MoneySense.ca: Photo created by freepik – www.freepik.com
My latest MoneySense Retired Money column looks at the topic of whether average savers transitioning to Retirement really need to fear outliving their money. The piece picks up from a blog this summer from Michael James on Money, which will be republished in its entirety tomorrow here on the Hub.
You can access the full MoneySense column by clicking on the highlighted text: How long will your retirement nest egg last? In addition to citing Michael J. Wiener’s work, the piece passes on the views of two prominent recently retired actuaries: Malcolm Hamilton and Fred Vettese, as well as my co-author on Victory Lap Retirement, ex corporate banker Mike Drak.
Like this blog, despite being online the column’s scope is somewhat constrained by a word limit. In fact, in an email, Hamilton told me he didn’t think such a topic could be addressed in just 800 or 900 words.
Actuary and retirement expert Malcolm Hamilton
“Why? We presume that good advice is universal … that it applies to everyone. It does not, particularly when addressing concerns about running out of money. For years I have looked for evidence that large numbers of seniors spent too much and suffered as a consequence. I haven’t found anything persuasive.”
No one knows how much Canadians should save or how quickly they should draw down their savings after retirement, Hamilton added: “Some people are frugal. They save heavily before retirement and spend sparingly after retirement, leaving large amounts to their children when they die. We all want parents like this. Others are spendthrift. They save little before retirement and live frugally after retirement because they have no money except government pensions.”
Finding balance between extremes of Over-Saving and Over-Spending
We all have quirky behaviours when it comes to managing money. One trick we fall victim to is called mental accounting. We separate our money into different types of mental accounts, with different rules, depending upon how we get it, how we spend it, and how it makes us feel.
An easy example is when you have a fund set aside for something like a vacation or house down payment while at the same time carrying high-interest credit-card debt. Or how you decide to spend a $1,200 tax refund versus what you’d do with $100 per month if you had the right amount of tax coming off your paycheque in the first place.
I’m guilty of mental accounting every month when I budget $1,000 for groceries, $200 for dining out, $125 for clothing, and $75 for alcohol. I manipulate those mental accounts all the time, like when I overspend in one category and just take it out of another (shifting a meal from ‘dining’ to ‘entertainment’ for example).
The Mental Accounting challenge
Why do we assign money to these mental categories? One answer is to control how we think about it. If we were perfectly rational and could figure out the opportunity costs and complex trade-offs of every single financial transaction then it wouldn’t matter how we label our money: it would just come from a big pool called ‘our money.’ It’s just money, after all; totally fungible and interchangeable.
But because we’re human with cognitive limitations and emotions we need help with our money decisions. That’s where mental accounting comes in and acts as a useful shortcut for what decisions to make.
Another interesting way we classify our financial decisions has to do with the length of time between when we bought an item and when we consumed it.
Nobel Prize winner Richard Thaler studied wine purchases and consumption and found that advance purchases of wine are often thought of as investments. Months or years later, when the bottle is opened and consumed, the consumption feels free, as if no money was spent on wine that evening. Continue Reading…
What are the best investment vehicles for holding a safe and highly liquid Emergency Fund? That’s the focus of the third in my latest series of blogs for Motley Fool Canada introducing the basic principles of establishing Financial Independence.
In the first two installments of this new series of articles, we looked at two key steps toward Financial Independence: jettisoning debt and, once that is accomplished, applying the resulting surplus to savings and ultimately long-term investments.
As the latest blog argues, you could even argue that an emergency cash cushion should take precedence over both debt elimination and saving/investing.
What should you be looking at in an Emergency Fund? First, you need liquidity: the ability to access the cash at a moment’s notice. Second, you want safety of capital, which really means cash equivalents or fixed income, not equities normally held with a time horizon of more than five years. Third, assuming some sort of fixed income that’s not locked up like a 5-year GIC, you want at least a reasonable rate of interest to be paid on it.
Normally, you shouldn’t regard RRSP investments as an emergency cushion, since you’ll have to pay tax to access the funds. Most people will try to keep relatively high cash balances in their chequing accounts that can serve as a cushion, although typically these accounts pay next to nothing in interest income. One possibility is short-term or redeemable GICs that may pay somewhere between 1 and 2% per annum. Another good place to “park” such funds is a High Interest Savings Account (HISA).
