Building Wealth

For the first 30 or so years of working, saving and investing, you’ll be first in the mode of getting out of the hole (paying down debt), and then building your net worth (that’s wealth accumulation.). But don’t forget, wealth accumulation isn’t the ultimate goal. Decumulation is! (a separate category here at the Hub).

Those TV ads about financial advisors

Posted By |

By Darren Coleman

Special to the Financial Independence Hub

There is an Oscar Wilde quote that goes like this: “A cynic knows the price of everything and the value of nothing.” I think of it every time I see one of those Questrade TV commercials where the client meets with their wealth-management advisor so they can tell the person they are fired. Why? The fees are too high.

The commercials drive home the point that advice costs more than doing things yourself, which is no surprise. I’m also flattered because in one of the ads, the character has my name – Darren – and it makes me think I might be in that seat. But that’s as far as the similarity goes because in all the years I have been in this business no client has ever told me they are leaving because of my fees. Not one.

This is where I think those TV ads miss the point. The issue at hand should not be about price. It should be about Value.

All those ads focus on the price of advice and the implication is clear: that advisors are gouging their clients. The advisor gets to retire early because of fat fees while the client, according to the ads, loses up to 30% of their retirement savings to fees. While the math in these ads may be  questionable, the ads also ignore any benefit that the Advisor’s advice may bring.

The ads showcase clients not experiencing true value

Let’s explore what these ads are really about. What they showcase is that the client is not experiencing true value in the relationship. So, the client decides to go it alone and hire Questrade’s robot to do things for them. Questrade, and ‘robo-advisors’ as they are called in the industry, offer a discounted trading commission to do-it-yourself traders, along with pre-built portfolios for more passive investors. As there is no personalized advice on any financial matters for the client, the fees are much lower. Which is as it should be.

I, for one, would never use such a service. I don’t even like those robot vacuum cleaners; the one my wife bought always gets caught under the couch because it can’t find its own way out, which is annoying. I also dislike those robot attendants which more and more companies are using for navigating their telephone systems. And I use these analogies for good reason.

As far as handling your investments and financial matters, does going it alone or going with a pre-built model portfolio actually work? The evidence shows this is not the best solution for most people.

Behavioural mistakes rob people of bulk of their returns

Every year Dalbar, North America’s leading independent expert for evaluating, auditing and rating business practices, produces its annual Quantitative Analysis of Investor Behaviourstudy, which shows that most investors underperform their own investment portfolios. Year after year, investors buy and sell at the wrong times. They do this because they allow their emotions to get in the way. Consider it part of the human condition. Believe me, professional advisors know all about these tendencies: that behavioural mistakes rob people of the bulk of their returns.

For example, in March 2019, Dalbar calculated that the average investor lost more than twice as much as the market in the previous year! The average investor saw their portfolio drop by more than 9% while the market was down only 4%. And this was no fluke. Over a 20-year time period, these mistakes have continued and investors, on average, underperformed the broad market by about 4% annually. Continue Reading…

How to create a pension for the Average Joe: 65 with as little as $200K in Savings

Posted By |

By Billy and Akaisha Kaderli, RetireEarlyLifestyle.com

Special to the Financial Independence Hub

We know many of our readers are not “average.” However, if average Joe can support his retirement on as little as US$200,000 savings, imagine what you can do with the amount you have!

By reading the chart below, you can see that the average spending for retirement households age 65 – 74 is US$46,000.


It is tough to make that $46k amount with only Joe’s savings, so what should he do?

Social Security

The average recipient today (in the United States) collects US$1,461 a month, or US$17,532 a year. Joe’s SS check is average and he has a wife who also collects the average Social Security amount.

$17,532 times 2 (people) = US$35,000 per year.

Not quite the $46,000 that they need but getting closer.

Hopefully, Joe has his retirement money invested in VTI (Vanguard Total Stock Market) or SPY (S&P 500 Index) and is making market gains equaling around 10% annually.


Here you can see that since the 1950’s — about when Joe was born — the S&P 500 has had an annualized return of over 11%, dividends reinvested, but let’s use 10% as a more conservative projection.

Remember, Joe has to make up $11,000 to match his average spending ($46,000). But let’s give Joe an extra one thousand dollars per year so he can pamper Mrs. Joe with occasional gifts and dinners out.

So, he needs $12,000 out of the $200,000 in savings per year to make up the difference in spending. That’s an extra $1.000 per month.

Invested in the S&P 500 — based on 69 years of returns and using 10% as the annual return — after his first year he would have $220,000 minus $12,000 withdrawal = $208,000.

Now Joe has $47,000 in annual income: $35,000 from Social Security and $12,000 from investments.

Plus, his $200,000 has grown to $208,000, a 4% gain outpacing inflation at the current rate of less than 2% per year.

Their Social Security payment is also indexed to inflation so as inflation rises, so will their Social Security. Continue Reading…

Millennials value property more than looks when it comes to dating: HSBC study

Posted By |
HSBC.com

It seems Canada’s soaring real estate market has started to affect Millennial dating patterns. According to a survey coming out today from HSBC Bank Canada 61% of Millennials feel anxious about buying a property, so much so that shared financial (39%) or property (33%) goals are considered more important than looks when daters are considering a potential future partner.

HSBC adds that this obsession with shared property has a downside for Canadian millennials: “They are far more likely to say they had stayed in a bad relationship due to property (16%) than Canadians on average (6%).” Sounds like a possible basis for a new Millennial situation comedy!

