Tag Archives: investing

How to create a winning retirement income strategy

Posted By |

A successful retirement begins with a successful retirement income strategy.

One of the things that investors of all ages fear is that they won’t have a good financial plan in place so that they have enough retirement income to live on once they’ve stopped working.

Here are some ways to ease that anxiety:

In retirement, try to even out (equalize) your income with your spouse’s income, to lower overall taxes. Here’s how:

1.) Have the higher income spouse pay the household bills

The easiest way to even out income between two spouses is to have the higher-income spouse pay the mortgage, grocery bills, medical costs, insurance and other non-deductible costs of family life.

2.) Set up a spousal RRSP

Registered retirement savings plans, or RRSPs, are a form of tax-deferred savings plan designed to help investors save for retirement. RRSP contributions are tax deductible, and the investments grow tax-free.

3.) Pay interest on your spouse’s investment loans

If the lower-income spouse takes out an investment loan from a third party, such as a bank, the higher-income spouse can pay the interest on that loan.

RRIFs are a great long-term retirement income strategy

Continue Reading…

Men and women approach taxes & investing differently

Posted By |

By Gennaro De Luca

Special to the Financial Independence Hub

Anyone who is in financial services, and especially wealth management, knows there are big differences between men and women in terms of how they invest. But what isn’t as well known is that there are also big differences between men and women when they do their tax returns.

I started working at a bank at the age of 19, have been in financial services since 1990, and have spent the past 18 years in wealth management. But I also have a company that specializes in doing tax returns for small businesses, families and students. All this experience has provided a lot of insight into how men and women differ when it comes to financial matters.

Let’s first look at tax returns. Nine times out of ten it is the woman who takes the bull by the horns to get the family’s taxes done. Women tend to be more involved and are much more apt to ask questions of their accountant or tax preparer. Men may not ask any questions at all; they just hand over their documents and see you later.

What kind of questions am I talking about? Women want to know things like this:

  • What kind of tax credits are we eligible for?
  • Are there any government benefits we are eligible for?

That latter point is especially important for women who have small children. Indeed, many young families are really squeezed nowadays, so every opportunity for a tax break is vital.

Here is a perfect example from a client that illustrates what I mean. The woman is a teacher who could claim certain expenses for driving her car to work. Her husband is not a teacher, but does work for an employer. She asked us if her husband is also eligible for this same deduction because, like her, he drives a car for his employer and has lots of expenses.

As it turned out, he was eligible for what is known as a T2200, which is a declaration of conditions of employment –- effectively work-related expenses –- and in his case it meant deductions of $10,475, which resulted in a tax saving of over $3,000 on his tax return. But if his wife had never asked the question, none of this would have been claimed.

Men are more resistant to change

Another difference with doing taxes concerns technology. Today more than 80% of tax returns in Canada are done digitally, Continue Reading…

The Pros and Cons of Universal Life Insurance

Posted By |

By Lorne Marr, LSM Insurance

Special to the Financial Independence Hub

Universal Life Insurance gives you flexible, cost-effective coverage that lasts a lifetime. It can be personalized to suit your changing needs and has a combined tax-advantage investment component that you can manage according to your risk tolerance and financial goals. Universal Life Insurance was invented by the recently deceased George R. Dinney in 1962. He explains the concept in his authorship of “Life Insurance as a Game.”

Universal Life Insurance allows you to adjust your premium payments (reasonable limits apply) as your needs or situation change. It is the ideal choice for people interested in flexible coverage. Unlike term insurance, which covers for a set number of years, universal coverage protects your family for life, as long as you keep up with the premium payments.

The policy has an investment component that gives you the opportunity to grow your wealth, so you have the option of using your life insurance while you are still alive. This means you can fund financial goals or leave more to your beneficiaries.

All the premium payments you make go into a policy fund. This fund pays for the cost of your coverage plus investments. The balance remaining after coverage costs are invested on a tax-advantaged basis. There are a variety of investment options for you to choose from, based on your risk tolerance and financial objectives.

