Longevity & Aging

No doubt about it: at some point we’re neither semi-retired, findependent or fully retired. We’re out there in a retirement community or retirement home, and maybe for a few years near the end of this incarnation, some time to reflect on it all in a nursing home. Our Longevity & Aging category features our own unique blog posts, as well as blog feeds from Mark Venning’s ChangeRangers.com and other experts.

Purpose Longevity Pension Fund game changer for Canadian retirees?

Posted By |

By Dale Roberts, cutthecrapinvesting

Special to the Financial Independence Hub

It’s possible that the game has been changed for the better, for Canadian retirees. Purpose Investments has launched a retirement funding mutual fund that is designed to deliver an annual payout at 6.15% annual. That is, the fund would pay out a minimum of 6.15% of your initial total fund value. For every $100,000 that you have invested, you would receive an annual payment $6,150. Introducing the Purpose Longevity® Pension Fund.

The Purpose Longevity Pension Fund offers the pension model, now available to the typical investor. Advisors will also be able to use the fund and will collect a modest trailing commission. For many Canadian retirees it will certainly be a game changer.

Income for life.

One of the greatest fears for retirees is running out of money. And most retirees don’t want to manage their own investments. They want to enjoy life, without financial worry. The Purpose Longevity Pension Fund will allow Canadians to top up their Canada Pension Plan and Old Age Security payments. Retirees may have other private pensions and other assets within the mix. The fund will allow a retiree to pensionize a large percentage of their liquid assets. They approach would remove much of the stock and bond market (volatility) risk.

And more importantly perhaps, it would remove the risk of investors messing up their retirement portfolio (and retirement funding) by way of bad behaviour.

Related post: Pensionize your nest egg with annuities: your super bonds.

The Purpose fund sits between the Vanguard VRIF ETF retirement funding solution and the traditional annuities. The Vanguard ETF is designed to pay out at a 4% rate of the portfolio value, adjusted each year.

An annual 6.15% payment (at age 65) is a big step up the retirement funding ladder.

When a retiree manages their own investment portfolio they will often use the 4% rule as a benchmark for the level that the portfolio can safely deliver retirement income, including an annual inflation adjustment. On Boomer and Echo I had offered …

The 4% rule. Is there a new normal for Canadian Retirees?

Everything changes in the decumulation stage.

Life changes and priorities change when we switch to the retirement or decumulation stage. Retirees just want to get paid.

Purpose Investments Presentation

Canadian retirees are not necessarily well served by the financial institutions in the retirement stage.

Purpose Investments Presentation

The pension model for the masses.

How does a fund pay out at a 6.15% rate (and potentially to increase) while studies show that a balanced or conservative investment mix can only ‘safely’ pay out at a 4%-4.5% level? Once again it follows the model used by pension funds (public and private) around the world.

I asked Som Seif, CEO of Purpose Investments to deliver an explanation.

It is based on what they call Longevity Risk Pooling. The difference between the required return on the fund (net 3.5%) and the income paid to investors (6.15%+) is because when people buy, they get their income, but as some people redeem/pass away earlier, they leave behind in the pool their returns on their invested capital (ie they get their unpaid capital out upon death or redemption).  These returns left behind reduce the total return required to provide the income stream for all investors.

Som Seif

It is the pooling of funds by the collective group of investors that will hold the fund, that delivers the secret sauce. There is retirement funding strength in numbers.

This is called Longevity Risk Pooling (or Sharing).

And as per the above quote, the underlying fund holdings only have to deliver at an annual 3.5% rate of return for the Purpose Longevity Pension Fund to deliver on the 6.15% funding level. Here’s ‘the how’ …

If you put in $500,000. After a number of years you receive distributions of $200,000, but then you pass away.  Your estate would receive the unpaid capital of $300,000 ($500k-$200k). The return on the invested capital would stay in the pool for the benefit of all of the investors remaining.  This return would reduce the overall required return for everyone.

Som Seif

The approach as been back tested.

Morneau Shepell conducted extreme stress testing on the model, which included the use of their economic scenario generator (ESG) that produced over 2,000 different simulations of future paths of economies and financial markets.

Probability of success (i.e. not having to decrease the income payout):

  • Over a 25 year period: 91%
  • Over a 35 year period: 86%

Purpose Investments can reduce income levels to ensure that the assets are never depleted and that income payments can continue to unitholders for their lifetime.

