General

Selling my U.S. stocks

Image from Pixabay

By Mark Seed, myownadvisor

Special to Financial Independence Hub

For many years on this site, I have highlighted various portfolio buys, sells and holds. Given those changes over the years related to How We Invest, I figured it might be interesting to share how I’ve actually sold off most of our U.S. stocks over the years in favour of a different approach.

Your mileage may vary – read on!

Is there an optimal mix of stocks for your portfolio?

In my book, there are many ways to build a responsible investment portfolio – there is no one-size fits all.

Here are some approaches to consider before we get to my answer on this question.

An Income Portfolio

An income portfolio may consist primarily of dividend-paying stocks, which are stocks from companies that pay out a portion of their profits to their shareholders. I like those companies and own many of those companies in Canada:

  • Banks
  • Utilities
  • Pipelines/energy
  • And more…

See chart. 🙂

July 2025 Dividend Income Update - Dividends Page

A Balanced Portfolio

A balanced portfolio invests in both stocks and bonds to reduce potential volatility.

Investors who are looking to navigate short-term stock market price fluctuations with moderate growth, might be well suited to this approach. An example would be something like owning 60% stocks and 40% bonds or fixed income. You can build a retirement portfolio with that blend. I’ve done some math on that based on a reader question.

A Growth Portfolio

This means investment income from your portfolio is not the main goal – almost at the other end of the income portfolio spectrum.

So, is there an optimal mix of stocks for your portfolio?

I believe the answer is “yes” and that answer is at the heart of your investment objectives.

These are the two key answers I’ve worked through over the years to land on our investment objectives as we approach full retirement in a few short years.

1. What are our financial goals?

One of our long-standing financial goals was the ability to live off dividends and distributions from part of our portfolio.

Our portfolio is designed to do just that.

2. What is our tolerance for risk?

Fairly high.

Our investment timeline has been measured in decades so….we’ve been close to 90% equities for a few years now. 

Otherwise, I’ve been on record many times on this site to share our near-term spending will be in cash / cash equivalents. That will be true for 2026 spending and it is our hope that will occur once again for 2027 spending as well – whereby we hope to avoid selling any part of our portfolio to fund living expenses in early retirement.

Selling my U.S. stocks

Years ago, I learned some important lessons in diversification. I learned some more U.S. stocks are better (to offset the Canadian stocks I continue to own) but not necessarily via individual U.S. stocks.

Gone are:

  • Procter & Gamble (PG)
  • Johnson & Johnson (JNJ)
  • Berkshire (BRK.B)
  • BlackRock (BLK)
  • NextEra (NEE)
  • And many more!

I’ve kicked most of our individual U.S. stocks to the curb over time in favour of owning more low-cost ex-Canada ETF XAW and tech ETF QQQ as my main equity ETFs in registered accounts for growth.

We only have a few remaining individual U.S. stocks left at the time of this post.

We own ETFs instead of individual U.S. stocks for these reasons: Continue Reading…

The Hidden Cost of Homeownership: How to avoid Debt

Image courtesy fotodestock/The HEQ Partners

By Shael Weinreb, Home Equity Partners

Special to Financial Independence Hub

Most Canadians live with debt; as of this year, the majority (75 per cent) of Canadian households are carrying some form of debt, including mortgages, credit cards, and loans.

And yet, some Canadians don’t recognize the warning signs. It’s easy to think debt only matters when it’s obvious, like missing a credit card payment. However, the warning signs are often subtle, like avoiding bills, delaying home repairs, or feeling stressed when you check your bank account.

Having debt isn’t inherently bad. Paying off your credit card in full each month is a controlled use of credit. The danger comes when you spend more than you earn, miss payments, or carry growing balances, which can threaten your financial independence.

The Burden on Homeowners

For homeowners, your house is your largest asset, but also your biggest liability. When you can’t afford regular upkeep or emergency repairs, small issues can quickly snowball into big bills. A leaking roof, broken furnace, or failing appliance becomes more than an inconvenience, it can result in major costs.

