Tag Archives: stocks

Trump Tariffs lead to Trade War: What investors can do now

Posted By |
Image via Pixabay

By Kyle Prevost, MillionDollarJourney

Special to Financial Independence Hub 

With so many Canadians plugged into the latest Trump Tariff news, I felt that I needed to get an updated trade war column out as soon as possible!

So what I’m going to do today is update an article I wrote back when we were taking our first baby steps into Trump Tariff reality. Below you’ll see a ton of info on what tariffs are, what Canada’s situation is in regards to the big picture effect on our economy, and finally, what the impact is likely to be on your portfolio.

But first, just to bring you up to speed, here’s what the President announced in his big “Liberation Day” speech – complete with grade-five-science-fair-style cardboard visual aid.

  • A baseline tariff of 10% will be imposed on nearly all imported goods from all countries. This tariff is set to take effect on April 5, 2025
  • Canada and Mexico will not – for the moment – be part of that 10% baseline tariff.
  • Canada and Mexico trade is basically now broken up into three categories: goods that are USMCA-compliant, goods that are not UMSCA-compliant, and goods that are in sectors that Trump wants special rules for.
  • USMCA-compliant goods are actually in the best spot of any imported goods in the world right now – as they get to enter the USA tariff-free!
  • Goods that are not UMSCA compliant are still under the 25% “Fentanyl Tariff” rules.
  • We already knew about potash and fossil fuels having their own 10% tariff rules, but it appears that lumber, steel, and aluminium will continue to have their own special place on the Trump Tariff list as well.
  • Likely the biggest Canada-related news was that the 25% tariff on automobiles will be applied to Canadian-made vehicles (despite the USMCA explicitly outlining this as being illegal).

In regards to the rest of the world, the most noteworthy developments were:

  • An additional 34% tariff on China, resulting in a total tariff of 54% when combined with existing duties.
  • European Union: A 20% tariff.
  • Japan and South Korea: 25% and 24% tariff respectively.
  • India: 26% tariff.
  • Vietnam: 46% tariff.
  • Many many many other tariffs.

As we hit publish on this article, countries around the world were announcing retaliatory tariffs and US stock market futures were showing that the overall US stock market was set to lose 4% as it opened on April 3rd.

The best quote that I heard in regards to summing up this whole mess was from Flavio Volpe, president of the Automotive Parts Manufacturers’ Association who stated that the new tariff situation was “like dodging a bullet into the path of a tank.” He went on to write, “The. Auto. Tariff. Package. Will. Shut. Down. The. Auto. Sector. In. The. USA. And. In. Canada,” and then, “Don’t be distracted. 25% tariffs are 4 times the 6/7% profit margins of all the companies. Math, not art.”

It appears that the rest of the world is finally waking up to the same reality that Canada and Mexico have been experiencing for the last two months. There’s much more that could be written about the gnashing of teeth and simply incredible quotes from the President such as, “An old-fashioned term that we use, groceries. I used it on the campaign. It’s such an old-fashioned term, but a beautiful term: groceries. It sort of says a bag with different things in it.”

Oooook.

For now, take a deep breath and read what I had to say a month ago in regards to your stock portfolio. The reality was true then, and it’s true today. In my predictions column back in late December I wrote:

“One of the most pressing questions for Canadian businesses in 2025 is whether the newly elected U.S. president will follow through on his promises of large tariffs on Canadian imports.

Trump’s fixation on trade deficits could lead to a significant shake-up in the global economy. He appears intent on generating tariff income to support the legislative groundwork for corporate tax cuts. His “national security” justification may lack substance, but it could still trigger sweeping trade policies. 

I don’t actually believe that Mr. Trump understands how trade wars actually work, and he hasn’t cared to learn anything new in several decades. So the hopes better angels will talk him out of this are perhaps misplaced.

I believe even more strongly that the President-elect doesn’t understand how trade balances work, and consequently, he does not understand that in buying goods from Canada with a strong US Dollar, his constituents (US consumers) are winning! There is no “subsidization” of Canadian business going on here. 

