Decumulate & Downsize

Most of your investing life you and your adviser (if you have one) are focused on wealth accumulation. But, we tend to forget, eventually the whole idea of this long process of delayed gratification is to actually spend this money! That’s decumulation as opposed to wealth accumulation. This stage may also involve downsizing from larger homes to smaller ones or condos, moving to the country or otherwise simplifying your life and jettisoning possessions that may tie you down.

Federal Budget 2019: Liberals unveil $22.8 billion in new spending in pre-election budget

Posted By |

Not surprisingly, the Liberals’ fourth federal budget released Tuesday afternoon is the predicted pre-election spendathon targeting the two big voting blocks of Seniors and Millennials. You may wish to refresh this link from time to time, or check my Twitter feed at @JonChevreau. Also check out FP Live’s “Everything you need to know about Federal Budget 2019.”

One of the first reports out was the CBC: Liberals table a pre-election budget designed to ease Canadians’ anxieties. It said that Morneau’s fourth budget includes $22.8 billion in new spending. The 460-page document is titled Investing in the Middle Class. Not surprisingly, the CBC noted, there is no timeline for erasing the Deficit, projected to be $20 billion next year, then falling to $15 billion two years later, and then to $10 billion in 2023-24.

First-time home buyers can tap RRSPs for $35,000

As predicted, the Budget targets Millennials who are finding it hard to get a foot on the housing ladder. It  boosts the amount of money that can be withdrawn from RRSPs for a first-time home purchase, from the previous $25,000 to $35,000 ($70,000 for couples). Low-income seniors will be able to keep more of the Guaranteed Income Supplement (GIS) if they opt to remain in the workforce and safeguards are being introduced to protect employer pensions in the event of bankruptcies.

Among other spending initiatives is ensuring access to high-speed Internet by 2030 across the country, $1.2 billon over three years to help First Nations children access health and social services, an additional $739 million over five years to repair water systems on First Nations reserves, and a federal purchase incentive of up to $5,000 for electric battery or hydrogen fuel cell vehicles with sticker prices below $45,000.

Little wiggle room in a Recession

The Financial Post’s Kevin Carmichael filed a piece headlined “Liberals leave themselves little wiggle room in the event of a recession.” And Andrew Coyne commented that “the federal budget is a testament to the pleasures of endless growth. Forget productivity, tax cuts or investment.” One of his colourful quips was this:

“I’ve said before that these are deficits of choice, rather than necessity. A better way to describe them might be deficits for show.”

The Globe noted that the $23-billion in new spending spans more than a hundred different areas, although the focus is on new home buyers and training programs for workers. Later this year there will be $1.25 billion (over 3 years) “First Time Home Buyer Incentive” managed by the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation. The Globe added that “CMHC would put up 10 per cent of the price of a newly constructed home and 5 per cent of an existing home, and share in the homeowner’s equity.” To qualify you must be a first-time home buyer with annual household income below $120,000.

8 ways personal finances will be affected: GIS, CPP & more

G&M personal finance columnist Rob Carrick listed 8 ways the budget will impact ordinary citizens’ finances. He noted that seniors receiving the GIS will be able to earn $5,000 without affecting benefits, up from $3,500, and that there will also be an additional 50% exemption of up to $10,000. Contributors to the Canada Pension Plan who are 70 and older and haven’t applied for benefits will be “proactively enrolled” starting next year. Carrick said Ottawa says about 40,000 people over 70 miss out on CPP benefits averaging $302 a month. He also writes that the tax break on stock options will be limited for employees of larger, mature companies (as opposed to startups), with annual caps of $200,000 on stock options eligible for preferential tax treatment. Continue Reading…

Enable, don’t label … but whatever you do don’t call them ‘seniors’!

Posted By |

By Yvonne Ziomecki, HomeEquity Bank

Special to the Financial Independence Hub

When you are a marketer you tend to look at advertising through a different lens than everyone else – sometimes you are critical, sometimes curious, and sometimes you just admire the genius.  But it’s hard to assess your own advertising through the same lens, especially when you are in your mid forties and the product you market is for people who are retired.  That’s when you call for help!

Last summer our company HomeEquity Bank, provider of CHIP Reverse Mortgages, launched new advertising campaign through a series of humorous ads developed and based on research insights, addressing the fact that older Canadians see themselves as active and able and completely in control of financial decisions related to their home.

Specifically: staying in the home they love.  Our research showed that 93%+ of older Canadians want to age in place.  We also learned that 80% of older Canadians don’t want to be called ‘Seniors’ and most prefer no labels to describe them or their peer group.

In order to better understand if our ads were hitting the mark we engaged the neuroscience research firm Brainsights to study the unconscious brain activity of 300 Canadian Boomers. Research participants were presented with approximately 1 hour of advertisements including our ads, other ads, movie trailers, promotional videos, etc.  Brainsights analyzed participants’ responses to all the content they saw. The findings revealed not only that many marketers were engaging in unconscious age bias, but also that Boomers were pushing back against offensive labels and aging stereotypes.

