Building Wealth

For the first 30 or so years of working, saving and investing, you’ll be first in the mode of getting out of the hole (paying down debt), and then building your net worth (that’s wealth accumulation.). But don’t forget, wealth accumulation isn’t the ultimate goal. Decumulation is! (a separate category here at the Hub).

What is Quality Investing?

Posted By |

As consumers we prefer higher quality things, and with stocks it may be no different. Learn why Quality may be important to investors.

Image courtesy BMO ETFs/Getty Images

By Erin Allen, Vice President, Direct Distribution, BMO ETFs

(Sponsor Blog)

Quality is a very familiar concept in society. As we know, an item can’t be judged on price alone. If one shirt costs $10, versus another that costs $30, does this mean the cheaper shirt is better based on price alone?  Most likely not, as what matters is the quality of the shirts, and how it will perform in the future!

In investing, Quality is no different. It starts with a base assumption that all stocks aren’t created equal, some are going to be higher quality than others, and as a result may enjoy better risk-adjusted returns. As consumers we prefer higher-quality things, and with stocks it is no different. Indeed, higher-quality stocks have historically shown benefits to investors, outperforming over time.[1]

What makes a company a quality company?

There are different approaches to identifying Quality, with associated pros and cons. Warren Buffett prefers to look for companies with “competitive moats” and companies that exhibit earnings power in excess of its peers. If a business model is easily replicated, one would expect copycats to soon enter, and drive down profitability.  Companies with competitive moats have advantages that competitors find difficult to touch, and would be considered higher quality. Many fundamental investors have a Quality screen in place and will also often look for high-quality management teams, which are assessed by in-person meetings, and other heuristics.

Quality can also be defined by assessing financial metrics in a consistent and disciplined approach. This is an approach BMO GAM has taken for the ETFs listed below, using the MSCI index which BMO’s Quality ETFs are based. Three metrics are assessed: ROE (Return on Equity), Leverage (Debt to Equity), and Earnings stability (the consistency of earnings through time). Having discipline, and a regular rebalancing schedule to assess and make changes, is of tremendous benefit in investing, to mitigate the role of emotion and behavioural biases, and to ensure the portfolio remains on plan, and true to its intended exposure.

ROE – This is a measure of profitability. Companies with higher profitability are winners in their respective industries. In investing, while things do evolve over time, winners tend to remain winners*1. Higher profitability is a good signal a company has a high-Quality business model.

Low Leverage – High Quality companies tend to be cash rich, from driving solid and consistent business results. Apple is a great example, as it is currently sitting on over US$60 billion of cash and short-term investments2. In short, Quality companies often have less need for debt, so BMO GAM screens for companies with less debt overall.

Earnings Stability – Companies with strong competitive advantages tend to have more consistent earnings streams, as competitors find it difficult to take a “bite out of their lunch.” Quality companies tend to show their merits in earnings consistency through time.

When does Quality tend to perform well, and when may it lag?

Quality companies tend to have a risk level at or slightly below broad markets, and can participate in growth, while maintaining a measure of defensiveness should volatility in markets increase.  Investing in higher-profitability stocks tends to give the quality exposure a growth flavour, while in negative equity markets quality stocks will often be preferred due to their strong overall balance sheet strength, with less debt and more consistent earnings. As well, higher interest rate environments tend not to be as much a concern for quality companies, as their debt levels are lower and they are less exposed to higher interest rate impacts.3

Performance wise, like all factors, Quality is best evaluated versus broad market performance through the entire market cycle, or market cycles. However, as a generalization, Quality stocks tend to do well in growth markets. In very strong bull markets Quality stocks tend to participate well, but higher risk/lower quality stocks may outperform when investors are the most exuberant and take on more risk.  In backdrops with higher market volatility, Quality tends to outperform, as company fundamentals and balance sheet strength matter. These are general historical performance trends, and performance in specific market scenarios may vary.

The chart below illustrates factor performance over the past 10 years which shows quality outperforming in many years.

