All posts by Financial Independence Hub

How to put together a stock portfolio that will carry you comfortably into retirement.  

patmckeough
Pat McKeough

By Patrick McKeough, TSInetwork.ca

Special to the Financial Independence Hub

During your working years, you put yourself on an investing regimen. Each year, you set aside a fixed sum to invest. It’s important to continue investing the same sum (or raise it) through good years and bad. The same sum buys more shares in “bad” years, when prices are low. It buys fewer shares in good years, when prices are high. This cuts your long-term average cost per share.

The process reverses in retirement

In retirement, you reverse the process. You sell enough stock every year to raise the cash you wish to extract from your portfolio. You may sell more stock in years when you feel prices are high. You should sell less when prices are low. But either way, you should aim to sell in a way that leaves you with a stronger portfolio that is better suited to your goals and temperaments.

To practice the Successful Investor method, you need to get acquainted with a number of well-established stocks with a history of earnings and, in most cases, dividends. You choose your yearly purchases from this list, based on their fundamental appeal.

Spread money across five main economic sectors

You also take care to spread your money out across most if not all of the five main economic sectors: Manufacturing, Resources, Consumer, Finance and Utilities.

Some of your selections will seem particularly attractive in light of the value they offer, based on earnings and balance sheet information. Other selections will cost more in relation to these measures, but will make up for it with better growth potential. So, rather than aim for a value or growth focus in your portfolio, you’ll have some of each.

You also take care to downplay or avoid stocks that are in the broker/media limelight. Some stocks work their way into the limelight because they are profiting from an investment fad. Some get there through stock promotion.

No need to worry about how much money to spend or when to buy

Some stocks in the limelight are good businesses that deserve attention. But the limelight blows their appeal out of proportion. This builds up investor expectations for these stocks, often to unsustainable levels. Some limelight stocks live up to these heightened expectations, or even exceed them. But most limelight stocks eventually stumble. When the inevitable disappointments emerge, stock price downturns can be sudden and brutal. Some are permanent. That’s why these stocks should make up at most a modest part of your portfolio.

Note that you don’t need to spend time thinking about how much money to invest. You invest the same amount every year. Of course, you will occasionally raise or lower your yearly commitment for an indefinite period, because of changes in your income or expenses.

You also don’t spend time worrying about when to buy. You buy every year. It’s best to do your buying as early as possible in each New Year.

That’s how we invest for our wealth management clients, to the extent that this is possible for each client, in light of his or her temperament and circumstances. Instead of agonizing over how much to invest or when to buy, we invest each client’s funds as soon as they become available. Rather than depend on predictions, we focus on investment quality, and portfolio balance and diversification.

That’s where we can create the most value, so that’s where we spend most of our time and effort.

 

Related:

Pat McKeough has been one of Canada’s most respected investment advisors for over three decades. He is the founder and senior editor of TSI Network and the founder of Successful Investor Wealth Management. He is also the author of several acclaimed investment books.

How to eat Healthily without Breaking the Bank

By Sandy Cardy

Special to the Financial Independence Hub

The price of groceries is on the rise again. However, there are ways you can limit the amount of money you spend when it comes time to grocery shop.

During the holiday season, I wrote an article about over-consumption – the gist being that the over-consumption of credit can leave us with debt troubles and how over-consumption of the wrong foods can leave us with harmful health debt.

There’s a general consensus that it costs too much money to eat healthily all the time. While it’s true that natural food products can be quite expensive, especially if you eat gluten-free or vegan packaged foods, there are ways to stretch your dollar at the grocery store.

The rising cost of groceries has made headlines again; in 2015 the average Canadian household spent about $325 more on food and is expected to spend an extra $345 in 2016, according to the University of Guelph’s Food Institute.

Meat and produce are expected to see the biggest price jump, with meat seeing a 4.5 per cent increase and fruits and vegetables rising between 4 and 4.5 per cent this year.

