Tag Archives: taxes

Age 60, retirement on a lower income – can I do it?

Posted By |

 

 

By Mark Seed

Special to the Financial Independence Hub

Retirement plans come in all shapes and sizes but retirement on a lower income is possible.

Not every Canadian has a house in Toronto or Vancouver they can cash-in on.

Gold-plated pension plans are dwindling.

There are people living in multi-family dwellings striving to make retirement ends meet.

Not every person is in a relationship.

Retirement on a lower income is (and is going to be) a reality for many Canadians. 

Here is a case study to find out if this reader might have enough to retire on a lower income.

(Note: information below has been adapted for this post; assumptions below made for illustrative purposes.)

Hi Mark,

I enjoy reading your path to financial independence and it has inspired me to invest better.  I’ve ditched my high cost mutual funds and I’m now invested in lower costs ETFs inside my RRSP.  I think that should help my retirement plan. 

So, do you think I’m ready to retire at 60?

Here is a bit about me:

  • Single, live in Nova Scotia. No children.
  • Own my home, no debt. I paid off my house by myself about 10 years ago.  No plans to move.  It might be worth $300,000 or so.
  • 1 car is paid for, a 2014 Hyundai SUV. Not sure what that is worth but I don’t plan on buying a new car anytime soon.
  • I have close to $50,000 saved inside my TFSA, all cash, I use that as my emergency fund.
  • I have about $250,000 saved inside my RRSP, invested in 3-4 ETFs now.
  • I have some pension-like income coming to me thanks to my time with a former employer. A LIRA is worth about $140,000 now.  I keep all of that invested in low-cost ETF VCN – one of the low-cost funds in your list here (so thanks for your help!)

I’m thinking of stopping work later this summer, taking Canada Pension Plan (CPP) soon and I will start Old Age Security (OAS) as soon as I can at age 65.

I plan to spend about $3,000 to $4,000 per month (after tax) including travel to Florida, maybe once or twice per year to stay with friends who have a condo there for a week or so at a time.

So …. do you think I’m ready to retire at 60?  Any insights are appreciated.  Thanks for your time.

Steven G.

Thanks for your email Steven G.  It seems like you’ve done well with the emergency fund, killing debt, and investing in lower-cost products to help build your wealth.

Whether you can retire soon (I think you can with some adjustments by the way … see below) will require a host of assumptions to be made in addition to your details above.  This is because all plans, including any for retirement, are looking to make decisions about our future that is always unknown.

To help me make some educated decisions if you can retire on your own with a lower income, I enlisted the help of Owen Winkelmolen, a fee-for-service financial planner (FPSC Level 1) and founder of PlanEasy.ca.

Owen has provided some professional insight to other My Own Advisor readers in these posts here:

What is a LIRA, how should you invest in a LIRA?

My mother is in her early 90s, she just sold her home, now what to do with the money?

This couple wants to spend $50,000 per year in retirement, did they save enough?

Can we join the early retirement FIRE club now, at age 52?

Owen, thoughts?

Owen Winkelmolen analysis

Mark, I echo what you wrote above.  When it comes to retirement planning there are a few important considerations that we always want to review.  You’ll see those assumptions for Steven below.  There are also tax considerations.  Taxes will be one of the largest expenses for many retirees and Steven’s case is no different. In fact, living in Nova Scotia unfortunately means that Steven will be paying the highest tax rate in the country for his income level.  Let’s look at some assumptions first so we can run some math:

  • Assume income (today) of $60,000 per year (pre-tax).
  • OAS: Assume full OAS at age 65 $7,217/year.
  • CPP: Assume 35 years of full CPP contributions (ages 25-60) and a few years with partial contributions
    • CPP at age 60 = $8,580/year.
    • CPP at age 65 = $13,967/year (assumes future contributions in line with $60,000 income and includes new enhanced CPP benefits as of 2019).
  • Assume ETF portfolio with average fees 0.16%. Good job on VCN Steven!
  • Assume $85,000 in available RRSP contribution room.
  • Assume $13,500 in available TFSA contribution room.
  • Assume birthdate Aug 1, 1959.
  • Assume assertive risk investor profile.

Based on Steven’s current employment income, I’ve gone ahead and estimated that he will be paying around $14,000 in income tax each year (give or take depending on tax credits, etc.) At this income level Steven is paying the highest tax rate out of any province in Canada. Ouch … but reality. Continue Reading…

MoneySense ETF All-stars 2019

Posted By |

 

The latest MoneySense ETF All-stars has just been published for 2019. click on the highlighted text in the headline to access the full article: Best ETFs in Canada for 2019 (you don’t need to subscribe to access).

I’ve been writing this annual feature every year since 2013, always with the help of several ETF experts. This year, as the article reprises, there were a few changes in the makeup of the panel but we more than replaced the departing analysts, for a total of nine in total, including several returning experts. Among the newcomers are two regular Hub contributors: fee-only planner Robb Engen of Boomer & Echo, and CuttheCrapInvesting blogger Dale Roberts. Bios of the rest are below.

