Hub Blogs contains fresh contributions written by Financial Independence Hub staff or contributors that have not appeared elsewhere first, or have been modified or customized for the Hub by the original blogger. In contrast, Top Blogs shows links to the best external financial blogs around the world.
The U.S. healthcare sector has faced unique challenges in late 2024 and the first half of 2025. Last year, we provided an in-depth look at global healthcare as a long-term opportunity and examined some of the catalysts and innovations that were impacting the sector. Today, the U.S. and global healthcare space continues to evolve while combatting headwinds in some key areas.
The state of U.S. healthcare equities
Healthcare performed relatively well in the early part of 2025, despite broader trade uncertainty and macroeconomic headwinds. The medical technology and tools sub-sector experienced some short-term volatility that was driven by the uncertainty surrounding tariffs. That comes as little surprise, considering companies in the space reliance on oversees manufacturing and revenue generation.
Domestic names, like those in Managed care and select Biopharmaceuticals, remained relatively insulated during this period. This stemmed from an easing in the tariff narrative, which was triggered by a sharp drop in several macroeconomic indicators that included manufacturing activity and consumer confidence. As we progressed further into 2025, a cloud of uncertainty crept into healthcare. That contributed to some recent volatility across several sub-sectors. In this article, we have provided some recent catalysts to help investors make sense of the current situation in healthcare.
Drug pricing in 2025
On May 12, 2025, President Donald Trump signed an Executive Order (EO) titled “Delivering Most-Favored-Nation Prescription Drug Pricing to American Patients.” This EO proclaimed that the Trump administration “will take immediate steps to end global freeloading and, should drug manufacturers fail to offer American consumers, the most-favoured-nation lowest price, my Administration will take additional aggressive action.”
Ultimately, the aim is to align U.S. drug prices more closely with lower prices paid internationally. This EO echoes a summer 2020 Trump-era EO that was blocked in court and failed to be implemented. The current version faces similar hurdles. There is no bipartisan backing for the policy, the legality surrounding it is dubious, and there is opposition among both Democrat and Republican lawmakers.
All of these make the implementation of this EO unlikely. However, we could see pilot programs within the Department of Health and Humans Services (HHS), making attempts to fold the current EO’s proclamations into future IRA negotiations, or more comprehensive legislative proposals.
In addition, there are those who have predicted the policy could reduce the research and development (R&D) budgets further. That could potentially impact innovation and companies that have been propelled due to strong R&D spending. However, the risk may truly lie in the negative sentiment that continues to emerge in the news cycle.
Vaccine market uncertainty
The appointment of Robert F. Kennedy Jr. as the United States Secretary of Health has damaged sentiment for healthcare companies that manufacture vaccines. RFK Jr. is a vocal “vaccine sceptic.” Moreover, the Trump administration has pursued leadership changes at the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), which raises questions about stricter vaccine approval processes going forward.
Merck & Co, the U.S.–based pharmaceutical giant, with its vaccine-related businesses, has felt the pressure. In addition to the political uncertainty, a recent CMS technical document has added to the complexity in the vaccine arena. The report suggested that reformulated drugs may no longer be classified as “new” for Medicare negotiations. This development could impact companies with operations in the “combination therapy” space like Johnson & Johnson’s Darzalex Faspro, or Bristol Myers’ subcutaneous version of Opdivo. That could affect future patent projections as well. Continue Reading…
Kevin Depocas Dumas says even with current U.S.-Canada tensions he’s not seeing a lot of Canadians who want to sell their Florida properties.
In the latest episode of Two Way Traffic, he and host Darren Coleman discussed issues affecting Canadians who own property in the state. About half a million Canadians are in that boat.
Dumas is Associate Vice President of Business Development of NatBank, a wholly owned subsidiary of the National Bank of Canada that’s operated in Florida for over 30 years.
Topics he and Coleman discussed include:
Difficulties Canadians in the U.S. have in getting a mortgage from an American bank and what to do about it.
Problems Canadians in the U.S. – even wealthy ones – have in obtaining credit or getting a loan.
Why it’s cheaper to deal with an American financial institution than a Canadian one when in the U.S., but there could be issues you may not anticipate.
Today I’m joined by Kevin Dupocas Dumas, AVP of NAT Bank in Florida. So you guys have offices in Naples. Where else?
Kevin Depocas Dumas
We have three other branches on the east coast of Florida. One in Hollywood. One in Pompano Beach. And one in Boynton Beach.
