All posts by Jonathan Chevreau

GreedyRates.ca: The 5 degrees of Financial Freedom

Image: GreedyRates.ca/Shutterstock

My first article for GreedyRates.ca ran over the weekend. Click on The 5 Degrees of Financial Freedom for the full article. It talks about how many terms in personal finance are used interchangeably, and often imprecisely: financial security, financial independence, retirement and especially financial freedom.

I suggest that most of us travel through a financial life cycle as predictable as the human life cycle, and there is a corresponding hierarchy of growth stages that we need to keep in mind in order to continually meet and exceed our financial goals. But because the term financial freedom can apply to so many stages, I argue it’s better to use more precise terms to identify the various degrees of Financial Freedom.

From the 5-stage hierarchy below, I argue that the key milestone in our financial lives is Findependence (a contraction of Financial Independence), a turning point that I define as the moment all sources of passive income exceed your monthly living expenses. Note that the full version at GreedyRates.ca contains three key bullet points for each of the stages, for a total of 15. Below, I summarize just the stages themselves.

Stage (Sub) 0: Indebted Wage Slavery

We may start out our financial lives with student debt, credit-card debt or mortgage debt in the early years of forging careers and raising families. Whatever its nature, debt keeps you chained to employment or work of some type.  Since those starting their financial journey in debt haven’t really begun their financial journey at all, I call the preliminary stage Stage 0. As a character in my financial novel, Findependence Day, tells a young Millennial couple still in debt: “You can’t climb the tower of wealth while you’re still mired in the basement of debt.”

Stage 1: Financial Security

The next level to aspire to in the ascending hierarchy is Financial Security. In this stage you have eliminated your debts and have accumulated enough wealth so that your absolutely necessary monthly expenses (rent/mortgage, food, utilities, travel and basic entertainment) are taken care of for the near future.

Stage 2: Financial Vitality

It can take a long time just to establish a modicum of financial security but I argue you need to aim higher than mere financial survival and embrace what Tony Robbins dubs Financial Vitality. You want enough flexibility in your cash flow that, after the necessities are taken care of, you can enjoy little luxuries like new clothing or intangibles like gym or yoga memberships, and attend the occasional sporting or cultural event. It’s the difference between financially surviving and financially thriving.

Continue Reading…

Retired Money: The Four Phases of Retirement

As anyone who has left full-time employment probably knows, these days Retirement is seldom a one-time sudden event. Just as an airplane doesn’t vertically descend instantly in order to land but begins its descent hundreds of kilometres away, so too do formerly fully employed workers usually gradually cut back. In fact, as my latest MoneySense Retired Money column says, there are at least four phases of Retirement. Click on the highlighted text to retrieve the full online column: The Four Phases of Retirement.

That’s according to former financial adviser and retiree Riley Moynes, who has prepared thousands of clients for retirement over his long career. His views are encapsulated in a short booklet titled just that: The Four Phases of Retirement. The subtitle is What to Expect When You’re Retiring, which is a clearly a nod to the bestselling book on pregnancy. 

Having just reached the traditional retirement age of 65 earlier this month, I can attest to the gradual nature of Retirement, which in earlier Retired Money columns referred to the glide path analogy made above.

So what are the 4 phases?

Phase 1: Extended Vacation

This is the classical honeymoon phase that full-time workers imagine amounts to a permanent vacation. It typically involves extended travel, the chance to indulge in hobbies, spend more time with the family and (especially!) one’s spouse.

Phase 2: The plunge into the abyss of insignificance

This “drop from the top” can be one of the top ten traumas human being faces in their lives. With it comes the reality of five “unavoidable losses”: structure, identify, relationships, a sense of purpose and a sense of power.

Phase 3: Trial & Error

The retiree starts to realize the sands of time are starting to slip rapidly away and that if you are to accomplish anything with what time remains, it had better be soon. The dominant question here is “How can I contribute?” You tentatively start a few ventures and eventually commit to one but are prepared to go back to the drawing board if it doesn’t work out.

Phase 4: Reinvent and Repurpose

Not everyone reaches this stage (indeed, some may go back to Phase 1 and just kick back and enjoy themselves again) but for those who yearn to  leave a legacy, Phase 4 is the place to do it. The retiree ask three questions designed to identify one’s unique ability: What do you absolutely love to do? What do you do very well? And what attributes or skills have led to success in the past?

Moynes now gives workshops on Retirement (see www.thefourphases.com) and also published a companion book in 2017 titled The Ten Lessons: How You Too Can Squeeze All the “Juice” Out of Retirement (see www.thetenlessons.com).

The 2018 MoneySense ETF All-Stars

The 2018 edition of the MoneySense ETF All-Stars has just been published: you can read the whole article by clicking on the highlighted headline: The Best ETFs for 2018.