While there are more than 800 ETFs available on Canadian stock exchanges, our “All-Star” list remains an elite one: despite the multitude of new product launches in 2018, we increased the number of All-stars from just 21 to 25, although we also added a new feature we dubbed “Desert Island picks” to give a little more latitude to the individual preferences of each analyst.

Canadian Equity ETFs

All four Canadian equity ETFs are returning under the new revised panel: VCN, XIC, HXT and ZCN. There were also a couple of vigorous debates about Canadian equities, particularly about the fate of Horizons HXT, a swap-based total return product that has long been a pick of the All-Star panelists because of its tax-efficiency in non-registered portfolios. Last week’s federal budget added the possibility of regulatory risk to HXT and more than a dozen other similar products from Horizons. For 2019 at least, the panel opted to retain HXT as an All-Star, and we will monitor developments in the meantime. In the meantime, caveat emptor. (See Dale Roberts’ post on the topic.) Go to this MoneySense link for the chart of the winners and further commentary.

US equities

Here the panel again stood pat, opting to retain all four of our 2018 US equity picks: XUU, VFV,  VSP and ZSP. Go to this MoneySense link for the chart of the US equity winners and further commentary.

International Equities

The panel was in favor of retaining our three international ETF All-stars from previous years but also decided to add two new ones, both from Vanguard. The returning picks include the two from BlackRock: the iShares Core MSCI All Country World ex Canada Index ETF (XAW) and the iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF (XEF.) Also back is Vanguard’s Emerging Markets ETF (VEE). A new addition this year is VXC, the Vanguard FTSE Global All Cap ex Canada ETF. Also new this year is VIU, the Vanguard FTSE Developed All Cap ex North America Index ETF. Go to this MoneySense link for the chart of the International winners and further commentary. Continue Reading…

Instead of helping investors ravaged by fees, Ottawa plays gotcha on total returns for the “rich”

Posted By |
HorizonsETFs.com

 

By Dale Roberts, CuttheCrapInvesting

Special to the Financial Independence Hub

The week just completed was budget week in Canada. And government finances certainly get most of the attention and most of the ink. But there were some investment issues that made it into Budget 2019. Not the larger societal issue of Canadians paying the highest mutual fund fees in the developed world combined with the standard and unscrupulous and unethical practices of the typical financial ‘advisor’ in Canada.

Nope, this made it into the budget. From a post on holypotato.net and John Robertson the author of The Value of Simple:

The derivative transaction mention means they will target total return ETFs such as Horizons’ TSX 60 Total Return (TRI) index ETF. Here’s the link to HXT, which replicates the TSX 60 by way of swaps. These funds are derivative based and they can be incredibly tax efficient. They remove the funds’ income. From Dan Bortolotti in this MoneySense article…

There are several advantages to building an ETF with a swap rather than holding the stocks or bonds directly. The first is tax-efficiency. The most important advantage of swap-based ETFs is their potential to defer or reduce taxes. As we’ve noted, these ETFs do not pay dividends or interest, which means you won’t be taxed on any income as long as you hold your units. All of the gains in the fund are considered capital gains, which are not taxable until you eventually sell the holding. And even then, capital gains are taxed at only half the rate of regular interest income and foreign dividends. (Canadian dividends enjoy favourable tax treatment too, but for high-income earners, capital gains are still taxed at a lower rate.)

And this ETF allows Canadians to invest at an incredibly low MER of just .03% with rebate. Horizons offers a suite of total return funds that includes US and International stock indices plus Canadian and US bonds. One could build a tax-efficient portfolio. [Editor’s Note: The chart shown at the top of the Hub version of this blog shows a Horizon bond ETF that operates along similar principles.]

Eat the rich investors

There is almost $1.9 billion in the HXT. There is well over $1.6 trillion in Canadian mutual funds. Now certainly not all of those funds are crap, but most of ’em are quite poor due to average fees in the area of 2.2% annual. Of course couch potato investors will know that passive low fee index investing drastically outperforms high fee actively managed funds over longer periods.

So instead of going after the 2.2% fee junk, they go after the .03% offering.

I’d estimate that the amount that Canadians pay and lose needlessly to high fees is in the range of $20,000,000,000 or more annually. Yes that’s $20 billion. That’s massive. It’s so massive it’s the size of our annual deficit projections. Ha. I’m not sure that picking up some tax scraps to the tune of tens of millions of dollars from swap based funds is going to close the deficit gap. Continue Reading…

Is an RRSP right for you? Not necessarily

Posted By |

By Michael Wickware, CMO, Planswell

Special to the Financial Independence Hub

We’re all accustomed to seasonal advertising. Real estate listings in the spring, back to school sales in late summer, holiday sales in the fall, and at the start of every new year, financial industry ads urging you to contribute to your RRSP.