Darren Coleman
This conversation is going to be helpful for Canadians who have or want to have property in Florida. So let’s guide people through this. Who is NAT Bank?
Kevin Depocas Dumas
Kevin Depocas Dumas
NAT Bank was created 30 years ago and we are a wholly owned subsidiary of National Bank of Canada. We’ve been operating here for 30 years offering financing solutions or banking solutions primarily for Canadians. A lot of Canadians may not have access to the financing market or the banking market here. We take care of those needs for them, especially for those who spend half their year in Florida.
Darren Coleman
You and I just happened to meet each other. I was in Naples and you guys were doing a presentation in your branch for your clients. You had a cross-border attorney doing the presentation and it just happened to be my friend Shlomi Levy who’s been on this podcast. I should give full disclosure since I was a vice president at National Bank Financial for five months after they acquired HSBC. So what are some of the challenges if Canadians have property or wish to buy property in the U.S.? How easy is it to go into a U.S. bank and say I’d like a mortgage on my condo? Or a mortgage on my property? How easy is it to get a U.S.-domiciled mortgage?
Kevin Depocas Dumas
This is actually the biggest problem for Canadians coming down here. They cannot use their Canadian credit history or their Canadian assets. They’re not going to be using any documents that come from Canada. So they don’t qualify for a loan, or if they do, they have to go to the private lenders: which usually won’t do a loan at more than 50% LTV. So Canadians are not only faced with the currency exchange, but where are they going to get funds from investments they’re holding and putting it into buying the property? This is the biggest thing they’ll face here. Continue Reading…
On Wednesday, BMO ETFs conducted its second annual ETF Investor day. Conducted at the Toronto Stock Exchange, Do-it-yourself investors and finfluencers [Financial Influencers] were on hand for the ceremonial opening of the exchange, shown in the photo on the left (including myself).
Hard to believe, but this marks BMO’s 16th year as a Canadian ETF provider.
Before we get to the individual expert picks from BMO’s large ETF stable, the morning began with the obligatory analysis of the current Trump-inspired global trade war, and its implications for the Canadian economy and stock market.
Economic Update
In an Economic update Amber Kanwar, Host of the In the Money Podcast interviewed Bipan Rai, Head of ETF & Structured Solutions Strategy at BMO ETFs. Rai said the protectionist measures being imposed by the Trump administration have “not been seen since the Great Depression.” In the U.S. tariffs are now north of 20%, or ten times the 2% average tariffs that were previously in place.
Asked what will happen next, Rai said probably one of three things: Trump might rescind the Tariffs, or there will be a massive expansion of U.S. fiscal policy to fund its Tax Cuts, or the Federal Reserve will cut rates. But he doesn’t think a U.S. recession will show up this year, as its economy is “too dynamic.”
BMO ETFs Bipan Rai
However, Rai was less confident that Canada won’t face a Recession: “I’m very concerned about the Canadian economy in coming quarters.” The two most recent scenarios from the Bank of Canada are mixed: one is “far more benign,” the second “more malignant.” He thinks the former is more likely, with a few negative quarters of GDP growth but not likely exhibiting Stagflation risk. 70% of Canada’s GDP is generated from trade, “most of it with the U.S. As much as [Prime Minister Mark] Carney talks about diversifying away from the U.S., that’s not going to happen. The U.S. is way too big and is right next door. We may do more with the United Kingdom but it and the European Union won’t replace the U.S. Jobs may be lost, especially in the auto sector.”
Asked if he expects more rate cuts from central banks around the world, Rai said he thinks the BOC is likely closer to the end, with one or two more rate cuts, after which fiscal stimulus will kick in. England or the ECB may cut a few more times, then Japan and a few “others divorced from the rest.”
How retail investors can play Defence
Kanwar also probed the views of two experts in a session titled Playing Defense: Positioning Your Portfolio in today’s environment. Now that the U.S. market has rebounded 18% from the lows around early April’s Liberation Day, Kanwar asked how Do-it-yourself [DIY] investors can deal with volatility. Jimmy Xu, Head of Liquid Alternatives & Non-linear solutions, BMO ETFs, said it depends on investor goals. Those with a long-term 20- or 30-year time horizon before Retirement would be “best to sit tight,” Xu said, “Overtrading is the enemy of growing assets and market timing is hard.”