Net, net, the payments could move higher or lower. The risk will be managed, while any benefits offered by the markets will be passed along to investors.

The fund series.

There will also be a D-series available for self-directed investors.

The game changers combo offering.

On MoneySense and when we put together the Best ETFs in Canada, we often refer to the one ticket asset allocation ETFs as game changers. For use in the accumulation stage (wealth building) Canadian investors can hold comprehensive all-in-one portfolio ETFs with fees in the range of 0.20%.

And now enter the Purpose Longevity Pension Fund that might turn out to be the next piece in the game changing investment landscape.

  • Accumulation: one ticket
  • Decumulation: personal pension mutual fund

I’ll continue to do more research and I’ll add to this post. And I would invite reader questions. What do you want to know about this new offering?

I’ll get you the answers and I’ll add the responses to this post.

Thanks for reading. We’ll see you in the comment section.

Support your portfolio and Cut The Crap Investing.

While I do not accept monies for feature blog posts please click here on the mission and ‘how I might get paid’ disclosures. Affiliate partnerships help me pay the bills for this site. That will allow me to keep this site free of ads and easy to read.

You will also earn a break on fees by way of many of those partnership links.

I also have partnerships with several of the leading Canadian Robo Advisors such as Justwealth, BMO Smartfolio ,Wealthsimple, Nest Wealth and Questwealth from Questrade.

Consider Justwealth for RESP accounts. That is THE option in Canada.

At Questrade, Canadians can buy ETFs for free.

I use and I’m a big fan of the no fee Tangerine Cash Back Credit Card. We make about $55 per month in cash back on everyday spending.

Make your cash work a lot harder at EQ Bank. RRSP and TFSA account savings rates are at 1.3%.

Kindly use the buttons below to share this post.

Dale

Dale Roberts is the Chief Disruptor at cutthecrapinvesting.com. A former ad guy and investment advisor, Dale now helps Canadians say goodbye to paying some of the highest investment fees in the world. This blog originally appeared on Dale’s site June 1, 2021 and is republished on the Hub with his permission.

Practical ways to minimize unexpected Medical Bills 

Posted By |

By Emily Roberts

For the Financial Independence Hub

Many of us may  plan ahead for receiving medical bills and know what we need to do to settle them. However, receiving an unexpected medical bill is a whole different ballgame that can throw your finances into disarray. With this in mind, we will be considering some practical ways to minimize unexpected medical bills in the future.

Factors to Consider

Accidents happen all the time. While some of them may leave you unscathed, you should know what you could do to minimize your medical bills if and when you are faced with any.

  • Lawyers: They are particularly useful for those incidents where you got injured or experienced injury, and it was not your fault. Car accidents, incidents at work, and various other situations could lead to injury, and to unexpected medical bills. Hiring the services of personal injury lawyers can ensure that those who are liable for your accident are held accountable. Compensation that is acquired through their services can be used to cover medical bills.
  • Ask Questions: Asking plenty of questions before, during, and after treatment can help to minimize the medical bills that you receive. By regularly asking questions, you can ensure that any needed procedures are covered by your health insurance policy, or that they are affordable if they are outside the area of coverage. Make sure that you understand what your overall medical bill should be at the end of your procedure so that you are not hit by any unexpected costs.
  • Preauthorization Processes: Some health insurance options and some health centers require preauthorization from the insurance providers before going ahead with a procedure or treatment. While this could be an unfortunate discovery for those who desperately need medical attention — mainly if you are then unable to go forth with your treatment — it undoubtedly minimizes the medical bills that you are faced with. Once more, you know what the costs will be and whether your insurance provider covers the treatment, you can make better financial plans.

Emily Roberts is a young writer who is passionate about literature and blog writing.

 

Are life settlements key to solving America’s retirement crisis?

Posted By |

By Lucas Siegel

Special to the Financial Independence Hub

As the retirement crisis continues, the need for workable options for funding retirement becomes even more vital. Today’s senior Americans are at risk of not having enough for necessary living expenses.

Over the years, misconceptions have developed about life settlements and their viability. The truth is, under the right circumstances, taking advantage of a life settlement and selling a life insurance policy to a third-party investor can help seniors unlock much-needed cash.

