The latest FWB TV video has been posted at FWBSecurities.com and will be archived at Findependence.TV. This 10-minute video is the third of ten installments we’ve been running every other week at the Hub. The title, of course, derives from Charles Ellis’s classic book on indexing, Winning the Loser’s Game. In addition to a clip from Eugene Fama, pictured above, there are interviews with Vanguard founder John Bogle, the IMA’s John Godfrey and a disillusioned former fund manager, Alan Miller. All in all, it’s a pretty compelling indictment of the high costs of active security selection and the benefits of low-cost “index” investing, whether implemented with index mutual funds or exchange-traded funds (ETFs.) For a video primer on ETFs, see this Hub post from last week. Below is Financial Wealth Builder president Paul Philip’s take on this latest instalment:

By Paul Philip

Speak to index/passive investors and if you ask them to explain how they generate the returns the answer is simple and arithmetic: You start with the return of the market, you subtract the costs (usually lower than active investing) and you end up with your net return.

Investors should appreciate this approach for two reasons, the first is that it’s low cost, the second is that it’s evidence-based; it can be proven; there is a formula.

Ask this same question to an active manager and the answer is likely going to be, “I can do better.”

It would have to be their answer because they are getting paid to try and beat the market. It would be absurd to pay anyone to underperform, well at least intentionally. It would be even more absurd for someone to say they are trying to underperform in their job.

Underperformance is not just a symptom of trying to outguess the market or trying to predict the future but is also due to costs eating away at returns.  Active management not only means high trading costs, but also means large marketing budgets — as these investing leviathans spend money trying to convince advisors that their way is better than their competitors. It means spending money developing a brand so that when the advisors recommend these funds to their clients, the clients will feel a comfort level investing in the brand.

Brand and marketing don’t yield a market-beating return.  Simple index and more importantly strategic index investing will more often than not produce the returns that investors seek and will outperform active management.

Paul Philip is president of Financial Wealth Builders Securities, a team of independent wealth advisors providing holistic financial planning, investments and strategies to well informed Canadians. Visit  www.fwbsecurities.com for more investor education and resources.

By Anne Marie Thomas

Special to the Financial Independence Hub

If you install winter tires and live in Ontario, you’re in for some savings next time you renew your car insurance policy or shop around for coverage.

Ontario recently announced that auto insurers must offer drivers who change their tires seasonally a Winter Tire discount come January 1, 2016. To qualify for the discount, you typically have to install a set of four winter tires (with the three-peak mountain snowflake logo) and have the tires on your vehicle between November and April.

The Winter Tire discount, however, is not new. Many insurance providers already offer the discount to policyholders who usually end up saving around 5 per cent off their premiums. The companies that did not offer the discount in the past, must now do so to the benefit of their policyholders who swap out their all-season tires for winter wheels.

This isn’t the first discount to be made mandatory in Ontario. A while back (about 15 to 20 years ago) insurers were required to offer a Retiree discount too. Aside from these two mandated discounts, there are many others that can help you lower your premiums.

Although discounts vary by insurance provider (and sometimes province) they’re a great way for drivers to keep their auto insurance rates in check, but sometimes it’s simply a matter of knowing about them.

Multi-line discount

Probably the most well-known discount is the Multi-line discount. Continue Reading…

By David Rotfleisch

Special to the Financial Independence Hub

Want to pay less tax? The year-end brings with it legitimate, allowable opportunities for tax planning that can lower your taxes payable to CRA.

1.) Timing of Expenses

Taxpayers in business should accelerate expenses to make purchases that can be deducted this year rather than waiting for 2016. Employees are entitled to write off depreciation on cars, planes, and musical instruments. Tradespersons and apprentices are permitted to deduct the cost of their tools up to a prescribed limit. Individuals planning on purchases should do so late in the year, to enjoy the benefit of depreciation claims this year.

Plan to purchase any capital property before the tax year-end to be able to claim CRA deductions (at 50% of full rate) this year. Furthermore, until Dec 31, all manufacturing and processing (M&P) equipment qualifies for a 50% straight line depreciation rate which allows for faster write off then the normal declining balance that will kick in on Jan 1.

2.) RRSPs

RRSPs are a key tool for tax planning and allow Canadians to receive a deduction for the amount contributed, while also allowing the capital to accumulate tax-free until retirement. Continue Reading…

As the Tuesday papers reported, the middle-class tax cut and lower annual TFSA contribution limits kick in as of Jan. 1 2016. As the FP’s Garry Marr wrote Tuesday I suppose we can be grateful the Liberals didn’t cut the TFSA program altogether and it could have been worse: they might have cancelled out the “bonus” $10,000 TFSA room we received in 2015. A truly churlish move might have been to allow only $500 in 2016, although the administration nightmares and hordes of angry voters — 11 million of them have TFSAs and more than half liked the higher limits — would surely have created a backlash.

The other tiny bit of silver lining is that the $5,500 limit is again linked to inflation (the $10,000 limit was not), so we can at least hope that the limit will eventually rise to $6,000 and beyond if inflation rises in earnest. Of course, that will be another problem.

In any case, as the Hub showed on Tuesday, the Working Canadians petition is now live at  https://petitions.parl.gc.ca, after Conservative MP Peter Kent (Thornhill) sponsored Catherine Swift’s petition. It will be up until early April. After just a week, it has just under 3,000 signatures, on top of the 7,000 from the earlier Working Canadian petition. See also my FP piece that day: TFSA cancels out benefits of ‘middle class’ tax cuts, critics warn.

I find it interesting that those of us who support the petition all tend to be 60-plus and still working. That applies to Catherine and Peter, though I’m not sure about Bill Tufts, who also wrote a Hub blog on the topic as it relates to pension parity.

The two-tiered society

I actually had a bad cold all week and had to force myself to continue working. It occurred to me that this was a stark contrast to recent news stories about how many extra sick days public-sector workers take, especially on Mondays and Fridays in the summer.

Couple that phenomenon with the disparity between public-sector and private-sector pensions and it’s clear we have a two-tiered society: those in the public sector who take plenty of paid vacations and sick days and who can retire in their late 50s; and those in the private sector who keep toiling well into their 60s and are reluctant to stop working even when they’re sick. (which is what I am as I write these words: hope it doesn’t show!). Continue Reading…

By Randy Cass

Special to the Financial Independence Hub

Let’s start with a question: what is good investing?

I define good investing as a means to an end. You figure out your current financial situation, look at your life goals, think about your time horizon and ability to tolerate risk and then you create a solution that fits you specifically.

With this definition in mind, let’s look at three myths about good investing.

Myth #1: Only the rich can afford good financial advice.

 The good news is that it’s now possible for the average Canadian investor to get the type of service that used to only be available to people with millions of dollars. The combination of smarter technology and low-cost products, such as ETFs alongside with new companies like Nest Wealth – who advocate that every investor deserves a high level of service, not just those with millions of dollars – means we’re well on our way to solving this problem.

Continue Reading…