Building Wealth

For the first 30 or so years of working, saving and investing, you’ll be first in the mode of getting out of the hole (paying down debt), and then building your net worth (that’s wealth accumulation.). But don’t forget, wealth accumulation isn’t the ultimate goal. Decumulation is! (a separate category here at the Hub).

Trump Tariffs lead to Trade War: What investors can do now

Image via Pixabay

By Kyle Prevost, MillionDollarJourney

Special to Financial Independence Hub 

With so many Canadians plugged into the latest Trump Tariff news, I felt that I needed to get an updated trade war column out as soon as possible!

So what I’m going to do today is update an article I wrote back when we were taking our first baby steps into Trump Tariff reality. Below you’ll see a ton of info on what tariffs are, what Canada’s situation is in regards to the big picture effect on our economy, and finally, what the impact is likely to be on your portfolio.

But first, just to bring you up to speed, here’s what the President announced in his big “Liberation Day” speech – complete with grade-five-science-fair-style cardboard visual aid.

  • A baseline tariff of 10% will be imposed on nearly all imported goods from all countries. This tariff is set to take effect on April 5, 2025
  • Canada and Mexico will not – for the moment – be part of that 10% baseline tariff.
  • Canada and Mexico trade is basically now broken up into three categories: goods that are USMCA-compliant, goods that are not UMSCA-compliant, and goods that are in sectors that Trump wants special rules for.
  • USMCA-compliant goods are actually in the best spot of any imported goods in the world right now – as they get to enter the USA tariff-free!
  • Goods that are not UMSCA compliant are still under the 25% “Fentanyl Tariff” rules.
  • We already knew about potash and fossil fuels having their own 10% tariff rules, but it appears that lumber, steel, and aluminium will continue to have their own special place on the Trump Tariff list as well.
  • Likely the biggest Canada-related news was that the 25% tariff on automobiles will be applied to Canadian-made vehicles (despite the USMCA explicitly outlining this as being illegal).

In regards to the rest of the world, the most noteworthy developments were:

  • An additional 34% tariff on China, resulting in a total tariff of 54% when combined with existing duties.
  • European Union: A 20% tariff.
  • Japan and South Korea: 25% and 24% tariff respectively.
  • India: 26% tariff.
  • Vietnam: 46% tariff.
  • Many many many other tariffs.

As we hit publish on this article, countries around the world were announcing retaliatory tariffs and US stock market futures were showing that the overall US stock market was set to lose 4% as it opened on April 3rd.

The best quote that I heard in regards to summing up this whole mess was from Flavio Volpe, president of the Automotive Parts Manufacturers’ Association who stated that the new tariff situation was “like dodging a bullet into the path of a tank.” He went on to write, “The. Auto. Tariff. Package. Will. Shut. Down. The. Auto. Sector. In. The. USA. And. In. Canada,” and then, “Don’t be distracted. 25% tariffs are 4 times the 6/7% profit margins of all the companies. Math, not art.”

It appears that the rest of the world is finally waking up to the same reality that Canada and Mexico have been experiencing for the last two months. There’s much more that could be written about the gnashing of teeth and simply incredible quotes from the President such as, “An old-fashioned term that we use, groceries. I used it on the campaign. It’s such an old-fashioned term, but a beautiful term: groceries. It sort of says a bag with different things in it.”

Oooook.

For now, take a deep breath and read what I had to say a month ago in regards to your stock portfolio. The reality was true then, and it’s true today. In my predictions column back in late December I wrote:

One of the most pressing questions for Canadian businesses in 2025 is whether the newly elected U.S. president will follow through on his promises of large tariffs on Canadian imports.

Trump’s fixation on trade deficits could lead to a significant shake-up in the global economy. He appears intent on generating tariff income to support the legislative groundwork for corporate tax cuts. His “national security” justification may lack substance, but it could still trigger sweeping trade policies. 

I don’t actually believe that Mr. Trump understands how trade wars actually work, and he hasn’t cared to learn anything new in several decades. So the hopes better angels will talk him out of this are perhaps misplaced.

I believe even more strongly that the President-elect doesn’t understand how trade balances work, and consequently, he does not understand that in buying goods from Canada with a strong US Dollar, his constituents (US consumers) are winning! There is no “subsidization” of Canadian business going on here. 

