Building Wealth

For the first 30 or so years of working, saving and investing, you’ll be first in the mode of getting out of the hole (paying down debt), and then building your net worth (that’s wealth accumulation.). But don’t forget, wealth accumulation isn’t the ultimate goal. Decumulation is! (a separate category here at the Hub).

Real Life Investment Strategies #1: Will Geopolitics Ruin my Financial Plans?

Lowrie Financial Canva Custom Creation

By Steve Lowrie, CFA

Special to Financial Independence Hub

Now that we’re well into 2024, it’s time to turn the page on last year’s “Play It Again, Steve – Timeless Financial Tips”.

To shift gears, I recently polled my blog post readers, asking them what was on their mind and, although specific topics were varied, the underlying question resounded:

Timeless financial tips are well and good – but how do they apply to my investment decisions in real life?

To address that question, I’m launching Lowrie Financial’s “Real Life Investment Strategies.” Each post in this new series will use case studies to illustrate the choices real people are making, as they contemplate money management concerns in real time.

Active Concerns around Geopolitical Events and their Impact on your Financial Future

In our blog post readers survey, there were several responses with a clear theme:

  • worrying thoughts about current events,
  • what the geopolitical climate may mean to your money, and
  • what investment strategies to avert setbacks for your financial future

So, let’s address some of the more worrisome flash points looming large at this time: the world, its politics, and its politicians.

Of course, it’s natural, and advisable, to want your investments to weather the market storms wrought by geopolitical forces. The catch is there’s always a crisis going on somewhere and we never know for sure how it’s going to play out, until it has. That’s true whether it is history repeating itself, a new and unexpected upset, or (usually) a blend of both.

The other reality is that the most significant risks, with the greatest negative financial impact, are those you don’t see coming.

For example, in the last 25 years, we have had to deal with these three and unexpected and significant events:

If there is any good news in these events, which I realize is a stretch, they only come around every ten years or so.

That’s why I’ve long advised the best way to protect your wealth during each crisis du jour is to avoid getting tossed around in its waves. We seek to accomplish this by building — and maintaining — a steadfast, globally diversified portfolio designed to skim across the rough surfaces toward more dependable destinations.

Let’s use a couple of case studies to illustrate how we manage real-life portfolios in the face of ever-evolving, often unnerving current events. Although my stories will be drawn from real conversations and actual investor experiences, they will be fictionalized to protect individual privacy. In particular, names are not real.

The Accumulators: Suzie and Trevor Hall

Financial Accumulators Suzie and Trevor Hall

Meet the Halls

Suzie and Trevor are hard-working professionals in their late 40s, with two teenage children. They own a home, which is almost fully paid off. While they intend to stay in their home long-term, the place could definitely use some renovations.

Current Lifestyle: The Halls have been good about living within their means, while also sustaining a satisfying lifestyle. They take occasional vacations, but they’ve also diligently saved excess cash flow over time.

Financial Goals: The Halls hope to retire within 15–20 years. They also want to fully fund their children’s education, as well as complete those home renovations before they retire.

Investment Profile: Suzie and Trevor consider themselves to be conservative investors. They would like their portfolio to continue to grow. But they also worry: what if today’s global crises really do a number on their nest egg? They think they should avoid experiencing much more than a 30% hit during any given market downturn.

Suzie and Trevor’s Financial Planning Action Items

Here’s how I might advise the Halls moving forward:

  1. Start with planning, not investing.

 “How will the 2024 U.S. presidential elections impact our investments?”

Except in hindsight, the only correct answer is, “Who knows?”

As we’ve covered before in the 2020 blog, Should I Change My Investments During an Election?, leading with these kinds of queries steer the Halls’ conversation toward the market’s concerns, instead of their own.

They are better off considering geopolitical volatility in a more manageable context:

  • What is your expected retirement date?
  • Other lifetime goals?
  • Personal investment style? and so on.

True, personal goals may shift over time. But defining manageable targets helps us define desired saving targets, rate of return expectations, and asset allocations for meeting them. As the Halls’ own circumstances and larger world events evolve, we can review and update their progress annually.

  1. Establish a spending plan.

Next, I’d advise the Halls to use their available cash flow to support their three key mandates: saving for their kids’ education costs, completing their home renovations, and investing toward retirement. Three goals, calling for three different investment amounts, return expectations, and timeframes.