Freelance writer Tony Dong, founder of ETF Portfolio Blueprint, said volatility is the price of admission to create investment returns that are superior to risk-free treasury bills. Betting on certain sectors may expose DIY investors to uncompensated risk, Dong said. Even equal-weight products provide imperfect exposure to the size premium commanded by small- and mid-cap stocks. But investors can overweight less volatile stocks concentrated in structurally defensive sectors like health care, utilities and consumer staples. Jimmy Xu said sector-agnostic low-volatility strategies can help investors get around this problem. BMO’s low-volatility ETFs own low-volatility stocks that have a low beta relative to the broad market, which amounts to “a better tool than picking top sectors.” Continue Reading…
Looking to break away from the traditional 9-to-5 path to Financial Independence? In this expert roundup, professionals share the platforms and resources that helped them explore alternative ways to build wealth, from niche investment tools to entrepreneurship communities.
Whether you’re just starting out or refining your strategy, you’ll find practical insights and trusted recommendations to guide your journey.
Prioritize Autonomy Over Liquidity
The Motley Fool: Comprehensive Financial Education
Tim Ferriss Show: Disciplined Wealth-Building Systems
Side Hustle School: Practical Income Ideas
Mad Fientist: Balanced Approach to Saving
NAPFA: Personalized Financial Guidance
Morningstar: Diverse Investment Strategies
Prioritize Autonomy over Liquidity
Frameworks that map autonomy before liquidity targets have reshaped how to allocate personal capital. For example, layering $25,000 into private credit offerings that yield predictable monthly payments has more impact on Financial Independence than a $300,000 retirement account you cannot touch for 20 years. This logic came from dissecting how quiet operators generate cash flow without public scale or visibility. Their systems work because they are boring, consistent, and mechanical. That mindset shift pulled me away from chasing numbers and toward protecting hours.
Skip platforms that market freedom as a finish line and look for models that treat Financial Independence as a structural asset class. Follow people who explain how they built repeatable systems with clean numbers: no fluff, no pitch. If someone makes $900 monthly from a vending machine route and spends 4 hours managing it, study that. It might be low-scale, but the math still applies. What I am getting at is this: financial freedom shows up in how your time behaves, not how your balance sheet looks. — Eric Croak, CFP, President, Croak Capital
The Motley Fool: Comprehensive Financial Education
One resource that has been crucial for my understanding of alternative financial paths is The Motley Fool. This site provides wide-ranging content around personal finance, investing, and wealth-building processes, encouraging me to be a more critical thinker regarding the diversification of my financial portfolio. While my experience has centered so far around the precious metals exchange, The Motley Fool‘s observations about stock, bond, and market trends have made my thinking about various ways of wealth-building more comprehensive.
What makes The Motley Fool stand out is that it offers a synthesis of research, educational articles, and investment analysis that contains actionable tips to realize Financial Independence. The ongoing posts about current market conditions and performances of individual stocks have proven particularly useful in judging risk and uncovering emerging opportunities. It has assisted me in streamlining my investment plan and made me comfortable venturing outside my original area of interest in order not to be heavily reliant on a given asset class.
For anyone interested in designing financial liberty, I recommend researching The Motley Fool’s publications. They foster a balanced attitude toward building wealth through a combination of long-term investing and general financial advice. Whether you are a new investor or a professional investor, the site provides simple techniques and information that are easily understandable and implementable into any financial process. The most important thing to take away is to stay educated, diversified, and calculated in your choices. — Brandon Thor, CEO, Thor Metals Group
Investopedia: Up-to-Date Financial Knowledge
One of the most useful resources I have used is the Investopedia website. I recommend that others explore this resource and the various articles it offers, specifically in the personal finance category. This is a website that is constantly updated with new information that is relevant and comprehensive. When learning about alternative paths to financial independence, it’s important to have a source that contains a network of resources covering all financial levels. For some people, this is a site to learn about the basics of finance, while for others like me, it allows us to constantly get updates within the field we work in. — Peter Reagan, Financial Market Strategist, Birch Gold Group
Indie Hackers changed my approach to business and entrepreneurship. The content on Indie Hackers provides examples of how independent creators and small business owners develop digital products, content brands, or niche services that support their independence.
As someone running a blog rooted in curation and personal shopping, it’s given me real-world examples of monetization through affiliate content, digital products, and community building. If you’re even a little curious about earning independently through content or software, I’d say spend a weekend exploring Indie Hackers. — Danilo Miranda, Managing Director, Presenteverso
Reddit: Diverse Financial Wisdom
One of the key resources that has been instrumental in informing my road to financial freedom is the collaborative platform, “Personal Finance Subreddits.” These forums are filled with experiences from individuals at various points in their financial journeys, sharing straightforward advice on topics such as the best investing tips and how to shed costly habits. The diversity of experience gained has served me well in challenging conventional financial wisdom and in innovating more freely toward building wealth.
