Decumulate & Downsize

Most of your investing life you and your adviser (if you have one) are focused on wealth accumulation. But, we tend to forget, eventually the whole idea of this long process of delayed gratification is to actually spend this money! That’s decumulation as opposed to wealth accumulation. This stage may also involve downsizing from larger homes to smaller ones or condos, moving to the country or otherwise simplifying your life and jettisoning possessions that may tie you down.

Lending to Spouse at Prescribed 1% rate ‘Best Before’ April 1

Posted By |

“Never spend your money before you have it.”
—Thomas Jefferson

I can’t emphasize enough that time is truly of the essence if you benefit from implementing this simple family lending practice. Interest rates are expected to inch up again and will alter the value of this tactic. Hence, I revisit the benefits of one of the few remaining family income splitting strategies.

It is commonly known as the “prescribed rate” loan. The procedure needs these components:

  • One spouse is in a lower tax bracket than the other, or earns little income.
  • The higher tax bracket spouse has cash to lend to the other spouse.

“The benefit of the prescribed loan strategy is a bigger family nest egg.”

Examine your family benefits from this income splitting opportunity. All loan arrangements and documentation must be in place by March 31, 2018 to derive maximum benefit. The key is to charge interest at least at the prescribed rate on cash loaned to a spouse/partner. That prescribed rate is now set at 1% for loan arrangements made by March 31, 2018.

The lower income spouse aims to accumulate a larger nest egg while the family pays less tax. The good news is that loans don’t have to be repaid for a long time, say 10 to 20 years or more.

My sample case highlights the income splitting strategy (figures annualized):

  • The higher tax bracket spouse lends $200,000 to the other at the 1% prescribed rate.
  • The recipient spouse invests the cash, say at 4% ($8,000) and reports the investment income.
  • The recipient must pay 1% annual interest ($2,000) to the lender spouse.
  • The lender spouse is taxed on the 1% interest, while the recipient deducts it.
  • The recipient is taxed on the net income generated ($8,000-$2,000).
  • This results in annual income of $6,000 shifted to the lower income spouse.
  • A promissory note is evidence for the loan.
  • A separate investment account is preferred for the recipient.
  • These loans are best made for investment reasons, such as buying dividend stocks.
  • A new 1% loan can also deal with an existing higher rate prescribed loan.
  • Multiple prescribed loans can be made at 1% while the rate does not change.
  • Business owners can investigate the viability of prescribed loans to shareholders.

Prescribed Rate Loan – Sampler

Here is a simplified method to think of such loans:

Cash Borrowed at 1% rate:  $200,000
Assumed Investment Income (4%): $8,000
Less: Prescribed Loan Interest (1%): $2,000
Taxable Income for Borrower Spouse: $6,000
Taxable Interest for Lender Spouse: $2,000

The benefit of the prescribed loan strategy is a bigger family nest egg. Your mission is to shift investment income into the hands of the lowest taxed spouse.

Need for speed

Today’s prescribed rate, which is set quarterly, is as low as it can be. However, it is most likely to rise at the next setting later this month. The prevailing expectation is a jump to 2% from the current 1% rate on April 01, 2018. Such an increase reduces the net value of the loan arrangement. Further, we may not enjoy a 1% rate for a long time, perhaps never again. Continue Reading…

Choose investments carefully when building dividend portfolios for long-term gains

Posted By |

A dividend portfolio should focus on high-quality stocks with a proven record of paying dividends

High-growth dividend stocks offer investors a measure of security. Dividends, after all, are much more stable than earnings projections. More important, dividends are impossible to fake: either the company has the cash to pay them or it doesn’t.

It’s important to make sound moves while building a dividend portfolio. That’s why we recommend looking for dividend stocks that have a strong position in their market and have a history of building revenue and cash flow.

The best stocks for your dividend portfolio dominate their markets

When we suggest dividend stocks for a portfolio we look for dividend stocks that have industry prominence, if not dominance. Our reasoning, besides brand recognition, is that major companies can influence legislation, industry trends, etc. to suit themselves. Minor firms can’t do that.

How to avoid sabotaging your dividend portfolio

You may decide to vary how much money you invest every year, depending on your view of the market outlook. But nobody can consistently guess right about the market outlook. Trying to do so is likely to cost you money about half the time.