  1. Invest systematically.

Next, we can invest systematically across future unknowns. For example, whether Russia and Ukraine remain at war indefinitely or eventually reach an accord, global markets are expected to trend upward over time; we just don’t know when or where the growth spurts will occur. For the Halls, I may recommend adding assets monthly, so they can dollar-cost average across varied market conditions. If (or more likely, when) another crisis occurs and prices decrease, they may even want to increase their saving and investing during these “buy low” windows of opportunity.

  1. Do a lifeboat drill.

Suzie and Trevor had said they wouldn’t want their portfolio to ever drop by more than 30% as they pursue expected market returns. But would they really be ok with that much of a drop? I like to replace vague percentages with real dollar declines. We would look at past market downturns and corrections, how long they lasted from start to finish, and how long the Halls’ target portfolio would have taken to recover from each. This “life-boat drill” helps them use realistic numbers for withstanding real future declines.

  1. Remember, it’s priced in.

How will today’s heightened Middle East tensions play out for Suzie and Trevor’s investments? Once again, we don’t know; we can’t know. But I do know, whatever happens next, “by the time you’ve heard the news, the collective market has too, and has already priced it in” (as we wrote in our first timeless tip, Play It Again, Steve – Timeless Financial Tips #1: Repeat After Me: “It’s Already Priced In”). Besides, since the Halls are still in their wealth accumulation years, a price decline could even come as welcome news. Lower prices today give future market prices more room to grow over time.

In our next case study, let’s look at how today’s geopolitical pressure points may impact a couple closer to retirement.

Almost Ready to Retire: Jim and Carol Oates

Financial Almost Ready to Retire Jim and Carol Oates

Meet the Oates’

Jim and Carol are in their early 60s. Jim owns a business and Carol manages the household. They became empty nesters when the youngest of their three children recently moved to British Columbia. They own their principal home outright and are considering purchasing a winter property in warmer climes.

Current Lifestyle: To pursue a satisfying retirement, the Oates were careful to avoid lifestyle creep during their career years. Now, Jim is making moves to sell his business, and their retirement days are fast approaching. They expect to support their retirement lifestyle with the proceeds of Jim’s business sale, along with their investments. Will they be ready to loosen up a bit? Yes … and no. Maybe? They wonder whether they will have enough to do so.

Financial Goals: The Oates would like to make significant travel plans, after many years of shorter getaways, closer to home. (A business owner is never fully “off duty.”) Plus, if the sale goes well, they’d like to help their children buy into today’s housing market. Continue Reading…

Dividend investing vs Index Investing (& Hybrid strategies)

By Bob Lai, Tawcan

Special to the Financial Independence Hub

 

Ahh, the age-old debate… dividend investing vs. index investing. Is one better than the other?

Well, like any good debate, there is much evidence that can support both sides of the argument.

For example, dividend investors will quickly point out that over the long term, dividend stocks return better than non-paying dividend stocks.

SP500-and-SP-500-with-Dividends-Reinvested-Returns-Chart

On the other hand, index investors will point out that dividends are irrelevant.

I’m not going to argue which one is better on this post, but you can probably figure out where we stand given we are hybrid investors.

When it comes to investing, it’s super easy to just take all the numbers, plug them into the different formulas, and analyze the results to the nth degree. There have been a lot of books on how to invest based on mathematical formulas or theories.

They are all good and all, but I would argue that investing in real life is very different than running mathematical analysis.

30% investment strategy vs 70% psychology

In my short +15 years of DIY investing career, I have come to realize that investing in real life is not just about investment strategy and analysis. Rather, I believe investing in real life is about 30% investment strategy/theory and 70% psychology.

Psychology plays an important role in deciding whether your investment is going to be a success or a failure. It is also the number one reason why people end up buying high and selling low even though they should be doing the complete opposite.

When your hard-earned money is melting away faster than ice cream on a sunny day, all you care about is preserving whatever money you have left, so you end up selling low on emotion. On the other hand, when stocks are going higher and higher and you’re seeing everyone and their dogs making money hand over fist (and paw ha!), you want to get in on the action as well, so you end up buying high on emotion. Continue Reading…

The revival of the 60/40 rule: Good for brokers, but not for investors

The revival of the 60/40 rule is a plus for brokers – but not for investors

Image by Pexels: RDNE Stock Project

Some experienced brokers (now more often referred to as investment advisors) are pleased at the recent rise in interest rates and inflation. After all, it could lead to a revival of the 60/40 rule, which was in common use for much of the second half of the 20th century, especially among experienced stockbrokers. Veteran brokers understood how to use it to spur clients to do more trading between stocks and bonds, and pay more brokerage commissions and fees.

