All posts by Jonathan Chevreau

Overhaul of mutual fund fees not as sweeping as some would like

Deferred Sales Charges (DSC) on mutual funds are going to be eliminated in Canada but recommendations released today by securities regulators did not go so far as to implement an outright ban of trailer commissions (aka trailer fees, also referred to as embedded compensation.)

The Canadian Securities Administrators (CSA) also released proposals regarding rules about what advice or products are in the “best interest” of financial consumers.

 

You can find a full summary in this article that appeared today in the Globe & Mail. (The full link may only be available to G&M subscribers, depending on how many free views readers have previously accessed). Rob Carrick also has a column on the topic titled It just became clear we’ll never see an investment industry where clients must come first. Well, we’ll see. Over at the Financial Post, Barbara Schecter reports OSC drops push for adviser standard.

Big win for industry

For more of an industry perspective, there is a full report here at Advisor.ca. And the industry’s newspaper, Investment Executive, headlined its coverage as “a big win for the industry.

John De Goey

One of the sources cited in both G&M articles is John De Goey, an investment adviser and author, who also sent this email to the Hub expressing his disappointment in the decisions:

“This is shameful on the part of the CSA.  It has been almost 15 years since Julia Dublin’s Fair Dealing Model drew attention to the concern of bias caused by embedded commissions.”  He also offered these four observations:

  • The primary concern is advisor bias as caused by embedded compensation, and there’s nothing here to address that
  • Does not allow for “product meritocracy”
  • Does not address how the trailing commission on equities is double the trailing commission on income (which creates obvious, massive, self-evident advisor bias)
  • Does nothing to address the discrepancy between ETFs and mutual funds.  Advisor’s preferred business model should never drive product recommendations

 

Vanguard says industry will organically evolve away from embedded compensation

Vanguard Canada’s Atul Tiwari

However, Vanguard Investments Canada Inc. managing director Atul Tiwari said Vanguard is “encouraged by some of the proposals from the CSA. Although there will not be a ban on embedded commissions, we believe that the Canadian market, like other regions around the world, will organically evolve away from it. The CSA has made clear that suitability determinations will need to be in the best interests of clients. This will likely accelerate the move that we are already seeing in advisors going from commission-based to fee-based models. We support that trend as providing superior fee transparency and enhancing the use of low cost products to give clients better long term returns. Vanguard will continue to champion the interests of Canadian investors with more low-cost and high-quality product options.”

And finally, my take on this at the Motley Fool

(Added on Friday afternoon): You can find my own take on this development in my monthly blog at Motley Fool Canada. Click on the highlighted headline here: New mutual fund advice guidelines underwhelm advocates for Consumer-Investors.

 

Retired Money: How to be financially, physically and emotionally fit for Retirement

My latest MoneySense Retired Money column, which has just been published, looks at a self-published book by the semi-retired (at age 64) Howard Pell. His book is titled Retire Fit, Fit & Fit. Click on the highlighted headline to retrieve the full MoneySense column: Retirement fitness involves mind and body, as well as money.

So what does the Fit, Fit & Fit mean? It’s in the headline of this blog as well as the adjacent photo taken from the book cover, which is the book’s subtitle. So it’s referring to being all three of financially fit, physically fit and emotionally fit for Retirement.

There are plenty of books about financial fitness so Pell pays only lip service to that aspect: what he brings to the table is insights on how to integrate finances with physical and emotional fitness. (To some extent, so does the book I co-authored with Mike Drak: Victory Lap Retirement)

Pell, who is based in Waterloo, Ont., does add a few newish terms to the semi-retirement lexicon.  He dubs the lifestyle “voluntary unemployment” but like many at this stage, finds the word “retired” inadequate. He tosses out several alternatives but the best one is his suggestion to simply adopt the Spanish word for “retired,” which is Jubilado (for males) or Jubilada (for females.”) He would use the term to signify anyone who is financially, physically and emotionally fit.

I can certainly relate to his observation of the semi-retired life that  “The big difference is that now all my deadlines and commitments are self-imposed.” Of course, as the old quip goes about driven self-employed business people: “My boss is a slavedriver.”

Pell also went personally through the “glide path” to semi-retirement described in other Retired Money columns and here at the Hub, via working a three-day week for his then employer during the last two years of his time there. This is a good way to test out your financial fitness while also clearing time for more physical fitness and — perhaps the toughest challenge — preparing for emotional fitness for retirement (I’m speaking for myself here.)

Finding the sweet spot

A Venn diagram on page 7 of Pell’s book (shown adjacent) illustrates that the sweet spot is the intersection where financial, emotional and physical fitness all converge.

If they don’t, and you became financially fit by selling out either your physical and/or your emotional health, the retirement your finances make possible may be a very limited and unsatisfying one.

It’s also possible to be only physically fit or only emotionally fit but lack the financial resources for retirement. The need to keep working to pay the bills will be frustrating, especially if all your peers have retired.