Beyond the financial pressure, studies are continuing to show a strong link between debt and its negative impact on mental health.Nearly half of Canadians (48 per cent) have lost sleep due to financial worries. To boot, 38 per cent of Canadians stress about their personal finances on a weekly basis. Many families are forced to make impossible choices between replacing a broken air conditioner or selling a car. Debt is a hidden shame that leads people to suffer in silence and delay critical decisions.

Why aspiring Homeowners should pay Attention

Debt doesn’t just impact people who already own property. It can also stand in the way of becoming a homeowner. Mortgage lenders look closely at your debt-to-income ratio. If your debt is too high relative to your income, you may not qualify for a loan at all. Even if you do qualify, the added expenses of property ownership, from insurance and taxes to unexpected repairs, can become overwhelming.

For many Canadians, the dream of owning a home becomes a financial trap if there isn’t enough cushion built in to handle the inevitable surprises that come with it.

Five steps to Stay Ahead

Whether you’re a homeowner or planning to become one, these steps can help protect your finances, and your peace of mind: Continue Reading…

Summer Reads 2025: Booking Up on Ageing & Longevity

By Mark Venning, ChangeRangers.com

Special to Financial Independence Hub

For this my 8th year of suggested titles for “booking up” in the subject area of ageing and longevity there’s only one book in a stack of others on unrelated subjects.

As I observed last year, with countless new books in this subject area arriving each year, sometimes I find a scarcity of new books that help to move the societal conversation, for I tend to lean towards those which focus that way, and those that offer an age inclusive global perspective where possible.

First up then, published in Australia, is The Age-friendly Lens (2023) a ‎ Routledge collection of essays/case studies edited by Christie M. Gardiner &Eileen O’Brien Webb, compiled in 2 parts; Age-friendly Systems and Age-friendly Housing & Accommodation. The chapters feature insights from around the world: Canada, Netherlands, Poland and Australia for example. In part as the introduction says, this book is “recommended reading for policy makers, politicians, think tanks and lobbyists who are all-age-inclusiveness.”

For a taste, Chapter 13 is available in Open Access on Taylor Francis Publishing:  International standardisation of products and services for ageing societies: Promoting the global application of an age- friendly lens. I promote this as it is written by a team of members on the ISO TC314 Ageing Societies Standards Committee, of which I am a relatively new contributing member represented in Canada on the Standards Council of Canada.

As somewhat of a connection off centre from this age-friendly lens, as it relates to age-friendly cities, I mention this next book on my summer reading list, new this summer: Messy Cities: Why We Can’t Plan Everything (2025) a collection of over 40 short essays edited by Dylan Reid, Zahra Ebrahim, Leslie Woo & John Lorinc – asking myself to wonder, how does messy work when we consider the design of an age-friendly or age inclusive city?

Urbanist admired Toronto

In Dylan Reid’s “sneak peek” of this book about messy urbanism, on his Desire Lines Substack, the story is told about how urbanist James Rojas came to Toronto in 2007 and admired it for the “sort of less than manicured quality to the whole thing … and coupled with a huge diversity of people, the city ends up feeling gloriously messy, in a functional and walkable way.”

Well Toronto, my original home city, is still messy, a 2025 version one can observe. And not to be disturbed, while I wait for this book to arrive this week, I have directed myself to inspect Reid’s 2010 essay Bless This Mess,  which will tone me up in the meantime. Continue Reading…

Canadians with expensive mutual funds need to learn about ETFs

 

Deposit Photos

By Dale Roberts

Special to Financial Independence Hub

Canadians pay some of the highest investment fees on the planet. Most of the Canadian mutual funds charge very high fees. Those fees directly reduce your returns. Too much of the investment returns end up in the wrong pockets. The very good news is that in 2025 you can move to very good, very simple and very inexpensive investment options. Cutting your fees from the 2.0% area to 0.20% or lower is life-changing. It could even double your retirement nest egg. Who doesn’t want to retire with twice the financial security, twice the lifestyle? Canadians should avoid most mutual funds. It’s so easy to leave your mutual funds and your advisor behind; you can move to a better place.

Most Canadian mutual funds are offered by salespersons, not qualified advisors. These advisors at Canadian banks and other sales shops for the high-fee funds have very low investment knowledge. Their only concern is selling you a product and lining their own pockets.