While a blanket 25% tariff on all Canadian goods seems unlikely, a more targeted 10-15% tariff on non-energy products feels probable. If that happens, Canadian businesses would face a challenging environment, and retaliatory tariffs from Canada could escalate tensions further.

My guess is that we’ll see some major disruption in Canadian manufacturing, with supply chains snarled, and some factory commitments being delayed indefinitely as companies decide to move more operations within the USA for the next few years at the very least. I’d also be pretty worried if I was a farmer and/or worked in the dairy industry. Some of these tariffs might come off when the overall North American trade deal is finalized.”

I’d say that held up pretty well!

The key here is definitely not to panic. The Canadian stock market has actually held up pretty well so far – and as always, it’s key to remember that the vast majority of the companies in Canada’s stock market DO NOT depend on selling specific goods to the USA. It’s also worth noting that a lot of companies that weren’t previously UMSCA-compliant are likely to become so in a hurry. If that happens, there might actually be a lot of Canadian companies in an enviable position relative to the rest of their global competitors as they will have no tariff to worry about (for now) versus 10%-50%+ for other countries.

This isn’t going to be good for any of the world’s economies, but the Trump Tariffs are already proving very unpopular with US Citizens and even among Republican politicians. Read on for more detailed reasoning on why you don’t need to do anything drastic in the face of these latest Trump tariff developments, and the broader US – Canada Trade War that has now expanded to include the rest of the world.

Trump (Delayed) Tariff Details

So – what is a tariff anyway?

A tariff is a tax by a government on foreign goods coming into a country. The import company (or person) pays the tax to the US federal government. In the vast majority of cases, the company then turns around and sells the imported product for a higher price (and possibly also takes a hit to their profit margin).

Trump’s tariff summary:

  • A 25% tax on all imports – aside from oil. This happens on Tuesday, February 5th.
  • A 10% tax on oil. This is supposed to kick in on February 18th.
  • Mexico will see a 25% tax on all of its imports.
  • China will get a comparatively light 10% tariff on its imports.
  • Canada will respond with two-phases of tariffs in response. They will total $155 billion of US goods.
  • Mexico hasn’t finalized details but announced tariffs ranging from 5% to 20% on US imports including pork, cheese, fresh produce, manufactured steel and aluminum.

If you’re wondering what we send to the USA – it’s a lot (we don’t have 2024 numbers finalized yet).

top us imports canada
Source: CBC News
trade dependancy
Source: Council of Foreign Relations

The potential fallout from U.S. tariffs looms large. If the worst-case scenario unfolds and these tariffs stay on Canadian companies for more than a month or two, economists estimate it could push Canada into a three-year recession, shave three percentage points off our GDP, and wipe out 1.5 million jobs. While forecasts vary, one thing is clear – the economic risks are significant. It would likely be even worse for Mexico.

The USA isn’t going to get off the hook easily either. Predictions range between their GDP shrinking .3% to 1%. That range doesn’t give a precise picture of the fact that counter-tariffs will be heavily targeted with the goal of inflicting maximum pain to companies that are important to Republicans’ electoral chances. I wouldn’t want to be in the US alcohol or consumer goods business right now.

American consumers are going to immediately see higher prices on agricultural goods, lumber (which means more expensive houses), gasoline (especially in the midwest), and vehicles.

When it comes to cars, the idea that the tariffs will somehow shutdown Canadian factories and move them to the USA overnight is ridiculous. What will happen is that the complex supply chains involved for North American manufacturers will get much more expensive, and consequently it will make the final product more expensive. Continue Reading…

How to invest and shop during Trump idiocracy

Posted By |
Theatrical release poster for the film, Idiocracy. via Wikipedia.

By Mark Seed, myownadvisor

Special to Financial Independence Hub

A few months ago I wrote:

“Yes, interesting times may call for interesting portfolio changes! Or not. :)”

Well, here we are.

