Longevity & Aging

No doubt about it: at some point we’re neither semi-retired, findependent or fully retired. We’re out there in a retirement community or retirement home, and maybe for a few years near the end of this incarnation, some time to reflect on it all in a nursing home. Our Longevity & Aging category features our own unique blog posts, as well as blog feeds from Mark Venning’s ChangeRangers.com and other experts.

Financial Planning & the Retirement Earworm: Focus should change to Financing for Longevity

Posted By Financial Independence Hub | August 27, 2019

By Mark Venning, ChangeRangers.com

Special to the Financial Independence Hub

At last, a headline that helps us progress, moving us to change the later life narrative with respect to the issue of financial planning.

“Longevity planning will be a central mission for advisers of the future.” In a brief July 22, 2019 article in Investment News with this headline, Ryan W. Neal cites their recent roundtable discussion on the Future of Financial Advice, where “industry leaders agreed longevity planning will increasingly play a role in how advisers work with clients, especially in the face of fee compression and automated investing.”

This is a welcomed repeated echo, from my persistent suggestion to financial planners since 2011 that the replacement phrase for “retirement planning” should be “financing for longevity.” My presentation at the Canadian Institute of Financial Planners 16^thAnnual Conference in June 2018 was titled around just that: Changing Client Conversations Mind-set Shift. Financing for Longevity.

One of my key points for this audience was that this means a recognition of changing patterns in client conversations, related to money and financial management. Conversations need to reflect shifts in generational experiential differences and thus the need to help clients re-frame their attitudes and expectations. The future of financial planning is no longer exclusively a Boomer-centric market.

Financing for Longevity, more echoes

Neal in his article refers to Joseph Coughlin, founder of MIT’s AgeLab and author of The Longevity Economy (2017). In another 2019 Investment News article comes one more echo in this call – from Coughlin, “(the financial planning)profession is at a new frontier to create an entirely new business around longevity planning …. We are done with retirement – the word, the idea, the products, the conversations were really good, for my father. But not for the next generation.”

Another echo from Lynda Gratton & Andrew Scott in their book The 100-Year Life(2016). In chapter 7 on Money, they talk about “financing a long life.” Earlier chapter 2 on Financing, part of this longevity planning is geared around “working for longer.” Pensions or no pensions aside, they submit,“The simple truth is that if you live for longer then you need more money. This means either saving more or working for longer.”

Cascades retirement planning software: a case study

Posted By Financial Independence Hub | August 9, 2019

By Ian Moyer

(Sponsor Content)

The task of retirement income planning can be overwhelming for Canadians as they get closer to leaving the workforce. Making the right decisions can be difficult with all the possible sources of income they might have, including Old Age Security (OAS) and Canada Pension Plan (CPP), and of course, Canada’s complex tax codes don’t make it any easier. People need help.

Cascades is a Canadian retirement income calculator that takes the difficulty out of retirement income planning. In many cases it saves retirees hundreds of thousands of dollars in income tax, while showing a year-over-year road map guiding them through retirement. Who wouldn’t want to save money? But in some cases, like the one highlighted below, it’s not about extra tax savings: it’s about having enough money to last your entire retirement.

Bob and Ann’s story is based on a real-life case we came across last week, and it’s a great example of why proper retirement income planning is so important.

Meet retiree Bob, 65, and Ann, 56, still working

Bob is currently 65 and has been retired for 2 years. He was self-employed as a cabinet maker and still has his shop at home where he works part time bringing in $12,000 annually. Because he was self- employed, Bob has no defined benefit or defined contribution pensions. He currently holds about $250,000 in his RRSP, $15,500 in his TFSA, and $50,000 in a non-registered account. Bob receives close to max CPP at $12,600 and $7,248 from OAS.

Ann is originally from the United States and met Bob while he was vacationing in Florida. She is currently 56 and plans on retiring at 63 from her job as a logistics coordinator for an auto parts manufacturer. Ann brings in $57,500 annually and has a defined contribution pension currently worth about $140,000. Ann has no other savings apart from her defined contribution pension, but will receive $4,800 in CPP that she plans to start receiving as soon as she retires at 63. Because Ann hasn’t been in Canada for 40 years since the age of 18, she will only receive $3,500 annually from OAS.

How to create a pension for the Average Joe: 65 with as little as $200K in Savings

Posted By Financial Independence Hub | July 26, 2019

By Billy and Akaisha Kaderli, RetireEarlyLifestyle.com

Special to the Financial Independence Hub

We know many of our readers are not “average.” However, if average Joe can support his retirement on as little as US$200,000 savings, imagine what you can do with the amount you have!

By reading the chart below, you can see that the average spending for retirement households age 65 – 74 is US$46,000.

It is tough to make that $46k amount with only Joe’s savings, so what should he do?

Social Security

The average recipient today (in the United States) collects US$1,461 a month, or US$17,532 a year. Joe’s SS check is average and he has a wife who also collects the average Social Security amount.

$17,532 times 2 (people) = US$35,000 per year.