The 60/40 rule is based on the proposition that a good-quality, balanced portfolio is made up of 60% good-quality stocks and 40% good-quality bonds. This idea leads to another: that investors can enhance their results by “rebalancing” their portfolios when they get away from that 60/40 goal, due to divergences between the bond and stock markets.

This is one of those clever ideas that at first glance, seems to make sense to many investors. It makes sense to brokers because it’s sure to make money for them. The payoff is rather less certain for the paying customers: the investors.

The problem is that stock and bond prices rise and fall under the influence of ever-changing sets of random factors: sometimes moving them in the same direction, other times moving them apart. These sets of random factors will vary in a random fashion as well. The stock/bond balance in a portfolio can hold steady for long periods, or swing abruptly from the “ideal” 60/40 split in a single day. This can happen even on a quiet day with few news developments to promote buying or selling.

The 60/40 rule gives the broker a rationale for proposing trades in a portfolio when changes in stock and bond prices have moved the portfolio away from the idealized 60/40 split.

This leads to another of the many conflicts of interest that exist in the investment business. However, unlike the hidden bond commissions I mentioned above, some brokers made a living out of the 60/40 rule. In my days as a broker, some old-timers in the office told me they could use the rule to add 2% to 4% of a client’s total portfolio to their gross annual commissions.

Any trade in your portfolio will cost you money in the form of fees and/or commissions, regardless of whether you make or lose money. But every trade you do in your portfolio will make money for the brokerage firm and/or salesperson, of course. That’s how they get paid.

Useless as a market indicator, great as a marketing device

We’ve often pointed out that market indicators sound a lot better than they perform. The 60/40 rule falls a step or two below an indicator. Rather than telling investors how they can make money in their investments, as market indicators supposedly do, this rule tells brokers and financial advisors how they can encourage their clients to do more buying and selling in the market, and thus increase broker incomes.

After all, the rule is based on a belief about the supposed advantage of a particular ratio of stocks to bonds in a portfolio. It’s not as if the rule comes with instructions on when to buy or sell, as you can derive from many market indicators. Instead, it gives brokers a rationale for advising their clients to buy bonds and sell stocks (or vice versa) more often. Continue Reading…

A Year in Review & Beyond: Navigating Curveballs and Embracing the Future

By Alizay Fatema, Associate Portfolio Manager, BMO ETFs

(Sponsor Blog)

As we begin the new year, it’s only fitting to cast a retrospective gaze in 2023 and unravel the pivotal moments that altered the landscape of the global markets. 2023 was a year where several themes dominated the global economy while it was still recovering from the aftershocks of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Looking in the rear-view mirror, some of the key contributors to financial markets volatility were the banking crisis, inflation concerns and central banks monetary tightening policies, rise of the artificial intelligence and geo-political risks stemming from the ongoing wars.

Unveiling the Banking Turmoil

Unlike the subprime mortgage crisis of 2008 that was triggered by risky mortgage lending practices, the banking upheaval of March 2023 started owing to deficiencies in risk management and lack of proper supervision which ultimately caused multiple small-medium sized regional banks to fail in the U.S.

During the month of March 2023, Silvergate Bank, Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank faced bank runs over fears of their solvency and collapsed [1][2]. As a result, share prices of other banks such as First Republic Bank (FRB), Western Alliance Bancorporation and PacWest Bancorp plunged. FRB was later closed, and its deposits and assets were sold to JP Morgan Chase. Internationally, the jitters of the US banking crisis spilled over into Switzerland, where Credit Suisse collapsed owing to multiple scandals, and was acquired by its competitor, the UBS Group AG, in a buy-out on March 19, 2023 [3].

The Federal Reserve (Fed), Bank of Canada (BoC), European Central Bank, and several other central banks announced significant liquidity measures to calm market turmoil and mitigate the impact of the stress [4].