How much your investment will grow depends on the performance of your investments and the amount of your premiums. The money in the investment portion of your account is yours. You can use it to make premium payments or a source of savings. You can use it as collateral for a loan, withdraw it outright or just let it grow for financial security for your loved ones. Don’t forget that borrowing or withdrawing funds from your policy reduces its cash value.

Pros of Universal Life Insurance

Universal Life Insurance provides many benefits, such as: Continue Reading…

“Botched” CRM2 implementation just adding to investor confusion: veteran adviser

Posted By |
Tim Paziuk

By Tim Paziuk

Special to the Financial Independence Hub

After 37 years in the financial services industry I realize I shouldn’t be surprised, and I’m not. I’m shocked. Shocked by the confusion created by the very people who are charged with the responsibility of watching out for us, mainly the Canadian Securities Administration (CSA).

Here is the first paragraph from the overview on the CSA website

The Canadian Securities Administrators (CSA) is an umbrella organization of Canada’s provincial and territorial securities regulators whose objective is to improve, coordinate and harmonize regulation of the Canadian capital markets.

I draw your attention to the words ‘improve, coordinate and harmonize’. In my opinion, they have done more to hinder and confuse the average Canadian than to provide clear and complete information.

Let me give you some background on the recently implemented program referred to as the Client Relationship Management Model – Phase 2 (CRM2).

According to the Ontario Securities Commission:

The Client Relationship Model – Phase 2 (CRM2) amendments to NI 31-103 that came into effect on July 15, 2013 are being phased-in over a three-year period. These amendments introduce new requirements for reporting to clients about the costs and performance of their investments, and the content of their accounts. The requirements apply to dealers and advisers in all categories of registration, with some application to IFMs as well. For more information about these amendments, see CSA Notice of Amendments to NI 31-103 and to 31-103CP (Cost Disclosure, Performance Reporting and Client Statements). Continue Reading…

Q&A: Stock markets are at all time highs … should we sell?

Posted By |

By Steve Lowrie, Lowrie Financial

Special to the Financial Independence Hub

Here’s a question I received recently, which rhymes with many I’ve heard before:

Now that the Dow has hit 20,000, we should seriously get out and put the cash under the mattress … don’t you think?

This time it was the Dow’s recent high-water mark. In the past, it’s been the same question in various forms, all of which could be rephrased to this question behind the question: Should the all-time nominal stock market highs be used as some sort of signal to reduce equity holdings?

Or conversely, should it be used as a rationale for holding onto cash balances or deferring new equity purchases (which, in my experience, is an even more common form of market-timing)?

It is human nature to look for shortcuts and/or ways to simplify complex questions. The fact that people predict outcomes by making up stories is what makes us all … humans.

Timing the markets when they’re at all-time highs is a nice, neat and simple story. Unfortunately it’s a fable; it doesn’t work. To use a “baseball story,”  three strikes and you are out.

One.

I can point a couple of my past posts here and here for frowning on these sorts of signals, or treating them as anything other than the noisy blips they are on your financial radar screen. Try to chase them, and you’re more likely to be left flying blind.

Two.

Nominal levels ignore market valuations. That means new market highs may be fun, but they’ve not been worth beans for predicting future returns. Those are expected either way, but for entirely different reasons.

Three.

To take a deeper dive into the subject, Dimensional Fund Advisors has done the heavy lifting for us in “New Market Highs and Positive Expected Returns.”Their conclusion is that it doesn’t work. Give it a read if you want all of the details.

Still not convinced? … then please contact me.

Steve Lowrie holds the CFA designation and has over 20 years of experience dealing with individual investors. Before creating Lowrie Financial in 2009, he worked at various Bay Street brokerage firms both as an advisor and in management. “I help investors ignore the Wall and Bay Street hype and hysteria, and focus on what’s best for themselves.” This blog appeared originally appeared on his site on February 3rd and is republished here with permission.