The traditional RRSP season is driven by two main factors:

1.) The rules say you have the first 60 days of each new year to make a contribution that can be applied to your previous years’ tax return.

2.) RRSPs are lucrative for banks and financial advisors, because you’re likely going to keep paying them fees every year from now until retirement.

You might ask, “Isn’t it also driven by the fact that RRSPs are a great way for Canadians to save money?” The billboards, posters, banners and sales pitches certainly seem to suggest as much. I may be a marketing guy, but I work at a financial planning company, so I know it’s not quite that simple.

Unless these advertisers actually know about your personal financial situation, how can they be so sure that an RRSP is the right answer for you? Does absolutely everybody need to contribute to an RRSP, or is there some nuance these Mad Men might be missing?

In my search for answers, I had one major advantage. Planswell has built more than 100,000 financial plans for Canadians. Every plan is based on analyzing dozens of data points about things like goals, income, assets, debts, investments, insurance and more. In other words, I know more than any bank or ad agency about what individual people actually need to get ahead financially.

I asked our engineering team to dig into the data, and what we found definitely challenges the conventional wisdom:

An RRSP was wrong choice 52% of the time!

I didn’t think an RRSP was the best choice every time, but the gap between what the marketing campaigns are saying and what people actually need is a lot wider than I expected. It turns out the annual RRSP ad blitz, backed by all the biggest financial institutions in Canada, has been giving bad advice to half the country.

We decided to dig deeper, and found several reasons why an RRSP may not be the best choice for you. Here are three of the top reasons:

1.) It won’t always maximize your tax savings

An RRSP is not meant to avoid tax completely: just to put it off until you retire. The idea is to reduce your taxable income while you’re working and in a relatively high tax bracket, then pay the tax when you’re retired and in a lower tax bracket. But if you’re already in a low tax bracket, this strategy doesn’t work. And, if you’re early in your career and expect to be in a higher tax bracket in the future, you might be better off letting your RRSP contribution room accumulate until you can use it for a bigger benefit.

2.) You have shorter-term priorities

An RRSP is a long-term retirement investment. You don’t want to be paying fees and taxes and losing contribution room by taking money out early. That means you should make sure that your short-term needs are covered first. For example, if you don’t already have an emergency fund set aside or if you’re planning to buy a home or make a major purchase within the next few years, you may not want to lock your savings away in an RRSP now.

3.) You could miss out on bigger opportunities

Let’s assume an RRSP makes sense from a tax point of view and that you have your short-term needs covered. You’re good to go, right? Not necessarily. Continue Reading…

The worst markets for the Land Transfer Tax

Posted By |

By Penelope Graham, Zoocasa

Special to the Financial Independence Hub

It’s no secret that purchasing a home is the largest financial investment for many households, and having a realistic budget is key to maximizing affordability. However, despite the years of careful saving and planning most prospective buyers undertake, there’s one closing cost that can present considerable sticker shock: land transfer tax.

Charged by the provincial government (as well as at the municipal level in the City of Toronto), this levy is calculated based on the total purchase price of the home. It must be paid in cash before the transaction can be completed, and cannot be covered by a home loan or rolled into a mortgage.

Because LTT is based on home price, this means buyers in Ontario’s priciest markets shell out much more for it than others. In fact, according to a recent cost analysis by Zoocasa, a buyer in Toronto would be taxed $27,521 for a home priced at the September average of $864,275. That’s an additional 3.2% of the total purchase price.

In Sault Ste. Marie, however, where the average home price clocks in at a relatively more affordable $164,853, said buyer would pay only $1,374 in tax, representing just 0.8% of the total home price.

However, buyers in the majority of Ontario’s more moderately-priced markets can expect to pay between $5,000 and $7,000 in LTT; someone perusing Kitchener homes for sale, which come at the average price of $479,904, would pay $6,073 in LTT. A buyer of Hamilton real estate would be taxed $6,482 on the average home price of $500,365.

Check out the infographic to the left to see how LTT can vary in housing markets across Ontario:

LTT rebates available for first-time home buyers

Fortunately for those climbing onto the property ladder for the first time, there is some relief from land transfer tax in the form of rebates: The Ontario government will refund $4,000, while the City of Toronto offers $4,475. As well, first-time home buyers paying less than $368,360 on their home – the provincial threshold for LTT – will avoid paying it altogether, a reality in markets such as Saut Se. Marie, Thunder Bay, North Bay, Sudbury, Windsor-Essex, and Kingston.

Top 5 Ontario cities where you’ll pay the most Land Transfer Tax

1 – City of Toronto: $27,531

2 – Oakville: $17,750

3 – Richmond Hill: $16,571

4 – Vaughan: $16,369

5 – Markham: $14,424 Continue Reading…