Research revealed 4 insights to help marketing resonate with Boomers:

•  Say goodbye to old age stereotypes. Today’s Boomers see themselves as being cheeky, mischievous, adventurous and capable. Old age stereotypes depicting 55+ Canadians as frail and fumbling will miss the mark. Continue Reading…

Pensionize your Nest Egg with Annuities, your Super Bonds

Posted By |

By Dale Roberts, CuttheCrapInvesting

Special to the Financial Independence Hub

Most Canadians do not have a defined pension with guaranteed income. Speaking of birds and nest eggs, those guaranteed pensions are going the way of the dodo bird. Just 33% of Canadians have a defined benefit workplace pension where the income is guaranteed and usually indexed to inflation.

That’s according to Pensionize Your Nest Egg: How to Use Product Allocation to Create a Guaranteed Income For Life.

There’s only one way for me and you to create a generous and guaranteed income stream and that’s by way of the annuity. It’s a topic and product category that gets little attention. And when it gets attention it’s often negative. Annuities are offered by insurance companies. Strike One. Annuities come with ‘high fees.’ Strike Two. Let’s not go to Strike Three; we want to keep this blog post alive. In the process we might keep your retirement in good shape as well.

Hear me out. I’ll admit that I have not been a fan of the annuity in the past. I’ll also admit that I knew very little about annuities. That’s always a good way to form an opinion, right? Give that thumbs down based on the headlines and 5 minutes of research. So please join me in a more than surprising and interesting discovery of just what the heck an annuity is.

With an annuity you simply purchase your own pension

Yup, it’s that simple. As an example, you hand over $100,000 and the insurance company will pay you monthly income, guaranteed for life. Of course that’s a Life Annuity. There are a few types of annuities, but for now we’ll stick to the most common and most popular annuity.

And of course the rates available will fluctuate based on a few factors. Here’s a site that will give you an idea of the rates available in today’s market.

In March of 2019 here are the rates for a Canadian single male. The payment is in the range of 6% annually for a male at age 65.

Annuity RatesYou can purchase an income stream for life. And of course, the longer you wait to purchase that annuity the greater your payments. You might stagger your annuity purchase(s) over many years and periods of your retirement. That’s typically the advice found in Pensionize Your Nest Egg and offered from advisors who Pensionize a portion of their clients’ nest eggs.

When you hand over your money, it’s a done deal

These are irreversible contracts. When you purchase an annuity you usually exchange control of those funds for guaranteed income for life. When you die, your money goes to the insurance company. To be exact, a portion of your monies goes to the survivors:  to those who purchased annuities and who might live to 85, 90, 95 or 100. That’s how insurance companies can afford to pay you rates that are well beyond the bond and GIC rates of the day. With an annuity the unlucky (the dead) pay for the lucky (the living).

In the above quote table there is a 10-year guarantee, meaning that the payment would continue for 10 years from time of purchase even in the event of an early death.

Many Canadians are living well into their 90s

And from the many tools available at pensionizeyournestegg.com here’s a shocking survivability table for a 65-year-old male.

Survivability TableFor a 65-year-old Canadian male there’s a 25% chance that they’ll live to age 94. Yikes. What side of the annuity grass will you be on? This table demonstrates why a certain level of guaranteed income might be a good idea. You might at least cover your basic living needs for life and projected oldage home payments with guaranteed income.

The 3 product allocation buckets

The main theme of Pensionize Your Nest Egg is to think product buckets, not traditional asset allocation that would normally include your mix of cash, GICs, stocks and bonds. Instead the theme and 3 buckets is …

  1. Guaranteed Income For Life.
  2. Guaranteed Income Plus Growth Potential.
  3. Asset Growth Potential (your personal portfolio) Continue Reading…

FP: How retired seniors can use their spouse as a tax asset

Posted By |

My latest Financial Post column has just been published in the print edition of the Wednesday paper (Feb. 27, page FP8), under the headline Top tax asset in Retirement? Think Spouse. Click on the highlighted text to access the full story  via the National Post e-paper. Or for the website edition, click on this clever headline: Your biggest tax asset in Retirement may be sleeping right beside you.

The column looks at how senior couples approaching Retirement or semi-retirement face a slightly different tax situation than when both were working in full-time jobs. There’s limited scope for income splitting when you’re working but Pension Income Splitting — introduced more than ten years ago — is a real boon for senior couples that enjoy one fat employer-provided pension and the other does not.

For tax purposes, up to half of the pension can be “transferred” to the lower-income spouse’s hands, thereby reducing some of the highly-taxed income for the pension recipient, and putting more of the pension into the low-taxed hands of the spouse receiving some of the transfer. Note this doesn’t actually mean they receive the pension: it all happens on the tax returns, and is easily handled by tax software when you choose to file your taxes jointly as a couple. Note that unlike in the United States, there is no formal joint tax return for couples in Canada: each spouse must file on their own but the tax software makes it relatively smooth by creating so-called “Coupled Returns,” which helps optimize who claims deductions like charitable or political contributions and the like.

