Tag Archives: investing

An investing guide for beginners

group elementary school students in computer classBy Robb Engen, Boomer & Echo

Special to the Financial Independence Hub

Young readers often ask for investing tips and wonder how to get started. My typical response is that once you have a good handle on your finances – no credit-card debt, student loans fully paid (or close to it), some cash saved up for emergencies, short-term goals are funded (or on the way) – then it’s probably a good time to start your investing journey.

Finding the right investing approach can be tricky for beginners. There are plenty of options available, from GICs and bonds to mutual funds, stocks and ETFs. Then you need to consider your age and risk tolerance. Do you have the stomach to handle stock market fluctuations of 25 per cent or more, or would you prefer to see returns that are lower, yet less volatile?

If you’re serious about saving for retirement, you need an investing guide. Here are a few ideas to get you started:

First time investors: Building your portfolio

Continue Reading…

How to avoid cognitive biases

AmanRaina
Aman Raina

By Aman Raina, Sage Investors

Special to the Financial Independence Hub

In my last series of articles, I’ve reviewed some core cognitive biases that are constantly messing with our brains and can impair our ability to make better investment decisions. These biases are:

Groupthink/Herd Behaviour

Optimism Bias

Expert Bias

Confirmation Bias

Recency Bias

Geographical Bias

We’ve seen how all of these forces and tensions, poke and prod our emotions and decision making. The big questions is, can we eliminate these behaviours or are we stuck with them?

The simple answer is No. We’re human and as such we are ALL predisposed to these behaviours and always will be. It doesn’t matter if you’re a Sage Investor, Warren Buffett or David Tepper. At some point one or likely all of these biases will come into play.

We cannot eliminate cognitive behaviours but we can manage or control them by instilling some emotional discipline.

How to Manage Our Brain

The reality and some may say the sad, bizarre reality is we need to start thinking more like this guy.

 

We need to think more like George Costanza and try to take the other side of the trade. If you remember the episode, George made a life changing mood by deciding to do the opposite of what his instincts normally tell him. The result is George gets the job and the girl.

It sounds really really stupid and without any logic; however in investing, it appears that taking a contrarian approach and challenging conventional wisdom can go a long way to making better investment decisions. I wouldn’t go out and do what George was doing, however. Certain flashpoints in the psychology of how investors behave can provide good starting points for doing some due diligence that can uncover tomorrows great investment opportunities. Below are some easy methods for managing the various biases that throw us for a loop.

Groupthink/Herding Bias: We need to avoid what the consensus or conventional thinking is on a particular stock or business event.  At the very least, we should be challenging what the consensus is saying and also we need to listen closely to what the consensus does not like as they are likely to be tomorrow’s winners. We need to avoid chasing hot trends or the “It” stock or the investment strategy flavour of the month and stick to long term first principles of investing (i.e. invest in companies and ideas that create consistent tangible wealth from the scarce capital they have been entrusted with by shareholders and are trading at a discount to their value).

We need to looking out for companies and ideas that are not in vogue because chances are the market has punished them so much that the stock has become a decent entry point. I’m always looking out for companies that can demonstrate that they can be profitable when business conditions are tough, because when the pendulum turns, a great opportunity will exist to generate some meaningful returns. Dull, unsexy, and boring companies are truly gold.

Optimism Bias: We need to avoid getting immersed in just the positive of an investment opportunity. We need to seek out alternative views and perspectives. If I am researching a stock, I’m obviously interested in looking the positives in the business. (Is it profitable? Do they sell a product that people will buy again and again? Are they financially strong? Etc). I also need to be just as interested in alternative perspectives that are just as important in framing the investment decision. What are the risks the company faces in their industry? What is their competition? Is there any competition?

Expert Bias: Experts aren’t going away. We shouldn’t ignore them and we should always listen as they provide a perspective. We need to focus less on their forecasts and predictions as the research has shown they are no better than any of us in predicting the future. We should however pay close to their commentary that is critical or negative to a business concept as often those provide opportunities to uncover the diamond in the rough opportunities and a starting point for some due diligence.

