Debt & Frugality

As Didi says in the novel (Findependence Day), “There’s no point climbing the Tower of Wealth when you’re still mired in the basement of debt.” If you owe credit-card debt still charging an usurous 20% per annum, forget about building wealth: focus on eliminating that debt. And once done, focus on paying off your mortgage. As Theo says in the novel, “The foundation of financial independence is a paid-for house.”

Doing the math on investment fees: the math isn’t pretty

Posted By |

A few weeks ago I invited readers to share their portfolio details with me so I could help ‘do the math’ on their investment fees. Many of you did, and the results weren’t pretty. From accounts loaded with deferred sales charges (DSCs), management expense ratios (MERs) in the high 2 per cent range, and funds overlapping the same sectors and regions, it was a predictable mess of over-priced products.

The worst of the bunch: the number of portfolios filled with segregated funds.

I’ve highlighted segregated funds as the biggest offender when it comes to fees for two reasons:

1.) The MER on segregated funds are higher than most mutual funds (which we know are already high enough). I looked at one portfolio that held a suite of segregated funds from Industrial Alliance called Ecoflex, with MERs of 2.99, 3.26, and 3.29 per cent;

2.) Segregated funds were exempt from CRM2 disclosure rules because they are considered insurance products. Investors receive the fund facts sheet, which still express fees in percentage terms rather than breaking them down and disclosing in dollar terms.

Doing the math on your investment fees

 

Keep in mind most readers were looking for me to do the math on their investment fees for portfolios valued at $250,000 or more. One reader, a soon-to-be retiree, had an average MER of 3.13 per cent for his $412,000 portfolio.

I told him he paid nearly $13,000 in investment fees last year and asked if he thought he was getting good value for his fees. He said he hadn’t met with his advisor in three years, despite repeated attempts to get together to discuss his retirement plan.

Another reader held $300,000 in high-fee mutual funds with Investors Group. She recognized the fees, but was on the fence about switching because she was in the middle of the deferred sales charge schedule:  a penalty that would cost her $10,000 if she sold the funds and transferred to a robo-advisor. Continue Reading…

What is a Mortgage Vacation?

Posted By |

By Sean Cooper

Special to the Financial Independence Hub

Do you enjoy going on vacation? Who doesn’t? So, the term “mortgage vacation” has to be something similar, right? When you hear mortgage vacation, you’re probably picturing yourself laying on a warm, sandy beach, drinking an umbrella drink. Well I hate to break it to you, but although you got the vacation part right, you forgot the most important part: the mortgage part.

A mortgage vacation is a feature that lets you skip paying mortgage payments for up to a few months, but with a catch. You have to prepay the amount in advance. In an era where savings rates are near record lows and household debt is near a record high, mortgage vacations have become a popular feature with mortgage lenders. Who needs to save for a rainy day when you have a mortgage vacation?

A mortgage vacation can help you out when you run into financial difficulty or when you want to use your cash flow towards something else. But as the saying goes, there’s no such thing as a free lunch. By planning ahead of time, you can avoid taking a mortgage vacation and still be on your way to burning your mortgage.

What is a Mortgage Vacation?

If you’re like most homeowners, you’re introduced to mortgage vacations in this way. You get a letter in the mail from your lender letting you know that you’ve been approved for a mortgage vacation. Yippee! The banks market mortgage vacations like they’re a privilege for their best clients, but as I mentioned earlier, there’s a catch. Hidden in the fine print is what happens when you skip your mortgage payment. Continue Reading…

My journey to Passive Index Investing, Part 2

Posted By |

By Dr. Networth

Special to the Financial Independence Hub

After reading My Journey to Passive Index Investing – Part 1, you may think that I have it in for financial advisors.  I don’t.   I believe the majority of financial advisors truly want to help their clients, but either their hands are tied or they have misguided beliefs.

The way financial advice compensation is structured creates a situation which, unfortunately, benefits the financial industry more than the individual investor.   There are also some financial advisors who truly believe active management beats out passive index investing over the long-term, despite high commissions/MERs and strong evidence which says otherwise.  Stay away from these financial advisors, since they have “drank the Kool-Aid.”