Regardless about how you feel about the current U.S. Administration, I would think most people would agree that this U.S. President feels very emboldened right now. With no future term to go: this is his last shot at taking shots at pretty much anything and everyone he wants without too many consequences near-term. At least it seems that way …

Since writing this post below from December I thought I would update such a post about any recent portfolio changes and beyond that, how our shopping habits have shifted (if at all) in recent months.

How to invest and shop during Trump idiocracy

I put the term “idiocracy” in the post title since it’s very much how I feel right now.

It’s like watching the Ferris Bueller movie scene: on tariffs.

History repeats.

Now that tariffs are in place and we’re now in a (trade) war between Canadian and U.S. businesses, consumers and workers (sadly), I’m expecting these tariffs will roil stock markets for months or years to come.

I have.

This is how I intend to invest and shop during some prolonged Trump idiocracy.

Approach #1 – What investments can withstand stagflation?

New tariffs are likely, in my opinion, to trigger a sustained period of low economic growth and even higher inflation: which will impact everyone.

At the most basic level, inflation means a rise in the general level of prices of goods and/or services over a period of time. When inflation occurs, each unit of currency buys fewer goods and services. Inflation results in a loss in the value of money and purchasing power. We will all be impacted by this.

Stagflation is essentially a combination of stagnant economic growth, high unemployment, and high inflation. When you think about it …. this combination probably shouldn’t exist: prices shouldn’t go up when people have less or no money to spend. This could be a place where things are trending…

Farmland might perform well during stagflation but we don’t own any.

Instead, I own some “defensive stocks” including some in key economic sectors like consumer staples, healthcare and utilities in my low-cost ETFs that should be able to weather a prolonged disruption. I also consider a few selected stocks we own as defensive plays: waste management companies. At the time of this post, both Waste Management (WM) and Waste Connections (WCN) we own have held up very well and provided stellar returns over the last 5+ years that I’ve owned them.

  • WM is up almost 100% in the last 5-years.
  • WCN is up over 100% in the last 5-years.

We’ll see what the future brings and my low-cost ETFs are a great diversifier: regardless.

Approach #2 – Staying global while keeping cash

Beyend certain sectors, investors should always consider holding a well-diversified stock portfolio across different sectors and different economic regions to reduce the long-term reliance on industries directly affected by tariffs.

While I have enjoyed a nice tech-kicker return from owning low-cost ETF QQQ for approaching 10 years now, and I will continue to hold some QQQ in my portfolio, I could see technology stocks tanking near-term. To help offset that, I own some XAW ETF for geographical diversification beyond the U.S. stock market. Thankfully. 

Times of market stress are however times to buy stocks and equity ETFs.

Near-term and long-term investing creates buying opportunities for disciplined investors. A well-structured, diversified global mix of stocks including those beyond the U.S. could provide some decent defence against a very toxic, unpredictable economic and political agenda.

For new and established readers on this site, you might be aware I’ve mentioned that our investing approach could be considered a “hybrid approach” – a structure that was established about 15 years ago as follows:

  1. We invest in a mix of Canadian stocks in our taxable account: to deliver income and some growth, and
  2. Beyond the taxable account, we own a bunch of low-cost ETFs like QQQ and XAW inside our registered accounts: inside our RRSPs, TFSAs and my LIRA for extra diversification.

I like the hybrid approach, the process and the results to date.

At the time of this post, I just don’t see how I should be making any significant changes to our equity portfolio.

Beyond our portfolio of stocks and equity ETFs we keep cash/cash equivalents.

Cash savings remains a good hedge for a very uncertain near-term future. We have a mix of Interest Savings Accounts (ISAs) / High Interest Savings Accounts (HISAs), along with Money Market Funds (MMFs) in particular in our registered accounts. Generally, plain-vanilla savings accounts offer very low interest rates. So, if you want to earn more on your savings deposits (rather than simply using your savings account) then consider an ISA or HISA.