What is interesting about these subreddits is their emphasis on real-world strategies individuals implement to accumulate wealth. Whether learning to take advantage of tax benefits, following stock market trends, or investing in alternative assets such as precious metals and cryptocurrencies, these communities offer actionable information. I discovered that engaging in dialogue around alternative investments, especially in sectors such as precious metals, has been instrumental in informing Alloy’s financial product approach.
If you are considering venturing into alternative routes to fiscal freedom, I highly recommend exploring these kinds of forums. They have a treasure trove of information at your fingertips, which tends to be backed up by real-world case studies and anecdotes. You’ll find techniques that defy mainstream wisdom and encourage you to think differently about how to build your wealth. The icing on the cake is that all these communities evolve continuously, which means you stay informed about current trends and thinking as they emerge. — Brandon Aversano, CEO, The Alloy Market
X: Direct Access to Wealth-Building Minds
I’ve explored countless resources for alternative wealth-building paths. The platform that has been absolutely game-changing for me is Twitter (now X).
Most people use Twitter incorrectly: they scroll mindlessly or argue about politics. However, when you curate your feed with the right financial minds, it becomes an incredible learning tool that costs nothing but attention.
What makes Twitter invaluable is the real-time access to people who have actually built wealth through unconventional means, not just theory. You get daily insights from entrepreneurs, investors, and creators who are doing the work right now.
For example, I learned about affiliate marketing strategies that helped me scale by following people who were transparent about their successes and failures. No nonsense, just practical advice you can implement immediately.
The beauty of Twitter is that it’s not just consumption: you can directly engage with these people. Ask questions, share your progress, build relationships. That kind of access used to require expensive masterminds or conferences.
If you’re serious about Financial Independence, start by following 20-30 people who have built what you want to build. Don’t just follow the big names: find the practitioners who are openly sharing their journeys. Then actually implement what resonates, don’t just collect information.
Remember though: no platform will make you wealthy if you’re just consuming content. The magic happens when you take what you learn and actually execute on it consistently. — John Talasi, Entrepreneur, JohnTalasi.com
One resource that has really stood out to me is ChooseFI, both the podcast and the broader community around it. It’s not flashy, but it’s full of practical, real-world conversations that challenge traditional ideas of work and retirement. As someone who works in the construction value stream, I appreciate systems thinking, and ChooseFI breaks down Financial Independence like a process: identifying waste, streamlining inputs, and looking for long-term sustainability.
It helped me rethink how I approach personal finance, not just for myself but in advising others on business efficiency and risk. What really makes it valuable is the variety of stories — teachers, tradespeople, small business owners — people who found unique paths to build security and freedom, often without earning six figures.
I’d recommend diving into the early episodes where they lay out the core principles. Even if you’re not aiming for full early retirement, the mindset shift around intentional spending, value-based living, and building flexibility into your life is incredibly useful. It’s not just about money: it’s about designing a life that actually works for you. — Andrew Moore, Director, Rubicon Wigzell Limited
Reframe Expenses in Hours Worked
Reddit’s r/financialindependence has reshaped how I think about money, especially after reading a post where someone broke down the true cost of their car in hours worked, not just in dollars. They added up the loan payment, insurance, and maintenance, then compared it against their take-home pay. It came out to roughly 21 hours a month just to keep the car. That hit me harder than any financial advice I had read before, because it shifted the decision from, “Can I afford this?” to, “Is this worth that much of my life?”
I took that same method and applied it to a few things in my own budget. I started with recurring costs like software subscriptions and monthly meals out. Some of them made sense. Others felt absurd once I saw the time attached to them. That one shift made it easier to simplify without turning everything into a sacrifice. Framing expenses through time instead of just money gave me a cleaner way to decide what stayed. The posts in that subreddit don’t offer perfect answers, but they push you to ask sharper questions. That’s what I keep returning for. — Robbin Schuchmann, Co-founder / SEO Specialist, EOR Overview
Podcasts: Accessible Financial Insights
I’m always on the lookout for tools and resources that offer fresh perspectives, both for my clients and myself. One that has consistently stood out over the years is podcasts. They’re accessible, insightful, and often make complex financial ideas feel surprisingly relatable. Two podcasts I frequently recommend are The Ramsey Show and Odd Lots from Bloomberg.