I believe a financial advisor with a CFP designation should have a fiduciary responsibility to create a comprehensive financial plan.  This includes insurance, estate planning, portfolio management (using low-cost ETFs/funds), as well as “holding your hand” during the inevitable market corrections.

Is advice worth 1 or 2% in fees?

How much is that worth?   This is a difficult question to answer. I don’t think it is worth the typical 1-2% in fees, which most banks and financial firms charge, especially if you have a large portfolio.  With the implementation of “Robo-advisors” and financial advisors that charge flat-fee or hourly-based (not tied to commissions on products), consumers are now beginning to have more choice for financial advice at a lower cost.

As you may recall, Part 1 ended with me as a newbie staff physician  in 2009 with little financial knowledge and an idea planted in my mind to “check out ETFs.”

It wasn’t until 2010 when I came across an article in the Globe and Mail, by Rob Carrick, where he rated the best personal finance blogs of 2010.  One of the blogs caught my eye: “Canadian Couch Potato,” written by Dan Bortolotti, which has been the best resource for index investing in Canada.

 

Through CCP, I came across another Canadian personal finance blogger by the name of Andrew Hallam, and his book “Millionaire Teacher.  The Nine Rules of Wealth You Should have Learned in School“, which was  originally published in 2011 (updated in 2017).

Hallam’s book is worth the price of admission,  since he has read a ton of personal finance/investing books, and has summarized succinctly in his book.  If you still have doubts whether passive investing beats active investing over the long-term those doubts will be put to rest after reading Chapter 3.   Physicians practice evidence-based medicine, because research backs it up.  The same concept should apply when it comes to investing. The enormous amount of evidence in favour of passive investing is, in my opinion, equivalent to a “Grade A” recommendation in evidence-based medicine. 

I have read my fair share of excellent finance books/blogs, but everything that you need to know about personal finances and index investing in Canada can be essentially found in these two resources.   If you read Hallam’s book and CCP’s blog (in particular his “Model Portfolios“), then you will:

  • Know more than the majority of financial advisors out there

  • Understand that the #1 determinant of your long-term investment returns is your asset allocation (% stocks: % bonds)

  • Understand that the #2 determinant of your long-term investment returns is to keep fees/MERs low by using low-cost index ETFs/funds, which will outperform the majority of actively-managed funds

  • Understand how to manage your own portfolio with low cost ETFs with minimal effort/time  

If you spend a bit of your time with these two resources, then you will eventually be able to save 1-2% MER each year by managing your own portfolio. 1-2% savings on a $1 million dollar portfolio will be $10,000-$20,000 per year, every year, for the rest of your life. That is a considerable amount of money which can be used on your family instead, such as taking 1 or 2 nice family vacation trips per year. For the equivalent amount, how many hours would you need to work at your job?

Once everything has been set up, you only require 30 minutes per month to manage this portfolio.  It really isn’t that difficult, as Loonie Doctor explains. However, taking that first step to managing your portfolio can be frightening and may fill you with self-doubt.   Comparable to a medical student learning a new procedure/skill – “See one, do one, teach one”.  These 2 resources will help you with the “See one” part.  At some point, you will need to take the plunge.   Follow that with sharing your knowledge with others, and you will become an “expert” in DIY passive index investing.

Analysis Paralysis

A point I would like to mention is the “law of diminishing returns” when it comes to learning about index investing.   After a certain point, any additional time spent learning about the nuances of index investing will probably not result in better returns, and may in fact, cause analysis paralysis: Continue Reading…

My journey to Passive Index Investing – Part 1

Posted By |
By Dr. Networth
Special to the Financial Independence Hub

“If I were you, I would check out ETFs.”

And that’s how it started.   An idea was planted in my head.   A little nudge from a friend of mine.   This was back in 2009, when Exchange-traded Funds (ETFs) were not widely known.   I had never heard of the term before, and I did not know much about investing apart from hearing whispers  that I should just go to MD Management, hand over my money and let them “handle it.”

I was just finishing up with residency/fellowship, and was about to embark on my first staff physician job.  Since my pay cheque was about to dwarf my resident’s salary, I figured I should probably know the basics about investing, so I asked my friend for his advice.   At the time, he was working as a financial advisor at Bank of Montreal (BMO) with “high-net worth clients” (portfolios over $1 million); thus he seemed like a good resource to start with.  Looking back, I am extremely grateful for his honesty and transparency, as he could’ve easily recommended that I hand over my money and let him “handle it.”

