General

VBAL vs. Mawer Balanced Fund for One-stop investing

Posted By |

Investors could have done a lot worse over the past 30 years than investing in the Mawer Balanced Fund. Mawer, which epitomizes the art of boring investing, has been nothing short of consistently brilliant: with annual returns of 8.5 per cent since the fund’s inception in 1988.

Investment giant Vanguard doesn’t have the same longevity or track record here in Canada, but its launch of the Vanguard Balanced ETF portfolio (VBAL) gives investors another one-stop investing option.

This post will go under the hood and compare VBAL to the Mawer Balanced Fund for investors looking for a one-stop investing solution for the next two to three decades.

About Vanguard

Vanguard is legendary in the United States and is largely credited for pioneering low-cost index investing. It came to Canada in December, 2011 and now offers nearly 40 ETFs and four mutual funds to Canadian investors with a total of $17 billion in assets under management (Dec 2018).

VBAL was introduced by Vanguard Canada in January, 2018 as part of a new suite of asset allocation ETFs (including VGRO and later VEQT). These funds have proven popular among Canadian investors and have collectively gathered more than $1 billion in assets.

Before their introduction, investors did not have access to a one-stop ETF solution. Instead, they’d have to build multi-ETF portfolios to get exposure to Canadian, U.S., and International equities, plus another ETF or two for fixed income.

Vanguard turned that around with what I’ve called a game-changing investing solution. VBAL represents the classic 60/40 portfolio.

Vanguard Balanced ETF (VBAL)

VBAL is a fund of funds. That means its underlying holdings are made up of other Vanguard funds. So rather than seeing a bunch of individual stocks and bonds in VBAL’s holdings, you’ll instead see these seven products:

  • Vanguard US Total Market Index ETF
  • Vanguard Canadian Aggregate Bond Index ETF
  • Vanguard FTSE Canada All Cap Index ETF
  • Vanguard FTSE Developed All Cap ex North America Index ETF
  • Vanguard Global ex-US Aggregate Bond Index ETF CAD-hedged
  • Vanguard US Aggregate Bond Index ETF CAD-hedged
  • Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets All Cap Index ETF

The fund’s mandate is to maintain a long-term strategic asset allocation of equity (approximately 60%) and fixed income (approximately 40%) securities. It’s as diversified, globally, as you can get: with a whopping 12,318 stocks and 15,412 bonds wrapped up inside this one-stop balanced ETF.

VBAL Holdings

VBAL has net assets of $675 million (June 30, 2019). Its distribution or dividend yield is 2.58 per cent (dividends paid quarterly). Its management expense ratio or MER is 0.25 per cent.

Investors can purchase VBAL through a discount brokerage account and it is an eligible investment inside an RRSP, RRIF, RESP, TFSA, DPSP, RDSP, or non-registered account.

VBAL’s performance data only goes back to its inception date of January 24, 2018. It has returned 4.05 per cent annualized since that time, and 10.44 per cent year-to-date (July 30, 2019).

Justin Bender, a portfolio manager at PWL Capital, has simulated the returns as if the fund did exist for the past 20 years and found the following annualized returns (as of June 30, 2019):

  • 1-year return – 5.09%
  • 3-year return – 7.22%
  • 5-year return – 6.62%
  • 10-year return – 7.95%
  • 20-year return – 5.34%

You can read more about VBAL and its fact sheet and prospectus here.

About Mawer

If Vanguard is legendary for pioneering low cost investing, Mawer has achieved cult-like status among active investors for an incredible track record of outperforming its benchmarks. Mawer was founded in 1974. It’s a privately owned, independent investment firm, managing over $55 billion in assets. Mawer has locations in Toronto, Calgary, and Singapore.

While its philosophy is ‘be boring,’ Mawer’s performance is anything but. Of its 13 mutual funds, eight have beaten their benchmark index since inception: including the Mawer Balanced Fund, which trounced its benchmark over the last decade (9.9 per cent to 7.8 per cent). Continue Reading…

Debt Review: How Debt Relief options affect your Credit

Posted By |

By Jackson Maven

Special to the Financial Independence Hub

“Debt,” though a small word, has a deeper impact. Settling debt makes people worried and sometimes may even disturb their entire finances. There are numerous ways by which one can settle debt, but the concern remains to find a way that would not cause any negative impact on Credit.

This article we will discuss ways in which the debt relief plan may affect your credit.

1.) Is Debt Settlement a good idea?

Debt settlement may cost a fortune for some; whereas, others may end up paying less than what they owed.