There’s good news though! Eating healthy doesn’t have to come with a hefty price tag. By stocking up your pantry on a variety of everyday superfoods and pairing them with fresh ingredients, dinners to feed the family can cost you less.

Stock Your Pantry Continue Reading…

FWB TV: The pro and cons of robo-advisers

Screen Shot 2016-03-22 at 2.14.19 PMThe latest FWB TV video is now available here at Findependence.TV and at FWB Securities.com: If you’re not a Robo client then perhaps a Robo-Advisor is not for you.

Robo-Advice is automated portfolio management with minimal human interaction.  As the video points out, the growing popularity of robo advisors have made them one of the biggest developments in investing in recent years: they’re easy, simple and cost effective, which makes them especially appealing to younger investors.

In the 4-minute video, host Robin Powell interviews a robo-skeptic: Neil Bage of UK-based Suitable Strategies. He says investing involves a lot more than just filling out questionnaires and doing math and is concerned that if the human advice element is not present, investors may suffer if they miss out on the “seeing the whites of the eyes” type of face-to-face conversations about risk and risk tolerance.

(Mind you, American robo services are more likely NOT to have a human advice component; most robo services in Canada tend to offer at least some human interaction to complement the automated online component.) Continue Reading…

Budget closes two Life Insurance Tax Planning strategies

Photo.Robert Kepes
Robert Kepes

By Robert G. Kepes, Morris Kepes Winters

Special to the Financial Independence Hub

The March 22, 2016 federal budget closed two tax-planning strategies that involved the use of life insurance and private companies. Here is the first one:

Capital Dividend Account (CDA) Planning

The death benefit from an exempt life insurance policy is tax-free, and the same principle holds true if a private company is the beneficiary of the policy. The life insurance proceeds are added to the CDA of the private company when they can later be paid as a tax-free capital dividend to the shareholder. However, if the company is both the owner and beneficiary of the policy, then the amount that goes into the CDA is only the amount in excess of the adjusted cost base (ACB) of the policy.

For example, if the death benefit is $1 million and the ACB is $100,000, then only $900,000 is available for the CDA. Only $900,000 can be paid out tax-free, while the other $100,000 would be paid as a taxable dividend to the shareholder.

It follows that if the policy owner is not also the corporate beneficiary, then there is no reduction to the beneficiary’s CDA. A common planning strategy was to have ownership of the life policy in a parent holding company with the subsidiary company the beneficiary. This was done especially if the subsidiary was operating an active business and the owner did not want the policy to be an asset of the business that could be attacked by creditors.

Upon the death of the insured, the full death benefit of $1 million would go into the subsidiary’s CDA and be available to be paid out tax-free. Continue Reading…

Let’s tackle Ageism, not quibble about Age: OAS Eligibility to move back to 65 from 67

lisataylor
Lisa Taylor

By Lisa Taylor, ChallengeFactory.ca

Special to the Financial Independence Hub

In this week’s federal budget, the Liberal Government will announce that they are returning the eligibility age for OAS back to 65. In recent years, the previous Conservative government had shifted the eligibility age to 67, mirroring moves in many other countries.

Since Prime Minister Trudeau declared this intention, first in the federal campaign and then in this recent Bloomberg News interview, I’ve been asked by many to react.

Most assume that Challenge Factory, with its focus on workforce engagement for people in their 50s, 60s, 70s and beyond would resist this change to lower in effect Canada’s “retirement” age.

Whether the age of eligibility is set at 65 or 67 or 71 is irrelevant if the government doesn’t also take steps to foster the older workers and the intergenerational workforce. Eligibility does not necessarily correlate to when Canadians will choose to leave the workforce and the danger in this new announcement is that the headline remains focused on age 65 as a targeted age for people to make their exit.

We are optimistic that this move marks the beginning of new and beneficial discussions about ageism, aging and the workforce.

New definition needed for the word “retirement”

Continue Reading…