Beat the bank at their own game

That’s the premise and the truth told by former banker Larry Bates. Larry outlines just how poor are Canadian mutual funds, and the mutual fund industry. Have a read of …

Don’t give away half of your investments – Beat the Bank.

On wealth destruction Larry offers a humorous ‘quote’.

My investments put three kids through University. Unfortunately, they were my advisors’ kids – Anonymous

And there’s the crux, the punchline. When Canadians pay those high fees that average 2.2% annual or more, over an investment lifetime they will give away half of their investment wealth. Don’t be that investor. Don’t let your portfolio get crushed by fees.

Canada’s largest mutual funds, not so bad?

Canada’s largest mutual funds are offered by Canada’s largest bank – Royal Bank of Canada. When I first looked at the RBC Select Funds, including the RBC Select Balanced Portfolio I suggested they were ‘not so bad.’  But over time the fees and poor portfolio management continue to take their toll.

In that post I compare the RBC funds to a simple and superior low-fee approach, using an ETF portfolio. An ETF is an exchange traded fund.

  • Over the last three years the iShares Balanced ETF Portfolio (XBAL.TO) is up 7.4% compared to 5.2% for the RBC Balanced Fund.
  • Over the last 5 years the iShares Balanced ETF Portfolio (XBAL.TO) is up 7.7% compared to 6.2% for the RBC Balanced Fund.

Scorecard: over the last 3 years the RBC fund underperformed by an average of 2.2% annually. Over the last 5 years the RBC fund underperformed by an average of 1.5% annually.

You’ll find other comparisons to RBC Select and dividend funds in that post link.

How bad are TD mutual funds?

Canada’s second largest bank says ‘hold my beer.’ I can take your poor performance and go one better. This past week I looked at TDs very popular portfolio solutions known as the “Comfort” Portfolios. Once again, this is an attempt to create a diversified global balanced portfolio in one offering. A one-fund solution.

Check out the GIC rates at EQ Bank

I compared the Comfort Portfolios to a simple Canadian ETF Portfolio. The following table lists the average annual returns.

The underperformance is tragic. We see the TD portfolios underperforming simple ETF models by 2%, 2.5%, 3.o% annual and more.

Earn 50% more? Double your money over mutual funds?

With an additional 2.5% annual over a 20-year period, you could retire with 59% more. Over a 25-year period you’re talking 80% more. Over 30 years we move to ‘twice as much.’

For the above, I used a simple investment calcuator comparing 6% and 8.5% annual returns. In the investment world your return advantage could be greater or less given the sequence of returns. But it gives us a very good idea of the potential for greater returns, and a much richer lifestyle in retirement.

How to invest in ETFs

lf you’re new to the Exchange Traded Fund (ETF) concept please have a read of …

What is index investing?

An Exchange Traded Fund will allow you to own the companies within a market index, for example the TSX Composite (the Canadian stock market) in one fund, ticker symbol XIC. The fee for buying the Canadian stock market is 0.06%. Yes you read that right, that’s 6/100th of one per cent. Continue Reading…

The lowdown on Trump, tariffs and investing according to Diane Francis

Diane Francis is a Toronto-based journalist who began her career as a financial writer before branching out into geopolitics. She publishes a twice-weekly newsletter that has readers in 106 countries around the world. Born in the United States, Francis is a dual citizen possessing unique expertise that allows her to comment on the intersection of economics and politics. She was recently John De Goey’s guest on his podcast “Make Better Wealth Decisions” (https://make-better-wealth-decisions.captivate.fm/listen) and offered some candid thoughts about investing in a time of great uncertainty and upheaval.

De Goey is a portfolio manager with Designed Securities in Toronto. “Make Better Wealth Decisions” is a popular, twice-weekly podcast about investing and money management.

Early in the interview De Goey asked Francis about this confluence of economics and politics, and how one should make decisions when there are so many unknowns out there. Francis responded by referring to her days as a financial writer when she wanted to find out what was going on in a particular country.

Diane Francis (LinkedIn)

“I would call an investment banking analyst who covered that area,” she said. “They know more about what’s going on in that country than any politicians or any journalists because they’re making dollar decisions on whether to buy the bonds, sell the bonds, buy the stocks or get involved in the private investment in that country. So I realized that was one of the most important pillars underlying how you should invest.”