While a blanket 25% tariff on all Canadian goods seems unlikely, a more targeted 10-15% tariff on non-energy products feels probable. If that happens, Canadian businesses would face a challenging environment, and retaliatory tariffs from Canada could escalate tensions further.

My guess is that we’ll see some major disruption in Canadian manufacturing, with supply chains snarled, and some factory commitments being delayed indefinitely as companies decide to move more operations within the USA for the next few years at the very least. I’d also be pretty worried if I was a farmer and/or worked in the dairy industry. Some of these tariffs might come off when the overall North American trade deal is finalized.”

I’d say that held up pretty well!

The key here is definitely not to panic. The Canadian stock market has actually held up pretty well so far – and as always, it’s key to remember that the vast majority of the companies in Canada’s stock market DO NOT depend on selling specific goods to the USA. It’s also worth noting that a lot of companies that weren’t previously UMSCA-compliant are likely to become so in a hurry. If that happens, there might actually be a lot of Canadian companies in an enviable position relative to the rest of their global competitors as they will have no tariff to worry about (for now) versus 10%-50%+ for other countries.

This isn’t going to be good for any of the world’s economies, but the Trump Tariffs are already proving very unpopular with US Citizens and even among Republican politicians. Read on for more detailed reasoning on why you don’t need to do anything drastic in the face of these latest Trump tariff developments, and the broader US – Canada Trade War that has now expanded to include the rest of the world.

Trump (Delayed) Tariff Details

So – what is a tariff anyway?

A tariff is a tax by a government on foreign goods coming into a country. The import company (or person) pays the tax to the US federal government. In the vast majority of cases, the company then turns around and sells the imported product for a higher price (and possibly also takes a hit to their profit margin).

Trump’s tariff summary:

  • A 25% tax on all imports – aside from oil. This happens on Tuesday, February 5th.
  • A 10% tax on oil. This is supposed to kick in on February 18th.
  • Mexico will see a 25% tax on all of its imports.
  • China will get a comparatively light 10% tariff on its imports.
  • Canada will respond with two-phases of tariffs in response. They will total $155 billion of US goods.
  • Mexico hasn’t finalized details but announced tariffs ranging from 5% to 20% on US imports including pork, cheese, fresh produce, manufactured steel and aluminum.

If you’re wondering what we send to the USA – it’s a lot (we don’t have 2024 numbers finalized yet).

top us imports canada
Source: CBC News

The potential fallout from U.S. tariffs looms large. If the worst-case scenario unfolds and these tariffs stay on Canadian companies for more than a month or two, economists estimate it could push Canada into a three-year recession, shave three percentage points off our GDP, and wipe out 1.5 million jobs. While forecasts vary, one thing is clear – the economic risks are significant. It would likely be even worse for Mexico.

The USA isn’t going to get off the hook easily either. Predictions range between their GDP shrinking .3% to 1%. That range doesn’t give a precise picture of the fact that counter-tariffs will be heavily targeted with the goal of inflicting maximum pain to companies that are important to Republicans’ electoral chances. I wouldn’t want to be in the US alcohol or consumer goods business right now.

American consumers are going to immediately see higher prices on agricultural goods, lumber (which means more expensive houses), gasoline (especially in the midwest), and vehicles.

When it comes to cars, the idea that the tariffs will somehow shutdown Canadian factories and move them to the USA overnight is ridiculous. What will happen is that the complex supply chains involved for North American manufacturers will get much more expensive, and consequently it will make the final product more expensive. Continue Reading…

Don’t avoid U.S. stocks: Embrace a global portfolio

 

By Dale Roberts

Special to Financial Independence Hub

We all know that Canadians are up in arms (well, elbows are up to be more specific) over President Trump’s strategy to destroy Canada, economically. There is a national wave of pride that says ‘Buy Canadian’ and avoid most anything produced in the U.S. More Canadians refuse to cross the border as well, tourism to the U.S. is down significantly. And while U.S. produce rots on the shelves at No Frills, many Canadian investors are also dumping their U.S. stocks in protest. This is the financial equivalent to cutting of your nose to spite your face. Don’t avoid U.S. stocks. Embrace a global portfolio.