Other considerations

Implementing a quality exposure in your portfolio leads to sector differences and security differences versus the broad index. For example, in the U.S., Quality tends to overweight Technology companies, as many of these companies fit the bill of high profitability/low debt/consistent earnings, and underweight other sectors such as Consumer Discretionary, where the metrics are not as strong. Continue Reading…

Retired Money: Taking RetireMint for a test spin

Posted By |

My latest MoneySense Retired Money column has just been published: you can find the full column by clicking on the highlighted headline here: What is RetireMint? The Canadian online platform shows retirement planning isn’t just about finances.

We provided a sneak preview of RetireMint late in August, which you can read here: Retirement needs a new definition. That was provided by RetireMint founder Ryan Donovan.

The MoneySense column goes into more depth, passing on my initial experiences using the program, as well as highlighting a few social media comments on the product and some user experiences provided by RetireMint.

RetireMint (with a capital M, followed by a small-case letter I rather than an e) is a Canadian retirement tool that just might affect how you plan for Retirement. There’s not a lot of risk as you can try it for free. One thing I liked once I gave it a spin is that it isn’t just another retirement app that tells you how much money you need to retire. It spends as much or more time on the softer aspects of Retirement in Canada: what you’re going to do with all that leisure time, travelling, part-time work, keeping your social networks intact and so on.

In that respect, the ‘beyond financial’ aspects of RetireMint remind me of a book I once co-authored with ex corporate banker Mike Drak: Victory Lap Retirement, or indeed my own financial novel Findependence Day. As I often used to explain, once you have enough money and reach your Financial Independence Day (Findependence), everything that happens thereafter can be characterized as your Victory Lap.

As Donovan puts it, this wider definition must “break free from the tethered association of solely financial planning.”

Donovan says roughly 8,000 Canadians will reach retirement every single week over the next 15 years. And yet more than 60% of them do not know their retirement date one year in advance, and more than a third will delay their retirement because they don’t have a plan in place.

Retirement not calendar date or amount in your bank account

Donovan says  “Retirement has become so synonymous with financial planning, and so associated with ‘old age,’ that they’re practically inseparable. Yet, in reality, retirement is a stage of life, not a date on the calendar, an amount in your bank account, and is certainly not a death sentence.” He doesn’t argue that financial planning is the keystone of retirement preparation, as “you won’t even be able to flirt with the idea of retiring without it.” But it’s much broader in scope than that. As he puts it, this wider definition must “break free from the tethered association of solely financial planning.” Continue Reading…

Real Estate Investments for Findependence

Posted By |
Commercial Real Estate: Image via Pexels: Brett Sayles

By Devin Partida

Special to Financial Independence Hub

Real estate is a powerful investment tool for anyone looking to build wealth and achieve Findependence [Financial Independence], especially in the U.S. and Canada. It offers the potential for passive income, long-term growth and significant tax advantages, making it an attractive option for many investors.

It is crucial to understand the different types of real estate investments — such as residential, commercial and short-term rentals — and how they align with market trends in North America to make the most of this opportunity. Each type comes with risks and rewards, but real estate can be fundamental to a diversified and profitable investment portfolio when approached strategically.

The Role of Real Estate in Diversified Portfolios

Real estate provides a sense of stability that many investors find appealing, especially when compared to the volatility of the stock market and the impact of inflation in the U.S. and Canadian markets. One-third of Americans view real estate as the best long-term investment, even above stocks, gold, savings accounts or bonds.

Balancing properties with traditional investments like stocks and bonds can enhance financial stability and create a more resilient portfolio. However, understanding regional market trends is essential — particularly in high-demand areas like New York, Los Angeles or Toronto — where property values increase steadily. Being informed about these markets allows investors to make practical decisions that support their long-term goals.

Types of Real Estate Investments

Several investment options are available when building wealth through real estate. Here are different types to help investors choose the right path:

Residential Properties

Residential spaces — including single-family homes, duplexes and condos — are popular investment options for those aiming to generate rental income. Investors can also take advantage of property appreciation through this method, especially in fast-growing areas like the suburbs of Toronto, Vancouver or Austin. While the potential for returns is strong, they must consider risks like fluctuating home prices, tenant turnover and maintenance expenses.

