All posts by Jonathan Chevreau

Retired Money: Reflections on turning 65 and transitioning into Retirement

Posted By |

Well, I’m officially “old” if you go by the federal Government’s eligibility date for receiving Old Age Security (OAS) benefits. The traditional retirement age has long been age 65, a milestone I reached on April 6th. As I have previously written, I had a hockey tournament to play that weekend so the party my wife and I host every 5 years or so was postponed to late May, by which time we calculated my first OAS cheque should have been deposited into our joint account. (There appears to be roughly a six-week gap between turning 65 and the first payment, even if you set up the process a year ago: Ottawa invites you to start the OAS process rolling when you turn 65. See the “Related Articles” links at the bottom of this blog for some articles on this.)

In any case, my latest MoneySense Retired Money column goes into my (mixed) feelings about reaching this milestone. You can retrieve the full column by clicking on the highlighted headline: I’ve just turned 65: Here’s how I’m transitioning into Retirement.

Regular readers of this site or my books will know I see Retirement as a gradual process rather than a one-time sudden event more likely to generate what Mike Drak and I call “Sudden Retirement Syndrome.” My contraction for Financial Independence (Findependence, coined in the title of my financial novel, Findependence Day) is not meant to be synonymous with full-stop Retirement. Shortly after I left my last full-time journalism job four years ago (almost to the day!), I was happy to co-author a book with Mike and go with his chosen title, Victory Lap Retirement.

Four years into my “Victory Lap”

So I’ve been on my Victory Lap for four years now. That doesn’t mean 65 isn’t a significant milestone: as it tacks on another (albeit modest) stream of income, it means I can slow down a bit, if it’s possible to slow down when you’re running a website like this with daily content.

I described in an earlier piece in the FP how I am still working “some semblance” of a 40-hour week, although a good third of that time consists of errands or activities like Yoga or going to the gym, all the subject of the Younger Next Year 2018 Facebook group that a group of us launched late in 2017. Younger Next Year is a New York Times bestselling book that has been around for years but didn’t come to my attention until late in 2017 when regular Hub contributor Doug Dahmer gave me a copy.

The Hub’s subsequent review in the last post of the year led to the creation of the Facebook group, with the lead taken by Vicki Peuckert Cook, who is based in Rochester, but who I hope to meet this weekend for the infamous OAS party at our home in Toronto. For more on the genesis of the group, read member Fritz Gilbert’s blog republished on the Hub late in March: Do you want to be younger in 2018 than in 2017?

The group has already attracted more than 450 members on both sides of the border, including the co-author of the book, Chris Crowley, and his coauthor on Thinner This Year, Jennifer Sacheck.

Certainly the 6-day a week regime recommended in Younger Next Year is more doable if you’re retired or semi-retired/Findependent. Most of the Facebook group appears to be in that category, although there are a few dedicated younger folk still juggling full-time careers with raising a family and doing what they can on the exercise/nutrition front.

Continue Reading…

MoneySense/Surviscor Best Online Brokerages 2018

Posted By |

The sixth annual MoneySense survey of Canada’s one line brokerages (aka discount brokers) is now available. Written this year by me with Glenn LaCoste, CEO of Oakville, Ont.-based Surviscor Inc., you can find the full piece by clicking on the highlighted headline: Canada’s Best Online Brokers 2018.

Qtrade Investor once again narrowly edged out Questrade as the top firm overall:

Best Overall:

  1. Qtrade Investor – 22 pts
  2. Questrade – 21 pts
  3. iTRADE – 14 pts
  4. BMO InvestorLine – 14 pts

12 firms were included, ranging from the many bank-owned discount brokerages to the still-independent Questrade. The report also looks at various categories, including Mobile, ETFs, Design & User Experience, and Fees & Service.

As you go through the separate categories you’ll see both firms often place in the top three spots: five for Qtrade and four for Questrade this time around. Qtrade was first in two categories, second in another two, and third in one; while Questrade was first in one category, second in two categories and third in one.

Methodology

The survey methodology is based on MoneySense-specific categories based on Surviscor’s latest mobile and online reviews. Continue Reading…

Retired Money: Seniors prefer term Guaranteed Lifetime Income to Annuities

Posted By |

Annuities continue to get short shrift from those nearing or in Retirement, but if you describe them with a different label — like a Guaranteed Lifetime Income — they are viewed much more favourably, according to a study released Tuesday. I summarize the main results of the Canadian Guaranteed Lifetime Income Study in my latest MoneySense Retired Money column, which you can access by clicking on the highlighted headline: Guaranteed Income is a No Brainer: Just Don’t Call it an Annuity.

The study was conducted by Greenwald & Associates and CANNEX for two Canadian insurance companies, Great West Life and Sun Life in February with 1,003 Canadians aged 55 to 75 with financial assets of at least $100,000 (not counting a home. It found only 45% are highly confident they will be able to maintain their standard of living in retirement, assuming a life expectancy of 85.

I’d argue that the majority who ARE confident are probably the beneficiaries of employer-sponsored Defined Benefit pension plans, ideally the kind of inflation-indexed ones that many public servants enjoy. They are of course becoming much less common in the private sector.