Continue Reading…

FP: How tax-efficient ETFs can help dividend and fixed-income investors

My latest Financial Post column (on page FP8 of Friday’s paper) looks at how certain tax-efficient ETFs can provide investors with a measure of tax relief in their non-registered portfolios. You can find the full column online by clicking on the highlighted headline here: Friends with Benefits: How ETFS can help keep the taxman at bay.

By definition, investing in taxable (non-registered) accounts is inherently tax inefficient. Outside registered plans, fixed income is the most harshly taxed asset while deferred capital gains is most favorably taxed.

In between are dividends. As anyone who receives T-5 or T-3 slips at tax time knows, dividends create a yearly tax liability, although as Markham-based fee-for-service financial planner Ed Rempel observes, those with annual taxable income under $47,000 will pay little or not tax on Canadian dividends.

Foreign dividends are highly taxed like Canadian interest, but qualifying Canadian dividends generate the dividend tax credit. This eases the pain but retirees are often irked by the dividend “gross-up” rules, which can bump them into higher tax brackets and result in clawback of government benefits like Old Age Security. Continue Reading…

Retired Money: Reflections on turning 65 and transitioning into Retirement

Well, I’m officially “old” if you go by the federal Government’s eligibility date for receiving Old Age Security (OAS) benefits. The traditional retirement age has long been age 65, a milestone I reached on April 6th. As I have previously written, I had a hockey tournament to play that weekend so the party my wife and I host every 5 years or so was postponed to late May, by which time we calculated my first OAS cheque should have been deposited into our joint account. (There appears to be roughly a six-week gap between turning 65 and the first payment, even if you set up the process a year ago: Ottawa invites you to start the OAS process rolling when you turn 65. See the “Related Articles” links at the bottom of this blog for some articles on this.)

In any case, my latest MoneySense Retired Money column goes into my (mixed) feelings about reaching this milestone. You can retrieve the full column by clicking on the highlighted headline: I’ve just turned 65: Here’s how I’m transitioning into Retirement.

Regular readers of this site or my books will know I see Retirement as a gradual process rather than a one-time sudden event more likely to generate what Mike Drak and I call “Sudden Retirement Syndrome.” My contraction for Financial Independence (Findependence, coined in the title of my financial novel, Findependence Day) is not meant to be synonymous with full-stop Retirement. Shortly after I left my last full-time journalism job four years ago (almost to the day!), I was happy to co-author a book with Mike and go with his chosen title, Victory Lap Retirement.

Four years into my “Victory Lap”

So I’ve been on my Victory Lap for four years now. That doesn’t mean 65 isn’t a significant milestone: as it tacks on another (albeit modest) stream of income, it means I can slow down a bit, if it’s possible to slow down when you’re running a website like this with daily content.

I described in an earlier piece in the FP how I am still working “some semblance” of a 40-hour week, although a good third of that time consists of errands or activities like Yoga or going to the gym, all the subject of the Younger Next Year 2018 Facebook group that a group of us launched late in 2017. Younger Next Year is a New York Times bestselling book that has been around for years but didn’t come to my attention until late in 2017 when regular Hub contributor Doug Dahmer gave me a copy.

The Hub’s subsequent review in the last post of the year led to the creation of the Facebook group, with the lead taken by Vicki Peuckert Cook, who is based in Rochester, but who I hope to meet this weekend for the infamous OAS party at our home in Toronto. For more on the genesis of the group, read member Fritz Gilbert’s blog republished on the Hub late in March: Do you want to be younger in 2018 than in 2017?

The group has already attracted more than 450 members on both sides of the border, including the co-author of the book, Chris Crowley, and his coauthor on Thinner This Year, Jennifer Sacheck.

Certainly the 6-day a week regime recommended in Younger Next Year is more doable if you’re retired or semi-retired/Findependent. Most of the Facebook group appears to be in that category, although there are a few dedicated younger folk still juggling full-time careers with raising a family and doing what they can on the exercise/nutrition front.

Continue Reading…

MoneySense/Surviscor Best Online Brokerages 2018

The sixth annual MoneySense survey of Canada’s one line brokerages (aka discount brokers) is now available. Written this year by me with Glenn LaCoste, CEO of Oakville, Ont.-based Surviscor Inc., you can find the full piece by clicking on the highlighted headline: Canada’s Best Online Brokers 2018.

Qtrade Investor once again narrowly edged out Questrade as the top firm overall:

Best Overall:

  1. Qtrade Investor – 22 pts
  2. Questrade – 21 pts
  3. iTRADE – 14 pts
  4. BMO InvestorLine – 14 pts

12 firms were included, ranging from the many bank-owned discount brokerages to the still-independent Questrade. The report also looks at various categories, including Mobile, ETFs, Design & User Experience, and Fees & Service.

As you go through the separate categories you’ll see both firms often place in the top three spots: five for Qtrade and four for Questrade this time around. Qtrade was first in two categories, second in another two, and third in one; while Questrade was first in one category, second in two categories and third in one.

Methodology

The survey methodology is based on MoneySense-specific categories based on Surviscor’s latest mobile and online reviews. Continue Reading…