The greatest appeal of ISAs and HISAs for taxable savings IMO is liquidity, while earning interest, and member financial institutions of Canada Deposit Insurance Corporation (CDIC) insure savings of up to $100,000. It’s good business for banks and institutions as well since money deposited generates interest by allowing the bank to access those funds for loans to others. There are usually no fees for these accounts and while interest rates have come down in recent months, ISA and HISA interest rates are consistently north of 2% at the time of this post.

I believe some form of savings account / ISA / HISA remains the cornerstone of everyone’s personal finance portfolio since 1. your money is saved for future expenses or ready for emergencies, 2. it is safe/low risk, 3. it is liquid, and 4. you still earn returns.

Let your equities do as they wish after that.

Approach #3 – Shop local, buy local, and avoid U.S. travel

We are fortunate to live in an area in Ottawa where we can shop local and buy from local farmers. We will continue to do that.

For those that want to shop more in Canada and buy more Canadian goods visit here:

We’ve been fortunate to save up some money in our “sunshine fund” as I call it for some future travel. I/we have no near-term plans to spend our money in the U.S.

I’ve been fortunate to visit many, many U.S. States over the years but given this recent trade war initiated by this current U.S. Administration I hardly have any desire to spend my money in a country whereby that government talks about annexing us.

It’s that simple for us.

I encourage other Canadians who can and do travel, to consider the same – avoiding the U.S. – not because of its citizens but the U.S. Administration decisions. Continue Reading…

Offence vs Defence

Posted By |
  • Ch-ch-ch-ch-changes
  • Turn and face the strange
  • Ch-ch-changes
  • Don’t want to be a richer man
  • Ch-ch-ch-ch-changes
  • Turn and face the strange
  • Ch-ch-changes
  • There’s gonna have to be a different man
  • Time may change me
  • But I can’t trace time — Changes, by David Bowie
Image courtesy Outcome/Shutterstock

By Noah Solomon

Special to Financial Independence Hub

There is a basic principle that most people follow when it comes to their spending decisions. In essence, people generally try to either

(1) Get the most they can for the least amount of money, or

(2) Spend the least amount of money on the things they want (i.e. get the best deal)

In other words, rational utility maximizers try to be as efficient as possible when parting with their hard-earned dollars.

Strangely, many investors abandon this principle when it comes to their portfolios. With investing, what you get is return (hopefully more than less), and what you pay (other than fees) is risk. People often focus on return without any regard for the amount of risk they are taking. Alternately, many make the mistake of reducing risk at any cost, regardless of the magnitude of potential returns they leave on the table.

The foundation of successful investing necessitates achieving an optimal balance between return and risk. Different types of assets (volatile speculative stocks, stable dividend paying stocks, bonds, etc.) have very different risk and return characteristics. Relatedly, a portfolio’s level of exposure to different asset classes is the primary determinant of its risk and return profile, including how efficient the balance is between the two.

Offense, Defense, & Bobby Knight

Robert Montgomery “Bobby” Knight was an American men’s college basketball coach. Nicknamed “the General,”h e won 902 NCAA Division I men’s basketball games, a record at the time of his retirement. He is quoted as saying:

“As coaches we talk about two things: offense and defense. There is a third phase we neglect, which is more important. It’s conversion from offense to defense and defense to offense.”

Nobody can escape the fact that you can’t have your cake and eat it too. You can’t increase potential returns without taking greater risk. Similarly, you can’t reduce the possibility of losses without reducing the potential for returns.

Picking up Pennies in Front of a Steamroller vs. Shooting Fish in a Barrel

Notwithstanding this unfortunate tradeoff, there are times when investors should focus heavily on return on capital (i.e. being more aggressive), times when they should be more concerned with return of capital (i.e. being more defensive), and all points in between.