The “All-Star” portfolio consists of a 7-person expert panel plus myself. While the number of ETFs trading in Canada have reached 583, the All-Star list is now at 20, up from 14 a year ago. We added one to each existing category (except international equity) and
created a new category: the panel was unanimous in declaring the three new Vanguard Asset Allocation ETFs as All-Stars. See the Hub’s February 1st commentary on the launch of those three new products: Gamechanger.

In addition to adding the new category we call “One Decision” Packages, the panel added a single new ETF in three of the four existing categories: Canadian equities, US Equities and Fixed Income. We stood pat on the three international equity ETFs, although that asset class is also covered by the new Vanguard products.

Canadian equities

New in Canadian equities is the BMO S&P TSX Capped Composite IDX ETF (ticker ZCN), which expands the list from the returning three picks: Vanguard FTSE Canada ;All-cap Index ETF (VCN/TSX) XIC: the iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF; and HXT: Horizons S&P/TSX 60 ETF.

The panel was unanimous in retaining all three of these picks, since the trio maintain the lowest management fees among the segment, and HXT is particularly tax efficient and low cost for non-registered portfolios. But the panel agreed with Forstrong’s recommendation to add ZCN, which has the same rock-bottom annual fee of 0.05% as VCN and XIC. ZCN now has more assets than VCN.

US Equities

The panel agreed to add a fourth pick to the US all-cap space, again from BMO: BMO S&P500 Index ETF (CAD), ticker ZSP. As the Forstrong team observed, ZSP’s fee of 0.08 is the same as VFV’s and the fund now has the most assets of the four core US ETFs.

Two of our returning US equity picks are the hedged and unhedged versions of Vanguard Canada’s S&P 500 ETFs: VSP and VFV respectively, plus the iShares Core S&P US Total Market ETF (XUU.)

Fixed Income

The panel added a sixth ETF to the existing lineup of fixed-income ETFs: the iShares Core Canadian Short Term Bond Index ETF (XSB). Continue Reading…

Retired Money: The case for early partial annuitization

Fred Vettese and Rona Birenbaum in YouTube video

If you lack what finance professor and author Moshe Milevky calls a “real” pension (i.e. an employer-sponsored Defined Benefit plan), then you’re a likely candidate for annuitization or at least partial annuitization of your RRSP and/or RRIF.

My latest MoneySense Retired Money column revisits Fred Vettese’s excellent new book, Retirement Income for Life, and in particular his third “enhancement” suggestion for maximizing retirement income. We  formally reviewed Vettese’s book in the MoneySense column before that, and commented on it further here at the Hub. 

You can find the new piece drilling down on the partial annuitization enhancement by clicking on the highlighted headline: RRIF or Annuity? How about Both.

One of the main sources in the piece is fee-only planner Rona Birenbaum (pictured above with Fred Vettese), who has some useful videos on YouTube about annuities, including an interview with Vettese about the partial annuitization strategy described in the new MoneySense column. See Is it time for annuities?

Expect an annuity wave from retiring boomers without DB pensions

Certainly you’re going to hear a lot more about annuities as the baby boomers move seriously from Wealth accumulation mode to de-accumulation, aka “decumulation.” Coincidentally both Vettese and I are 1953 babies with April birthdays. In an interview with Fred, he told me he bought some annuities a year ago and that he believes that those who plan to retire at age 65 (and who lack a traditional employer-sponsored Defined Benefit pension) should consider at least partly annualizing at 65, to the tune of roughly 30% of the value of their nest egg (typically in an RRSP or RRIF). That means registered annuities.

Certainly, in light of the 10% “correction” in stocks that occurred in the last few weeks, the possibility of a more severe stock market retrenchment has to be upper most in the minds of soon-to-retire baby boomers. I note in his recent G&M column, Ian McGugan (in his early 60s) confessed he was slowly starting to take some profits from stocks and move them to safer fixed-income investments like GICs. See The Market’s gone mad: Here’s how to protect yourself. See also Graham Bodel’s article earlier this week: Response to an investor who frets the market is going to crash.

Annuities are one way to hedge against market risk, since you’re in effect transferring some of the market risk inherent in an RRSP or a RRIF to the shoulders of the insurance company offering the annuity. That’s one reason in the YouTube video above, Vettese talks about partly annuitizing as soon as you retire, whether that be age 65, or sooner or later than that traditional retirement date.

Financial advisors may not agree with all of Vettese’s five “enhancements.”

The earlier column reviewing the book mentioned that not many of Vettese’s “enhancements” to retirement income may be endorsed by the average commission-compensated financial advisor. Even so, as the Royal Bank argued earlier this year here at the Hub, annuities can help fund a full lifestyle in retirement. It observed that 62% of Canadians aged 55 to 75 are worried they’ll outlive their retirement savings but only 10% use or plan to use an annuity to ensure they’ll have a viable lifestyle in retirement.

