipelines and telco). I’m hopeful that the approach will allow us to boost our spend rate to the 5-6% range.

Canadian banks in 2024

At the beginning of the month we looked at investing in Canadian banks. I noted that it is difficult to pick the winners and there is a surprising variance in returns among the individual banks. Here’s the total returns in 2024. Continue Reading…

Creating retirement income from your portfolio

Posted By |

By Dale Roberts, cutthecrapinvesting

Special to Financial Independence Hub

There is a 4% “rule” that suggests you can spend about 4% of your portfolio value each year, with annual increases adjusted for inflation. And the idea is to create sustainable income that will last 30 years or more. This post looks to a Globe & Mail article (and chart) from Norm Rothery. We’re creating retirement income at various spend rates and looking at the outcomes.

The ‘problem’ with the 4% rule is that it is based on the absolute worst outcomes including retiring just before or during the Depression of 1929. In this post on MoneySense Jonathan Chevreau shows that in most periods (with a US-centric portfolio) a retiree could have comfortably moved that spend rate to the 6% range. If we use the 4% rule there’s a good chance we’ll leave a lot of money on the table. We will lead a lesser retirement compared to what the portfolio was offering. As always, past performance does not guarantee future results.

The 4% rule suggests that each $100,000 will create $4,000 in annual income with an inflation adjustment.

All said, we do need to manage the stock-market risk. Balanced portfolios are used for the 4% Rule evaluations. The portfolios are in the area of a 50% to 60% equities with the remainder in bonds. The studies will use the stock markets and the bond market indices. For example the S&P 500 (IVV) for U.S. equities and the aggregate bond index (AGG) for bonds. Investment and advisory fees will directly lower your spend rate. A 5% spend rate becomes a 3.0% spend rate with advisory and fund fees totalling 2%. Taxes are another consideration.

Creating retirement income

Here’s the wonderful post (sub required) from Norm Rothery.

And here’s the chart that says it all, creating retirement income from 1994 at various spend rates. A global balanced portfolio is used; I will outline that below.

As Norm states, your outcome is all about the start date. Here’s how to read the chart. Each line represents a spend rate and the current portfolio value from each start date. For example, on the far right we see the portfolio value from the 2024 start date. Of course, it’s still near the original $1 million. On the far left we see the current portfolio value (inflation adjusted) with a 1994 retirement start date. If we look at 2010 on the x axis (bottom) we see the current portfolio value from a 2010 start date. At a 5% spend rate, the portfolio value is near the original $1 million.

The portfolios have a 60/40 split between stocks and bonds, and more specifically put 40 per cent in the S&P Canada Aggregate Bond Index (Canadian bonds), 20 per cent in the S&P/TSX Composite Index (Canadian stocks), 20 per cent in the S&P 500 index (U.S. stocks), and 20 per cent in the MSCI EAFE Index (international stocks).

1994 was a wonderful retirement start date. In and around the year 2000 and just before 2008 provided unfortunate start dates. We see the 2000 start date with 5% and 6% spend rates go to zero.

Some retirees get lucky; some don’t.

That unfortunate retirement start date

In a separate post Norm looked at creating retirement income from that unfortunate year 2000 start date.

In a recent Sunday Reads post I looked at that chart and retiring during the dot com crash. You’ll find plenty of other commentary in that link, including what happened to the all-equity portfolio as it tried to take on that severe market correction. Also for consideration, it might be more about your risk tolerance and emotions compared to the portfolio math. That post also shows that retirees with more conservative portfolios feel free to spend more. Your emotions can certainly get in the way of your spending plans, and hence your retirement lifestyle. Continue Reading…