Sometimes, there is significantly more downside than upside from taking risk. Although it is still possible to reap decent returns in such environments, the odds aren’t in your favour. Reaching further out on the risk curve in such regimes is akin to picking up pennies in front of a steamroller:  the potential rewards are small relative to the possible consequences. At the other end of the spectrum, there are environments in which the probability of gains dwarfs the probability of losses. Although there is a relatively small chance that you could lose money in such circumstances, the wind is clearly at your back. At these junctures, dialing up your risk exposure is akin to shooting fish in a barrel – the likelihood of success is high while the risk of an adverse event is small.

John F. Kennedy & the Chameleonic Nature of Markets

Former President John F. Kennedy asserted that “The one unchangeable certainty is that nothing is certain or unchangeable.” With regard to markets, the risk and return profiles of different asset classes are not stagnant. Rather, they change over time depending on a variety of factors, including interest rates, economic growth, inflation, valuations, etc.

Given this dynamic, it follows that determining your optimal asset mix is not a “one and done” treatise, but rather a dynamic process that takes into account changing conditions. Yesterday’s optimal portfolio may not look like today’s, which in turn may be significantly different than the one of the future.

It’s not just the risk vs. return profile of any given asset class that should inform its weight with portfolios, but also how it compares with those for other asset classes. As such, investors should use changing risk/return profiles among asset classes to “tilt” their portfolios, increasing the weights of certain types of investments while decreasing others.

In “normal” times, the expected return from stocks exceeds the yields offered by cash and high-grade bonds by roughly 3% per annum. However, this difference can expand or contract depending on economic conditions and relative valuations among asset classes.

In the decade plus era following the global financial crisis, not only did rates remain at historically low levels, but the prospective returns on equities were abnormally high given the positive impact that low rates have on spending, earnings growth, and multiples. Against this backdrop, the prospective returns from stocks far exceeded yields on safe harbour investments. Under these conditions, it is no surprise that investors who had outsized exposure to stocks vs. bonds were handsomely rewarded.

Expected Return on Stocks vs. Yield on High Grade Bonds: Post GFC Era

As things currently stand, the picture is markedly different. Following the most significant rate-hiking cycle in decades, bonds are once again “back in the game.” Moreover, lofty equity market valuations (at least in the U.S.) suggest that the S&P 500 Index will deliver below-average returns over the next several years. Continue Reading…

Tariffs Troubles? Remember this Timeless Tip: “It’s already priced in.”

Posted By |
Image: Canva Custom Creation/Lowrie Financial

By Steve Lowrie, CFA

Special to Financial Independence Hub

A key concern many investors have at the moment is the impact of Trump’s tariffs on goods produced outside the U.S. on the markets. I’m hearing from those wondering if they should do something to protect their wealth; their primary question is: What should I do with my investments?

My answer (as it usually is when investors are concerned about the geopolitical impact on the markets): stick with the plan because, by the time the news is public and you become concerned, the markets have already accounted for it/priced it in, so any reaction you take is too late.

A useful historical reference on tariffs is President Trump’s first term. Starting in 2017, his administration targeted China, implementing tariffs on a broad range of products by 2018. The following years saw ongoing trade negotiations that led to an agreement, though many tariffs remained. Despite the uncertainty, both U.S. and Chinese markets outperformed the MSCI World ex USA Index over Trump’s four-year term. Have a look at the data from 2017 to 2020, as Dimensional compares China MSCI Index to US S&P 500 Index to MSCI World ex USA Index.

Markets are forward-looking, meaning that the potential economic effects of tariffs are likely already factored into current prices. As a result, when these anticipated changes materialize, their impact on markets may be limited.

Understanding how Market Pricing Works

Let’s talk about the price of stocks.

It stands to reason: To make money in the market, you need to sell your holdings for more than you paid. Of course, we’re all familiar with good old “buy low, sell high.” But despite its simplicity, many investors fall short. Instead, they end up doing just the opposite, or at least leaving returns on the table that could have been theirs to keep.

You can defend against these human foibles by understanding how stock pricing works and using that knowledge to your advantage.

Good News, Bad News, and Market Views

How do you know when a stock or stock fund is priced for buying or selling?

The short answer is, we don’t.