The Ramsey Show is a great example of how powerful simple financial habits can be. It focuses on helping people get out of debt, live within their means, and build a strong foundation for long-term Financial Independence. It’s full of real-life stories that remind you you’re not alone in trying to figure it all out. Financial freedom doesn’t always require complex strategies; it often starts with small, consistent steps.
Odd Lots, on the other hand, offers a deeper dive into the financial world. It’s ideal for anyone curious about how investing, markets, and the wider economy work. It’s helped me, and many on our team, stay informed and engaged with the broader forces that shape our clients’ financial plans. Continue Reading…
In mid-April, my monthly Retired Money column for MoneySense looked at the experience of new retirees who have just shifted from RRSPs to Registered Retirement Income Funds (RRIFs), including my own.
Now my followup May column has been published, and it looks in more detail at how such new retirees should handle their Asset Allocation, particularly in light of this volatile Trump Trade War era we are now in. You can find the full column by clicking on the highlighted headline: How to allocate a RRIF for Secure Income in Retirement.
The column begins with an old rule of thumb that advisor John De Goey says is now obsolete: that your age should roughly equal your Fixed-Income exposure. So, for example, that rule would suggest a new RRIF owner aged 71 might have 71% fixed-income and just 29% stock exposure.
I bounced that off De Goey, who recently aired his views on Trump’s second reign of Error in this recent Findependence Hub blog: The Gangster in the White House.
A new Rule of Thumb for Retirement Asset Allocation
He introduced me to a novel formula that was new to me and perhaps to most readers. “I believe longevity has made that [previous] rule of thumb out of date for at least a generation now. My view, after taking longevity into account, is that you should use age times the decimal of your age until you get to RRIF age (71). This assumes that the client is not particularly risk averse. The portfolio still has to be suitable.”
So under this new rule and assuming the other qualifications apply to your personal -circumstances, a 50-year-old should be 50 x .50 = 25% in fixed income; a 60-year-old should be 60 x .60 = 36% in income; and a 71-year old-should be 71 x .71 = ~ 50% in income. However, beyond that age, De Goey thinks 50% fixed income is the maximum. “People over the age of 71 should be able to withstand having half their money in equities even if they’re in their 90s, because the risk associated with the 50/50 portfolio is quite low.
I was recently interviewed by Allan Small on his Allan Small Financial Show, along with financial commentator and broadcaster Patricia Lovett-Reid, formerly a TD Waterhouse senior vice president and later CTV commentator. Allan, who is Senior Investment Advisor for Scarborough-based IA Private Wealth Inc., probed us about current investor psyche and how to position for the global trade war.
Coping with the Triple T
Patricia coined the term Triple T: for Trump, Trade and Tension. Reviewing past investor panics, she said it is “different this time in that we have an individual wreaking havoc on a global platform.” Even so, she suggested staying the course with quality holdings, albeit being a more defensive with utilities, telecom, financials and Gold. Since we may all spend a third of our lives in Retirement, retirees should not abandon the “stocks for the long run” stance, she said. If you can’t sleep at night, ask your advisor what you can do about it but personally, Lovett-Reid says she has not made any drastic changes to her family’s Asset Allocation.
One focus of the interview, some of which also aired on CFRB 1010 Radio, was our “crystal ball” for markets by the end of the year. All three of us thought they would likely be a bit higher from where they were in late April. Patricia said the TSX should outperform for the rest of 2025, based on its resource and materials stocks (Gold, Oil). My view assumed Trump would partly back down from his harder-nosed Tariff positions but if he doesn’t, I said, “Look out below.”
One observation was that those with Defined Benefit pension plans can consider those to be a form of fixed income. That leaves more room to take risk with equities in other parts of one’s retirement portfolio. In a followup email, Patricia told me that “As someone with a DB [pension], I tend to skew toward more equities. And yet I do like the 60/40 split (equities to bonds). I’m very much about asset protection versus accumulation, so we are erring on the cautious side.”
What role can Annuities play?
The full MoneySense column closes with a look at annuities, which resemble Fixed Income.
In the past, I have referenced retired actuary Fred Vettese’s suggestion in various Globe & Mail columns that – at least for those who don’t have employer-sponsored Defined Benefit pension plans – they should partly annuitize when their RRSP must be converted to a RRIF. Continue Reading…
Posted By 
Posted By 