Because the column has to fit in the paper and included several sources (some of whom blog here at the Hub), I’ve taken the liberty of adding some of the points made that did not appear in the column or had to be truncated.

Income splitting options limited under age 65

Under age 65, the options for income splitting are very limited, says Aaron Hector, vice president of Calgary-based Doherty Bryant Financial Strategies.  “Generally here you are only looking at payments out of defined benefit plans (of which  up to 50% can be split) or spousal loans from non-registered investments.”

Doherty Bryant’s Aaron Hector

More from Aaron Hector:  “If each spouse has their own registered plan (RRSP/RRIF/LIRA/LIF) then the withdrawal from their own personal plan can be taxed fully to them. So if one spouse is working, they may not need or want to draw any additional income from their registered plans, but the spouse who is not working can choose to draw down their registered plan. It is important to note that regular RRSP withdrawals will never qualify for income splitting, even after 65. The withdrawals need to come from a RRIF to be eligible for income splitting. Sometimes people are hesitant to convert their RRSPs into RRIFs because they don’t yet want to commit to the subsequent forced annual taxable RRIF withdrawals. What is less commonly known is that someone can convert only a portion of their RRSP into a RRIF, leaving the remaining RRSP balance untouched until it is forced into being converted into a RRIF by the end of the year in which they turn 71. Furthermore, if someone converts to a RRIF early (ie. before 71) then they will always have the option to convert their RRIF back into a RRSP anytime before 71. Doing so would allow them to ‘turn off the taps’ that is the RRIF income stream. Once you turn 65 (but not before) withdrawals from RRIFs and LIFs become eligible for income splitting. Only the spouse who’s RRIF/LIF is being drawn upon needs to be 65; the recipient of the income splitting can be younger than 65. However, in this case the recipient spouse will not get the “pension income tax credit” until they are also 65.

It’s also important to note that when it comes to these income splitting provisions, age 65 at any point of the year is sufficient. If you turn 65 on December 31, then the same 50% splitting provisions apply to you as if your birthday was on January 1. (ie. the splittable portion does not get pro-rated in the year you turn 65 depending on your specific birth date). Because of the age 65 significance, and also as a hedge against future governments changing the tax rules (ie. taking away pension income splitting rules, which have not always been allowable) I try to have my client couples have an even amount of money in their registered plans. Spouse 1 should add up their RRSP, LIRA, Spousal RRSP, etc.. and the total should be close to the same total of spouse 2. If there is a discrepancy, then Spousal RRSP contributions should be utilized to even things out. This allows flexibility in income planning and withdrawals in the years prior to age 65. I caution on Spousal RRSP contributions the closer someone is to needing the money because of the 3 year-rule. The 3-year rule is such that if a withdrawal is made in the year of a contribution, or either of the next two calendar years, then the income from that withdrawal will be attributed (ie. taxed) back to the contributing spouse instead of the Spousal RRSP account holder.”

Taxation of Non-registered income works differently

Income from non-registered accounts works a bit differently, Aaron notes: Continue Reading…

Are current beliefs about RRSPs costing Canadians money in the long term?

Posted By |

By Edward Kholodenko

Special to the Financial Independence Hub

A recent study we conducted with Leger (www.leger360.com) asking what Canadians wanted in relation to their RRSP investments unearthed some compelling findings demonstrating that many Canadians have misconceptions that could be costing them money, especially in the long term.

Our research confirmed 78 per cent would be willing to switch to a lower-fee RRSP investment, if the lower fees could ensure a superior rate of return.  When we asked if they were able to move their RRSP easily, which factors would be most important, 66 per cent once again said they would move accounts for lower fees and better returns.

In addition to lower fees and higher returns, 31 per cent of people we talked to identified the ability to easily manage their RRSPs and make contributions online as a factor to consider in a switch (highest in those between the ages of 25 – 44 years), speaking perhaps to the rising appeal of newer fintech companies who offer the ability to do everything online.

When asked for other reasons they might consider switching their RRSPs, respondents cited frustrations including feeling like they’re being upsold (28 per cent), having to book an appointment and visit their financial institution in person (27 per cent) and not knowing what their RRSP is invested in (26 per cent).

This strongly suggests Canadians are far from content with their current RRSP contribution process and provider and would be willing to switch; however, there are misconceptions that are holding people back.  Most interesting — only 50 per cent believe their RRSPs can easily be transferred between financial institutions.

Common misconceptions

Why? Common misconceptions included high transfer fees (32 per cent), incurring a tax penalty (24 per cent) and even the fear of an uncomfortable conversation with their current advisor or financial institution (16 per cent).  While only 50 per cent of Canadians told us that they believe their RRSP can be easily moved between financial institutions, the reality is that RRSPs are easy to transfer.  There are no tax penalties incurred when an account is transferred and furthermore, most institutions would cover the cost of any transfer fee that may be charged and by consolidating your RRSPs at an institution with lower fees, you may reach your retirement goals faster. Continue Reading…