Now I certainly understand, here’s the kind of motivation that gets our elbows up …

Of course Canadians will take a pass on that 51st State offer. But we should not take a pass on U.S. stocks. While you may not be a fan of the United States of America, it is still where they keep most of the best companies on earth. It is where they keep the best stock market on the planet. It’s where the entrepreneurial spirit and innovation rages like no place on earth.

Good luck hanging out in Rogers

Ironcially, the best way to protect against economic attack might be embracing our attacker. At least in a portfolio sense. What if they win? What if they destroy Canada economically? They can. Trump might. The U.S. would get stronger as we get weaker. Good luck hanging out in Rogers, Bell, BMO, CIBC, Enbridge, Magna and Suncor. Remember, America doesn’t need anything that Canada produces 😉

A portfolio can be used to hedge most economic events in life, even our country’s economic demise. I suggest that you protect yourself and your family first. Don’t remove what might be your best line of defence. If the U.S. remained an economic powerhouse (with U.S. companies leading the way), and the Canadian stock market and Canadian dollar collapsed, owning these great U.S. companies would make you rich in your own land. And in grotesque fashion, the greater the divide the richer you would get in your own land by way of those U.S. holdings. Here’s the U.S. market going up 4-fold from 2013 with the added currency boost. The weaker the Canadian Dollar, the greater your return.

Warren Buffett does not hate you

Keep in mind that the C.E.O.’s and management at Berkshire Hathaway, Pepsi, Microsoft, Home Depot, Johnson & Johnson and Apple are not out to get you. Quite the opposite, they know a massive tariff war is a very, very, very bad idea for everyone.

In fact, Warren Buffett slams Donald Trump’s tariffs on Canada and Mexico and calls them an act of war. Most business leaders don’t like what’s going on, and it’s the same for so many, or most Americans …

And in Vermont …

The fact that a tariff war is a bad idea might be reason for optimism. For Seeking Alpha this week I offered Defensive stocks for unpredictable Trump policy.

From that article.

My take on the global tariff war concept is …

The bad news is a global tariff war spells economic destruction.

The good news is a global tariff war spells economic destruction.

Essentially, it can’t happen, I think and hope. The markets will push back and so will voters if the economy continues to weaken, and we see a spike in inflation.

It’s safe to say that Trump does not want to be a half-term President, again. They have mid-term elections in 2026.

But U.S. stocks are underperforming

Yes, you might have noticed. And I’ve been pointing this out to readers for several weeks. The markets have been turning their back on U.S. stocks and are embracing international equities. Continue Reading…

Why a Market Timing Strategy leads to poor investment Returns

Forget relying on a market timing strategy to boost returns. Focus instead on these proven tips for successful investing.

Deposit Photos

Market timing is the practice of trying to predict future trends and turning points in stock prices. For most people, this is a wasted, if not harmful, effort.

Random events tend to occur in bunches. A market timing strategy generates a lot of random buy and sell signals. Some are bound to work out well. But few work out well enough to offset losses on the inevitable erroneous signals, and leave a decent profit leftover.

Why successful investors stay away from a market timing strategy

The practice of market timing consists of coming up with and acting on a series of guesses (or estimates, or probability assessments) to use in your buying and selling decisions. Market timing theory attempts to interpret and detect buy and sell signals in trading patterns and history. Some of the decisions you make with the help of market timing will bring you profits, and others will cost you money.

Market timing can pay off sporadically, of course. Although the results are largely random, successes and failures are apt to come in spurts. The worst thing that can happen to you near the start of an investing career is that you make a series of successful timing decisions. This may lead you to believe that you have a natural talent for market timing, or that you’ve stumbled on a timing process that’s a guaranteed money-maker. Either of these conclusions can spur you to back your future timing decisions with growing amounts of money.

A significant market setback of, say, 10% or more will come along eventually. Unfortunately, no one can consistently say when that will be. Trying to foresee setbacks is sure to cost you money, however. That’s because many of the setbacks you foresee won’t occur. If you act on your prediction and sell, you’ll miss out on profits. You may buy back in at higher prices, just in time to be in the market when the next setback does occur. That’s known as a “double whipsaw.”

