Debt & Frugality

As Didi says in the novel (Findependence Day), “There’s no point climbing the Tower of Wealth when you’re still mired in the basement of debt.” If you owe credit-card debt still charging an usurous 20% per annum, forget about building wealth: focus on eliminating that debt. And once done, focus on paying off your mortgage. As Theo says in the novel, “The foundation of financial independence is a paid-for house.”

What do home buyers want from the Federal Budget?

Posted By |

By Penelope Graham, Zoocasa

Special to the Financial Independence Hub

The Federal government’s budget reveal is tomorrow, and all eyes  are on what kinds of goodies will be included for beleaguered first-time home buyers.

While Finance Minister Bill Morneau has strongly hinted that some sort of measure would be unveiled to alleviate the home affordability challenges facing Canadians, it remains to be seen what that will entail. In the meantime, the government has been on the receiving end of proposals from various members of the housing industry, including local and regional real estate boards as well as Mortgage Professionals Canada, as to what would best address the issue.

Industry wants Stress Test, Amortizations, reeled back

Much of the focus has been placed on two key areas: the federal mortgage stress test, which was implemented just over a year ago in January 2018, as well as the length of maximum amortizations for first-time buyers.

Relaxing the criteria around both would improve buyers’ chances of qualifying for a mortgage, experts argue, and therefore should be the priority of the feds when implementing change. The result of the stricter threshold has effectively cooled demand in even the largest Canadian markets, and has pushed a greater percentage of buyers to high-rise living across the nation, from Vancouver condos for sale, to Hamilton and Ottawa condos, rather than single-family detached options.

Survey results yield other priorities

However, home buyers aren’t necessarily in agreeance with that approach. According to a recent survey conducted by Zoocasa, while 82% of Canadians feel that housing affordability continues to be a major issue, they’re not so sure the government is in a position to improve the situation. A total of 55% of respondents do not believe that affordability can be fixed via government measures alone, while 21% don’t feel it’s possible for new policies to exact change within the next five years.

Respondents also had different opinions about what measures would be of biggest help to their pocket books. When asked specifically about the mortgage stress test, for instance, only 57% said they were aware of what it was – and of that group, just half felt reducing the test’s rate threshold (currently the Bank of Canada’s five-year rate of 5.34% or 2% on top of the borrower’s contract rate, whichever is higher) would be of help. Only 15% of all respondents felt such a measure would be effective.

They also weren’t sold that extending maximum amortizations for high-ratio borrowers (those paying less than 20% down) or first-time buyers would be of service either; doing so would reduce monthly mortgage payments, making home financing easier on household budgets, and also ease the stress test’s affordability criteria. Continue Reading…

How federal housing policies could impact first-time homebuyers

Posted By |

By Jordan Lavin, Ratehub.ca

Special to the Financial Independence Hub

For a little more than a decade, the Federal Government has been making policies that make it harder to buy your first home in Canada.

It’s hard to blame them. The great recession of 2008-09 was principally caused by a crash in the U.S. housing market which, in turn, had been caused by lax mortgage lending standards. Hundreds of thousands of people bought homes they couldn’t really afford, and were later foreclosed on or forced to sell. Left behind was a glut of housing inventory and an equal glut of people who had lost everything. The ripple effect was felt throughout the world, including here in Canada.

Fortunately, the mortgage problem was isolated to the United States. But the repercussions hit Canada hard, and interest rates fell to unprecedented lows as a response to the worsening economic situation. During the recovery, mortgage rates in Canada continued to fall and house prices quickly rose. In hot markets like Vancouver and Toronto, the average price of a home nearly doubled between 2010 and 2016.

All this left government officials on this side of the border wondering if it was possible for the mortgage and housing market to fail here. With the compounding worry of a housing market crash – what if prices went back down as quickly as they had gone up? – they began making new policies with the goal of making it more difficult for Canadians to qualify for a mortgage, especially if that mortgage were to be insured by the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation (CMHC).