Regular Hub contributor Robb Engen — a fee-only financial planner who also runs the Boomer & Echo website — wrote recently (on both sites) that annuities are one way retirees or would-be retirees without traditional DB pensions can Create their own personal pension in retirement.

As I note in the MoneySense column, while I’m certainly approaching the age when partial annuitization may make sense, I’ll probably wait a year or two. But in preparation for that possibility, as well as for the column, I asked Birenbaum to prepare three quotes for a $100,000 registered annuity, starting at ages 65, 70 and 75. As you might expect, the longer you wait to begin receiving payments, the higher the payout, but it’s not such a massive rise that you could rule out early payments if you really needed them to live on.

The mechanics of buying an annuity

And should you be ready to take the step, it’s not all that complicated. In the above case, you would liquidate $100,000 worth of investments in your RRSP so the cash is available to transfer, then complete an annuity purchase application and fill out and submit a T2033 RRSP transfer form. That form is sent to your RRSP administrator, and they transfer the cash to the insurance company without triggering tax. Once all these preliminary steps have been taken, payments begin the month following the annuity purchase.

Oh, and one last step, Birenbaum adds: Start relaxing!

Federal budget 2018: Just what you’d expect from a Liberal government well into its mandate

The Liberals’ 2018 federal budget that descended on us on Tuesday afternoon is pretty much what you’d expect from the Justin Trudeau administration at this slightly-past-the-midway point of its mandate: lots of spending on things like gender pay equity, parental leave, native rights. Another stab at sin taxes, with a carton of 200 cigarettes going up by $1 and a proposal for excise duties on cannabis if and when marijuana becomes legal in July. A bit of business tax reform scaled down from the measures that so incensed small business last fall. As for balancing Ottawa’s books? Not so much.

The CBC’s web site provides this overview: Liberals spend billions to close gaps for working women, indigenous families. If you want to do straight to the source, click on the Finance Canada site here.

Here’s the Globe & Mail’s overview that went up soon after 4 pm:  Federal budget highlights: 12 things you need to know. In case you’ve met the paywall limit on free views, it reports that the budget is in line with previous estimates from Finance Canada, which means deficits for the “foreseeable future.”  Pay equity legislation is proposed for federal government employees and federal regulated sectors. And $447 million will be spent over 5 years to create a new indigenous Skills and Employment Training Program (replacing the Aboriginal Skills and Employment Training Strategy).  And another $1.4 billion or more over 6 years is proposed for First Nations child and family services.

A National Pharmacare program is being “consulted” on. More detail on passive income and private corporations: companies with more than $150,000 in passive income will no longer be eligible for the small business tax rate, while those with under $50,000 oil passive income will not be affected. In between is a formula. Also more than half a billion will go to Cybersecurity, and $3.8 billion over 5 years will go to “support science.”  And journalism has not been forgotten: the budget proposes $50 million over 5 years to support journalism in “underserved communities.”

At the National Post, this piece looks at 5 ways average Canadians could be impacted by the federal budget. MoneySense‘s Julie Cazzin totes up 15 ways Budget 2015 will impact your wallet. There’s something for everyone, Cazzin writes, but no real showstoppers. Julie also looks at 5 measures that directly impact Canadian families. Another MoneySense writer looks at the implications for small business owners.

Carrick sees 7 changes affecting personal finances

Here’s Rob Carrick’s piece on 7 changes that could affect your finances. Carrick writes in the Globe that Ottawa will be modernizing deposit insurance, replace the Canada Working Income Tax Benefit with the introduction of a Canada Workers Benefit, which raises benefits by up to  $170 a year in 2019 for single parents and couples, while raising the level at which the benefit is phase out from $32,339 to $36,483. The Sears bankruptcy appears to have stimulated consultation on pension security, while as of June 2018 an extra five weeks of parental benefits will be available when parents share parental leave. (Yes, Justin Trudeau’s government wishes to encourage more men to take pat leave!) There is also an expansion of the medical expense tax credit and a move to strengthen the oversight of bank sales practices by the federal Financial Consumer Agency of Canada.

Coyne: Budget has nothing to do with budgeting; Ivison: Liberals show their cunning

Back at the National Post, you can get useful video insights from columnists Andrew Coyne, John Ivison and William Watson here. Coyne’s column is titled Liberals deliver a federal budget that has nothing to do with budgeting, or the economy.  In it, he wryly observes that the Liberals are pandering “to every conceivable Liberal client group and policy cult: environmentalists, seasonal EI recipients, multiculturalism, official language groups, regional development, all the way to the media … And, of course, feminists.”

John Ivison’s column is headlined “In their third federal budget, Trudeau’s Liberals show their cunning.

Finally, for a sober look from the tax and accounting pros at KPMG, read this overview.

My take? How about addressing pension inequity between public and private sectors?, not just gender pay inequity?

Continue Reading…