If you invest more money in years when you’re confident about the economy or market, you may wind up buying more shares when prices are high. If you cut back on your investing in years when the outlook is uncertain, you’ll buy fewer shares when stock prices are low.

Investors may go so far as to try to improve their returns by taking money out of the stock market when they feel risk is high. They often get this urge after a few weeks or months of bad financial news or unsettling political developments. By then, however, the market may have already dropped enough to offset any negative developments.

Often, these temporary sellers wind up buying their way back into the market when the news has improved and stock prices have gone above the price where they sold.

Some brokers encourage this costly practice. From time to time, they may advise clients to “take some money off the table,” setting up a false analogy between investing and gambling. That’s in a broker’s interest. Continue Reading…

Budget 2018 aftermath: Holding passive investments inside Private Corporations

Posted By |

By Brad Smith and Tea Pupica-Terzic 

Special to the Financial Independence Hub

The 2018 Federal Budget confirms that the Government will move forward with the implementation of the December 13, 2017 proposals regarding the splitting of income by private company owners and their family members. The Budget, however, proposes two additional key measures regarding the taxation of passive investment income earned by a Private Corporation, a topic that was aggressively targeted by the July 2017 consultation paper on tax planning strategies involving private corporations.

The first measure focuses on limiting the access to the small business tax rate to private corporations earning a significant amount of passive income.[1]  Currently, the small business deduction limit allows for $500,000 of active business income to be taxed at a preferential small business tax rate. This $500,000 limit begins to be ground down once the taxable capital of an associated group of companies reaches $10,000,000; it is completely eliminated once the taxable capital of the group is $15,000,000.

Budget introduced new reduction mechanism on passive investment income

The Budget’s proposal introduces a new reduction mechanism, which will work in tandem with the aforementioned existing business limit reduction, based on the passive investment income earned by a private corporation and its associated group. Specifically, once a corporation and its associated members earn $50,000 of passive investment income in a given year, the small business deduction limit begins to be ground down, on a straight line basis, until the passive investment income reaches $150,000. At this point, the small business deduction limit would be ground down to nil. The new reduction will apply to taxation years that begin after 2018.

The second measure aims at correcting an unintended tax advantage currently enjoyed by some private corporations when paying out eligible dividends to their shareholders in situations where the refundable tax pool (aka refundable dividend tax on hand “RDTOH”) was generated from investment income that would need to be paid out as a non-eligible dividend. The Budget is creating a new account, called the eligible RDTOH account, which will include the tax paid on eligible portfolio dividends.

Otherwise, tax paid on investment income or on non-eligible portfolio investments will be included in the non-eligible RDTOH account. The ordering rule will dictate that a private corporation, in payment of non-eligible dividends, will first have to access the refundable tax in the non-eligible RDTOH pool before it can tap into the eligible RDTOH pool.  A payment of eligible dividends will only entitle the corporation to dividend refund to the extent of its eligible RDTOH pool. These new measures will also come into play after 2018.[2] Continue Reading…

Is fear keeping you out of the stock market?

Posted By |

The biggest concern for many investors is the fear of losing their money. The stock markets have shown some volatility the last few weeks, and the recent screaming headlines in the financial media do nothing but encourage panic.

Some people think the latest bull market has overvalued stocks and a major market meltdown is imminent. They are sitting on their cash and waiting for the right entry point.

According to a BlackRock survey, 70% of adults aged 25 to 36 are also clinging to cash assets. Apparently, these Millennials don’t have much trust in the stock market and are afraid of another large market crash. This puts them at risk of not having enough saved to enjoy a comfortable retirement.

It’s true. Investing in equities does carry risks. Market corrections (drop of about 10%) are common. Bear markets (drop of 20% or more) will likely occur during an investor’s lifetime.

Even a reasonably diversified portfolio of stocks lost about half of its value during the 2008-2009 market crash. However, avoiding equities completely isn’t the best strategy. The stock market can be good to investors who have the discipline.

What can you do to get over your stock market fears?

1.) Educate yourself

Combat your fears with knowledge. Learn the basics: how the markets work so you can prepare yourself for future market conditions. The more you know, the less afraid you become, but avoid information overload.