Among the changes: Limiting amortization length for insured mortgages to 25 years; Limiting CHMC insurance to homes purchased for under $1-million only; Establishing a minimum down payment of 5% and then increasing the minimum for homes over $500,000; and expanding a “stress test” to eventually force all mortgage borrowers to qualify at a higher interest rate than they would actually pay.

This cocktail proved poisonous for first-time homebuyers. High house prices, harder qualification criteria and lower earning potential forced first-time homebuyers to get creative, finding new ways to afford homes.

Today, the government is looking at two new policy changes that could have an impact on first-time homebuyers.

A return to 30-year insured mortgages for first-time homebuyers

Currently, the longest you can take to pay back an insured mortgage (mortgage insurance is usually required when you have a down payment of less than 20%) is 25 years. But one policy change the government says they’re looking at is increasing that limit to 30 years.

This is a boon to affordability, at least at the qualification level. Ratehub’s mortgage payment calculator shows that the monthly payment on a $500,000 mortgage at today’s best rate of 3.29% will be $2,441 when amortized over 25 years, or $2,181 when amortized over 30 years. Since mortgage affordability is based on a fraction of your income, a lower payment equals a higher purchase price you can qualify for.

But there’s a significant downside. The obvious is the additional 5 years of mortgage payments later in life. If you’re over 35, signing a new 30-year mortgage could keep you making payments into retirement. Continue Reading…

Are current beliefs about RRSPs costing Canadians money in the long term?

Posted By |

By Edward Kholodenko

Special to the Financial Independence Hub

A recent study we conducted with Leger (www.leger360.com) asking what Canadians wanted in relation to their RRSP investments unearthed some compelling findings demonstrating that many Canadians have misconceptions that could be costing them money, especially in the long term.

Our research confirmed 78 per cent would be willing to switch to a lower-fee RRSP investment, if the lower fees could ensure a superior rate of return.  When we asked if they were able to move their RRSP easily, which factors would be most important, 66 per cent once again said they would move accounts for lower fees and better returns.

In addition to lower fees and higher returns, 31 per cent of people we talked to identified the ability to easily manage their RRSPs and make contributions online as a factor to consider in a switch (highest in those between the ages of 25 – 44 years), speaking perhaps to the rising appeal of newer fintech companies who offer the ability to do everything online.

When asked for other reasons they might consider switching their RRSPs, respondents cited frustrations including feeling like they’re being upsold (28 per cent), having to book an appointment and visit their financial institution in person (27 per cent) and not knowing what their RRSP is invested in (26 per cent).

This strongly suggests Canadians are far from content with their current RRSP contribution process and provider and would be willing to switch; however, there are misconceptions that are holding people back.  Most interesting — only 50 per cent believe their RRSPs can easily be transferred between financial institutions.

Common misconceptions

Why? Common misconceptions included high transfer fees (32 per cent), incurring a tax penalty (24 per cent) and even the fear of an uncomfortable conversation with their current advisor or financial institution (16 per cent).  While only 50 per cent of Canadians told us that they believe their RRSP can be easily moved between financial institutions, the reality is that RRSPs are easy to transfer.  There are no tax penalties incurred when an account is transferred and furthermore, most institutions would cover the cost of any transfer fee that may be charged and by consolidating your RRSPs at an institution with lower fees, you may reach your retirement goals faster. Continue Reading…

5 common financial mistakes Millennials are making

Posted By |

By Noel Gonzales

Millennials have many opportunities in their hands today. With their skills and talent, they can earn more and do more with their lives. However exciting this is, it also becomes quite a challenging task for millennials to use wisely what they have.

Today’s trends on consumerism entice people to buy and spend more when they earn more, and this is where the trap of debt begins. Aside from this, here are five other common financial mistakes that millennials are making:

1.) Millennials don’t invest in the stock market or other financial markets

Millennials are tech-savvy, and most own a smartphone. Hence, investing in the stock market is not difficult to do nowadays. However, a lot of people, including millennials, still consider traditional savings as the way to go; they’re unaware that stocks grow more income than savings.