One factor to consider is reviewing any restrictive contracts — particularly in spaces with homeowners’ or condominium associations — because these can limit how the space is used. For example, some groups have strict rules about short-term rentals, which can affect an investor’s ability to maximize returns.

Commercial Properties

Commercial properties generally provide investors with the opportunity for longer-term leases and higher rental income than their residential counterparts. Additionally, they can take advantage of tax breaks and deductions — such as depreciating the property over 39 years — which can reduce taxable income. These factors make buying and improving commercial spaces attractive for investors looking to maximize their returns.

However, these investments come with risks, including economic downturns that may affect tenants and the added complexities of managing larger spaces. For those willing to navigate these challenges, commercial real estate can be rewarding to a diversified investment strategy.

Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs)

REITs provide an accessible way to invest in large-scale commercial properties without needing direct ownership. They’re great options for those seeking regular dividends and diversified exposure.

While REITs offer attractive returns, investors have very little control over individual properties. A recent example of market impact is the decline in the market cap of Canadian REITs, which fell from nearly $59 billion in 2021 to just $38.2 billion in 2023. Despite these risks, they remain popular for those looking to enter commercial real estate quickly.

Expert Tips for Maximizing Returns

Managing a property investment requires careful planning and strategy to maximize returns. Here are tips to help investors stay ahead and ensure long-term success: Continue Reading…

What Investors should know about ADRs and CDRs, and their Fees

Posted By |
Deposit Photos

Recently one of our Inner Circle members asked, “You mentioned recently that TSI recommends a handful of ADRs (American Depositary Receipts) providing exposure to European and Japanese stocks. One question: What are the ADR fees charged to investors by U.S.-listed ADRs?”

An American Depositary Receipt, or ADR, is a proxy for a foreign stock that trades in the U.S. and represents a specified number of shares in the foreign corporation. ADRs are bought and sold on U.S. stock markets, just like regular stocks, and are issued or sponsored in the U.S. by a bank or brokerage firm. If you own an ADR, you have the right to obtain the foreign stock it represents. However, investors usually find it more convenient to continue to hold the ADR.

One ADR certificate may represent one or more shares of the foreign stock. Or, if the stock is expensive, the ADR may represent a fraction of a share; that way the ADR will start out trading at a moderate price or be in the range of similar securities on the exchange where it trades.

The price of an ADR is usually close to the price of the foreign stock in its home market. There are no redemption dates on ADRs.

When an investor owns an ADR, a custodian — Citi, Bank of New York Mellon, and J.P. Morgan Chase are among the largest — is in charge of holding it. The custodian also maintains the records and collects the dividends paid out by the foreign issuer. It then converts those payments into U.S. dollars and deposits them into stockholders’ accounts. For all these services, the custodian charges an ADR fee.

The custodian may deduct that ADR fee from the dividends, or it may charge the ADR holder separately. If the ADR doesn’t pay a dividend, the custodian will charge the ADR fee directly to the brokerage, which in turn will charge it to a client’s account.

We feel you can find all the foreign investment variety and exposure you need by confining your purchases to U.S. and Canadian stocks, plus low-fee ETFs (exchange traded funds). However, if you want to invest in a particular foreign stock, it’s generally more convenient and economic to hold ADRs of foreign stocks, rather than the foreign stocks themselves.

Bonus: What are CDRs?

CIBC

While I’m on the topic, some investors confuse ADRs, with CDRs. Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (CIBC)’s Canadian Depository Receipts (CDRs) give investors the opportunity to buy shares and/or fractions of shares in any of a number of U.S. or other foreign companies, in bundles that start out trading at a price of about $20 Cdn. each. CDRs come with a built-in hedging feature that reduces exchange-rate fluctuations. This feature costs you 0.60% of your investment yearly.