Non-payment of credit-card bills or other amounts due to the creditors for six months or more, worries creditors. In such a situation, you can make a debt settlement offer to your creditors. Here you can offer to pay the minimum amount that you can easily pay, against the total amount due. If your creditors want to close your account and are looking forward to getting whatever amount possible, they might accept the offer. On the contrary, if they demand full repayment, they may either transfer your case to a collection agency or may even take you to court.

2.) A few things to remember

Debts constitute a third of the credit score. Paying off debts helps in improving this part of the credit score. Impact of debt on the credit score depends on many factors. Hence, if you want to know the impact of debt on your credit score, you need to have a complete understanding of your credit history. Based on this, you can select the debt relief option that has the least impact on your credit score. Hence before selecting the credit relief option, a credit check is a must.

3.) Credit Utilization Impact

Credit utilization = Ratio of Pending credit card payment/Total Credit Card Limit *100

Lower ratio of credit utilization is always welcome. Higher credit utilization ratio results in lower credit score. In addition to this, it also reflects that lending you money can be quite risky as you are already overextended.

Debt Relief Options

i) Counselling

You can opt for credit counselling. In this, you can discuss your debt situation with a professional counsellor. A counsellor can advise you the best way to pay off your debts. The best part is these counselling sessions would have no impact on the credit score. But, if your counsellor registers you in a management or repayment plan, then that plan may have some effect on your credit score. Continue Reading…

Retirement planning software and the 70% Rule

Posted By |

By Ian Moyer

(Sponsor Content)

Individuals who are following conventional retirement-planning may be in disbelief as they approach retirement and discover that they cannot afford to retire just yet or are likely to outlive their retirement funds.

The 70% Rule

Common practice is to save enough so that your annual retirement income equals about 70% or more of your current income. Of course, many Canadians are not aware of such information entirely and have saved little or not enough for their retirement.

With this being said, there are still some fundamental issues with this understanding. One, few people have a complete understanding of their retirement resources or a realistic view of their retirement funds. In some cases, 70% retirement pay usually isn’t enough to sustain them in retirement.

Example

We’ll use the fictitious name Tom for this example. Tom is making $60,000 annually living a modest lifestyle. Tom will qualify for CPP and OAS. Tom only contributes through his employer-directed contribution program, which is $2500 a year.

Tom also saves $13,000 in a regular checking account, an additional $3,000 in non-registered savings and $12,000. Tom is a conservative investor and he thought he was doing pretty well saving what he can and living a modest lifestyle.

Using Cascades to do retirement planning at the age of 54 using the above figures. Tom discovers his annual income will only be approximately $38,250. After taxes per year. Going back to the common practice of 70% Tom needed minimum $42,000 per year as retirement income. This leaves Tom needing to find a way to make an additional $3750 a year. Tom would need a part-time job, choose not to retire or drastically change his lifestyle in retirement.

For a lot of individuals, they will have to work longer than they planned or seek part-time employment during retirement. This could be a problem for retirees and employers. In order to navigate this issue before it starts employers need to assist their employees with retirement planning.

Sample Cascades recommendations for maximizing an estate

How can we change this?

The first step would be for employers to become more effective at helping employees realistically prepare for and manage their retirement. For example, this could include a process or program to build up wealth accumulation prior to retirement, which could be a mix of LIRA, Capital Gains or RRSP just to name a few.

A second step would be for employees to change their behaviours and thoughts around retirement savings. Employees can make changes by becoming more proactive when it comes to saving. When some individuals think about saving for retirement after they attend school, buy a home, raise children and send them to college sometimes it can be too late. Continue Reading…

3 ways to start Real Estate investing and build Passive Income

Posted By |

By Catherine Way

Special to the Financial Independence Hub

Real estate investing has never been easier. With the surge of house-flipping success stories flooding social media, no wonder more people are looking to invest.

With more ways to start real estate investing, starting is the hardest step many face.

Building passive income is a necessity for any successful real estate investor, but owning and managing rentals with no experience can end badly for some.

Luckily there are a few easy ways to start investing to try out which investment style is best for you.

If you don’t know where to start for your first investment, read on!

Airbnb rentals

“Many investors are using the convenience of this app to start building their passive income. Airbnb is a great tool to have short term tenants, and to learn the basics of being a good landlord. With the app doing all the work to find tenants for you, as long as you are in a rea that sees travels, you can start making passive income with little to no investment. In fact some investors are creating only Airbnb rentals spaces because of the demand and profit from it.” – Loren Howard, Prime Plus Mortgages: Hard Money Lender Arizona.