All this is contained in Beyond the Bricks, an HSBC-sponsored annual global survey of almost 12,000 adults in ten countries, including 1,077 in Canada.

HSBC says that getting on the property ladder can be both exciting and stressful for Canadian millennial once they’ve found their perfect partner.  Most (62.8%) Canadian millennials said financial considerations drove their last house move, and the top two reasons for the move were getting more house for their money (25.5%) or a lower cost of living (23.4%). And the biggest source of tension was accepting money from parents for the purchase (in 14% of cases.) Continue Reading…

3 easy ways to build an Investment Portfolio on the cheap

Posted By |

I ditched my financial advisor about a decade ago and started investing on my own. I was fed up with paying high fees for underperforming mutual funds. Dividend-paying stocks were growing in popularity so I decided to take the plunge and build my own portfolio of blue-chip companies.

Several years later I realized my folly; it’s hard to pick winning stocks. It’s even more difficult to consistently pick winners and avoid losers over the long term. Overwhelmingly, the academic research showed that passive investing using mutual funds or exchange-traded funds (ETFs) has a much better chance of outperforming active investing that focuses on stock picking and market timing.

I bought into the research, sold my dividend stocks, and set up my new investment portfolio using two low-cost, broadly diversified ETFs.

Today investors have many more choices available to build an investment portfolio on the cheap. I’ll show you three ways to lower your investment costs, diversify your portfolio, and reduce the time you spend worrying about investing.

1). Use a robo-advisor

A traditional financial advisor or wealth manager might cost an investor between 1.5 to 2.5 per cent in management fees each year. Then along came robo-advisors to disrupt the portfolio management model and drive down costs to less than 1 per cent.

A robo-advisor helps you build a portfolio based on your risk tolerance, experience, and time horizon. Once your model portfolio is built all you have to do is make regular contributions and the robo-advisor will allocate your cash into the appropriate investments.

The robo-advisor takes care of rebalancing your money whenever the portfolio drifts away from its original allocation (due to market movements or from your own contributions).

Competition is heating up in the robo-advisor space with the likes of Wealthsimple, Nest Wealth, Justwealth, ModernAdvisor, Questwealth, and WealthBar all vying for your investment dollars. BMO SmartFolio has been around for a while and more recently RBC launched its own robo-platform with RBC InvestEase.

2.) Invest in index funds

An index fund tracks a stock or bond market and aims to deliver market returns minus a very small fee. All of the big banks offer index funds, typically at half the cost (or lower) than their traditional equity or bond mutual funds.

One popular set of index funds is TD’s e-Series funds. These funds can only be purchased online but they offer tremendous savings over their actively managed mutual fund cousins. Investors can find e-funds for Canadian equities, Canadian bonds, as well as U.S. equities and International equities all for fees of about 0.50 per cent or less.

Another solid set of index funds comes from Tangerine’s Investment Funds. These are one-fund solutions that come in five flavours; with the traditional 60 per cent equities, 40 per cent bonds balanced portfolio being its most popular. The expense ratio on Tangerine’s funds comes in at 1.07 per cent: higher than TD’s e-Series funds, but still a bargain compared to the industry average. Continue Reading…

No surprise: the best retirement investments are the same as for everyone else

Posted By |

We recommend that you base your investing for retirement on a sound financial plan relying on the best retirement investments.

One thing investors of all ages fear is not having a good financial plan in place so they have enough retirement income to live on once they’ve stopped working. Looking for the best retirement investments, addressing this concern is usually a high priority for many of our Successful Investor Portfolio Management clients.

Four key factors to consider when investing for retirement

  1. How much you expect to save prior to retirement;
  2. The return you expect on your savings;
  3. How much of that return you’ll have left after taxes;
  4. How much retirement income you’ll need once you’ve left the workforce.

Our portfolio diversification approach gives you strong potential for long-term gains  

If you diversify as we advise, you improve your chances of making money over long periods, no matter what happens in the market.

For example, manufacturing stocks may suffer if raw-material prices rise, but in that case your Resources stocks will gain. Rising wages can put pressure on manufacturers, but your Consumer stocks should do better as workers spend more.

If borrowers can’t pay back their loans, your Finance stocks will suffer. But high default rates usually lead to lower interest rates, which push up the value of your Utilities stocks.

As part of their portfolio diversification strategy, most investors should have investments in most, if not all, of these five sectors. The proper proportions for you depend on your temperament and circumstances.

For example, conservative or income-seeking investors may want to emphasize utilities and Canadian banks in their portfolio diversification, because of these stocks’ high and generally secure dividends.

More aggressive investors might want to increase their portfolio weightings in Resources or Manufacturing stocks. For example, more aggressive investors could consider holding as much as, say, 25% to 30% of their portfolios in Resources.

However, you’ll want to spread your Resource holdings out among oil and gas, metals and other Resources stocks for diversification and exposure to a number of areas.

Stick with conservative estimates to account for unforeseen setbacks

As for the return you expect from investing for retirement, it’s best to aim low. If you invest in bonds, assume you will earn the current yield; don’t assume you can make money trading in bonds.

Over long periods, the total return on a well-diversified portfolio of high-quality stocks runs to as much as 10%, or around 7.5% after inflation. Aim lower in your retirement planning — 5% a year, say — to allow for unforeseeable problems and setbacks.

Above all, it’s important to remember that while finances are important, the happiest retirees are those who stay busy. You can do that with travel, golf or sailing. But volunteering, or working part-time at something you enjoy, can work just as well. Continue Reading…