The Interest Rate Hiking Odyssey

Deeming inflation as transitory during 2021, central banks finally embraced inflation as a persistent problem and engaged in interest rate hiking saga starting from March 2022 which continued into 2023. These aggressive rate hikes had a significant impact on the financial markets as they made borrowing more expensive and led to record high bond yields. The chart below shows that the Fed conducted multiple hikes to bring the rates to 5.5%, highest level in more than 22 years [5]. BoC also increased its policy rate to 5% in a similar fashion.

Any “good news was bad news” in 2023 as robust labour market and resilient economic growth meant that central banks would have to keep interest rates higher for longer to the detriment of equities. Given the effect of monetary policy changes are subject to a lag, we would have to wait and see the full impact on the economy in the coming months.

The Rise of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) reshaping the future

2023 left an indelible imprint on the trajectory of technological evolution due to the rise of artificial intelligence and its profound effects that reverberated across numerous industries. We witnessed a pivotal juncture in the progression of generative AI in 2023 ever since Open AI released ChatGPT on November 30, 2022 [6], and within a few months it became one of the fastest growing applications in history and created a massive frenzy in the tech world. Despite concerns about the repercussion of higher interest rates in 2023, investors’ enthusiasm for AI took centre stage and the Nasdaq 100 index achieved the best year in over a decade owing to a stellar performance of the leading tech companies.

The Ascendance of Money Market ETFs in an Uncertain Financial Landscape

Assets in money-markets, high-interest savings accounts (HISAs) and other cash-like investments reached an all-time high during 2023 after the most aggressive monetary tightening cycle that was started by the Fed & BoC in 2022.  There is nearly $6 trillion parked in these funds and cash deposits in the U.S. [7], and over $25 billion in cash and HISA ETFs in Canada.

Yielding over 5%, these money market funds attracted retail investors, serving as a great avenue to park cash with guaranteed liquidity, minimum risk, low volatility, and flexibility. However, the recent shift in the Fed & BoC stance is signaling the end of the tightening campaign and projecting rate cuts in 2024. The latest ruling by office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) to uphold 100% liquidity requirements on HISA ETFs may impact the dynamic of these money market/HISA funds during this year.

Geopolitical Risks amidst two Ongoing Conflicts

2023 went down in history as being a year marked by two big wars: an ongoing conflict in Ukraine that started in 2022 as it fights off a Russian invasion and the outbreak of violence in the Middle East in October 2023 between Israel and Hamas [8].

Fear of potential escalation in the Middle East conflict and prospects of the war spilling over in the wider region added to uneasiness in the markets as the region is a crucial supplier of energy and a key shipping passageway. The market reacted to the news of the conflict by shifting towards safe-haven assets as this unforeseen geopolitical event increased uncertainties [9].

Dodging Recession, Double Digit Equity Returns and a Comeback in Fixed Income

During 2023, many investors feared that higher-for-longer interest rates would trigger a recession in the U.S and would take a toll on corporate profits and bond returns. As the Fed embarked upon the most aggressive rate hiking cycle, the yield curve inverted, sending a classic warning signal of a looming recession.

Moreover, the U.S. Institute for Supply Management’s (ISM) manufacturing index dropped below 50 in November 2023, indicating a contraction in manufacturing activity. Despite having the highest prediction of a recession with heightened volatility in the markets throughout 2023, the US economy avoided recession and equities posted double digit returns. Moreover, fixed income rebounded in 2023 and reported positive returns after persistently declining for two years, thanks to the bond rally in the last two months of 2023 as markets priced in rate cuts for early 2024.

The Canadian economy also dodged recession, largely attributed to substantial immigration which bolstered overall spending and economic growth. However, the GDP per capita declined, indicating that spending hasn’t matched the influx of newcomers primarily due to the increasing costs of home ownership and rent further exacerbating the housing crisis.

 

“Index returns do not reflect transactions costs, or the deduction of other fees and expenses and it is not possible to invest directly in an Index. Past performance is not indicative of future results.”

 Could 2024 be the Year of Fixed Income?

After having a humbling experience in 2023, the market consensus has now shifted for 2024 with the majority of fund managers in the U.S. expecting a soft landing for the economy [10], which might fuel rate cuts now that the sky-high inflation is subsiding and heading down towards the Fed’s & BoC’s target.

The chance of higher policy rates going forward is slimmer and the potential for rate cuts in 2024 is much stronger if inflation cools off further, the labour market weakens, consumer demand diminishes, and economic growth slows down. Both central banks indicated that future policy decisions will be data dependent and any rate cuts in 2024 will be contingent on inflation cooling off meaningfully, i.e., in line with their 2% target.