The best example I can think of is Apple when the stock started tanking. It felt like every analyst was pounding the table saying the company had lost its way and lost its ability to create innovative products. This after creating some of the most innovative products in history (iPhone, iPad, iPod) that were still selling millions and millions of units. It wasn’t enough for the analysts and pundits (most of whom have never run a business of their own by the way).  What happened? They came up with a watch. They upgraded their phones with new features and they still sold tons of them and at one point became the largest company in the world by market cap. If you were able to put aside the noise by the experts and focussed on the fact the company was selling 45 million phones a quarter and literally printing money, you could have bought the stock at a 30-40 per cent discount.

Confirmation Bias: We need to consume and process information from sources who may not share the same value systems, beliefs and ideologies as we do. They provide perspective, context and a lot of times, a reality check. If I believe in value investing, I shouldn’t ignore insights from people who study market psychology or technical market indicators. They have nuggets of wisdom from which we can profit. Start following on Twitter or Facebook people who adopt investment strategies that are different from yours.

Recency Bias: When we invest, we are trying to make rationale, intelligent guesses about the future. As a result we need to reduce our dependence on using information of the moment as the foundation of the investment decision. If anything, we need to recognize the stories and snapshots of the moment so that we can begin looking at the alternatives. It is from there that we will find the winners of tomorrow that we seek. So if I’m seeing magazine and newspaper covers trumpeting that the stock market closed at a record high, it should act as a flag to me that the easy money has been made and that things may get a bit choppy going forward. Conversely, I watch the news and see a news reports about investors being nervous about putting money into the stock market, I’ll perk up because we could be nearing a moment where an optimal time may be at hand to slowly start building positions.

Geographical Bias: We love our homecooking. The reality is keeping a large amount of your investments domestically is not going give your portfolio the juice it needs to generate long term meaningful returns. We need to get outside our postal code and embrace the fact that business is a global organism and some of the greatest ideas do not necessarily reside in North America. Open the doors.

Easier Said Than Done

Indeed, taking all of these actions in a consistent manner is not easy and it is something that you cannot just flip a switch to change your behaviours. It takes a long time and likely will come with some scrapes and bruises. It is a process. At the same time it is possible, especially if you have a network around you of resources and people that can keep you on the straight and narrow. I believe more than ever that managing these behaviors and biases is the secret sauce that can elevate our financial literacy and the level of success we need to meet our long term financial and life goals.

Aman Raina, MBA is an Investment Coach and founder of Sage Investors, an independent practice specializing in investment coaching and portfolio analysis services. This blog was originally published on his web site and is reproduced  here with permission. 

Continue Reading…

FWB TV: Your Biases — YOU present the greatest risk to your portfolio

Screen Shot 2016-03-31 at 9.53.34 AM
Tim Richards, Psy-Fi Blog

The latest Evidence-based Investor Video  is now available at FWB TV: Your Biases: YOU present the greatest risk to your portfolio.

Markets may be efficient; In 2013, Eugene Fama received a Nobel prize in economics for proving this theory. Yet investors continue to fear the markets when in fact the greatest danger to their portfolio is themselves.

In this four-minute video Tim Richards of the Psy-Fi Blog (pictured) says most investors behave irrationally and that if they insist on trying to buy and sell stocks on their own, they will predictably lose money because of ill-timed decisions. He estimates that such investors can lose between 3% to 4% per year because of poor buy and sell decisions.

Blind spot bias

Many investors suffer from the so-called “blind spot” bias, meaning that while they may be aware of biases (like confirmation bias) exhibited by OTHER people, they’re unaware of the biases they themselves may suffer from when investing.

Richards says the best defence to loss-generating biases is passive investing: using broadly diversified index mutual funds or exchange-traded funds (ETFs) and holding on for the long run.  Only a small minority of investors who are able to disregard their emotions should attempt active trading of securities, and even then Richards is skeptical that such an approach will consistently beat passive investing strategies.

While even passive investors are not immune from irrational behaviour like selling everything during a downturn, their odds are improved by being aware of their biases and better yet by using a financial advisor who is acquainted with the topic of behavioural finance.

After watching the video if you want to learn more, download the free guide, 12 Essential Ideas For Building Wealth.