Airbnb is a great app for first-time investors wanting to make passive income. In fact, there are many resource articles online on how to build an Airbnb business. Most people rent out spare rooms or guest houses to Airbnb guests to stay in, and operates like a mini-hotel service.

For those yearning to be real estate investors who do not have whole homes dedicated to investments, this is a great way to start building up your passive income to pursue other projects, or just learn the basics of taking care of tenants.

Airbnb is all over the world and their popularity is still on the rise. The app makes it simple to find tenants for properties, whether short or long term, and it only requires having a good space to start hosting. That means spare rooms or guest houses can begin to make you money, with little to no investment on your end. Continue Reading…

Retired Money: How retirees can lower RRIF tax shock by taxing “at source” wherever possible

Posted By |

My latest MoneySense column takes a look at the supposed “tax nightmare” new retirees sometimes face on the forced annual (and taxable) withdrawals of Registered Retirement Income Funds or RRIFs. Click on the highlighted headline for the full article: How to avoid tax payment nightmares when the RRIF withdrawals start.

It’s a simple idea really. Salaried employees take for granted the automatic deduction of income taxes “at source.” They receive their regular paycheque with “net” or after-tax deposits that go directly into their bank accounts.

RRIFs are famously taxable: once you reach the end of your 71styear, you are required to pay an ever-rising minimum percentage withdrawal, all fully taxed like earned income or interest. However, notes Aaron Hector, a financial planner with Calgary-based Doherty & Bryant Financial Strategists, there is no mandatory withholding tax on RRIFs, unlike the 10, 20% or 30% tax that must be withheld at source on RRSP withdrawals (which rises with amount withdrawn.)

Fortunately, you can ask your financial institution to deduct tax at source every time you make a RRIF withdrawal. Alternatively, new retirees or semi-retirees may wait till 71 to start a RRIF but choose to withdraw money from their RRSP whenever they need it during their 60s. Here, the problem is the minimum withholding required can prove to be inadequate if you take out chunks of RRSP cash that are too small. Take them out in $5,000 chunks or less and the 10% (5% in Quebec) withholding tax is unlikely to be sufficient once you file your annual return.

Try and take out at least an amount between $5,000 and $15,000, which results in a 20% withholding tax (10% in Quebec.). Better yet, make the withdrawals $15,000 or more and pay the 30% withholding tax (15% in Quebec). Don’t fret that this may be “too much” tax: if so, it will be rectified once you file your next tax return. You can find a summary of RRSP withholding rates at this Government of Canada website.

Hector says RRIF withdrawals in excess of the minimum annual required payment are treated the same as regular RRSP withdrawals for withholding tax. So if your minimum RRIF payment one year is $50,000 but you withdraw $100,000, the extra $50,000 will be taxed at 30% on withdrawals and come tax time, you’d pay tax on the entire $100,000. You can elect to have taxes withheld at source on the minimum RRIF payments as well: Hector estimates a third of his clients do just that. Others may end up making quarterly tax installments instead.

This situation is aggravated by the fact non-registered investment income is typically taxable.             Fortunately, you can choose to deliberately overtax yourself as you go on many common sources of retirement income: if you receive pensions from former employers and/or the Government (CPP, OAS), you can set things up to mimic the “taxed at source” setup salaried workers have. While not mandatory, pension administrators will deduct whatever percentage of tax you wish to arrange with them, whether a minimal amount or a near-confiscatory 50%, or somewhere between those extremes.

In my case, I set 30% as my withholding tax on corporate pensions, 25% on OAS and eventually the same amount for CPP. You may feel small pensions don’t have to be taxed at source if they are less than the Basic Personal Amount that is tax free to everyone: $11,809 in 2018, $12,609 in 2019.

The alternative is quarterly tax installments. Retired advisor Warren Baldwin says theCRA sends notices for payments based on simple arithmetic applied to the previous year’s taxes. “So if, for example, 2017 was a high-income year and you had a high tax liability on filing, CRA will request large payments in March and June of 2019. If income and the liability declines in 2018/19, then you might have overpaid and need to wait until spring of 2020 for the refund.”

Ideally, things will balance out when it comes time to file your taxes: if you went overboard in taxing yourself at source, you may end up with a refund; if you underestimated your taxes due, you may end up having to cut yet another cheque to Ottawa. Some object to giving the CRA an “interest-free” loan but personally, I’d rather receive a small refund than have to pay still more at tax time.