Eventually it happens to a lot of market timers. Some react by giving up on market timing. Others just give up on investing.

The best market timing strategy I can offer is to buy steadily and carefully throughout your working years, and sell gradually in retirement. That approach is virtually certain to enhance your investing profits. For one thing, it stops you from selling all your stocks near a market bottom, which market timers do from time to time.

How to be a successful investor without using a market timing strategy

Instead of trying to master market timing, you are far better off to study the earmarks of successful investments. Your long-term investment results will improve a great deal if you simply learn to spot and recognize these earmarks, and understand how they differ from the common risk factors in unsuccessful investments.

Here’s a look at some ways to make better investments: Continue Reading…

Playing Defense with Sector ETFs

Here’s how an equally weighted portfolio of healthcare, utility, and consumer staples ETFs could provide better downside protection and reduce volatility.

Image courtesy BMO ETFs/Getty Images

By Erin Allen, Director, Online Distribution, BMO ETFs

(Sponsor Blog)

The U.S. stock market, particularly the S&P 500 index, isn’t as uniform as it might seem. While you may think of it as a homogenous entity, it’s far from reality.

The S&P 500 can be broken down into 11 Global Industry Classification System (GICS) sectors: information technology, health care, financials, consumer discretionary, communication services, industrials, consumer staples, energy, utilities, real estate, and materials.

Each sector groups together companies that operate in the same industry and offer similar products and services. Historically, different sectors have also shown varying levels of sensitivity to market and economic conditions.

Some are cyclical, meaning they typically do well during economic expansions but struggle in downturns. On the other hand, some sectors are considered defensive, as their revenues and earnings remain stable regardless of economic cycles.

One well-known investment strategy that takes advantage of these differences is sector rotation, where investors shift their money between sectors based on macroeconomic indicators like GDP growth, interest rates, and inflation.

Source: SPDR Americas Research. ++/– indicates the best/worst two performing sectors. +/- indicates the third best/worst performing sectors. The Energy sector did not make the top/bottom three sectors during any cycles, as it is less sensitive to U.S. economic cycles but more driven by global supply and demand of crude oil. For illustrative purposes only. 1

However, for risk-conscious investors, another approach involves overweighting defensive sectors — particularly health care, utilities, and consumer staples — to provide better downside protection and reduce portfolio volatility.

What makes a sector defensive?

A sector is considered defensive when its companies provide goods or services that consumers continue to purchase regardless of economic conditions.2

For example, when the economy weakens, a consumer might delay buying a new car or upgrading their phone. These are discretionary purchases: non-essential items that can be postponed until financial conditions improve.

In contrast, even during a recession, people still pay their water and gas bills and continue buying household essentials like groceries and personal care products.

The underlying economic principle at play here is elasticity. In economics, elasticity measures how much the quantity demanded of a product changes in response to price or income changes.

Goods with inelastic demand see little fluctuation in consumption, even when prices rise or consumer income declines. This makes sectors with inelastic demand more stable during market downturns.

  • Utilities: Electricity, water, and gas are necessities that households and businesses must pay for, regardless of economic conditions.
  • Consumer Staples: Essential items like food, personal care products, and household goods remain in demand even when discretionary spending drops.
  • Health Care: Medical services, prescription drugs, and insurance are critical expenses that people prioritize, often regardless of cost.

How defensive are these sectors?

One way to quantify how defensive a sector has historically been is to look at its beta, a measure of volatility relative to the broader market3.

The market itself has a beta of 1.0, meaning any stock or sector with a beta below 1.0 tends to be less volatile and moves less than the overall market during upswings and downturns.

When analyzing long-running sector ETFs, the historical five-year betas confirm that health care, consumer staples, and utilities have lower volatility than the broader market.

The Health Care Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLV) has a beta of 0.644, The Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLP) comes in even lower at 0.575, and The Utilities Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLU) has a beta of 0.746. This suggests that all three sectors historically experience smaller price swings compared to the S&P 500.

Further supporting this, research from State Street Global Advisors examined periods of steep market drawdowns. Between 1999 and 2022, there were 11 instances where the S&P 500 declined by 10% or more in a single quarter7.

They found that an equally weighted portfolio of health care, consumer staples, and utilities delivered significantly smaller losses than both the S&P 500 and the Russell 1000 Value Index.

