Victory Lap

Once you achieve Financial Independence, you may choose to leave salaried employment but with decades of vibrant life ahead, it’s too soon to do nothing. The new stage of life between traditional employment and Full Retirement we call Victory Lap, or Victory Lap Retirement (also the title of a new book to be published in August 2016. You can pre-order now at VictoryLapRetirement.com). You may choose to start a business, go back to school or launch an Encore Act or Legacy Career. Perhaps you become a free agent, consultant, freelance writer or to change careers and re-enter the corporate world or government.

9 ways Entrepreneurs finance their Startups

Posted By |

As an entrepreneur, how have you financed your startup?

To help finance your next startup, we asked business professionals and leaders this question for their insights. From crowdfunding to savings from a full-time job, there are several ways to fund a startup.

Here are 9 ways entrepreneurs finance their startups:

  • Look into Commerce Authority Programs
  • Partner with Others
  • Finance with Commercial Bridge Loans
  • Connect with Local Non-Profits and Support Networks
  • Raise from Crowdfunding
  • Apply for Small Business Grants
  • Pitch to Potential Investors
  • Ask for Support from Family and Friends
  • Save Your Full-Time Salary

Look into Commerce Authority Programs

I’ve bootstrapped the financing of our company for 10 years, but programs from a local commerce authority can certainly help support and fund new initiatives. For example, the Arizona Commerce Authority offers programs such as the Small Business Capital Investment Incentive Program, where the ACA may certify up to $2.5M [US$] in tax credits each fiscal year, or the Rapid Employment Job Training Grant, a reimbursement for training and development expenses. Look into the programs at your local commerce authority, as many small businesses and startups may discover funding and grant incentives designed just for them. — Brett Farmiloe, Markitors

Partner with Others

Financing your business with partners to fund your growth in exchange for special access to your product, staff, distribution rights, ultimate sale, or some combination of those items using strategic partner financing is the best strategy to finance your startup. I’ve noticed that this option is often neglected. Strategic investments are similar to venture capitalism in that it is typically a stock sale (rather than a loan), yet it can also be royalty-based, in which the partner receives a portion of every sale, in my opinion. Partner financing is a great option because the firm you partner with is likely to be a huge corporation, and it may even be in a similar industry or one that has a stake in your company. — Carey Wilbur, Charter Capital

Finance with Commercial Bridge Loans

We like to overcome the obstacle of financing small businesses by bringing innovative solutions to the table. One such solution is our commercial bridge loans, which are flexible short-term financing options for commercial real estate properties. This might be a great option for fast growing businesses as they continue to grow and scale their operations.

As loan experts, we commit to truly helping clients as advisors. If you’re just starting a business, consider consulting a lending expert. Make sure your needs are heard and that you are provided with affordable options to choose from. — Allan J. Switalski, AVANA Capital

Connect with local Non-Profits and Support Networks

In addition to bootstrapping, local not-for-profit organizations and networks that support female entrepreneurs are some great ways to fund your startup. You can find funding and investors through these kinds of organizations like we did when we found Beam. One of the other great things about organizations like Beam is that you will become part of a network you can lean on for support and can also find mentorship from business professionals in your area. This mentorship can make a huge difference in helping you grow your business. Also, there’s a lot of grants out there that support female-founded businesses which require a little extra upfront research and work but another great avenue to fund the business.

— Sara Shah, Journ

Raise from Crowdfunding

Crowdfunding may be an alternative if you have a hot idea and are good at social media. When crowdfunding platforms like Kickstarter and Indiegogo were launched, there were a lot of enterprises that had significant success raising funds through their reach.