In the case of life settlements, we are talking about seniors having access to a significant amount of money. For instance, if eligible Americans took full advantage of life settlements, it could help cover more than US$42 billion in long-term care and retirement costs each year.

So, what is a life settlement?

A life settlement enables a qualifying life insurance policyholder to obtain a lump sum cash payment in exchange for selling their policy to a third party. The buyer takes on all responsibilities for the policy, including paying the premiums. The resulting money from the life settlement allows retirees to pay for necessary living and healthcare expenses, rather than struggle to make life insurance policy payments.

How to qualify for a life settlement

Many seniors are surprised to find how straightforward it is to qualify for a life settlement. They discover it isn’t necessary to have failing health or a terminal illness to receive a life settlement. The main requirements for a life settlement are being at least 70 years old and owning a life insurance policy valued at US$50,000 or more.

There is also no requirement in terms of how the money from a life settlement is spent. The money can be used for whatever the recipient wishes. Many seniors find the funds enable them to afford the rising costs of retirement. For instance, after receiving a life settlement, they may choose to pay down debt to decrease fixed expenses, pay for long-term care, pay for general living expenses, create an emergency fund, invest the money, or even spend the money on home renovations or a vacation.

Best states for life settlements

If you’re interested in learning more, you may be excited to find that you live in a state that is highly accommodating to life settlements. Our U.S. Life Settlement Index: The Best and Worst States for Life Settlements took a close look at seven attributes that affect life settlements in each state.

These attributes included existing state regulations for life settlements, the median monthly cost of long-term care, the face amount of life insurance per capita, and whether the state requires that policyholders receive life settlement disclosures. Additional considerations included the median household income, size of the population of those 75 and older, and average life expectancy.

Considering the various data, the U.S. Life Settlement Index identified the most and least accommodating states for life settlements. The top spots for most amenable went to California, which came in first, followed by Washington, New Jersey, and Illinois. Wisconsin and Massachusetts tied for fifth on the Index. Continue Reading…

Death and Taxes, Cross-border Style

Posted By |

Dollar Printing: Global Macro Shifts; Franklin Templeton Investments Licensed from Gettyimages

By David Cieslowski, CPA, CA, CFP, CIMA

(Sponsor Content)

As Benjamin Franklin famously wrote, “… in this world, nothing is certain except death and taxes.”  For US citizens, as well as some Canadians who own US assets, the first may be swiftly followed by the second.

In the United States, an estate tax is applied to the transfer of the taxable estate of every deceased  American citizen, resident or non-resident, including green card holders or others with dual US-Canadian citizenship. Even Canadian citizens who have never stepped foot in the United States, but hold US securities or other US assets, could find their estates subject to a tax on situs assets, which are defined as assets with a tangible or intangible direct US connection or location.

The low-down on US estate tax

Estate tax falls into the category of transfer taxes, as opposed to income tax. It can be substantial; those in the top marginal tax bracket may pay up to 40% on estates with assets of more than US$1 million. Moreover, for US citizens and residents this tax applies to assets held worldwide. Real estate ownership alone can easily exceed those limits.

Fortunately, the reality is somewhat more encouraging. Only around 2% of the US population actually pays estate tax, largely because of exclusions that effectively spare all but the largest estates.

The two most common exclusions are:

  • Annual exclusion of US$15,000 per person
  • Lifetime credit of US$11.7 million for 2021 and indexed annually. Something of a political football, this credit can rise or fall along with changes in government[1]. The current credit limit is set to expire at the end of January, 2025.

These annual exclusions are portable, meaning they can be used by any descendant of the deceased.

The gift that keeps on giving: to the IRS

In the battle of wills between those determined to transfer all of their wealth to succeeding generations and those determined to “tax to the max,” many strategies have been tried and failed. Gifting assets to relatives while the owner is still alive has been one of the more popular tactics. Not surprisingly, the IRS employs two additional taxes to thwart such attempts at tax-free wealth transfer.

The first is a garden-variety gift tax. For non-spouses, annual exclusions are the same as for estate taxes. For spouses they are more generous: unlimited for spouses who are US citizens and $159,000 for 2021 (indexed annually) for spouses who are not. Continue Reading…

How much Savings do you need to delay starting CPP and OAS?