She has brought this expertise to her work as a journalist. Francis is a columnist and Editor-at-Large for The National Post in Canada, and also writes for the Kyiv Post in Ukraine, and Ukraine Alert at the Atlantic Council’s Eurasia Center in Washington, D.C., not to mention the Huffington Post, New York Post, among others. What’s more, she holds an MBA and is a CPA as well. And she is a former U.S. Army Intel Analyst.

How downgraded U.S. credit rating could affect investors

De Goey pointed out to his listeners that she has written a number of books and one of the first, published back in 1990, was The Diane Francis Inside Guide to Canada’s 50 Best Stocks. Their discussion then moved into the U.S. credit rating being downgraded and how this might affect investing. Francis said it’s a concern when investing in bonds, but not so much in stocks, and shouldn’t matter if you invest outside the U.S.

She then revealed some insights about her own investing in lieu of European countries now boosting their military expenditures. She said she bought into companies in Germany that are involved in the military area and called them “winners.” By the same token, she said she has invested in Taiwan SemiConductor (TSMC) and made money doing that.

De Goey moved on to what he called the ‘Donroe Doctrine’ and Trump’s realigning of the world order. He mentioned the acronym that has been making the rounds in some media – TACO – for Trump Always Chickens Out when it comes to tariffs. But Francis said he doesn’t chicken out because it’s just a negotiating tactic on his part.

TACO vs TUDIE

“The tariff strategy is quite interesting and I know a lot of people won’t agree with me but I think it’s brilliant,” Francis said. “It’s ruthless and it’s not nice to do to trading partners but imagine what he’s done. He’s harnessed the buying power of the richest country in the history of the world and he’s beating the people who want to supply it with stuff over the head, asking them for bargains in the form of tariffs.”

De Goey used an acronym that he himself coined – TUDIE – for Trump Usually Does It Eventually. Francis didn’t disagree with that assessment and said Canada must do more than whine about the tariffs. She said we should do what Japan and South Korea did, namely, make deals to get their tariffs lowered. She added that Canada is teetering on a recession largely as a result of the Trump tariffs, but criticized Canada’s own policies over the years with such things as immigration, the military, lack of NATO commitments, etc.

The conversation moved on to countries retaliating against the U.S. with tariffs of their own and a possible trade war. De Goey brought up the tariffs that were levied back in the 1930s by the United States and the retaliation that ensued, leading to a global trade war and deepening what was already a severe recession and, ultimately, the Great Depression. Francis had some definite views about that. In fact, she didn’t think a global trade war is coming at all.

Tariff Retaliation is stupid

“I think retaliation is stupid,” she said. “You can’t retaliate. America is Canada’s biggest customer, supplier and investor. You can’t shoot yourself in the foot. I think this is a negotiation. You give. You take.”

She said there still remains a lot of good will between the U.S. and Canada. Before the interview closed, De Goey wanted to get into the war in Ukraine. As a journalist, Francis has been to Ukraine some 30 times and often writes about that war today. She said European countries are finally smartening up by boosting their militaries, and further, that we are at the “beginning of the end” of this war, adding that Trump’s new stance with Putin is a positive development. Francis has hopes for what she called a “semi-permanent ceasefire” but said Ukraine may have to lose 20% of its land in the process. But real peace, she said, will require boots on the ground for security purposes and NATO membership for Ukraine which she said could be one of the most dynamic economies in all of Europe.

When De Goey asked her about which interpersonal relationships are key, her answer was simple. “What’s your relationship with the Trump government?” Francis said. “This is the most powerful country in the history of the world from a military and economic viewpoint, and he was duly elected.” However, Francis does hold grave concerns about Trump’s relentless bashing of Fed Chairman Jerome Powell.

Said Francis: “As an investor I want to know what is going to be resolved over the Fed Chairman being taunted or fired by Trump. That will affect every country in the world.”

John De Goey, CIM, CFP, FP Canada™ Fellow, is a Portfolio Manager with Toronto-based Designed Wealth Management. He is the author of three books on the financial industry: The Professional Financial Advisor, Standup to the Financial Services Industry and most recently, Bullshift.  You can find John’s personal website here