What’s the disadvantage? Because many businesses seek funding through crowdfunding, you must build a lot of buzz in order to cut through the total signal noise. Unfortunately, it’s also easy to overextend yourself and irritate backers, which can lead to a lot of resentment before your firm even gets off the ground. — Veronica Miller, VPNOverview

Apply for Small Business Grants

I usually advise startups to consult small business grant administrators to fund your startups. Especially, when your new company is a pioneer and investing in innovative technologies and techniques, more funding opportunities arise.  What’s more, small businesses founded by women, minorities, or veterans are often eligible for grants from the Small Business Administration (SBA) and other organizations that promote entrepreneurship. If you fall into one of these categories, you should contact your local SBA branch or chamber of commerce to see if there is any local grant money available. — Spiros Skolarikis, Comidor

Pitch to potential Investors

We joined an accelerator program that connected us to investors. In turn, they take a share in the company in exchange for capital. The ownership-to-capital ratios are variable and are usually determined by a company’s valuation. I believe this is a wonderful option for companies who don’t have physical collateral to serve as a lien on a bank’s loan. However, it is only a good fit when there is a proven high growth potential as well as a competitive advantage of some sort, such as a patent or a captive consumer. Another advantage of working with investors is that they may give you a wealth of information, industry connections, and a clear path for your company. — Guy Katabi, Lightkey

Ask for support from Family and Friends

Borrowing money from friends and family is a traditional method of starting a business. While it may be more difficult to persuade investors or banks of the excellence of your idea, your family and friends will typically trust in your ambition.

They might be more willing to contribute to the funding of your company. If you do seek loans from friends and family, make sure that each of you has appropriate legal guidance, especially if the money is taken as a loan. However, what about the disadvantages? Borrowing money is an easy way to alienate friends and ruin family relationships. If you decide to go this route, go with caution. — Edward Mellett, Wikijob

Save your full-time Salary

I financed my startup with the salary from my full-time job. I was fortunate to have a good paying job as a software engineer, which enabled me to fuel my startup while it was just a side hustle. I’ve never been a big spender, and I live modestly:  this low-cost lifestyle left me with enough money to feed my business while getting it off the ground. I have since quit my job and operate my small business with the money it generates. –– Andy Kolodgie, Cash Home Buyers Georgia

Terkel creates community-driven content featuring expert insights. Sign up at terkel.io to answer questions and get published

Retired Money: Is the dream of Retiring Abroad still alive in the Covid era?

Posted By |

My latest MoneySense Retired Money column, just published, looks at the commonly held dream of many in the FIRE community (Financial Independence/Retire Early): that of geo-arbitrage and retiring outside Canada to an exotic location with a much lower cost of living. Click on the highlighted text for the full column: Has the Pandemic ended the dream of Retiring Abroad?

As I note in the piece, places like Mexico, the Far East or parts of Europe have such a relatively low cost of living that average Canadians might be able to retire early just on the strength of CPP and OAS. Add in any employer pensions and registered or unregistered savings and that would be gravy.

The column looks in particular at two locations in Mexico that are quite popular with both American and Canadian expatriates seeking nicer weather and a lower cost of living. One is Lake Chapala, the subject of a new edition of a book by regular Hub contributors Akaisha and Billy Kaderli. The book, pictured on the left, is titled The Adventurer’s Guide to Chapala Living.

“Chapala isn’t the only town/city where living in Mexico is wonderful. There are so many from which to choose,’ Akaisha told me via email, “ We believe retiring abroad is still feasible, without a doubt.”

At one point my wife and I seriously considered leaving the Land of Snow and High Taxes (aka our Home and Native Land) for Mexico. We took one trip to Chapala and nearby Ajijc, and a few years later the more inland and mountainous San Miguel de Allende, more on which below.

However, as the years went by and we neared our Findependence Day (i.e. Semi-Retirement), we concluded that there was too much crime in Mexico for our liking and that we are for the most part quite content to live in our current home in Long Branch, Ontario, just steps from Lake Ontario.

Even so, and as the MoneySense column relates in more depth, we do know a couple who actually took the plunge and sold their Toronto home to start a new life in San Miguel de Allende. Five years ago, the Hub recalled that trip and how we ran into a former Financial Post colleague of mine, Dean Cummer, and his partner.