Posted By |

By Michael J. Wiener

Special to the Financial Independence Hub

 

Canadians who take their CPP at age 60 instead of 70 “can expect to lose over $100,000 of secure lifetime income, in today’s dollars, over the course of their retirement,” according to Dr. Bonnie-Jeanne MacDonald in research released by the National Institute on Ageing (NIA) and the FP Canada Research Foundation.

However, those who retire before 70 need savings to tide them over until their larger CPP pensions start if they want to live at least as well in their 60s as they do later in retirement.  Here we look at the amount of savings required by a retired 60-year old to be able to delay CPP and OAS pensions.

Incentive for delaying is strong

We’re used to thinking of CPP and OAS pensions as just a few hundred dollars per month, but a 70-year old couple just starting to receive maximum CPP and OAS pensions (but not any of the new expanded CPP) would get $61,100 per year, rising with inflation for the rest of their lives.  If the same couple were 65 they’d only get $43,700 per year.  If this 65-year old couple had taken CPP at 60, their combined CPP and OAS would be $32,700 per year now.  The incentive for delaying the start of CPP and OAS is strong.

We can think of the savings needed to delay the start of CPP and OAS pensions as the price of buying larger inflation-indexed government pensions.  This price is an absolute bargain compared to the cost of buying an annuity from an insurance company.  Those in good health but worried about “losing” if they delay pensions and die young can focus on the positives.  Delaying pensions allows retirees to spend their savings confidently during their 60s knowing that their old age is secure.  Taking small pensions early can leave retirees penny-pinching in their 60s worried about their savings running out in old age.

The table below shows the amount of savings a retired 60-year old requires to delay starting CPP.  This table is based on a number of assumptions:

  1. The current maximum age 65 CPP pension is $1203.75 per month.  Before you take your CPP pension, it grows based on national wage growth as well as an actuarial formula, but after you take it, it grows with “regular” inflation, the Consumer Price Index (CPI).  We assume wage growth will exceed CPI growth by 0.75% per year.
  2. We assume the retiree is entitled to the maximum CPP pension.  Those with smaller CPP entitlements can scale down the savings amounts.  For example, someone expecting only 50% of the maximum CPP pension can cut the savings amounts in half.
  3. We assume the retiree holds savings in an RRSP/RRIF so that withdrawals will be taxed in the same way that CPP pensions are taxed.  Retirees using savings in non-registered accounts won’t need to save as much because they only need to match the after-tax amount of CPP pensions.
  4. The retiree is able to earn enough on savings to keep up with inflation.  (Online banks offer savings account rates that put the big banks to shame.)  The monthly pension amounts in the table are inflation-adjusted; the retiree’s savings will grow to cover the actual CPP pension payments.
  5. We assume the retiree doesn’t have a workplace pension whose bridge benefits end at age 65.  This bridge benefit replaces some of the savings needed to permit delaying CPP and OAS.
CPP % of  Inflation-Adjusted Months of Savings
 Start  Age 65 CPP Monthly CPP Spending from  Needed at
Age Pension Pension  Personal Savings Age 60
60 64.0% $770 0 0
61 71.2% $863 12 $10,400
62 78.4% $958 24 $23,000
63 85.6% $1054 36 $37,900
64 92.8% $1151 48 $55,200
65 100.0% $1250 60 $75,000
66 108.4% $1365 72 $98,300
67 116.8% $1481 84 $124,400
68 125.2% $1600 96 $153,600
69 133.6% $1720 108 $185,800
70 142.0% $1842 120 $221,000

You can’t start OAS till 65 but can delay it till 70

Unlike CPP, you can’t start your OAS pension until you’re at least 65.  But you can delay it until you’re 70 to get larger payments.  The table below shows the amount of savings a retired 60-year old requires to delay starting OAS.  The table is based on a number of assumptions:

  1. The current maximum age 65 OAS pension is $615.37 per month.
  2. We assume the retiree is entitled to the maximum OAS pension by living in Canada for at least 40 out of 47 years from age 18 to 65.
  3. We assume the retiree won’t want to live poor before age 65, which means spending from savings from age 60 to 64 to make up for not receiving OAS.
  4. We assume the retiree holds savings in an RRSP/RRIF so that withdrawals will be taxed in the same way that OAS pensions are taxed.  Retirees using savings in non-registered accounts won’t need to save as much because they only need to match the after-tax amount of OAS pensions. Continue Reading…