Stop reading the gloom and doom reports in the financial media. Your financial education should not come from the news media. They need something to report and tend to sensationalize short-term market events to grab our attention. Just because something appears in print doesn’t guarantee that the information is correct. Look for reliable sources.

Investing magazines and books can provide useful information.

Knowledge is freely available on the Internet. Basic investing information is available at sites like Get Smarter About Money and Canadian Securities Administrators. Some social media sites, forums and financial blogs are worthwhile if written by knowledgeable authors.

Lack of confidence and second guessing yourself can paralyze your decision making. If you’re afraid of picking the wrong investments, turn to a professional for help. You could also try one of the many well-publicized model portfolios that have yielded good returns.

2.) Take a long-term investing approach

The biggest fear of investing is losing a lot of money in a short period of time.

Investing is a long-term process and is most likely your only way to reach your long-term financial goals.

Consider the benefit of investing sooner rather than later. Time is on your side.

Don’t keep monitoring your portfolio. This is psychologically hard, but don’t let short-term losses bother you too much. No one likes losing money, but it will be temporary. You’re not going to need this money to survive tomorrow, or next month, will you?

Acknowledge short-term market risks, but trust in long-term historical gains and commit to long-term investments. Continue Reading…

Budget 2018: Pixie Dust

Posted By |

By Trevor Parry

Special to the Financial Independence Hub

While Bill Morneau’ s second federal budget can be described as a punt, this third foray can best be described as a “fart in the wind;” however,  given that this is a Justin Trudeau government, the term “pixie dust” seems far more appropriate.

The Budget included two major tax measures, one relatively substantial and the other curative.  The latter was a tweaking of the rules surrounding Refundable Dividend Tax on Hand (RDTOH) , dividing the pools into eligible and ineligible pools, thus corresponding with their according dividend. The more substantive measure was to introduce a measure that reduces the ability of a corporation (or its related entities) to claim the Small Business Deduction where “substantial” income has been earned of invested after tax profits.

The new rule would see a company’s SBD eroded by 5 dollars for each 1 dollar of passive income earned in excess of $50,000 each year.  If the company earns $150,000 per year in passive income it loses the entire SBD and is subject to General Rate taxation, effectively 26%.  The government claims that this will affect about 3% of businesses.  In the cases where the full SBD is lost the company will end up paying about $55,000 in additional corporate tax.  The same company would also be paying out eligible dividends, which will be taxed at lower personal rates by the shareholder.

Finance’s pragmatic policy wonks prevailed with the Small Business Deduction

I actually think that the more pragmatic policy wonks in the Department of Finance prevailed with regard to this measure.  The SBD was introduced to provide a tax incentive for small businesses to save and invest and by this process graduate to a medium sized or growing business.  The problem of course is that tax planners have for decades sought to freeze the status of a small business in place.  This can still be achieved by paying out shareholder bonuses, but given confiscatory personal rates in most of the provinces it is likely that trusted advisors will still the ability of a corporation to defer taxation and recommend that earnings continue to be retained.   The approach the government has taken is a more comprehensive approach to total corporate earnings.  It explicitly says to business owners and incorporated professionals that you can use your corporation as a retirement vehicle, or rainy day fund but you will be taxed as a more mature business.

There are of course planning measures that can be taken to avoid this new measure.  Permanent life insurance remains the last game in town with regard to significant tax deferral possibilities.  Given that the Department of Finance engaged in meaningful consultation in fashioning the substantive update of the “exempt test” rules in 2016 that no wholesale assault on life insurance is in the offing.

Instead, I think the Department will continue to observe the golden rule — “Pigs get fat and hogs get slaughtered” — in deciding what action is necessary.  Like the 10/8 strategy before, there are strategies being implemented today that clearly drift into the aggressive category.   The diversion of loan proceeds to a shareholder in an Immediate Finance Arrangement, or the rebating of commissions without their appropriate declaration of status as taxable income come to mind.

Individual Pension Plans only temporary remedy for new rules

Some might also trumpet the use of Individual Pension Plans.  IPP’s in the right instance are wonderful planning tools.  They are particularly useful for incorporated physicians who cannot plan retirement on the basis of an eventual sale of their professional corporations and who too often suffer from a lack of savings discipline.  Continue Reading…