I asked him what he recommended to his “high-net worth clients” to invest in.   His answer: BMO mutual funds.  Made sense, since he was at BMO.

Not all advisors invest alongside their clients

Then I asked him what he invested his own money in.  To my surprise, he invested his own money in ETFs, and did not hold a single BMO mutual fund.  I had always thought “wealthy” clients had access to the “best” investment products, so naturally, he would have done the same.

What???   I was confused!

Paraphrasing his answer:   “At the beginning of each month, financial advisors are told to recommend specific mutual funds to their clients in order to meet quotas, which in turn results in bonuses/commission fees.   The funds usually have a high MER (2% and above).   It lines my pockets and the bank’s pockets.  If I were you, I would check out ETFs.”

Looking back, I realize my friend was not your typical financial advisor.  He enjoyed reading books on personal finance/investing topics, and was quite knowledgable about investing.  Needless to say, he become disillusioned with the banking industry with all the sales tactics and the commissions and quotas driven nature of it all.   Not long after our conversation, he left the banking industry to pursue a career in a different industry that made him much happier.

Continue Reading…

Lending to Spouse at Prescribed 1% rate ‘Best Before’ April 1

Posted By |

“Never spend your money before you have it.”
—Thomas Jefferson

I can’t emphasize enough that time is truly of the essence if you benefit from implementing this simple family lending practice. Interest rates are expected to inch up again and will alter the value of this tactic. Hence, I revisit the benefits of one of the few remaining family income splitting strategies.

It is commonly known as the “prescribed rate” loan. The procedure needs these components:

  • One spouse is in a lower tax bracket than the other, or earns little income.
  • The higher tax bracket spouse has cash to lend to the other spouse.

“The benefit of the prescribed loan strategy is a bigger family nest egg.”

Examine your family benefits from this income splitting opportunity. All loan arrangements and documentation must be in place by March 31, 2018 to derive maximum benefit. The key is to charge interest at least at the prescribed rate on cash loaned to a spouse/partner. That prescribed rate is now set at 1% for loan arrangements made by March 31, 2018.

The lower income spouse aims to accumulate a larger nest egg while the family pays less tax. The good news is that loans don’t have to be repaid for a long time, say 10 to 20 years or more.

My sample case highlights the income splitting strategy (figures annualized):

  • The higher tax bracket spouse lends $200,000 to the other at the 1% prescribed rate.
  • The recipient spouse invests the cash, say at 4% ($8,000) and reports the investment income.
  • The recipient must pay 1% annual interest ($2,000) to the lender spouse.
  • The lender spouse is taxed on the 1% interest, while the recipient deducts it.
  • The recipient is taxed on the net income generated ($8,000-$2,000).
  • This results in annual income of $6,000 shifted to the lower income spouse.
  • A promissory note is evidence for the loan.
  • A separate investment account is preferred for the recipient.
  • These loans are best made for investment reasons, such as buying dividend stocks.
  • A new 1% loan can also deal with an existing higher rate prescribed loan.
  • Multiple prescribed loans can be made at 1% while the rate does not change.
  • Business owners can investigate the viability of prescribed loans to shareholders.

Prescribed Rate Loan – Sampler

Here is a simplified method to think of such loans:

Cash Borrowed at 1% rate:  $200,000
Assumed Investment Income (4%): $8,000
Less: Prescribed Loan Interest (1%): $2,000
Taxable Income for Borrower Spouse: $6,000
Taxable Interest for Lender Spouse: $2,000

The benefit of the prescribed loan strategy is a bigger family nest egg. Your mission is to shift investment income into the hands of the lowest taxed spouse.

Need for speed

Today’s prescribed rate, which is set quarterly, is as low as it can be. However, it is most likely to rise at the next setting later this month. The prevailing expectation is a jump to 2% from the current 1% rate on April 01, 2018. Such an increase reduces the net value of the loan arrangement. Further, we may not enjoy a 1% rate for a long time, perhaps never again. Continue Reading…