CDRs let you invest small sums in U.S. or other foreign stocks, some of which have exceptionally high per-share prices. (For instance, Nvidia currently trades for $610 a share.) Note, though, that with highly liquid stocks like Nvidia, or the other shares underlying CIBC’s CDRs, investors can easily buy, say, just one or two shares if they want. Continue Reading…

Five ways that Financial Marketing can mislead investors

Posted By |
Public domain image provided by Justwealth

By Robin Powell, The Evidence-Based Investor*  

Special to Financial Independence Hub

* Republished from the Just Word Blog from Robin Powell, the U.K.-based editor of The Evidence-Based investor and consultant to investors, planners & advisors  

Much as we like to think of ourselves as savvy consumers, we are actually very susceptible to PR and advertising. This is particularly true when it comes to investing.

Big banks like TD, RBC and Scotiabank, asset managers like Sun Life and Manulife, and online trading and investing platforms like Questrade and Wealthsimple, spend vast sums promoting their products and services. The more they spend, the more customers they attract.

Why, then, are people so receptive to financial marketing and so easily persuaded by it? In most cases it’s a lack of understanding. The financial markets are complex, and we’re bombarded with suggestions as to how to invest our money. In a world saturated with information, consumers rely on simple marketing messages to help them make decisions. They also derive comfort and security from large financial brands they’re already familiar with.

Big does not mean Best

The problem for investors is that the firms whose products are most often featured in the media are usually not the best ones to buy. The brands you’re most likely to see sponsoring hockey teams or film festivals, for example, or plastered across billboards in airports or train stations, are often just the sorts of companies you should avoid giving your business to. Why? Because the interests of consumers and big financial brands are often misaligned.

Financial firms are very clever at making it look as though their primary motivation is to help the likes of you and me to achieve better outcomes. But the bottom line is that they’re businesses, and their number one priority is to generate profits. To put it bluntly, these companies want our money. The more money we invest with them, and the more trading we do, the bigger the profits they make.

Financial education is extremely valuable. Educated investors almost invariably enjoy better outcomes. The danger, though, is that, all too often, we think we’re being educated when in fact we’re being sold to.

How Big Brands mislead us

There are all sorts of ways in which big financial brands mislead us. Here are five main ones.

1.) Emotional Appeal

Ideally, investors would act at all times in a calm and rational manner. We would only make decisions after carefully considering the available information and weighing up the options. But human beings are emotional animals, and financial marketers understand this better than anyone. This is why they deliberately appeal to emotions like fear and greed, and the fear of missing out, or FOMO, which, in a sense, is a combination of the two.

2.) Cognitive Biases

As well as their emotions, investors have to contend with a range of cognitive, or behavioural, biases that all of us are prone to. These include confirmation bias (our tendency to seek out information that confirms our pre-existing beliefs), herd behaviour (our instinct to copy what those around us are doing) and recency bias (our tendency to attach more weight than we should to recent events). Financial marketers know just the right buttons to press to exploit these built-in biases.

3.) Expert Endorsements

In his book Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion, the American psychologist Robert Cialdini writes about the importance of what he calls social proof. When we feel uncertain, he explains, we tend to look to others for answers as to how we should think and act. Closely related to this is the principle of authority, or the idea that people follow the lead of credible experts. So, for example, if someone recommends a certain product or strategy in the media, we’re inclined to take notice, even though that person may be heavily biased or not an expert at all.

4.) Scarcity and Urgency

Another way in which financial marketing leads consumers astray is that it generates a false sense of urgency. So, for instance, we might read about a particular investment “opportunity” — perhaps a hot stock or fund — in the weekend newspapers and feel impelled to buy it first thing on Monday morning. This is a very foolish way to invest. Of course, that stock or fund may well rise in value, but its price could just as easily fall. Regardless, investors are much better off taking a long-term view. It is very rarely, if ever, the case that you need to make an investment decision straight away.

5.) Financial Jargon

The final reason why the industry spin machine causes more harm than good is that it often contains financial jargon. At best, jargon confuses investors and over-complicates the investment process; at worst, it can be used to cloud and deliberately mislead. It can exploit people’s lack of financial literacy and give a false impression of trustworthiness and expertise. But the principles underpinning sensible investing are really quite simple, and consumers should place their trust instead in firms that simplify investing and explain how it works in clear, concise language.

Who can be Trusted?

You may be wondering, “If I can’t trust financial companies to tell me what’s best for me as an investor, who can I trust?” Continue Reading…