And yet, many investors still let current events dominate their decisions. They sell when they fear bad news means prices are going to fall. Or they buy when good news breaks. They invest in funds that do the same.

While this may seem logical, there’s a problem with it: You’re betting you or your fund manager can place winning trades before markets have already priced in the news.

To be blunt, that’s a losing bet.

You’re betting that you know more about what the price should be at any given point than what the formidable force of the market has already decided. Every so often, you might be right. But the preponderance of the evidence suggests any “wins” are more a matter of luck than skill.

Me and You against the World

Whenever you try to buy low or sell high, who is the force on the other side of the trading table?

It’s the market.

The market includes millions of individuals, institutions, banks, and brokerages trading hundreds of billions of dollars every moment of every day. It includes highly paid analysts continuously watching every move the markets make. It includes AI-driven engines seeking to get their trades in nanoseconds ahead of everyone else.

And you think you can beat that?

We believe it’s far more reasonable to assume, by the time you’ve heard the news, the collective market has too, and has already priced it in.

  • News of a recession, under way or avoided? It’s already priced in.
  • Inflation on the rise, or abating? It’s already priced in.
  • A company suffers a calamity or makes a major breakthrough? It’s already priced in.
  • The government passes critical legislation that helps or hinders global trading? It’s…

And so on. Here’s your best assumption:

If it’s public knowledge, it’s already priced in. (And if it’s insider information, it’s illegal to trade on it.)

What we don’t yet Know

As soon as an event is priced in, several things make it difficult to profitably trade on the news:

You’re Buying High, Selling Low: If you trade on news after it’s been priced in, odds are you’ll buy at a higher price (after good news) or sell at a lower price (based on bad news). Continue Reading…

Stock Market Anxiety leads to Bad Investing Decisions. Here’s what to do instead

Posted By |

Ignore stock market anxiety and negative stock predictions and instead focus your investing strategy on diversification and portfolio balance

Image by Pexels/Markus Spiske

The current state of the world is generating stock market anxiety, as it often does. My guess is that the Israel-Hamas war is just getting started and will last a long time. I also suspect that Russian dictator Vladimir Putin had something to do with getting it started, and will do what he can to keep it going. After all, when it comes to running his country, Putin takes a grasping-at-straws approach.

Putin may think that bringing the longstanding Mideast conflict back into the headlines is going to improve his chances of conquering Ukraine and bringing the Soviet Union back from the dead.

He thinks taking a long shot is better than no shot at all. Who knows? He might get lucky.

Early on in his war on Ukraine, Putin seemed to think that Chinese dictator Xi Jinping was going to take pity on him and his country, and offer free money and/or weapons to shore up Russia’s Ukraine invasion. Instead, Xi insists on staying out of the war, while paying discount prices for Russian oil. He takes special care not to let his country get caught up in the economic sanctions that the U.S. and NATO countries and allies are directing against the Russians.

It’s not that Putin is stupid. If a war between Israel and Hamas turns out to be a big drain on the U.S. budget, the U.S. might have less money available to arm Ukraine.

Up till lately, however, Israel has had little to say about Russia’s treatment of Ukraine. Israel may soon take a more active role in helping Ukraine defend itself.

Any war is a terrible thing, and this one is no different. The stock market seems to be creeping upward. Maybe it knows something that Putin hasn’t figured out.

Meanwhile, if your stock portfolio makes sense to you, we advise against selling due to Mideast fears.

Stock market anxiety recedes with investment quality, diversification and portfolio balance

You’ll find that many of your worries concern things that are unlikely to happen; that are already largely discounted in current stock prices; and that probably won’t matter as much as you feared they would.

You get a much better return on time spent if you devote less of it to worrying about high-risk investments, and more of it to an investing strategy. Create a strategy that is built upon analyzing the quality and diversification of your investments, and the structure and balance of your portfolio.

There’s another advantage as well. A calm investor is much less likely to react in haste and make sudden decisions that could prove to be damaging in the long run. Continue Reading…