They visited Toronto recently and I got the chance to catch up over lunch with Dean, who became one of the main sources for the MoneySense column: my editor wanted to know whether the dream of Retiring Abroad is still alive in the Covid era. Continue Reading…

Wealth & Happiness, Part 2: Happiness is a Thought and can be changed

Posted By |

By Warren MacKenzie, for Canadian Moneysaver

Special to the Financial Independence Hub

In Part One of this series we mentioned how ‘living in the moment’ — that is being free of ideas of self and the things we wish for — is an opportunity for happiness.

In this part we will first explain how happiness comes from our thoughts, not our financial circumstances, and how making money usually generates more happiness than spending it does. We will then look at how money can buy happiness when you give it away, and how it’s not enough to manage money wisely: we also have to use our money wisely.

For example, let’s imagine two people with the same size investment portfolio living in almost identical apartments. In one case, the individual who may have experienced a windfall is overjoyed to be living on his or her own, while the other person, who may have suffered a financial loss, is sad and embarrassed to now be living in such a small apartment. One person is happy and one is sad. The difference is not based on their different circumstances it is entirely based on their thoughts about their situation.

In his book, The Art of Happiness, Dalai Lama says, “Once basic needs are met – the message is clear: We don’t need more money, we don’t need greater success or fame, we don’t need the perfect body or the perfect mate – right now, at this very moment, we have a mind, which is all the basic equipment we need to achieve complete happiness.”

Overcoming challenges

For most successful people, it’s their accomplishments that gives them the greatest happiness, whether that includes looking after their family, accumulating wealth, or showing resilience and problem solving through difficult situations. Successful people know that a happy life is not a life without problems or negative circumstances: rather it is one where we have the opportunity to overcome challenges and problems.

It’s important to realize that most often, the greater the challenge, the greater the happiness that comes from overcoming it. If parents make things so easy for their children that they never have to work hard and learn to overcome challenges, (including financial challenges) their children may not develop the positive self-image and confidence that comes from solving problems and creating their own financial security. Continue Reading…

The Case for Bonds

Posted By |
Outcome Metric Asset Management

By Noah Solomon

Special to the Financial Independence Hub

Historically, investors have held bonds to diversify and mitigate the volatility of their portfolios. Conventional portfolios have sufficient allocations to low-volatility bonds to weather periodic bear markets in stocks. During the tech-wreck of 2000-02, the global financial crisis of 2007, and the Covid-crash of early 2020, bonds not only held up well relative to stocks, but actually produced gains, mitigating the pain investors experienced from large declines in stocks.

Over the past few decades, bonds have not only provided ample protection from bear markets in equities but have also provided reasonable returns for the privilege. During the 40 years from 1982 to 2020, 10-year U.S. Treasuries produced an average annualized real return of 4.71%.

The Ugly Truth

By any measure, the bond market’s one-two punch of healthy returns and portfolio insurance over the past several decades has been impressive. However, this experience has been highly anomalous from a long-term historical perspective.

The 4.71% annualized real return of 10-year U.S. Treasuries over the 40 years from 1981 to 2020 compares favorably to the corresponding return of only 1.36% for the 80 years beginning in 1941. Their returns over the past four decades look even more out of place when compared to -1.89% annualized real return for the 40 years from 1941 to 1980.

Bonds can also be less stable than stocks and just as vulnerable to extreme losses. Since 1928, the maximum peak-trough loss in real terms of 10-year U.S. Treasuries was -54.3% vs. -56.5% for stocks. Over the same time period, the worst rolling 10-year annualized real return for 10-year Treasuries was -4.7% as compared to -4.06% for the S&P 500 Index.

Bond bear markets can also last longer than those of stocks. Investors who bought Treasuries at the end of 1940 had to wait 51 years before they broke even in real terms. By contrast, the lengthiest period in which stocks remained underwater was the 13 years following the peak of the technology bubble in late 1999.

The current near-zero yields on bonds are likely to be an excellent indicator of what investors can anticipate for future returns. John Bogle, founder of The Vanguard Group, pointed out that since 1926, the yield on 10-year U.S. Treasury notes explains 92% of the annualized returns investors would have earned had they held the notes to maturity and reinvested the interest payments at prevailing rates.