This site and my various columns have long argued that, to paraphrase Pensionize Your Nest Egg co-author Moshe Milevsky, DB pensions and Government-provided equivalents like CPP and OAS can be regarded as REAL pensions, because they provide a guaranteed stream of income for as long as you live.

By contrast, investment portfolios comprising RRSPs, TFSAs, group RRSPs and Defined Contribution plans do not in themselves constitute the kind of “real” pension that Milevsky says should be one part of a diversified retirement income strategy. It’s up to retirees to convert their retirement nest eggs into real pensions and one of the most common ways to do this is to buy annuities.

Consider that investors hoping to live on RRSP/RRIF interest, dividends and capital gains have no guarantee their money will last as long as they will. With still-low interest rates and the possibility of stock-market losses, and the constant spectre of rising inflation, longevity risk and the possibility of outliving your money is a real concern.

The study lists several perceived positives and negatives of annuities and segregated funds. And it found the percentage of Canadians who rate GLI as a “highly valuable” supplement to government retirement sources like CPP and OAS has jumped from 60% in 2015 to 80% today.

Note too that Longevity and outliving savings is a particular concern for women, along with not being able to afford long-term care expenses. It’s a fact that women have longer life expectancies,  and the study shows their retirement worries are greater as a result.

Women more concerned about running out of money in old age

The study conducted by CANNEX and Greenwald & Associates found 34% of women are highly concerned about not being able to maintain their standard of living once they retire, compared to only 17% of men. Continue Reading…

Generation X feeling the Retirement squeeze

Posted By |

Generation X, and to a lesser extent the Millennials, are already starting to feel the retirement squeeze, according to a Franklin Templeton-sponsored survey released Thursday.

Details are in my column in Friday’s Financial Post, which you can retrieve by clicking on the highlighted headline here: Generation X is ‘stretched beyond their financial limits’ and struggling to save for Retirement. 

The challenges should be familiar to members of any generation (four are mentioned in the survey): it’s never easy saving money when you’re starting out in life with low wages and high expenses. But Franklin Templeton cautions against the  rationalization embraced by younger investors that they simply can  choose to keep on working if they haven’t accumulated enough assets to generate adequate income in retirement.

That may not always be an option, since ill health or corporate downsizing (to mention just two) may prevent this. You can find full details about the fifth annual edition of Franklin Templeton Investments Canada’s 2018 Retirement Income Strategies and Expectations (RISE) survey here.

Stressed GenX resigned to retiring later than hoped

More than half of Gen Xers (aged 37 to 52) are resigned to retiring later than they would want (56% in Canada, 59% in the US). While the online survey included Canadians and Americans across four generations, “this year we felt in particular that Gen X and the stress of preparing for Retirement was the predominant thing coming out of the research,” said Matthew Williams, a Franklin Templeton senior vice president, in an interview.

Continue Reading…

Retired Money: Tontines moving from academia to Retirement marketplace

Posted By |
Annuity and Tontine expert Moshe Milevsky

My latest MoneySense Retired Money column, just published, looks at how the 17th century “tontine” scheme may help solve 21st century angst about outliving your money in Retirement. Click on this headline to retrieve the whole article: Why Ottawa needs to push for tontine-type annuities.

We have described Moshe’s pioneering work in annuities and tontines before: the York University finance professor and prolific author has published entire books on tontines and annuities. As he outlines in Pensionize Your Nest Egg, Milevsky has always emphasized the distinction between what he calls “real” pensions (guaranteed-for-life Defined Benefit pensions) and capital-appreciation vehicles like RRSPs or Defined Contribution plans, which have to be “pensionized” (or “annuitized”)before they can be considered to be “real” pensions.

Milevsky and three fellow Canadian co-authors have just published a paper partially funded by the pension section of the U.S. Society of Actuaries,entitled Annuities versus Tontines in the 21stCentury: A Canadian Case Study. (The other authors are Thomas Salisbury, Gabriela Gonzales and Hanna Jankowski). In it they make the case for the reintroduction of retirement investment income tontines (RITs) into the modern financial supermarket.

For those who haven’t seen the film The Wrong Box, tontines are mortality-linked investments that superficially resemble life annuities but were quite popular in Europe in the 17thand 18thcentury and later America. But they fell into disrepute by the early 20thcentury, in part because of the kind of sordid image they received, often popularized by novels and films like The Wrong Box. The “longest-living” winner takes the pot, which is why creative artists have often used this as a plot device involving skulduggery.

In essence, tontines pool capital and distribute all the capital and investment gains to those who live the longest: those unlucky enough to die early forfeit the capital (i.e. their heirs forfeit it), while those who live the longest benefit with super returns.

While a tontine revival could make sense around the world – the pension and longevity trends are almost universal – they make particular sense in Canada. The authors state they “believe that Canada has a dearth of products for hedging personal risk, compared to the U.S. market.” They know of no Canadian insurance company that offers a true deferred income annuity (DIA or ALDA), not do they offer a variable income annuity or equity-indexed annuities with living benefits: all available in the US. The closest we have are segregated funds, and they really aren’t that great as far as guaranteeing lifetime income, Milevsky told me. Continue Reading…