How to put together a stock portfolio that will carry you comfortably into retirement.  

patmckeough
Pat McKeough

By Patrick McKeough, TSInetwork.ca

Special to the Financial Independence Hub

During your working years, you put yourself on an investing regimen. Each year, you set aside a fixed sum to invest. It’s important to continue investing the same sum (or raise it) through good years and bad. The same sum buys more shares in “bad” years, when prices are low. It buys fewer shares in good years, when prices are high. This cuts your long-term average cost per share.

The process reverses in retirement

In retirement, you reverse the process. You sell enough stock every year to raise the cash you wish to extract from your portfolio. You may sell more stock in years when you feel prices are high. You should sell less when prices are low. But either way, you should aim to sell in a way that leaves you with a stronger portfolio that is better suited to your goals and temperaments.

To practice the Successful Investor method, you need to get acquainted with a number of well-established stocks with a history of earnings and, in most cases, dividends. You choose your yearly purchases from this list, based on their fundamental appeal.

Spread money across five main economic sectors

You also take care to spread your money out across most if not all of the five main economic sectors: Manufacturing, Resources, Consumer, Finance and Utilities.

Some of your selections will seem particularly attractive in light of the value they offer, based on earnings and balance sheet information. Other selections will cost more in relation to these measures, but will make up for it with better growth potential. So, rather than aim for a value or growth focus in your portfolio, you’ll have some of each.

You also take care to downplay or avoid stocks that are in the broker/media limelight. Some stocks work their way into the limelight because they are profiting from an investment fad. Some get there through stock promotion.

No need to worry about how much money to spend or when to buy

Some stocks in the limelight are good businesses that deserve attention. But the limelight blows their appeal out of proportion. This builds up investor expectations for these stocks, often to unsustainable levels. Some limelight stocks live up to these heightened expectations, or even exceed them. But most limelight stocks eventually stumble. When the inevitable disappointments emerge, stock price downturns can be sudden and brutal. Some are permanent. That’s why these stocks should make up at most a modest part of your portfolio.

Note that you don’t need to spend time thinking about how much money to invest. You invest the same amount every year. Of course, you will occasionally raise or lower your yearly commitment for an indefinite period, because of changes in your income or expenses.

You also don’t spend time worrying about when to buy. You buy every year. It’s best to do your buying as early as possible in each New Year.

That’s how we invest for our wealth management clients, to the extent that this is possible for each client, in light of his or her temperament and circumstances. Instead of agonizing over how much to invest or when to buy, we invest each client’s funds as soon as they become available. Rather than depend on predictions, we focus on investment quality, and portfolio balance and diversification.

That’s where we can create the most value, so that’s where we spend most of our time and effort.

 

Related:

Pat McKeough has been one of Canada’s most respected investment advisors for over three decades. He is the founder and senior editor of TSI Network and the founder of Successful Investor Wealth Management. He is also the author of several acclaimed investment books.

A walk along Risk Road, Part 2: Investing in a Slow-Growth world

MAWER_Jim Hall 4x6 Formal blue bg
Mawer’s CIO, Jim Hall

By Cameron Webster, CFA
Institutional Portfolio Manager, Mawer Investment Management Ltd.

Special to the Financial Independence Hub

A few weeks ago in Part 1 of this series, we ran an interview featuring Mawer’s chief investment officer, Jim Hall (pictured, left) about current interest-rate trends and deflation.

This is the follow-up interview, where we look in more depth at the problem of investing in a low-growth world.

As noted earlier, we at  Mawer spend a great deal of time asking and answering the question: So What? A company’s share price is down 6%…so what? A central bank moved interest rates up…so what? Google re-named itself Alphabet…so what?

It’s not always an easy question to answer and often leads us to ask even more questions in an effort to develop key investment insights. “So what?” is one of the questions that can lead us to investment action (or inaction) in our process of building well-diversified, resilient portfolios.

MAWER_Cameron-Webster-4x6-Formal-blue-bg
Cameron Webster

Cameron Webster: Jim, last time we discussed how Mawer’s quarterly risk review ranks macro risks on both probability of occurrence and degree of severity. Remind us why this is part of the investment process.

Jim Hall: It is not enough to just look at potential risks. We need to ask ourselves is it something we need to do something about? Is this something upon which we need to act? Is it important? That’s the value in evaluating these risks on both probability of occurrence and severity of consequence. Continue Reading…