The perils of investing in bonds are well summarized by legendary investor Warren Buffett, who in his 2012 annual letter to Berkshire Hathaway shareholders warned:

They are among the most dangerous of assets. Over the past century these instruments have destroyed the purchasing power of investors in many countries, even as these holders continued to receive timely payments of interest and principal …. Right now, bonds should come with a warning label.

History also cautions against relying on bonds to mitigate portfolio losses when stocks decline. Notwithstanding that bonds provided much needed gains during the tech-wreck of 2000-2002, the global financial crisis of 2008, and the Covid-crash of 2020, stocks and bonds have been positively correlated in 55% of the 93 years from 1928 to 2020.

Putting history aside, the simple fact is that with current short-term rates at zero and 10-year Treasuries yielding 1.5%, it will be difficult for bonds to provide the same degree of protection (if any) in the next bear market. The math just doesn’t work!

From the beginning of 1928 through the end of last year, the annualized real return of the S&P 500 Index was 6.64%, as compared to 1.94% for 10-year Treasuries. Had you invested $1 in the S&P 500 at the beginning of 1928, by the end of 2020 it would have had an inflation-adjusted value of $396.03 vs. only $5.96 had you invested the same $1 in 10-year Treasuries. Put simply, the opportunity cost of maintaining a permanent allocation to bonds cannot be overstated.

Does this mean Bond Investors are Irrational?

The massive drag on portfolio returns over the long-term caused by a permanent allocation to bonds does not necessarily imply that investors who hold them are irrational.

Many investors may not have a sufficiently long investment horizon to weather crushing losses in bear markets and/or may be emotionally incapable of enduring large losses that can occur in portfolios that are heavily weighted in stocks. Continue Reading…

Can Dynamic Pension Pools strengthen Canadians’ Retirement Income Security?

Posted By |
Image courtesy National Institute on Ageing

A new report published by the National Institute on Ageing (NIA) and the Global Risk Institute (GRI) being published today aims to help overcome the $1.5-trillion Decumulation Disconnect in the Canadian Retirement Income System.

Titled Affordable Lifetime Pension Income for a Better Tomorrow, the report makes the case for how Dynamic Pension (DP) pools can strengthen retirement income security for millions of Canadian seniors. Here is the link to the full report.

The urgency is apparent when you consider that 10 million Canadian baby boomers are now entering retirement: with longer life expectancies and a greater dependency on private savings to sustain them. As the report’s authors write, “it’s more important than ever to find solutions that will help retiring Canadians turn their accumulated savings into low-cost lifetime pension income.”

Bonnie Jeanne MacDonald/Ryerson/National Institute on Aging

Lead author Dr. Bonnie-Jeanne MacDonald, Director of Financial Security Research at the NIA, says fears that retiring Canadians’ savings won’t sustain them in retirement are “legitimate …  Financial markets, inflation and health expenses are just some of the big unknowns that retirees will need to face over 10, 20, 30 or even 40 years.”

According to the report, Dynamic Pension [DP henceforth] pools have the potential to transform the Canadian retirement landscape. Their goal is simple: to help people optimize their expected lifetime retirement income while ensuring they never run out of money. In other words, gurantee that they won’t run out of money before they run out of life.

Pooling Longevity Risk

While protecting individuals from outliving their savings (i.e., longevity risk) can be prohibitively expensive, the same protection becomes affordable when spread across a large group. Pooling longevity risk allows retirees to spend their savings more confidently while they are alive, says the report.

In a DP pool, pension amounts are not guaranteed but may fluctuate from year to year. This means retirees can stay invested in capital markets and benefit from the higher expected returns.

DP pools have a risk-reward profile that is fundamentally different from current options and products available for older Canadians: such as guaranteed annuities purchased through insurance companies or individually managing and drawing down savings from personal retirement savings accounts, says another of the report’s authors, Barbara Sanders, Associate Professor at Simon Fraser University,  “Retirees who are comfortable with some investment risk can stay invested in equity markets and reap the associated rewards, which is important in today’s low-interest and high-inflation environment.” Continue Reading…