The market is currently anticipating rates to remain elevated till Q2 of 2024 as the labour market still seems robust and the December Consumer Price Index (CPI) print pushed the expectation of rate cuts even further. Continue Reading…

Where does the Tech Sector stand after Winter Earnings Season?

By Ambrose O’Callaghan, Harvest ETFs

(Sponsor Content)

The technology sector has put together a strong performance in the year-over-year period as of early afternoon trading on Tuesday, February 6, 2024.

For example, the S&P 500 Information Technology Index has delivered a year-over-year return of 47% at the time of this writing.

The tech sector, and the United States stock market at large, has been dominated by the performance of the “Magnificent 7” in 2023 and early 2024. The “Magnificent 7” are Apple, Amazon, Alphabet, Meta Platforms, Microsoft, Nvidia, and Tesla. Today, we’ll explore the performance of two big names and get a handle on the tech sector at large after many of the biggest names have unveiled their final batch of earnings for fiscal 2023.

“Tech companies have generally managed to report solid earnings so far this quarter,” says Harvest ETFs Portfolio Manager James Learmonth. “That highlighted continued strength in spending on artificial intelligence initiatives. In the shorter term, there has been a significant run in the sector over the past year and while there exists some potential for a consolidation period, momentum has continued, and the growth drivers remain in place.”

James Learmonth manages the Harvest Tech Achievers Growth & Income ETF (HTA:TSX). This ETF seeks to tap into large-cap tech companies that now lead this sector. HTA holds those leading companies to deliver both income and the growth opportunities investors seek in tech.

Which tech company’s earnings beat expectations in the winter of 2024?

Meta Platforms, which is one of the premier equally weighted holdings in HTA, unveiled its fourth quarter (Q4) and full-year fiscal 2023 earnings on Friday, February 2, 2024. The company reported adjusted earnings per share (EPS) of US$5.33 on revenue of US$40.1 billion in the final quarter of fiscal 2023: up from reported revenue of US$32.2 billion in Q4 FY2022. It beat analysts’ expectations with its Q4 2023 performance.

The company delivered advertising revenue of US$38.7 billion, which also beat analyst projections. Moreover, Meta reported 2.11 billion Facebook daily active users (DAUs). Ad impressions rose 21% from the prior year while the average price per ad declined by 2%. Meta also announced an additional $50 billion in share buybacks and its first-ever quarterly dividend payment.

Microsoft also put together a very strong earnings report. The multinational technology giant delivered revenue growth of 18% year-over-year to US$62.0 billion in the quarter ended December 31, 2023. Meanwhile, operating income jumped 33% to US$27.0 billion. Net income rose 33% to US$21.9 billion while non-GAAP net income delivered 26% growth. Diluted earnings per share (EPS) were reported at US$2.93 – up 33% compared to the previous year.

Shares of Microsoft have jumped 13% in the year-to-date period as of late morning trading on Friday, February 9, 2024. Meanwhile, Meta Platforms stock has surged 36% over the same period. These are the kind of equities that HTA seeks to harness to fuel growth and provide income through covered calls to Unitholders.

Where the tech sector is headed going forward

While this period of impressive earnings is encouraging, Portfolio Manager James Learmonth is monitoring any changes in momentum that “could come from the risk of a pause in spending at some point as companies ‘digest’ the equipment purchased over the past 12 months or so from the roll-out of new products … Many end user focused companies have yet to definitively demonstrate that they can effectively monetize AI solutions to the degree currently expected by investors. That is why we want to own the best-in-class companies that have proven platforms to capitalize on the long-term trend.”

He continued: “We remain positive on the sector over the intermediate to longer term. Growth drivers, such as artificial intelligence, cloud-based infrastructure, and other digital transformation initiatives, continue to drive spending. Cybersecurity also remains a key area of investment in an increasingly connected world, particularly given today’s geopolitical climate.”

How HTA is positioned in the current climate

At the time of writing, HTA has 40% exposure to software as a sub-sector, 29% in semiconductors & semiconductor equipment, and 10% in communication equipment. In June 2023, Bloomberg Intelligence projected that Generative AI had the potential to become a US$1.3 trillion market by 2032. The increased demand for generative AI products could add about US$280 billion of new software revenue, according to the research report. Continue Reading…