Not quite the $46,000 that they need but getting closer.

Hopefully, Joe has his retirement money invested in VTI (Vanguard Total Stock Market) or SPY (S&P 500 Index) and is making market gains equaling around 10% annually.

Here you can see that since the 1950’s — about when Joe was born — the S&P 500 has had an annualized return of over 11%, dividends reinvested, but let’s use 10% as a more conservative projection.

Remember, Joe has to make up $11,000 to match his average spending ($46,000). But let’s give Joe an extra one thousand dollars per year so he can pamper Mrs. Joe with occasional gifts and dinners out.

So, he needs $12,000 out of the $200,000 in savings per year to make up the difference in spending. That’s an extra $1.000 per month.

Invested in the S&P 500 — based on 69 years of returns and using 10% as the annual return — after his first year he would have $220,000 minus $12,000 withdrawal = $208,000.

Now Joe has $47,000 in annual income: $35,000 from Social Security and $12,000 from investments.

Plus, his $200,000 has grown to $208,000, a 4% gain outpacing inflation at the current rate of less than 2% per year.

Their Social Security payment is also indexed to inflation so as inflation rises, so will their Social Security. Continue Reading…

No surprise: the best retirement investments are the same as for everyone else

Posted By Pat McKeough | July 18, 2019

We recommend that you base your investing for retirement on a sound financial plan relying on the best retirement investments.

One thing investors of all ages fear is not having a good financial plan in place so they have enough retirement income to live on once they’ve stopped working. Looking for the best retirement investments, addressing this concern is usually a high priority for many of our Successful Investor Portfolio Management clients.

Four key factors to consider when investing for retirement

How much you expect to save prior to retirement;
The return you expect on your savings;
How much of that return you’ll have left after taxes;
How much retirement income you’ll need once you’ve left the workforce.

Our portfolio diversification approach gives you strong potential for long-term gains

If you diversify as we advise, you improve your chances of making money over long periods, no matter what happens in the market.

For example, manufacturing stocks may suffer if raw-material prices rise, but in that case your Resources stocks will gain. Rising wages can put pressure on manufacturers, but your Consumer stocks should do better as workers spend more.

If borrowers can’t pay back their loans, your Finance stocks will suffer. But high default rates usually lead to lower interest rates, which push up the value of your Utilities stocks.

As part of their portfolio diversification strategy, most investors should have investments in most, if not all, of these five sectors. The proper proportions for you depend on your temperament and circumstances.

For example, conservative or income-seeking investors may want to emphasize utilities and Canadian banks in their portfolio diversification, because of these stocks’ high and generally secure dividends.

More aggressive investors might want to increase their portfolio weightings in Resources or Manufacturing stocks. For example, more aggressive investors could consider holding as much as, say, 25% to 30% of their portfolios in Resources.

However, you’ll want to spread your Resource holdings out among oil and gas, metals and other Resources stocks for diversification and exposure to a number of areas.

Stick with conservative estimates to account for unforeseen setbacks

As for the return you expect from investing for retirement, it’s best to aim low. If you invest in bonds, assume you will earn the current yield; don’t assume you can make money trading in bonds.

Over long periods, the total return on a well-diversified portfolio of high-quality stocks runs to as much as 10%, or around 7.5% after inflation. Aim lower in your retirement planning — 5% a year, say — to allow for unforeseeable problems and setbacks.

Above all, it’s important to remember that while finances are important, the happiest retirees are those who stay busy. You can do that with travel, golf or sailing. But volunteering, or working part-time at something you enjoy, can work just as well. Continue Reading…

How much does it cost to Retire?

Posted By Financial Independence Hub | July 2, 2019

Photo: Elena Saharova, Unsplash

By Steve Lowrie, CFA

Special to the Financial Independence Hub

Hey, it worked. Last month, I posted “What’s on your mind?” asking you to tell me what financial questions I could help you resolve. Many thanks for your replies!

I’ll start with one good question posed, because it probably crosses everyone’s mind with increased frequency over time: How much money do I need to retire?

Since I’ve been a financial professional now for more than two decades, I feel well qualified to answer that question. The answer is: It depends.

Okay, I realize that isn’t a very helpful answer, even if it’s the truth. Let’s dig a little deeper.

From a purely quantitative perspective, there are several rules of thumb in common use. For example, some say if you’ve got 20 or 25 times your annual income in reserve that should do it. Others suggest you’re ready to retire if you can withdraw no more than 4% of your investment portfolio each year. So, if you have $1 million in your investment accounts, you should plan to withdraw no more than $40,000 annually in a “successful” retirement.

These and similar guidelines offer a decent starting point. But bad luck happens. Even if you’ve diligently saved up 20 times your income, if you happened to retire on the eve of a bear market or if you encounter large unexpected expenses, your handy rule of thumb could end up poking you in the eye. Continue Reading…

Share this:

Share this:

Share this:

Share this:

Share this:

Sign up for our Daily Digest E-Mail!