If you’re confused with how to start, you can take advantage of online resources and tools that can do the following:

  • Teach the basics of financial markets and investing.
  • Maximize your income, like a great position size calculator, that decides the estimated amount of currency units to buy or sell.

In investing, the younger you start, the better. If you start early, you’d surely thank your young and smart self 10 years from now.

2.) Millennials don’t invest in health insurance

Health insurance is a good investment for your future, as you have a shield that covers all your costs in the event of any health issues. Remember, health is your greatest asset. Illness can be very expensive, but when you have health insurance, your expenses are covered and you can focus on recovering.

There are now easy payment plans on health insurance, depending on your salary. You’ll be surprised to know that paying your insurance premiums can cost you less than the money you spend on your daily coffee run.

3.) Millennials don’t have an emergency fund  

As a millennial, you’re at the top of your health and age. Hence, you forego saving for an emergency fund. An emergency fund refers to money set aside to cover:

  • Emergency travel, such as when you need to go home because a family member died
  • Home repairs after a natural disaster
  • Sudden job loss

You should have at least three to six months’ worth of your monthly expenses as savings for emergencies. For example, if you spend a total of 500 USD every month to cover living expenses, home loan, etc., 3000 USD should be your emergency fund.

4.) Millennials don’t write a monthly budget

Not writing down a monthly budget is a mistake that can lead you to overspend. When you write your budget down, you can visualize it better and stick to it; hence, you know where and how to allocate your money efficiently. Continue Reading…

Which All-in-one, One-ticket Portfolio Is right for you?

Posted By |

By Dale Roberts, CuttheCrapInvesting

Special to the Financial Independence Hub

In February 2018 Vanguard Canada changed the investment game in Canada with the launch of complete Balanced Portfolios that you can purchase by entering one ticker symbol. For example, once logged into your discount brokerage account you would enter the symbol VBAL, and press buy to get a complete globally diversified Balanced Portfolio. The Portfolio is 60% Canadian, US and International stocks with 40% of those shock absorbers known as bonds.

Vanguard offers One-ticket Portfolios at five different risk levels.  With an MER of .22% these portfolios are a game changer. (In the pie charts below, Orange shows equities and blue fixed income percentages). 

 

iShares has also had One-ticket solutions available for several years. The asset allocation was ‘weird’ and the fees were not that low. considering the low fees on the underlying ETF assets. In response to Vanguard, iShares recently took the scrub brush to the funds, cleaned up the asset allocations and then cut the fees. In fact they undercut Vanguard just slightly with an MER of .20%. Here’s the link to the iShares product page; this will take you to XBAL, their Balanced Portfolio.

And then last week along comes one of the big banks with their own One-ticket offering. Here’s my review at the Hub: BMO keeps it simple with its One-ticket Portfolio Solutions.

 

 

The one-ticket solutions are the most cost-effective managed portfolios available in Canada. This should be the final dagger in the heart of the high fee mutual fund industry.

Which One-ticket provider is best?

Let’s call it a draw. The portfolios are equally great. They include the basic and sensible asset allocation building blocks of Canadian, US and International stocks supported by a bond component. All the One-ticket providers use Canadian and foreign bonds to manage the risks.

How to select the right portfolio

Nothing is more important than investing within our risk tolerance level. We could argue it is the most important ‘part of it all.’ The Portfolios do not come with an owner’s manual for when and how to use them. Matching the appropriate portfolio to your risk tolerance level, time horizon and objective is key.

We have to invest within our risk tolerance level; bad things happen when we invest outside of our comfort level – usually permanent losses. We must be comfortable with the percentage and dollar value that the portfolio could decline.

Are you comfortable with a portfolio that could decline by 5% in a major correction, 10%, 20%, 30%, 40% or 50%?

Remember those bonds work like shock absorbers to soften the blow and smooth out the ride during periods when the stock markets tank.  And tank they can; Canadian and US and International markets have declined by some 50% or more twice in the last 20 years. Continue Reading…