Monthly Archives: May 2015

Weekly wrap: Over-taxed rich, starving on bond yields, and the hazards of experts

Posted By Jonathan Chevreau | May 23, 2015

A week after his Globe & Mail article, Overtaxing the Rich: A Cautionary Tale, attracted widespread attention, Scotiabank tax guru Tim Cestnick has followed up with Overtaxing the Rich: Canada’s Tax Debate rages on.

In the original piece, Cestnick floated a colourful parable that suggested the rich are more than paying their share, to the benefit of those less fortunate. But if those with the highest incomes are pushed too far beyond the 50% rate, they may be inclined to leave, making the circumstances of those further down the pyramid that much worse.

With 650 comments and counting, it’s no hyperbole in this case to say there’s a true debate that’s raging here. And with an election coming up this fall, it’s safe to say this topic won’t be going away any time soon. The new higher TFSA limits are certainly a major element of this debate. No surprise that we at the Hub favour the new higher limits and I’d be surprised if Tim Cestnick or any of his well-heeled clients feels any differently.

The Bond dilemma

Meanwhile, rich or not and highly taxed or not, it continues to be a struggle finding yield at today’s paltry levels of interest rates, which of course are fully taxed outside registered accounts. This was one of several themes I picked up at a recent ETF and mutual fund conference in Chicago. Here’s my column in Motley Fool Canada on this topic, titled Caution Ahead: Why Bonds May Soon Become Much Harder to Manage.

In a similar vein, The Daily Reckoning’s Bill Bonner warned this week that Bonds are No Longer a Safe Haven. I guess that leaves cash or stocks. Continue Reading…

Googling Financial Independence

Posted By Jonathan Chevreau | May 22, 2015

When you run web sites themed on financial independence, you pay close attention to search engines, particularly Google. Curious about whether the term “financial independence” was making any headway against the incumbent term, Retirement, I entered both phrases into Google.

The results were about what I’d expect: 258 million results for Retirement but a decent showing of 18 million for Financial Independence.

And what about our pet contraction for Financial Independence, or Findependence? You had to ask, didn’t you? 43,600 results but the good news there is most of these hits come directly from Yours Truly and related enterprises (books, ebooks, websites and references to the term in other media).

Wikipedia’s definition still rules

The Battle between your Present and Your Future Self

Posted By Robb Engen | May 21, 2015

by Robb Engen, Boomer & Echo

Special to the Financial Independence Hub

Determining your financial priorities is like having a battle between your present and future self. Decisions that make your present-self happy and content might have dire consequences for your future-self.

Conversely, you don’t want to torture your present-self for the chance to be happy and prosperous in the distant future.

We’re raising a young family and with that comes a host of competing financial priorities to balance today. It’s easy to think we can put off saving for retirement, or even the next big purchase, until later in our working years when we’re more established in our careers and the pressures and impact of child care is lessened. But that means screwing over our future selves – making life more difficult tomorrow due to our choices today.

The 5 Wealth Zones of Decumulation

Posted By Jonathan Chevreau | May 20, 2015

Here’s my latest MoneySense blog, which summarizes pension consultant Don Ezra’s presentation at the most recent meeting of John Por’s Decumulation Institute. Launched in 2014, other members of the Institute include retired actuary Malcolm Hamilton, finance professor Moshe Milevsky, Black Rock Canada’s Paul Purcell, former Black Rock CEO Bill Chinery, Investor Economics’ founder Earl Bederman, Cortex Consulting’s Tom Iannucci, actuary Clive Morgan, and Michael Peskin. I attend both as an advisory member as well as the sole media representative.

As regular Hub readers may know by now, Decumulation is the opposite of Wealth Accumulation, a topic that will become increasingly important as baby boomers start leaving paid employment and start to embrace encore careers or traditional retirement. That’s why we have devoted one of our six major blog categories to Decumulation (coupled with Downsizing):

The blog can be found by clicking the above link, or below. But for the Hub only, John contributed the following summary of the meeting:

John Por

The Advisory Group discussed how financial advisors should approach retirees to maximize their income. Don Ezra has been working on a financial modelling tool that would allow financial advisors to plan individual saving and decumulation behaviour using a top down, longevity-based, multi-tier retirement income centred framework. The Advisory Group concluded such a tool would be a great step forward but warned that such a tool could be dangerous in inexperienced hands if the potential dangers of additional risk taking were not highlighted. Don Ezra and John Por discussed their work on the concepts of what a training program for financial advisors should contain. Jon Chevreau suggested a new certification program may be another useful step to tackle this issue.

Invisor.ca launches “goal-based” robo-like service

Posted By Jonathan Chevreau | May 19, 2015

Invisor (CNW Group/Invisor) — Invisor Logo (CNW Group)

By Jonathan Chevreau

Financial Independence Hub

After the initial wave last year of new robo-advisers washing up on the shores of the Canadian market comes a variation on the theme — a so-called “goal-based” online investment management service called Invisor.ca.

Announced Tuesday, the service claims to offer “personalized online investment management at a fraction of the cost of a traditional financial advisor.” The service is available initially in Ontario and Manitoba and it plans to register in other provinces “in the near future.” The custodian is Credential Securities Inc.

The reference to traditional advisors is evidently to mainstream retail mutual funds, whose fees are high enough that all domestic robo-advisers can undercut them and still make money. In a press release, Invisor notes that many Canadians pay more than 2.5% a year for mutual funds and that “in some cases these costs can be s high as 2.8% to 2.9%.” Continue Reading…

Share this:

Share this:

Share this:

Share this:

Share this:

Sign up for our Daily Digest E-Mail!