 Morningstar direct. Data as of 6/30/227

This demonstrates how overweighting defensive sectors has historically provided better downside protection in times of market stress versus broad market indices.

The ETFs for the job

BMO’s lineup of SPDR Select Sector Index ETFs includes three options that align with the defensive sectors discussed earlier. These ETFs provide targeted exposure to U.S. health care, consumer staples, and utilities, ensuring investors can overweight these segments without exposure to the rest of the S&P 500. Continue Reading…

Navigating Volatility with Asset Allocation ETFs

Image courtesy Harvest ETFs

By Ambrose O’Callaghan, Harvest ETFs

(Sponsor Blog)

The S&P 500 was down 3.53% in the year-to-date period as of mid-afternoon trading on Wednesday, March 19, 2025. Markets in the United States and across the globe have been hit with turbulence while the threat of tariffs has ramped up trade policy tensions. Earlier this month, we’d suggested that investors might consider taking it back to the basics.

In this piece, I want to explore why striking a defensive posture and pursuing diversification in your portfolio could provide peace of mind going forward.

The macroeconomic environment today

There are elevated risks that have led to uncertainty in the markets today. We are now two full months into Donald Trump’s second Presidential term. It already feels much longer than that to many Canadians. Investors may want to prepare for elevated volatility in the near to mid-term as there appears to be no immediate relief in sight when it comes to prickly trade tensions between allies and adversaries alike in the geopolitical sphere. Global trade policy uncertainty, a measurable index that quantifies policy risks, is the highest it has been since Trump’s first term.

Valuation concerns have been added to the risks and uncertainty. This is particularly true in the U.S. with regards to big tech. Investors have started to question the pace of earnings growth, as well as the strength and confidence of the consumer. A March report from the University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment Index showed it falling to 57.9. That is the lowest level since November 2022. It also represents a 10.5% drop from the same time in February 2025. Consumer sentiment had declined by 27.1% – or 21.5 points – in the year-over-year period. That is the largest annual decline since May 2022.

Between tariffs, geopolitics, valuations, and the economy, investors are being presented with an increasingly challenging and noisy backdrop.

Advantages of Asset Allocation funds

The biggest advantage that Asset Allocation funds offer investors is diversification. Diversification, it has been said, is the only “free lunch” in investing. Diversification does not eliminate risk, but it does spread out risk broadly. That has the potential to create more robust portfolios.

Asset Allocation exchange-traded funds (ETFs) help investors better diversify their holdings. These ETFs also provide the discipline to stay invested in the market to help manage the market gyrations that all investors inevitability experience. Staying invested in markets, especially in times of heightened volatility, is historically what sets investors up for long-term investing success. Moreover, asset allocation strategies offer investors the benefit of the package. While many investors may tweak exposures through individual ETF holdings, many can benefit from the “one-ticket approach” offered by asset allocation ETFs.

Asset allocation strategies in 2025

The Harvest Diversified Equity Income ETF (HRIF:TSX) allocates to other Harvest Equity Income ETFs – which overlay an active covered call strategy on a portfolio of sector-focused equities – to generate attractive equity income across a well-diversified sector mix.

Meanwhile, the Harvest Diversified Monthly Income ETF (HDIF:TSX) represents the same portfolio of Harvest Equity Income ETFs. However, HDIF employs modest leverage at approximately 25% to amplify returns and income.

Notable sectors in these ETFs include defensives like health care, utilities, real estate investment trusts (REITs), and it is complemented by growth sectors such as technology and industrials. The use of the covered call writing strategy transforms market volatility into higher levels of cashflow. These ETFs are one-ticket globally diversified equity income exposures, offering attractive overall yields.

A traditional balanced asset allocation portfolio

The traditional “balanced” investment portfolio is composed of 60% equities and 40% bonds. In 2024, Harvest launched the Harvest Balanced Income & Growth ETF (HBIG:TSX) and the Harvest Balanced Income & Growth Enhanced ETF (HBIE:TSX). These ETFs incorporate Fixed Income ETFs into the mix, aiming to replicate that 60/40 asset allocation. These Fixed Income ETFs include intermediate and long duration US Treasuries. Continue Reading…