As the name suggests, HISAs pay high amounts of interest, usually more than 2%. According to this source, several pay more than that: as of mid 2019, EQ Bank was paying 2.3%, Motus Bank up to 2.5%, Tangerine was offering a promotional rate of 2.75%, and Motive Financial was paying 2.8%, Wealth One Bank of Canada was paying 2.3% and WealthSimple 2%. Pretty nice returns for liquid cash cushions! Continue Reading…
What’s the difference between Saving and Investing and how do you move smoothly from the one to the other? Motley Fool Canada has just published the second in a new series of articles by me about the basic steps towards Financial Independence, or what I call “Findependence.” You can find the first one, which ran early in June, here; and the new one by clicking on the highlighted text here: 2 critical steps toward Financial Independence.
The first article discussed how the journey to Findependence hasn’t even begun while you’re still in debt. To paraphrase one of the characters in my book Findependence Day, you can’t even begin to climb the tower of Wealth until you get out of the basement of debt.
It’s nice to be free of debt, whether high-interest credit card debt, student loans or even a mortgage. It’s a big step moving from negative net worth to being merely broke, where your assets and liabilities cancel themselves out. Being free of all debt is certainly a nice place to be if you’ve been anxious over being hounded by creditors. But it’s not financial independence either, which is the stage of life when all sources of income more than meet your monthly financial needs.
As the followup article summarizes, you want to move from Debt elimination to the intermediate step of Saving, and then from Saving to true investing. Saving is being a loaner — you lend money to a bank or other institution and receive a small amount of interest back as well as your principal upon maturity. But to be an investor you want to be an owner: a business owner, through stocks or equities, or more broadly through a diversified basket of equity ETFs.
The end of the piece references a piece by Investopedia about the difference between investing and saving. You can find their explanation here. It says saving is for emergencies and purchases, by which they mean immediate needs. Investing is about a longer-term horizon (defined as seven or more years) and entails more risk than saving. That’s why they refer to the “risk free” return of investing in cash, treasury bills and the like.
Investing is about Money begetting Money
The beauty about saving is that, once the process is begun, it sets the stage for when money begins to beget still more money, a process that will ultimately happen even while you’re sleeping. So does investing: the difference is that saving is a kind of junior partner to investing: it works a bit for you, but nothing so hard as true investing for the long term. Saving begets small amounts of money; ultimately, investing begets huge amounts of money: eventually enough to live on whether or not you choose to work another day in your life. Continue Reading…
Retirement is a close second to home ownership, according to a LendEDU survey of American saving priorities
While having enough money saved for Retirement is narrowly behind buying a home, more than a third of Americans don’t expect they’ll ever be able to retire, according to a survey released Tuesday from LendEDU.com.
Retirement saving was cited by 19% of 1,000 respondents, versus 20% prioritizing “buying my own house or apartment.” Paying off credit-card debt was cited by 14% and building an emergency fund by 10%.
While there was only a minor lack of confidence about paying off credit cards and building an emergency fund, 17% don’t believe they’ll ever become homeowners and but almost four in ten Americas (39%) don’t believe they’ll ever be able retire.
Of those doubting their ability to retire, 52% were over age 54, 30% were between 45 and 54, and 15% were 35 to 44.
As for emergency savings, 33% said a major bill resulting from an injury would destroy their savings and therefore their long-term financial goals; another 14% cited some form of debt that could quickly get out of hand. However, 28% felt “relatively secure” and did not believe their financial goals could be derailed.
Secondary priorities
After home ownership and retirement, the most cited financial priorities were some form of getting out of debt: 14% cited paying off credit-card debt, 7% paying off student-loan debt, and 4% cited paying off other forms of debt apart from credit cards or student loans. 6% answered “Building my credit score,” 5% wanted enough saved to move out of their parents’ homes and rent a home or apartment, 4% said “Buying a car,” and 3% wanted to start a business.
1% wanted to invest in real estate, another 1% wanted to buy a second home and yet another 1% wanted to buy a second or third car. 3% want to “create a retirement account” and 2% want to “invest in the market outside my retirement account.”
Money a bigger priority than Love?
Of the 37% who were not currently in a long-term relationship, 72% were more focused on their financial targets, versus a minority 23% who prioritized finding a romantic partner. (The rest preferred not to say). The survey sees this as a “glass half full” finding: “It is good that Americans are quite serious when it comes to realizing their personal finance goals. But, on the glass empty side, sometimes one’s finances can’t buy happiness, or in this case love, and it is always important to understand what is truly important in life.” Continue Reading…
Posted By 
Posted By 
